adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

U.S. government won't say why it allows Canadians to fly to U.S. despite border closure – CBC.ca

Published

 on


It’s a quirky rule that has confounded many people: while the Canada-U.S. land border is closed to non-essential traffic due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Canadians can still fly to the United States for leisure travel. 

“It’s like having your front door locked but your back door wide open,” said U.S. immigration lawyer Len Saunders, whose office sits close to the Canadian border in Blaine, Wash.

“It just doesn’t make sense.”

To add to the confusion, the flying rule isn’t reciprocal: Canada bars American travellers from entering by any mode of transport, unless they get a special exemption

Saunders said he has been bombarded with calls from Canadians during the border closure inquiring about flying to the U.S.

“People are still calling me saying, ‘I just want to clarify that this is OK. And why can I fly, but I can’t drive?'”

CBC News asked the U.S. government that same question, but didn’t get a response. 

U.S. immigration lawyer Len Saunders, who is based in Washington state, said he’s been swamped with calls from Canadians inquiring about flying to the U.S.

Foreign relations expert Edward Alden suggests the reason why Canadians can still fly to the U.S. may be rooted in the fact that, compared to Canada, the U.S. has less stringent travel restrictions for air passengers.

“The measures in the United States are just across the board far more relaxed,” said Alden, a professor of U.S.-Canada economic relations at Western Washington University in Bellingham, Wash.

“[It’s] certainly one of the reasons we have higher [COVID-19] case numbers.”

‘I could have walked’

To help stop the spread of COVID-19, Canada and the U.S. agreed in late March to close their shared land border to non-essential travel.

Since then, many Canadians have flown to the U.S, after discovering that it’s still allowed. 

But the flying exemption has also sparked bewilderment.

Birgit Heinbach lives in Surrey, B.C., just seven kilometres from her American husband’s home across the border in Blaine, Wash.

Because she can currently only fly to the U.S., Heinbach said it took seven hours and two flights — from Vancouver to Seattle and then Seattle to Bellingham — to get to her husband’s home when she visited him in July. 

“The whole thing was ridiculous,” she said. “I could have walked in my own little shoes — in 45 minutes — to my husband’s house.”

Birgit Heinbach with her American husband, Ian Geddes, at the Peace Arch border crossing between Surrey, B.C., and Blaine, Wash. The couple lives seven kilometres apart on opposite sides of the Canada-U.S. border. (Len Saunders)

Canadian snowbird Tamara Carmichael lives in a non-winterized mobile home in Leduc, Alta., in the summer. Her winter home sits in an RV park in Yuma, Ariz.

Although Carmichael can still fly to the U.S. this winter, she said that’s not an option because she needs her truck to get around in Yuma, and can’t afford the fee — upwards of $1,500 — to ship it. 

She argues the U.S. flying exemption is nonsensical because driving is a much safer way to travel during the pandemic.

“Sticking everybody on an airplane is not a solution,” said Carmichael. “You’re packed into a tin can with a bunch of other people.”

Canadian snowbird Tamara Carmichael said she doesn’t understand why the U.S. still lets Canadians fly to the country when driving is a safer mode of travel during the pandemic. (Radio Canada/Olivier Periard)

According to a U.S. government document, it sanctioned the land border closure because “non-essential travel between the United States and Canada poses additional risk of [COVID-19] transmission.”

CBC News asked several U.S. government departments and agencies why the government still welcomes Canadian air passengers. The Department of Transportation and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) referred CBC to the Department of Homeland Security’s main office. That office and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention referred CBC to CBP.

No one provided an answer, despite repeated inquiries.

Experts offer theories

Alden theorizes that Canada — which has strict travel restrictions — prompted the land border closure, and that while the U.S. agreed, it had no desire to take it further. 

Canada has restricted most foreigners from entering the country by any mode of travel during the pandemic. But foreigners can still fly to the U.S. as long as they haven’t visited Brazil, China, Iran, Ireland, the U.K. or 26 European countries in the Schengen Area 14 days prior. 

Canada was never added to that no-fly list. Neither was Mexico, even though Mexico and the U.S. have also agreed to close their shared land border to non-essential travel. 

“Generally, the United States has a much looser regime in terms of trying to keep out travellers,” said Alden. “They don’t see casual travellers as much of a threat, because they’re worried about drugs and illegal migrants and terrorism.”

WATCH | U.S. President Donald Trump tells people not to fear the coronavirus:

U.S. President Donald Trump returned to the White House — still infected with the coronavirus — and removed his mask on the balcony before going inside. He then tweeted a video of himself telling Americans not to be afraid of coronavirus or let it take over their lives.  7:25

Alden also said that the U.S. may have reasoned it would be too cumbersome for the country’s airlines to weed out the non-essential travellers if the country expanded its land border bans to air passengers.

“If you were going to make distinctions between essential and non-essential travellers, the airlines were going to have to be involved in some way.”

Lawyer Saunders said he spoke this week with a senior U.S. CBP official who believes the U.S. still welcomes Canadian air passengers due to pressure from U.S. airlines to keep flights in operation.

“He said the airline industries would have lobbied hard when they were drafting this border closure,” said Saunders.

But the actual reason why Canadians can fly to the U.S. remains a mystery — until and unless its government offers an explanation.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

News

Bad traffic, changed plans: Toronto braces for uncertainty of its Taylor Swift Era

Published

 on

TORONTO – Will Taylor Swift bring chaos or do we all need to calm down?

It’s a question many Torontonians are asking this week as the city braces for the arrival of Swifties, the massive fan base of one of the world’s biggest pop stars.

Hundreds of thousands are expected to descend on the downtown core for the singer’s six concerts which kick off Thursday at the Rogers Centre and run until Nov. 23.

And while their arrival will be a boon to tourism dollars — the city estimates more than $282 million in economic impact — some worry it could worsen Toronto’s gridlock by clogging streets that already come to a standstill during rush hour.

Swift’s shows are set to collide with sports events at the nearby Scotiabank Arena, including a Raptors game on Friday and a Leafs game on Saturday.

Some residents and local businesses have already adjusted their plans to avoid the area and its planned road closures.

Aahil Dayani says he and some friends intended to throw a birthday bash for one of their pals until they realized it would overlap with the concerts.

“Something as simple as getting together and having dinner is now thrown out the window,” he said.

Dayani says the group rescheduled the gathering for after Swift leaves town. In the meantime, he plans to hunker down at his Toronto residence.

“Her coming into town has kind of changed up my social life,” he added.

“We’re pretty much just not doing anything.”

Max Sinclair, chief executive and founder of A.I. technology firm Ecomtent, suggested his employees avoid the company’s downtown offices on concert days, saying he doesn’t see the point in forcing people to endure potential traffic jams.

“It’s going to be less productive for us, and it’s going to be just a pain for everyone, so it’s easier to avoid it,” Sinclair said.

“We’re a hybrid company, so we can be flexible. It just makes sense.”

Swift’s concerts are the latest pop culture moment to draw attention to Toronto’s notoriously disastrous daily commute.

In June, One Direction singer Niall Horan uploaded a social media video of himself walking through traffic to reach the venue for his concert.

“Traffic’s too bad in Toronto, so we’re walking to the venue,” he wrote in the post.

Toronto Transit Commission spokesperson Stuart Green says the public agency has been working for more than a year on plans to ease the pressure of so many Swifties in one confined area.

“We are preparing for something that would be akin to maybe the Beatles coming in the ‘60s,” he said.

Dozens of buses and streetcars have been added to transit routes around the stadium, and the TTC has consulted the city on potential emergency scenarios.

Green will be part of a command centre operated by the City of Toronto and staffed by Toronto police leaders, emergency services and others who have handled massive gatherings including the Raptors’ NBA championship parade in 2019.

“There may be some who will say we’re over-preparing, and that’s fair,” Green said.

“But we know based on what’s happened in other places, better to be over-prepared than under-prepared.”

Metrolinx, the agency for Ontario’s GO Transit system, has also added extra trips and extended hours in some regions to accommodate fans looking to travel home.

A day before Swift’s first performance, the city began clearing out tents belonging to homeless people near the venue. The city said two people were offered space in a shelter.

“As the area around Rogers Centre is expected to receive a high volume of foot traffic in the coming days, this area has been prioritized for outreach work to ensure the safety of individuals in encampments, other residents, businesses and visitors — as is standard for large-scale events,” city spokesperson Russell Baker said in a statement.

Homeless advocate Diana Chan McNally questioned whether money and optics were behind the measure.

“People (in the area) are already in close proximity to concerts, sports games, and other events that generate massive amounts of traffic — that’s nothing new,” she said in a statement.

“If people were offered and willingly accepted a shelter space, free of coercion, I support that fully — that’s how it should happen.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 13, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

‘It’s literally incredible’: Swifties line up for merch ahead of Toronto concerts

Published

 on

TORONTO – Hundreds of Taylor Swift fans lined up outside the gates of Toronto’s Rogers Centre Wednesday, with hopes of snagging some of the pop star’s merchandise on the eve of the first of her six sold-out shows in the city.

Swift is slated to perform at the venue from Thursday to Saturday, and the following week from Nov. 21 to Nov. 23, with concert merchandise available for sale on some non-show days.

Swifties were all smiles as they left the merch shop, their arms full of sweaters and posters bearing pictures of the star and her Eras Tour logo.

Among them was Zoe Haronitis, 22, who said she waited in line for about two hours to get $300 worth of merchandise, including some apparel for her friends.

Haronitis endured the autumn cold and the hefty price tag even though she hasn’t secured a concert ticket. She said she’s hunting down a resale ticket and plans to spend up to $600.

“I haven’t really budgeted anything,” Haronitis said. “I don’t care how much money I spent. That was kind of my mindset.”

The megastar’s merchandise costs up to $115 for a sweater, and $30 for tote bags and other accessories.

Rachel Renwick, 28, also waited a couple of hours in line for merchandise, but only spent about $70 after learning that a coveted blue sweater and a crewneck had been snatched up by other eager fans before she got to the shop. She had been prepared to spend much more, she said.

“The two prized items sold out. I think a lot more damage would have been done,” Renwick said, adding she’s still determined to buy a sweater at a later date.

Renwick estimated she’s spent about $500 in total on “all-things Eras Tour,” including her concert outfit and merchandise.

The long queue for Swift merch is just a snapshot of what the city will see in the coming days. It’s estimated that up to 500,000 visitors from outside Toronto will be in town during the concert period.

Tens of thousands more are also expected to attend Taylgate’24, an unofficial Swiftie fan event scheduled to be held at the nearby Metro Toronto Convention Centre.

Meanwhile, Destination Toronto has said it anticipates the economic impact of the Eras Tour could grow to $282 million as the money continues to circulate.

But for fans like Haronitis, the experience in Toronto comes down to the Swiftie community. Knowing that Swift is going to be in the city for six shows and seeing hundreds gather just for merchandise is “awesome,” she said.

Even though Haronitis hasn’t officially bought her ticket yet, she said she’s excited to see the megastar.

“It’s literally incredible.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 13, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Via Rail seeks judicial review on CN’s speed restrictions

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Via Rail is asking for a judicial review on the reasons why Canadian National Railway Co. has imposed speed restrictions on its new passenger trains.

The Crown corporation says it is seeking the review from the Federal Court after many attempts at dialogue with the company did not yield valid reasoning for the change.

It says the restrictions imposed last month are causing daily delays on Via Rail’s Québec City-Windsor corridor, affecting thousands of passengers and damaging Via Rail’s reputation with travellers.

CN says in a statement that it imposed the restrictions at rail crossings given the industry’s experience and known risks associated with similar trains.

The company says Via has asked the courts to weigh in even though Via has agreed to buy the equipment needed to permanently fix the issues.

Via said in October that no incidents at level crossings have been reported in the two years since it put 16 Siemens Venture trains into operation.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 13, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:CN)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending