adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Trump amps up pandemic politics at ‘vaccine summit’

Published

 on

.cms-textAlign-lefttext-align:left;.cms-textAlign-centertext-align:center;.cms-textAlign-righttext-align:right;.cms-magazineStyles-smallCapsfont-variant:small-caps;

President Donald Trump on Tuesday gathered people at the White House to celebrate the “miracle” of a coronavirus vaccine.

But the vaccine makers declined to attend. An introductory video tossed some of Trump’s own government scientists under the bus. And the man Trump tapped to help speed vaccine development spent the morning distancing himself from the executive order Trump signed at the event.

Instead, the event — or Trump’s part of it, at least — was the typical Trumpian mixture of political theatrics, brags, grievances and accolades doled out based on fealty to his preferred narrative. In the audience were the Trump political allies, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, who have most vocally supported the president. And the White House launched the event with a video misleadingly portraying people such as Anthony Fauci, the government’s top infectious disease expert, as naysayers about Trump’s vaccine timeline.

The setup reflected the broader politicization of the pandemic that has become entrenched as Trump nears his departure date and President-elect Joe Biden prepares to replace him. Trump has retreated from regularly discussing the pandemic and rarely appears alongside medical professionals. Meanwhile, Biden has made the pandemic a central plank of almost all public appearances and on Tuesday appeared in Wilmington, Del., alongside many of his incoming top health care aides.

The result was essentially a Tuesday split screen: Trump’s overly optimistic “I told you so” predictions versus Biden’s “we’ll get there, but it will be tough” message.

In Washington, Trump vowed: “We think by spring we will be in a position nobody would have believed possible just a few months ago,” he said. “They say it’s somewhat of a miracle, and I think that’s true.”

But in Wilmington, Biden warned: The country is “in a very dark winter” — a nod to the record-breaking case surge — and “things may well get worse before they get better.”

The White House event was predicated as a signing ceremony for an executive order designed to pressure vaccine manufacturers to prioritize shipments within the U.S. over other countries — although the order didn’t appear to have any legal teeth.

The gathering opened with a video castigating media pundits, Biden and Fauci for offering more cautious assessments of the vaccine development timeline.

“Very few people thought this was possible,” Trump said during the event. “Of course they’ll be saying now, ‘We always told you it would be so,’ but we have them saying a little bit different.”

But many of the remarks the video highlighted were misleadingly portrayed. Fauci, for instance, was shown saying a vaccine arrival “could be January, could be later,” a statement that is largely true, especially for the majority of the population. Biden was also shown saying there is “no prospect” for the majority of the public to get a vaccine before the middle of 2021, a timeline that mostly tracks with the tentative rollout schedule.

Meanwhile, in Delaware, Fauci appeared via video at the Biden event, which also featured the president-elect’s top incoming health staffers.

In a pre-recorded message, Fauci cautioned that “the road ahead will not be easy. We have got a lot of hard and demanding work to do in the next year.”

He also offered what could be interpreted as an implicit rebuke of the incumbent president’s messaging throughout the public health crisis.

“In the fight against this pandemic, we must lead with science,” Fauci said, adding that “a key piece of our ongoing work is communicating consistently with the American people.”

Vivek Murthy, Biden’s choice to again become surgeon general, highlighted the “fear, anxiety, anger and distrust that so many Americans are feeling right now.”

And Rochelle Walensky, his pick to head the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, suggested that “the nation is coding” like a hospitalized patient in critical condition.

Back in Washington, the president was effusive in his praise of Operation Warp Speed, the administration’s initiative to speed vaccine development. The effort passed a major milestone Tuesday morning when the Food and Drug Administration released a positive analysis of the safety and efficacy of Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine as it pursues emergency authorization for its drug.

One of the people Trump gave kudos to at the event was Moncef Slaoui, who the president selected in May to help accelerate vaccine research. Yet earlier in the day, Slaoui had distanced himself from Trump’s executive order.

“We feel that we can deliver the vaccines as needed, so I don’t know exactly what this order is about,” he said on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

It is uncertain how enforceable Trump’s executive order will be, as drugmakers have already made initial agreements to deliver supplies to various countries. During his press conference, Trump referenced the Defense Production Act — a law that lets the government mandate production of certain materials in a crisis — and claimed the government had the ability to force the issue.

“We don’t think it will be necessary,” the president said. “If it is, it’s a very powerful act.”

Trump also strayed from the topic of the event during a brief Q&A with reporters, once again airing his false assertions that he won reelection and encouraging others to find the “courage” to overturn the results and award him a second term.

“If somebody has the courage, I know who the next administration will be,” Trump said.

Courts across the country have repeatedly rejected the Trump campaign’s attempts to challenge the results of the election in several battleground states that Trump lost to Biden, though the president has continued to keep up the fight and raise money for his political efforts.

Source: – POLITICO

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending