adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Trump is consistently inconsistent on abortion and reproductive rights

Published

 on

 

CHICAGO (AP) — Donald Trump has had a tough time finding a consistent message to questions about abortion and reproductive rights.

The former president has constantly shifted his stances or offered vague, contradictory and at times nonsensical answers to questions on an issue that has become a major vulnerability for Republicans in this year’s election. Trump has been trying to win over voters, especially women, skeptical about his views, especially after he nominated three Supreme Court justices who helped overturn the nationwide right to abortion two years ago.

The latest example came this week when the Republican presidential nominee said some abortion laws are “too tough” and would be “redone.”

“It’s going to be redone,” he said during a Fox News town hall that aired Wednesday. “They’re going to, you’re going to, you end up with a vote of the people. They’re too tough, too tough. And those are going to be redone because already there’s a movement in those states.”

Trump did not specify if he meant he would take some kind of action if he wins in November, and he did not say which states or laws he was talking about. He did not elaborate on what he meant by “redone.”

He also seemed to be contradicting his own stand when referencing the strict abortion bans passed in Republican-controlled states since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Trump recently said he would vote against a constitutional amendment on the Florida ballot that is aimed at overturning the state’s six-week abortion ban. That decision came after he had criticized the law as too harsh.

Trump has shifted between boasting about nominating the justices who helped strike down federal protections for abortion and trying to appear more neutral. It’s been an attempt to thread the divide between his base of anti-abortion supporters and the majority of Americans who support abortion rights.

About 6 in 10 Americans think their state should generally allow a person to obtain a legal abortion if they don’t want to be pregnant for any reason, according to a July poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Voters in seven states, including some conservative ones, have either protected abortion rights or defeated attempts to restrict them in statewide votes over the past two years.

Trump also has been repeating the narrative that he returned the question of abortion rights to states, even though voters do not have a direct say on that or any other issue in about half the states. This is particularly true for those living in the South, where Republican-controlled legislatures, many of which have been gerrymandered to give the GOP disproportionate power, have enacted some of the strictest abortion bans since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Currently, 13 states have banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy, while four more ban it after six weeks — before many women know they’re pregnant.

Meanwhile, anti-abortion groups and their Republican allies in state governments are using an array of strategies to counter proposed ballot initiatives in at least eight states this year.

Here’s a breakdown of Trump’s fluctuating stances on reproductive rights.

Flip-flopping on Florida

On Tuesday, Trump claimed some abortion laws are “too tough” and would be “redone.”

But in August, Trump said he would vote against a state ballot measure that is attempting to repeal the six-week abortion ban passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.

That came a day after he seemed to indicate he would vote in favor of the measure. Trump previously called Florida’s six-week ban a “terrible mistake” and too extreme. In an April Time magazine interview, Trump repeated that he “thought six weeks is too severe.”

Trump on vetoing a national ban

Trump’s latest flip-flopping has involved his views on a national abortion ban.

During the Oct. 1 vice presidential debate, Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social that he would veto a national abortion ban: “Everyone knows I would not support a federal abortion ban, under any circumstances, and would, in fact, veto it.”

This came just weeks after Trump repeatedly declined to say during the presidential debate with Democrat Kamala Harris whether he would veto a national abortion ban if he were elected.

Trump’s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, said in an interview with NBC News before the presidential debate that Trump would veto a ban. In response to debate moderators prompting him about Vance’s statement, Trump said: “I didn’t discuss it with JD, in all fairness. And I don’t mind if he has a certain view, but I don’t think he was speaking for me.”

‘Pro-choice’ to 15-week ban

Trump’s shifting abortion policy stances began when the former reality TV star and developer started flirting with running for office.

He once called himself “very pro-choice.” But before becoming president, Trump said he “would indeed support a ban,” according to his book “The America We Deserve,” which was published in 2000.

In his first year as president, he said he was “pro-life with exceptions” but also said “there has to be some form of punishment” for women seeking abortions — a position he quickly reversed.

At the 2018 annual March for Life, Trump voiced support for a federal ban on abortion on or after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

More recently, Trump suggested in March that he might support a national ban on abortions around 15 weeks before announcing that he instead would leave the matter to the states.

Views on abortion pills, prosecuting women

In the Time interview, Trump said it should be left up to the states to decide whether to prosecute women for abortions or to monitor women’s pregnancies.

“The states are going to make that decision,” Trump said. “The states are going to have to be comfortable or uncomfortable, not me.”

Democrats have seized on the comments he made in 2016, saying “there has to be some form of punishment” for women who have abortions.

Trump also declined to comment on access to the abortion pill mifepristone, claiming that he has “pretty strong views” on the matter. He said he would make a statement on the issue, but it never came.

Trump responded similarly when asked about his views on the Comstock Act, a 19th century law that has been revived by anti-abortion groups seeking to block the mailing of mifepristone.

IVF and contraception

In May, Trump said during an interview with a Pittsburgh television station that he was open to supporting regulations on contraception and that his campaign would release a policy on the issue “very shortly.” He later said his comments were misinterpreted.

In the KDKA interview, Trump was asked, “Do you support any restrictions on a person’s right to contraception?”

“We’re looking at that and I’m going to have a policy on that very shortly,” Trump responded.

Trump has not since released a policy statement on contraception.

Trump also has offered contradictory statements on in vitro fertilization.

During the Fox News town hall, which was taped Tuesday, Trump declared that he is “the father of IVF,” despite acknowledging during his answer that he needed an explanation of IVF in February after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law.

Trump said he instructed Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., to “explain IVF very quickly” to him in the aftermath of the ruling.

As concerns over access to fertility treatments rose, Trump pledged to promote IVF by requiring health insurance companies or the federal government to pay for it. Such a move would be at odds with the actions of much of his own party.

Even as the Republican Party has tried to create a national narrative that it is receptive to IVF, these messaging efforts have been undercut by GOP state lawmakers, Republican-dominated courts and anti-abortion leaders within the party’s ranks, as well as opposition to legislative attempts to protect IVF access.

___

The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan Party’s Scott Moe, NDP’s Carla Beck react to debate |

Published

 on

 

Saskatchewan‘s two main political party leaders faced off in the only televised debate in the lead up to the provincial election on Oct. 28. Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe and NDP Leader Carla Beck say voters got a chance to see their platforms. (Oct. 17, 2024)

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan political leaders back on campaign trail after election debate

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan‘s main political leaders are back on the campaign trail today after hammering each other in a televised debate.

Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe is set to make an announcement in Moose Jaw.

Saskatchewan NDP Leader Carla Beck is to make stops in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert.

During Wednesday night’s debate, Beck emphasized her plan to make life more affordable and said people deserve better than an out-of-touch Saskatchewan Party government.

Moe said his party wants to lower taxes and put money back into people’s pockets.

Election day is Oct. 28.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

N.B. election debate: Tory leader forced to defend record on gender policy, housing

Published

 on

 

FREDERICTON – New Brunswick’s Progressive Conservative leader was targeted by his two main opponents during a roundtable discussion on Wednesday, forced to defend his record on issues such as health care, housing and public safety.

But it was an exchange about the policy of the Blaine Higgs government on gender identity in schools that got particularly heated. Higgs, running for a third term in office, told the discussion moderator, “there was an outcry across the country” when parents learned about “secrets being kept from them about what their kids were doing at school.”

Those secrets, the Tory leader said, involved children who were questioning their gender identity, and who were able to use a new name in school without their parents’ knowledge. In response, the government’s new policy introduced in 2023 required teachers to get parental consent before they can use preferred first names and pronouns of students under 16.

“It’s shocking that this has become a discussion, when parents have always been the key player in raising their minor kids,” Higgs said. The policy caused dissent within his government, leading several cabinet ministers to resign and helping to trigger a failed attempt at ousting him as leader.

Liberal Leader Susan Holt said there were no complaints before Higgs introduced the new policy. What’s shocking, she said, is “we have a premier who’s saying teachers are keeping secrets from parents; he’s told people that teachers are teaching kids to lie.”

Joining Holt, Green Party Leader David Coon said “it’s worse than that.” Transgender students “are feeling under attack,” he said.

Coon said a Green government would reverse the changes Higgs made to the policy; the Liberals said they would allow students starting in Grade 6 to make decisions on their own about how they will be addressed in school.

Premier since 2018, Higgs regularly boasted to the two other leaders Wednesday that his six balanced budgets have given his party the fiscal space to promise voters a two-percentage-point cut to the harmonized sales tax if the Tories are re-elected Oct. 21. As well, he said, his government reduced the province’s debt by $2.5 billion, saving $90 million in interest payments “this year alone” that has instead gone to priorities like health care.

“But there is more to do,” Higgs said, adding that the province’s two health networks have to learn to work together instead of in competition.

Holt shot back quickly, saying little has improved in six years and that nurses “don’t trust you.”

“You’ve completely disrespected nurses,” the Liberal leader said during the discussion at St. Thomas University in Fredericton, hosted by CTV. “You told them that if they wanted to earn more money they should move to Alberta.”

Coon told Higgs about a person he met who waited 27 hours for care at the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital in Fredericton.

“We are in a state of emergency with our health-care system, we need to treat it with that kind of urgency,” Coon said, adding that his party has promised to spend $380 million a year on health.

On housing, Holt said Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island are building homes at twice the rate compared with New Brunswick. “We’re standing still while the provinces alongside us are passing us by.” She said both provinces have removed the provincial sales tax on multi-unit housing starts — one of her party’s promises.

Higgs said that promise is part of Holt’s “nothing new platform.” He added that New Brunswick was on pace to build up to 6,000 homes this year, a rate he said cannot be exceeded because of labour shortages. Removing the provincial sales tax would take away $170 million from provincial coffers, he said, adding that the tax savings wouldn’t go to renters.

“What is the program there?” Higgs asked Holt. “If we can’t build more we just give tax dollars away? We’re building to the maximum point right now.”

Reacting to labour shortages, Coon said his party is promising to “fast-track the certification process” for skilled workers in the construction industry. “All across this province we have tradespeople who aren’t working.”

On public safety, Higgs was forced to defend his policy of rejecting new applications for supervised drug-consumption sites, and his promise to introduce legislation to force severely addicted people into treatment.

Holt asked Higgs where he would get the money and resources to open up beds to force people into treatment “when we don’t even have the beds for the people who want to be there.” There are about 200 people waiting for addiction care, she said.

Coon said he was on a ride-along with the Fredericton police, and noted the large amount of area a single officer has to cover. “They need the opportunity to have community police officers to do that … on-the-ground work, and that’s going to make a difference.”

Higgs said public safety officers have been retrained to give them policing authority, adding that they are out on the streets and visible in communities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 16, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending