adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Today's letters: Afghanistan, propriety in politics (and elsewhere) and Rolling Stones drummer Charlie Watts – Ottawa Citizen

Published

 on


Article content

Afghanistan’s problems need even longer-term solutions

Advertisement

Article content

There are many reasons why Afghanistan is in the chaos it is today. One of the most important reasons is the logic used by the politicians in our Western democracies. Our politicians cannot acknowledge that a problem exists unless they can also describe the solution in simple “sound bite” terms. No politician is willing to admit they don’t have a solution to every problem. Thus, complex problems cannot be acknowledged.

In Afghanistan, politicians saw what they wanted to see: Afghanistan functioning as a democracy with a robust military for self-defense. So, the Afghanistan problem had been solved. No one asked the hard questions, and any evidence to the contrary was ignored or ridiculed.

What they refused to see, as they had no simple answer for it, was that Afghanistan was a house of cards. An inept and corrupt government mismanaging a highly divided country, backed by a poorly trained and under supported military. No politician wanted to admit the truth, that after 20 years and countless Billions of dollars spent they had failed.

Advertisement

Article content

“Solving” Afghanistan by building a real working democracy will take many years. No one knows how to build a democracy in a country so divided by cultural, language, religious and tribal differences. There is no simple solution. To make loyalty to a central government more important than loyalty to the local tribal or religious leader is an incredibly difficult task that will take strong honest Afghan leaders, and multiple generations to solve. It won’t be fixed by any politician’s sound bites.

Keith Dawson, Nepean

Fiasco in Kabul is a blow to the West’s image

The huge blow to the United States prestige and image caused by their hurried withdrawal from Afghanistan and deadly blast at Kabul airport has incalculable consequences. It’s also a big slap in the face for all Western countries. including Canada.

Advertisement

Article content

These events, tragic as they are for the Afghanis, will have wider consequences. Firstly, they will diminish significantly the U.S. and Canadian influence in geopolitical dealings with other states. Matters such as trade, human rights and even climate change will be harder to negotiate with aggressor countries such as Russia or China who do not respect the weak.

Secondly, the sworn enemies of the West, such as Al Qaeda, and Isis, will be emboldened in their minds to strike against the West again. The perception that the role of U.S. as world’s policemen has ended, has been solidified. To put it simplistically but bluntly, when cat’s away the mice will play.

Rafal Pomian, Ottawa

Alienating the Taliban could prove risky

Advertisement

Article content

Re: “Britain to urge sanctions on Taliban,” Aug. 23

Human organizations are never homogeneous. United by some beliefs, members often disagree on others; the Taliban are no exception. They appear to be united by a desire to rid their country of foreign troops and to replace what they perceive as a foreign-installed puppet government. They share a religious identity. However, they appear to disagree on concepts like inclusive government, the role of women in society, and revenge on former enemies. The leaders who held a press conference, and were interviewed by a woman on TV, tried to make it clear that they were different from those who held power 20 years ago. Some of the people in the field are acting as if they disagree.

Advertisement

Article content

If we want to help the Afghan people, we need to show respect for, and work with, those whose positions we find positive. Blanket condemnation of all Taliban may make our leaders look “strong and tough” but will strengthen the position of those with whom we disagree most. Countries that refuse to recognize a new government, who call for strong sanctions, and refuse to work with those in control will harm the people they claim to want to help.

Dave Parnas, Ottawa

Profanity is everywhere: what happened to propriety?

RE: “How American profanity has colonized its political discourse,” Aug. 25

Kudos to Mr. Cohen for putting my, and hopefully more people’s thoughts into words regarding profanity and vulgarity. I have been saying this for years, until friends and family cover their ears at my rant: Why do we need such foul language in all movies, and TV? It is getting more and more difficult to find something to watch that isn’t offensive.

Advertisement

Article content

Impossible to watch with children and teens. Gee, I hate to mention the word censor, but was it so bad when people on TV, movies and public life had to curtail their basest comments? Has no one any manners or sense of propriety?

As for the treatment of politicians, this has also gone downhill. Maybe the individual person is a nitwit but the office he or she serves deserves respect. What to do, what to do?

Patricia O’Reilly, Ottawa

It’s a certificate or a card, not a passport

At last someone has the sense to use the correct term. Passport is what we need to leave the country and enter another, they cost quite a lot of money to obtain.

Politicians seems to want to make it difficult, every province has a health systems, all we need is a very basic version (using the KISS principle) with only the information on it about the vaccine, photo, date if birth (important for youngsters) official reason for not having the vaccine, and the type received in two shots.

Advertisement

Article content

To all those who refuse to be vaccinated I would like to see a fine imposed, and if they do get sick, they have to pay all medical expenses so that they are not a further burden on the health costs of each province. Draconian I know but they are being extremely selfish because they risk infecting everyone else.

Roger Webber-Taylor, Ottawa

Mental health is a problem that deserves real solutions

Conservative Party leader Erin O’Toole’s assertion that one in five Canadians suffer from mental disorders and/or operational stress is an indication that we have a real problem. Indeed, it means more than 7 million need some help. His promise to provide $50 million over each of three years amounts to $6.56 per patient per year. Real problems deserve real solutions, not tokenisms.

Advertisement

Article content

Richard Andrews, Nepean

No wading pools? That’s not cool, Ottawa

With an exceptional heat wave all over Canada and the isolation that many children have endured during COVID, the City of Ottawa does not have it in their heart or budget to keep the wading pools open until school starts. Shame on you, shame on us for allowing this blatant discrimination of many underprivileged families, who have nowhere else to go in this terrible heat. I am glad I am taking three of such children with me to swim at “my place” for the day and give them a day of joy and respite and cooling off. I suggest that starting next summer, all wade pools stay open until school starts. This, in anticipation of climate change that will cause this heat for many years to come.

Advertisement

Article content

Yvonne Temple, Ottawa

Sir John A would likely still sit in Britain

Two days ago, after an absence of more than two years, I found myself in the arrivals section of the Ottawa Airport. Much to my surprise I found that the famous (now infamous) bench sculpture of Sir John A Macdonald and Sir Georges-Etienne Cartier had gone. After reading Kelly Egan’s piece I realized why.

While I understand why Macdonald is now so reviled, it seems a shame that so many wonderful pieces of art and sculpture are being arbitrarily removed for the sake of political correctness. My family emigrated back in 1967 from Britain, a country not unknown for its often brutal occupation of colonial countries but I have yet to see monuments to Queen Victoria and other royals being demolished. Is it because the Brits are less sensitive to past activities of the Mother country or see it as part and parcel of history, good and bad? Perhaps it is time for Canada to also get the same kind of balance.

Advertisement

Article content

Alexandra McAllister, Ottawa

We ought to remake Landsdowne

Re: “Ottawa, let’s build the new Civic Centre elsewhere,” Aug. 24

Lansdowne is a botched job, even financially, for all those involved in the partnership. This has been so ever since Larry O’Brien and our City Manager, Kent Kirkpatrick, suddenly cancelled the design competition. In favour of who? Yes: through a sole-sourced deal with a trio of big developers.

Even our present day mayor had a chance to stop this catastrophe when he was campaigning for the first time for the job. But he didn’t. And where does he get his campaign financing from? A substantial amount comes from the development industry; this is not illegal, in Ottawa anyways. But it doesn’t look good.

Advertisement

Article content

Levine presents us with a completely different yet wholistic vision of both the present Lansdowne pickle, and what we could have at a site such as Hurdman. Plus he’s covered all the important other angles such as public transportation, environmental considerations, and the detailed differences between amateur sports and professional levels, on what happens in our city, on a day to day basis, in both realms.

My own sense is that there ought to be plenty of room to remake Lansdowne as the more public space it was going to be. The Y could be invited to run a lot of the activities on the city’s behalf, and the city could finally have its own proper athletic facility that includes and indoor running and cycling track amongst other elements.

Advertisement

Article content

Brian Tansey, Ottawa

The legacy of Rolling Stones’ drummer Charlie Watts

Charlie Watts is a wonderful example that less can be more. Mick Jagger, Keith Richards and Ronnie Woods were expressive and flamboyant on the stage.

Then there was Watts, providing the all important beat. His drum kit consisted of one-half, or less, the number of pieces many drummers use. His expression was always serious bordering on deadpan. His drumming style was controlled; no twirling drumsticks and no wild drum solos. I was always drawn to his playing even with everything else that was happening on the stage. He could also be feisty — he was reported to have said to Mick Jagger, “I’m not your drummer; you’re my singer”

Mr. Watts, your were more, much more!

Bill Reid, Ottawa

Another lesson, courtesy of Mr. Watts

The passing of Rolling Stones drummer Charlie Watts marks the end of his great drumming career. His “evening job” with a blues band has seen him travel the world and bring joy to so many.

A lesson for all of is that there are few limits to what we can do, even as we age, reach our retirement age and in his case keep working for a few more decades.

Keep drumming in Heaven.

Dennis Fitzgerald, Melbourne, Australia

Advertisement

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

News

Beyoncé channels Pamela Anderson in ‘Baywatch’ for Halloween video asking viewers to vote

Published

 on

 

NEW YORK (AP) — In a new video posted early Election Day, Beyoncé channels Pamela Anderson in the television program “Baywatch” – red one-piece swimsuit and all – and asks viewers to vote.

In the two-and-a-half-minute clip, set to most of “Bodyguard,” a four-minute cut from her 2024 country album “Cowboy Carter,” Beyoncé cosplays as Anderson’s character before concluding with a simple message, written in white text: “Happy Beylloween,” followed by “Vote.”

At a rally for Donald Trump in Pittsburgh on Monday night, the former president spoke dismissively about Beyoncé’s appearance at a Kamala Harris rally in Houston in October, drawing boos for the megastar from his supporters.

“Beyoncé would come in. Everyone’s expecting a couple of songs. There were no songs. There was no happiness,” Trump said.

She did not perform — unlike in 2016, when she performed at a presidential campaign rally for Hillary Clinton in Cleveland – but she endorsed Harris and gave a moving speech, initially joined onstage by her Destiny’s Child bandmate Kelly Rowland.

“I’m not here as a celebrity, I’m not here as a politician. I’m here as a mother,” Beyoncé said.

“A mother who cares deeply about the world my children and all of our children live in, a world where we have the freedom to control our bodies, a world where we’re not divided,” she said at the rally in Houston, her hometown.

“Imagine our daughters growing up seeing what’s possible with no ceilings, no limitations,” she continued. “We must vote, and we need you.”

The Harris campaign has taken on Beyonce’s track “Freedom,” a cut from her landmark 2016 album “Lemonade,” as its anthem.

Harris used the song in July during her first official public appearance as a presidential candidate at her campaign headquarters in Delaware. That same month, Beyoncé’s mother, Tina Knowles, publicly endorsed Harris for president.

Beyoncé gave permission to Harris to use the song, a campaign official who was granted anonymity to discuss private campaign operations confirmed to The Associated Press.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Justin Trudeau’s Announcing Cuts to Immigration Could Facilitate a Trump Win

Published

 on

Outside of sports and a “Cold front coming down from Canada,” American news media only report on Canadian events that they believe are, or will be, influential to the US. Therefore, when Justin Trudeau’s announcement, having finally read the room, that Canada will be reducing the number of permanent residents admitted by more than 20 percent and temporary residents like skilled workers and college students will be cut by more than half made news south of the border, I knew the American media felt Trudeau’s about-face on immigration was newsworthy because many Americans would relate to Trudeau realizing Canada was accepting more immigrants than it could manage and are hoping their next POTUS will follow Trudeau’s playbook.

Canada, with lots of space and lacking convenient geographical ways for illegal immigrants to enter the country, though still many do, has a global reputation for being incredibly accepting of immigrants. On the surface, Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver appear to be multicultural havens. However, as the saying goes, “Too much of a good thing is never good,” resulting in a sharp rise in anti-immigrant sentiment, which you can almost taste in the air. A growing number of Canadians, regardless of their political affiliation, are blaming recent immigrants for causing the housing affordability crises, inflation, rise in crime and unemployment/stagnant wages.

Throughout history, populations have engulfed themselves in a tribal frenzy, a psychological state where people identify strongly with their own group, often leading to a ‘us versus them’ mentality. This has led to quick shifts from complacency to panic and finger-pointing at groups outside their tribe, a phenomenon that is not unique to any particular culture or time period.

My take on why the American news media found Trudeau’s blatantly obvious attempt to save his political career, balancing appeasement between the pitchfork crowd, who want a halt to immigration until Canada gets its house in order, and immigrant voters, who traditionally vote Liberal, newsworthy; the American news media, as do I, believe immigration fatigue is why Kamala Harris is going to lose on November 5th.

Because they frequently get the outcome wrong, I don’t take polls seriously. According to polls in 2014, Tim Hudak’s Progressive Conservatives and Kathleen Wynne’s Liberals were in a dead heat in Ontario, yet Wynne won with more than twice as many seats. In the 2018 Quebec election, most polls had the Coalition Avenir Québec with a 1-to-5-point lead over the governing Liberals. The result: The Coalition Avenir Québec enjoyed a landslide victory, winning 74 of 125 seats. Then there’s how the 2016 US election polls showing Donald Trump didn’t have a chance of winning against Hillary Clinton were ridiculously way off, highlighting the importance of the election day poll and, applicable in this election as it was in 2016, not to discount ‘shy Trump supporters;’ voters who support Trump but are hesitant to express their views publicly due to social or political pressure.

My distrust in polls aside, polls indicate Harris is leading by a few points. One would think that Trump’s many over-the-top shenanigans, which would be entertaining were he not the POTUS or again seeking the Oval Office, would have him far down in the polls. Trump is toe-to-toe with Harris in the polls because his approach to the economy—middle-class Americans are nostalgic for the relatively strong economic performance during Trump’s first three years in office—and immigration, which Americans are hyper-focused on right now, appeals to many Americans. In his quest to win votes, Trump is doing what anyone seeking political office needs to do: telling the people what they want to hear, strategically using populism—populism that serves your best interests is good populism—to evoke emotional responses. Harris isn’t doing herself any favours, nor moving voters, by going the “But, but… the orange man is bad!” route, while Trump cultivates support from “weird” marginal voting groups.

To Harris’s credit, things could have fallen apart when Biden abruptly stepped aside. Instead, Harris quickly clinched the nomination and had a strong first few weeks, erasing the deficit Biden had given her. The Democratic convention was a success, as was her acceptance speech. Her performance at the September 10th debate with Donald Trump was first-rate.

Harris’ Achilles heel is she’s now making promises she could have made and implemented while VP, making immigration and the economy Harris’ liabilities, especially since she’s been sitting next to Biden, watching the US turn into the circus it has become. These liabilities, basically her only liabilities, negate her stance on abortion, democracy, healthcare, a long-winning issue for Democrats, and Trump’s character. All Harris has offered voters is “feel-good vibes” over substance. In contrast, Trump offers the tangible political tornado (read: steamroll the problems Americans are facing) many Americans seek. With Trump, there’s no doubt that change, admittedly in a messy fashion, will happen. If enough Americans believe the changes he’ll implement will benefit them and their country…

The case against Harris on immigration, at a time when there’s a huge global backlash to immigration, even as the American news media are pointing out, in famously immigrant-friendly Canada, is relatively straightforward: During the first three years of the Biden-Harris administration, illegal Southern border crossings increased significantly.

The words illegal immigration, to put it mildly, irks most Americans. On the legal immigration front, according to Forbes, most billion-dollar startups were founded by immigrants. Google, Microsoft, and Oracle, to name three, have immigrants as CEOs. Immigrants, with tech skills and an entrepreneurial thirst, have kept America leading the world. I like to think that Americans and Canadians understand the best immigration policy is to strategically let enough of these immigrants in who’ll increase GDP and tax base and not rely on social programs. In other words, Americans and Canadians, and arguably citizens of European countries, expect their governments to be more strategic about immigration.

The days of the words on a bronze plaque mounted inside the Statue of Liberty pedestal’s lower level, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…” are no longer tolerated. Americans only want immigrants who’ll benefit America.

Does Trump demagogue the immigration issue with xenophobic and racist tropes, many of which are outright lies, such as claiming Haitian immigrants in Ohio are abducting and eating pets? Absolutely. However, such unhinged talk signals to Americans who are worried about the steady influx of illegal immigrants into their country that Trump can handle immigration so that it’s beneficial to the country as opposed to being an issue of economic stress.

In many ways, if polls are to be believed, Harris is paying the price for Biden and her lax policies early in their term. Yes, stimulus spending quickly rebuilt the job market, but at the cost of higher inflation. Loosen border policies at a time when anti-immigrant sentiment was increasing was a gross miscalculation, much like Trudeau’s immigration quota increase, and Biden indulging himself in running for re-election should never have happened.

If Trump wins, Democrats will proclaim that everyone is sexist, racist and misogynous, not to mention a likely White Supremacist, and for good measure, they’ll beat the “voter suppression” button. If Harris wins, Trump supporters will repeat voter fraud—since July, Elon Musk has tweeted on Twitter at least 22 times about voters being “imported” from abroad—being widespread.

Regardless of who wins tomorrow, Americans need to cool down; and give the divisive rhetoric a long overdue break. The right to an opinion belongs to everyone. Someone whose opinion differs from yours is not by default sexist, racist, a fascist or anything else; they simply disagree with you. Americans adopting the respectful mindset to agree to disagree would be the best thing they could do for the United States of America.

______________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a self-described connoisseur of human psychology, writes about what’s

on his mind from Toronto. You can follow Nick on Twitter and Instagram @NKossovan.

Continue Reading

Politics

RFK Jr. says Trump would push to remove fluoride from drinking water. ‘It’s possible,’ Trump says

Published

 on

 

PHOENIX (AP) — Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent proponent of debunked public health claims whom Donald Trump has promised to put in charge of health initiatives, said Saturday that Trump would push to remove fluoride from drinking water on his first day in office if elected president.

Fluoride strengthens teeth and reduces cavities by replacing minerals lost during normal wear and tear, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The addition of low levels of fluoride to drinking water has long been considered one of the greatest public health achievements of the last century.

Kennedy made the declaration Saturday on the social media platform X alongside a variety of claims about the heath effects of fluoride.

“On January 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S​. water systems to remove fluoride from public water,” Kennedy wrote. Trump and his wife, Melania Trump, “want to Make America Healthy Again,” he added, repeating a phrase Trump often uses and links to Kennedy.

Trump told NBC News on Sunday that he had not spoken to Kennedy about fluoride yet, “but it sounds OK to me. You know it’s possible.”

The former president declined to say whether he would seek a Cabinet role for Kennedy, a job that would require Senate confirmation, but added, “He’s going to have a big role in the administration.”

Asked whether banning certain vaccines would be on the table, Trump said he would talk to Kennedy and others about that. Trump described Kennedy as “a very talented guy and has strong views.”

The sudden and unexpected weekend social media post evoked the chaotic policymaking that defined Trump’s White House tenure, when he would issue policy declarations on Twitter at virtually all hours. It also underscored the concerns many experts have about Kennedy, who has long promoted debunked theories about vaccine safety, having influence over U.S. public health.

In 1950, federal officials endorsed water fluoridation to prevent tooth decay, and continued to promote it even after fluoride toothpaste brands hit the market several years later. Though fluoride can come from a number of sources, drinking water is the main source for Americans, researchers say.

Officials lowered their recommendation for drinking water fluoride levels in 2015 to address a tooth condition called fluorosis, that can cause splotches on teeth and was becoming more common in U.S. kids.

In August, a federal agency determined “with moderate confidence” that there is a link between higher levels of fluoride exposure and lower IQ in kids. The National Toxicology Program based its conclusion on studies involving fluoride levels at about twice the recommended limit for drinking water.

A federal judge later cited that study in ordering the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to further regulate fluoride in drinking water. U.S. District Judge Edward Chen cautioned that it’s not certain that the amount of fluoride typically added to water is causing lower IQ in kids, but he concluded that mounting research points to an unreasonable risk that it could be. He ordered the EPA to take steps to lower that risk, but didn’t say what those measures should be.

In his X post Saturday, Kennedy tagged Michael Connett, the lead attorney representing the plaintiff in that lawsuit, the environmental advocacy group Food & Water Watch.

Kennedy’s anti-vaccine organization has a lawsuit pending against news organizations including The Associated Press, accusing them of violating antitrust laws by taking action to identify misinformation, including about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines. Kennedy is on leave from the group but is listed as one of its attorneys in the lawsuit.

What role Kennedy might hold if Trump wins on Tuesday remains unclear. Kennedy recently told NewsNation that Trump asked him to “reorganize” agencies including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration and some agencies under the Department of Agriculture.

But for now, the former independent presidential candidate has become one of Trump’s top surrogates. Trump frequently mentions having the support of Kennedy, a scion of a Democratic dynasty and the son of former Attorney General Robert Kennedy and nephew of President John F. Kennedy.

Kennedy traveled with Trump Friday and spoke at his rallies in Michigan and Wisconsin.

Trump said Saturday that he told Kennedy: “You can work on food, you can work on anything you want” except oil policy.

“He wants health, he wants women’s health, he wants men’s health, he wants kids, he wants everything,” Trump added.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending