adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Business

Uber and Lyft expect to be carrying passengers in B.C. within days – Vancouver Sun

Published

 on


But the companies still face a patchwork of local business licences that make the service initially unavailable in some municipalities.

VICTORIA — Uber and Lyft vehicles may be on the road in some Metro Vancouver cities within days, after they got provincial permits on Thursday. But the companies still face a patchwork of local business licences that make the service initially unavailable in some municipalities.

B.C.’s independent Passenger Transportation Board ruled both companies can operate in the Lower Mainland and Whistler. It did not impose a cap on the number of vehicles they can use and did not put restrictions on variable rates and “surge” pricing during peak demand.

Both companies said they would begin operations within days and moved quickly obtained ride-hailing auto insurance on Thursday from the Insurance Corp. of B.C.

“We’re hoping to launch in multiple municipalities at once, but given some of the restrictions on Class 4 (driver’s licences), don’t expect that we will be able to cover all of Metro Vancouver on day 1 — but hopefully quickly thereafter,” said Michael van Hemmen, Uber’s head of Western Canada operations.

Recruiting drivers remains a challenge, said van Hemmen. The government’s decision to require Class 4 licences with extra training and tests has prevented some safe drivers from being able to provide rides, he said.

The provincial approval came as Metro Vancouver mayors finish work on an interim regional business licence for ride-hailing, which is expected to be ready by the end of the month. For now, Uber and Lyft will have to go to each municipality for a local business licence, where one is available, and they will face differing fees, requirements and processing times.

In Vancouver, Mayor Kennedy Stewart said the city expedited the process to issue local approvals by the end of day Thursday.

But in Surrey, the process is sure to be more difficult. Mayor Doug McCallum has pledged allegiance to the taxi sector and vowed to use the local business licence process as a way to block or restrict ride-hailing.

TransLink’s Mayors’ Council will announce the framework of a regional ride-hailing licence in late January or early February, but it will still be up to each individual council to decide whether they will join the licensing system, said Jonathan Coté, Mayors’ Council chair and mayor of New Westminster.

“There is a bit of a patchwork right now right now where some cities have set up their own individual processes, but many cities have actually not set up any process, and in that situation nothing needs to be applied for yet,” he said.

Coté said he thinks municipalities will make the regional licence issue a high priority and move to adopt it quickly once it is ready.

The B.C. government demanded late last year that mayors set up a regional licence to prevent individual cities from frustrating ride-hailing and warned that if it didn’t happen, the province may intervene.

Provincial approval came two years later than promised by the NDP government.

“I know people wanted it immediately,” said Transportation Minister Claire Trevena. “I was as frustrated as everyone in the time it seemed to be taking. I think in the end, people in B.C. can feel very comfortable in the service they’ll be getting.”

The decision was sure to disappoint the taxi sector, which had exerted political pressure on government to set limits on ride-hailing vehicles and ban so-called predatory pricing.

The Vancouver Taxi Association could not be reached for comment Thursday.

The B.C. Taxi Association issued a statement that expressed their belief that the introduction of ride hailing without limits on number of vehicles and no defined operating areas could spell the end for the taxi industry.

“The taxi industry has not taken the position that there should never be a ride share regime in B.C.,” read the statement issued by BCTA president Mohan Kang.

“B.C. Taxi Association accepts that ride shares would be implemented in some reasonable form however to implement ride shares in a manner that creates such a distinct disadvantage to taxis is not reasonable. That was and remains our position.”

Kang said the BCTA’s lawyers were in the process of reviewing Thursday’s decision and that the association would be meeting in the coming days to decide on a plan of action.

The board in its decisions said economic harm to taxis are simply part of the market adjusting.

Lyft and Uber will have to start fares at a set minimum and are forbidden from using coupons or discounts, but can otherwise use variable pricing based on demand.

“The intended effect of dynamic pricing is to reduce wait times at peak periods by incentivizing drivers and to lower costs at off peak periods to encourage trips,” the board wrote in its decision. “The board does not accept the submission that dynamic pricing is discriminatory in purpose or effect. The price of countless goods and services are dictated by market conditions.”

The board also brushed aside the argument from taxi companies that ride-hailing would devalue the traditional taxi licences obtained by operators.

“We live in a market economy and competition is the norm in marketplaces,” read the decision.

“While the board is sympathetic to the prospect that taxi licence holders may experience a drop in their licence-share value, it has never sanctioned the market for such shares nor does it have the authority to do so. … Taxi licensees created the market and invested in licence shares or used them as collateral. As with any investments, there are associated risks and impacts.”

The Passenger Transportation Board received 29 ride-hailing company applications.

It also announced Thursday it has rejected ReRyde Technologies and Kater.

Kater had tried to get an early jump on competing with ride-hailing by partnering with Vancouver taxis to roll out an early app-based hybrid taxi service. However, the board said its business plan was “incongruous and unrealistic.”

“Kater is aware of the PTB’s decision and is currently reviewing all TNS license application documents,” it said in  a statement. “We are very disappointed that a Vancouver company, which has locally developed the technology to provide a much-needed service throughout the province, has been declined.”

With files from Susan Lazaruk, Nick Eagland and Dam Fumano

rshaw@postmedia.com

twitter.com/robshaw_vansun

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Business

Transat AT reports $39.9M Q3 loss compared with $57.3M profit a year earlier

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – Travel company Transat AT Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter compared with a profit a year earlier as its revenue edged lower.

The parent company of Air Transat says it lost $39.9 million or $1.03 per diluted share in its quarter ended July 31.

The result compared with a profit of $57.3 million or $1.49 per diluted share a year earlier.

Revenue in what was the company’s third quarter totalled $736.2 million, down from $746.3 million in the same quarter last year.

On an adjusted basis, Transat says it lost $1.10 per share in its latest quarter compared with an adjusted profit of $1.10 per share a year earlier.

Transat chief executive Annick Guérard says demand for leisure travel remains healthy, as evidenced by higher traffic, but consumers are increasingly price conscious given the current economic uncertainty.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TRZ)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Dollarama keeping an eye on competitors as Loblaw launches new ultra-discount chain

Published

 on

 

Dollarama Inc.’s food aisles may have expanded far beyond sweet treats or piles of gum by the checkout counter in recent years, but its chief executive maintains his company is “not in the grocery business,” even if it’s keeping an eye on the sector.

“It’s just one small part of our store,” Neil Rossy told analysts on a Wednesday call, where he was questioned about the company’s food merchandise and rivals playing in the same space.

“We will keep an eye on all retailers — like all retailers keep an eye on us — to make sure that we’re competitive and we understand what’s out there.”

Over the last decade and as consumers have more recently sought deals, Dollarama’s food merchandise has expanded to include bread and pantry staples like cereal, rice and pasta sold at prices on par or below supermarkets.

However, the competition in the discount segment of the market Dollarama operates in intensified recently when the country’s biggest grocery chain began piloting a new ultra-discount store.

The No Name stores being tested by Loblaw Cos. Ltd. in Windsor, St. Catharines and Brockville, Ont., are billed as 20 per cent cheaper than discount retail competitors including No Frills. The grocery giant is able to offer such cost savings by relying on a smaller store footprint, fewer chilled products and a hearty range of No Name merchandise.

Though Rossy brushed off notions that his company is a supermarket challenger, grocers aren’t off his radar.

“All retailers in Canada are realistic about the fact that everyone is everyone’s competition on any given item or category,” he said.

Rossy declined to reveal how much of the chain’s sales would overlap with Loblaw or the food category, arguing the vast variety of items Dollarama sells is its strength rather than its grocery products alone.

“What makes Dollarama Dollarama is a very wide assortment of different departments that somewhat represent the old five-and-dime local convenience store,” he said.

The breadth of Dollarama’s offerings helped carry the company to a second-quarter profit of $285.9 million, up from $245.8 million in the same quarter last year as its sales rose 7.4 per cent.

The retailer said Wednesday the profit amounted to $1.02 per diluted share for the 13-week period ended July 28, up from 86 cents per diluted share a year earlier.

The period the quarter covers includes the start of summer, when Rossy said the weather was “terrible.”

“The weather got slightly better towards the end of the summer and our sales certainly increased, but not enough to make up for the season’s horrible start,” he said.

Sales totalled $1.56 billion for the quarter, up from $1.46 billion in the same quarter last year.

Comparable store sales, a key metric for retailers, increased 4.7 per cent, while the average transaction was down2.2 per cent and traffic was up seven per cent, RBC analyst Irene Nattel pointed out.

She told investors in a note that the numbers reflect “solid demand as cautious consumers focus on core consumables and everyday essentials.”

Analysts have attributed such behaviour to interest rates that have been slow to drop and high prices of key consumer goods, which are weighing on household budgets.

To cope, many Canadians have spent more time seeking deals, trading down to more affordable brands and forgoing small luxuries they would treat themselves to in better economic times.

“When people feel squeezed, they tend to shy away from discretionary, focus on the basics,” Rossy said. “When people are feeling good about their wallet, they tend to be more lax about the basics and more willing to spend on discretionary.”

The current economic situation has drawn in not just the average Canadian looking to save a buck or two, but also wealthier consumers.

“When the entire economy is feeling slightly squeezed, we get more consumers who might not have to or want to shop at a Dollarama generally or who enjoy shopping at a Dollarama but have the luxury of not having to worry about the price in some other store that they happen to be standing in that has those goods,” Rossy said.

“Well, when times are tougher, they’ll consider the extra five minutes to go to the store next door.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:DOL)

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. regulator fines TD Bank US$28M for faulty consumer reports

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has ordered TD Bank Group to pay US$28 million for repeatedly sharing inaccurate, negative information about its customers to consumer reporting companies.

The agency says TD has to pay US$7.76 million in total to tens of thousands of victims of its illegal actions, along with a US$20 million civil penalty.

It says TD shared information that contained systemic errors about credit card and bank deposit accounts to consumer reporting companies, which can include credit reports as well as screening reports for tenants and employees and other background checks.

CFPB director Rohit Chopra says in a statement that TD threatened the consumer reports of customers with fraudulent information then “barely lifted a finger to fix it,” and that regulators will need to “focus major attention” on TD Bank to change its course.

TD says in a statement it self-identified these issues and proactively worked to improve its practices, and that it is committed to delivering on its responsibilities to its customers.

The bank also faces scrutiny in the U.S. over its anti-money laundering program where it expects to pay more than US$3 billion in monetary penalties to resolve.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending