adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

Toronto’s Refugee Crisis: The Struggles, Sacrifices, and Systemic Gaps Affecting African Migrants

Published

 on

As of March 25, 2024, the City of Toronto is grappling with a massive influx of refugees, supporting 12,295 individuals across its shelter system and other housing programs. Of these, over 50 percent—more than 6,300 people—are refugee claimants, many of whom have arrived from African nations amid deep poverty, political turmoil, and widespread discrimination.

The crisis began in May 2023, when Toronto’s already overburdened shelter system was hit with an unexpected surge of African refugees, multiplying the number of asylum seekers by more than 500 percent. With Toronto’s shelter system already stretched beyond capacity, the sudden influx overwhelmed existing resources and set off a cascade of challenges that neither the city nor the federal government was fully prepared to handle.

The scene outside Toronto’s Peter Street shelter in July 2023 starkly illustrated the city’s growing refugee crisis. Dozens of refugees, many from Uganda, Kenya, and Nigeria, were left stranded on the streets as city officials and federal agencies squabbled over responsibilities. Refugees like Fatima Yusef, a Ugandan asylum seeker, found themselves caught in a bureaucratic nightmare. “We called the city, and when we talked to them they said to call the federal government, but when we call them they tell us to call the city,” Yusef recounted.

The inaction highlighted the glaring gap in support for refugees. When Deputy Mayor Jennifer McKelvie announced that Toronto shelters would start turning away refugee claimants and referring them to federally funded shelters, the reality hit hard: there were no such shelters funded by the federal government. This lack of coordinated response between municipal and federal authorities left thousands of refugees without adequate support.

The surge in refugee claimants from African countries and other nations like Syria, Venezuela, Afghanistan, and Myanmar is driven by multiple factors—famine, civil war, climate change, and widespread discrimination, particularly against LGBTQIA+ individuals. Many African countries have introduced draconian anti-LGBTQIA+ laws, forcing people to flee for their lives.

According to the UN Refugee Agency, Canada received over 144,000 asylum claims in 2023—a record number that far surpassed previous years. However, the influx of refugees has exposed deep flaws in Canada’s refugee support system.

Canada’s refugee system differentiates between convention refugees—those invited to Canada by the federal government—and refugee claimants, or asylum seekers, who apply for protection after arriving. The latter group faces a lengthy and costly process, often lasting years, before they can access basic services such as healthcare. Without legal recognition, refugee claimants are left in limbo, dependent on overwhelmed municipal and provincial systems for their survival.

Despite Canada’s commitment as a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of Refugees, the federal government has started deporting asylum seekers at a rapid pace. Between 2022 and 2023, Canada deported more than 23,000 undocumented migrants, spending over $111 million in the process.

Amid the systemic failures, Toronto’s Black community mobilized to provide urgent relief for stranded refugees. With the city’s shelter system unable to accommodate the influx, local Black churches opened their doors to the homeless.

Pastor Judith James of Revivaltime Tabernacle, Pastor Eddie Jjumba of Dominion Church International, and Nadine Miller, director of Pilgrim Feast Tabernacles, were among the leaders on the front lines. These churches, despite lacking sufficient resources, provided shelter, food, and support to hundreds of refugees. Pastor Eddie’s church alone housed over 215 refugees, many sleeping on the floor or in makeshift beds.

Pastor Judith recalled the emotional toll of the crisis, spending countless nights in her church with refugees who had fled unimaginable hardships, including political violence and persecution based on their sexuality. “Between July and September, we brought in over 1,000 people,” she said. “But we served over 4,000 because we were cooking and dropping off food at other locations.”

While the churches’ efforts were heroic, the financial toll has been devastating. Dominion Church incurred over $800,000 in eligible expenses, yet the City of Toronto could only reimburse just over 50 percent of that amount. Pilgrim Feast Tabernacles, now $1.5 million in debt, had to close its doors to refugees by the end of October 2023, although they continue to support some individuals discreetly.

Despite this, the pastors and their congregations have no regrets. “We are laser-focused on making sure this does not happen again,” said Pastor Judith.

The community’s collective response also exposed the glaring inequities faced by Black refugees. As Pastor Eddie poignantly observed, “If all those refugees sleeping on your church floor and on the street had been white people, how long do you think it would have taken the government to act?”

In response to the escalating crisis, the federal government pledged $22 million in upfront funding to support the establishment of a new refugee reception centre in Peel Region. However, the amount falls far short of what is needed, and negotiations between federal, provincial, and regional governments continue. The federal government insists on its contribution, but Peel Region refuses to open the reception centre until it is fully funded and sustained annually.

Meanwhile, as political leaders debate funding and responsibilities, refugees continue to arrive on Toronto’s streets, and winter is approaching. The question remains: will enough be done to prevent further tragedies?

The refugee crisis in Toronto highlights the critical need for systemic reform in Canada’s immigration system. As Black community leaders continue to provide support with limited resources, the federal and provincial governments must work together to implement long-term solutions that address both the immediate needs of refugees and the structural inequities that put their lives at risk.

With more refugees on the way, Toronto’s future depends on whether Canada can rise to the challenge and provide the compassionate, coordinated support that these asylum seekers so desperately need.

News

Man hiking near Fairy Creek, B.C., wrongfully arrested by Mounties, review finds

Published

 on

OTTAWA – The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP says police officers acted unreasonably when they arrested a man who was hiking in British Columbia’s Fairy Creek area in 2021 around the same time as old-growth logging protests.

In a summary of its review of a public complaint, the commission says Mounties demanded to search the hiker at a checkpoint on a public road in September 2021, and arrested him after he refused to leave the area or to be searched.

The commission says the arrest was “groundless,” and the demand to search his backpack was “unfounded.”

The summary says the man had been lawfully using the forest service road where he encountered police who were trying to keep people out of “exclusion zones” set up by the RCMP’s Community-Industry Response Group.

It says he was also not obligated to identify himself or submit to a police search after coming upon Mounties who refused to identify themselves by name, only reading out their badge numbers “quickly” and refused to repeat them.

The commission says the police acted unreasonably enforcing the exclusion zones in Fairy Creek, removing their name tags, while one office wore a “thin blue line” patch against RCMP uniform policy.

Police actions in Fairy Creek have been sharply criticized by a B.C. Supreme Court judge for overstepping the terms of a court injunction granted to Teal Jones in 2021 after logging activity in the ecologically sensitive area set off protests, leading to hundreds of arrests.

The Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP says it continues to review the actions of the Mounties’ community industry response group in a “systemic investigation,” after the B.C. judge threw out numerous cases against logging protesters for police failures in properly enforcing the court injunction.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Experts say Harris dominated in debate performance against Trump

Published

 on

PHILADELPHIA – Political experts say Kamala Harris was able to dominate Donald Trump by prodding the former Republican president over the crowd sizes at his rallies and the 2020 loss during a debate in Philadelphia Tuesday evening.

“Harris going in had the most to gain and also the most to lose,” said Allison Prasch, an expert on U.S. presidential rhetoric at the University of Wisconsin.

“I think she came in and really delivered an effective debate performance.”

Tuesday’s matchup saw Harris push the former president on his record and bait him into tirades far from Trump’s intended goals of focusing on immigration and the economy.

The former president’s strategy is always to dominate the discussion and the stage, said former Republican strategist Chip Felkel. Harris was able to rattle Trump, Felkel added, and put her courtroom experience on display.

“I think for the first time in his political life since 2015 somebody figured out how to push back,” Felkel said. “Not only to push back, but to dominate.”

Trump criticized Harris’s record, and her changing stance on issues like fracking and immigration.

Prasch said Trump’s most effective criticism came during his closing argument, when he criticized Harris for not being able to achieve her current election promises in the more than three years she’s been vice-president with the Biden administration. At that point, Prasch said, it was likely too little, too late.

Harris stayed focused and gave clear answers throughout the more than 90-minute debate. She also used her face and body to demonstrate when she thought statements from Trump were absurd or wrong, including the former president’s unsubstantiated claims that immigrants in Ohio are eating their neighbours’ dogs and cats.

“I think she gave a killer performance,” said Saleena Temple, who attended a Democrat-organized watch party.

“I appreciate how she addressed him and put him in his place but in a tactful manner, a professional manner, a political manner. She looked presidential.”

While Trump said he thought it was his best debate performance, Harris was rewarded at the end of the night with an endorsement from pop juggernaut Taylor Swift.

At a watch party a few blocks from where the debate was taking place, Matthew Lamorgese, chairman of the Philadelphia Young Republicans, said he believes voters know they can count on Trump’s record.

“Under Donald Trump, we had a strong economy, low inflation, and a secure border,” Lamorgese said. “We had world peace …. That’s what you are going to see.”

Experts say Harris has proven a problematic opponent for Trump so far on the campaign trail. Lamorgese said he wasn’t worried about the vice-president’s performance against the Republican former president.

“Kamala has a different set of issues but issues nonetheless,” Lamorgese said.

Tuesday’s debate was a stark contrast to the first presidential debate in June, where Trump easily dominated an unclear and uneasy performance by Joe Biden, which ultimately led to the president dropping from the race.

The race for the White House remains razor thin after a tumultuous summer that has included an assassination attempt of the former president and a wholly reimagined Democratic ticket.

Experts say many would-be voters are just starting to tune in to the campaigns.

Pennsylvania, where the debate took place, has become the forefront battleground state where both parties are trying to gain favour. Trump took it in 2016 before it swung back to Biden in 2020 — both by narrow margins.

Matthew Lebo, a specialist in U.S. politics at Western University in London, Ont., said Harris may see a bump in approval after the debate but she still has a lot of work to do ensuring voters know her policies and personality ahead of November.

The debate was light on policy particulars. Trump continued his threats to not defend NATO members that don’t meet the alliance’s defence spending targets, of which Canada is one.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau promised in July to meet the spending target, which is the equivalent of two per cent of gross domestic product, by 2032.

Harris talked about America’s ongoing support for the defence alliance and criticized Trump’s relationship with Vladimir Putin and close ties to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.

Whoever wins the election will be in power during the review of the Canada-United States-Mexico trade pact in 2026.

Harris was one of 10 U.S. senators to vote against the trilateral agreement under Trump, saying it didn’t do enough to protect American workers or the environment.

Trump repeated his plans to increase tariffs on imports and Harris spoke about ensuring American jobs remain in the U.S.

“Tariffs would certainly hurt trade with Canada if he ever went through with that,” Lebo said.

Canadians should be most concerned about Trump’s continued denials of responsibility for any role in the Jan. 6 attack on Capitol Hill and what that means for democracy, Lebo said.

“That’s just dangerous and Canadians, on the border of the United States, need a stable democracy there,” Lebo said.

“And he’s just undermining that.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

— With files from The Associated Press



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Tyreek Hill says he could have handled his traffic stop better but he still wants the officer fired

Published

 on

MIAMI GARDENS, Fla. (AP) — Miami Dolphins wide receiver Tyreek Hill acknowledged Wednesday that he could have handled himself better in the initial moments of a weekend traffic stop that left him handcuffed and pulled out of his car by police officers near the team’s stadium.

Hill also said he wants one of the officers involved in the incident dismissed from the police force.

Hill said he wishes he did some things “a bit differently” on Sunday morning, including leaving the window of his car down when officers instructed him to do so. He rolled up the window instead. The incident escalated quickly from there.

“I will say I could have been better,” Hill said. “I could have let down my window in that instant. But the thing about me is, I don’t want attention. I don’t want to be cameras-out, phones-on-you in that moment. But at the end of the day, I’m human. I’ve got to follow rules. I’ve got to do what everyone else would do.

“Now, does that give them the right to literally beat the dog out of me? Absolutely not,” Hill continued. “But at the end of the day, I wish I could go back and do things a bit differently.”

Miami-Dade Police Director Stephanie Daniels launched an internal affairs investigation on Sunday afternoon and one officer was transferred to administrative duties. That officer, Danny Torres, wants to be immediately reinstated, his attorney said this week. Meanwhile, the Dolphins have said they want “swift and strong action” against all the officers involved.

Hill did not mince words when detailing what action he thinks should be taken against the officer.

“Gone. Gone. Gone. Gone. Gone. He’s gotta go, man,” Hill said. “In that instant right there, not only did he treat me bad, but he also treated my teammates with disrespect. He had some crazy words towards them and they didn’t even do nothing. Like, what did they do to you? They’re just walking on the sidewalk. He’s got to go, man.”

Hill was pulled from his car near the team’s stadium less than three hours before kickoff of Miami’s Week 1 game. He was placed on the ground and handcuffed, and teammate Calais Campbell — who drove by the scene and stopped in an effort to play peacemaker — also was handcuffed by police during the incident.

Hill was cited for careless driving and failing to wear a seatbelt.

The Dolphins play the Buffalo Bills on Thursday night, and Hill said he would use the game as therapy, an escape from thinking about the incident. He said he would not take a knee — a move many players have used in recent years to protest police brutality — or call for the defunding of police. Hill has said several times in recent days that he has respect for police officers, and he intends to pursue work in law enforcement when his playing days end.

“Right now, what I’m focused on is my job and that’s to play football,” Hill said. “That’s all I can be, the best football player I can be.”

Body camera footage of the incident, released by the Miami-Dade Police Department on Monday evening, showed that the traffic stop escalated quickly after Hill put up the window of his car.

Hill rolled down the driver’s side window and handed his license to an officer who had been knocking on the window. Hill — one of the game’s best and most dynamic players, an eight-time Pro Bowl selection who led the NFL with 1,799 receiving yards last season — then told the officer repeatedly to stop knocking before rolling the darkly tinted window back up.

After a back and forth about the window, the bodycam video shows an officer pull Hill out of his car by his arm and head and then force him face-first onto the ground. Officers handcuffed Hill and one put a knee in the middle of his back.

Hill can be heard in the footage yelling repeatedly that he’d just had surgery on his knee as officers forced him to the ground. The receiver said Wednesday he had a minor stem cell procedure on his knee this offseason in Antigua. Dolphins coach Mike McDaniel called it a procedure that Hill “makes sure that he takes care of.”

Hill said he was inside a movie theater Monday night when he received word that the footage was released. He left the theater to watch it and said he hopes people seeing the video — both civilians and law enforcement — use it as a means to learn and get better, even drawing the parallel to the way that football players improve when they watch game film.

“It’s shell-shocking, man,” Hill said. “It’s really crazy to know that you have officers in this world that would literally do that with bodycams on. It’s sad. It’s really sad. Which brings up another conversation and leads into ‘What would they do if they didn’t have bodycams?’ which is even crazier.”

The altercation, and what was seen on the six officers’ bodycam videos, has again brought to the forefront conversations surrounding the experience of Black people with police — something that has been a national talking point for some time.

Hill has been involved in off-field incidents before, though teammates spoke out this week to condemn those who used Hill’s past allegations of violence to justify any excessive use of force. McDaniel said Wednesday that Hill continues to grow as a person, and that he has spoken to him on multiple occasions about why that matters. He also acknowledged that Hill could have handled the incident differently, without revealing specifics.

“A conversation about what provoked unnecessary,” McDaniel said, “is trivial to the unnecessary.”

___

AP NFL:



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending