adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

U.S. politics has too many Canadian pundits – The Washington Post

Published

 on


A sarcastic tweet from user “Gapeway Pundit” delighted many in the American center-left the other day. “I feel like Biden has done absolutely nothing for me,” Gapeway wrote. “Sure he’s reversed the Muslim ban but I’m not Muslim. And the trans military ban, but i’m not trans. He banned federal use of private prisons, but I’m not a prisoner. His COVID bill will give Americans $1,400, but I’m Canadian.”

The joke — and the positive reaction to it — nicely encapsulates a certain exhaustion I’ve noticed among moderate American progressives recently. President Biden remains broadly popular with most voters, yet still faces persistent criticism from an online far-left that insists he’s a disaster. It’s a group largely composed of bitter Bernie Sanders partisans — and apparently a disproportionate number of Canadians, too. Indeed, it’s become something of a running joke among centrist Democrats on social media that before taking the words of some stridently leftist Biden critic seriously, always check their profile location tag.

While I’m hesitant to provoke the wrath of the “Dirtbag Left” by naming and shaming anyone in particular, it’s not much of a secret that several of America’s prominent far-left tweeters, columnists, podcasters and YouTube personalities also happen to be Canadians based in Canada. They’re not Canadian political commentators who occasionally talk about American affairs — as all Canadian commentators do — but rather Canadians who are choosing to embed themselves deeply in America’s domestic political debate and function as outright activists for one very particular side.

As a trend, it should be unsettling and provoke at least a couple of questions. When does one cross the line between being interested in another country’s politics and actively meddling in their affairs? At what point does propagandizing for or against politicians in a country you don’t live in constitute an inappropriate infringement of their sovereignty?

To be sure, a lot of what’s been written over the years about Canadians who “care too much about American politics” is little more than a regurgitation of classic Canadian insecurities. Whenever social justice issues rise to the forefront of American debate, for instance, a certain sort of cocksure Canadian boomer reliably emerges to scold against “importing” American assumptions of race or class. The fact that virtually every article about anti-Black racism in Canada features a defensive comment insisting “it’s not just an American problem” highlights the degree such complacency is taken for granted.

Likewise, it’s obviously true that the outcomes of the American political process “affect Canada too”; not only at the level of formal international relations — such as when a president vetoes a cross-border pipeline — but also through intellectual trends and policy examples. All great Canadian thinkers are influenced by America’s vastly more robust infrastructure of research and ideas, and there’s plenty of reason for left and right on both sides of the border to be broadly invested in the success of their continental counterparts.

Yet all this is still very different from a Canadian who chooses to inject themselves into American political debates to the point of, say, rallying against Neera Tanden’s nomination as head of the Office of Management and Budget.

I’ll confess my hands aren’t entirely clean. From my perch in Vancouver, I spent a year writing for National Review, the famed American conservative politics magazine, and while it was a rewarding experience overall, I often felt awkward and self-conscious writing columns about what sort of bills the president should sign or what constitutional clauses should be changed. At some point, it was quite genuinely not my business, a fact that can be easily measured by imagining the reaction in Canada — or any other country — if there existed some sizable number of Americans who made a living attempting to shape the domestic politics of a place where they didn’t live, either.

The irony is that plenty of leftists think Americans do this already, in the Middle East or Latin America or wherever, and resent them for it. The Canadian left in particular has long been paranoid about American “meddling” in Canadian affairs, and it’s a testament to the blinding righteousness of today’s social media socialists that there’s little introspection about this hypocrisy.

There are plenty of problems that could be solved if Canadians were more informed of American realities, and plenty of benefit to be found in a continent where U.S.-Canadian relations are more open and integrated. It’s similarly easy to be inspired by Canadians — of any political stripe — who possess honest empathy for the struggles of the American people and genuinely want what’s best for them.

But it would be nice if more Canadians who are so inclined could direct some of that energy toward helping combat anti-American ignorance in their own country and deepening cross-border ties of trade, labor and people — a few things the United States needs a lot more than lefty hot takes about its politics.

Read more:

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending