adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Science

We asked iREx’s young astronomers: Do you think there’s life elsewhere?

Published

 on

To introduce you to our young researchers, we conducted a series of flash interviews throughout the 2022-2023 academic year, to which all our master’s and doctoral students and researchers were invited to respond. In recent months, we’ve been posting portraits on Facebook under the keyword #iRExFlashInterviews

In this fourth article in a series of four, we compile the various responses received from these up-and-coming young scientists to the question:

Do you think there is life elsewhere in the galaxy? If so, what is it like?

From right to left, top to bottom: Alexandrine L’Heureux, André Beaudoin, Anne Boucher, Ariane Deslières, Caroline Piaulet, Charles Cadieux, Charles-Édouard Boukaré, Chris Mann, Clémence Fontanive, Dereck Lizotte, Dominic Couture, Érika Le Bourdais, Etienne Artigau, Frédéric Genest, Giang Nguyen, Jared Splinter, Jonathan St-Antoine, Katherine Thibault, Keavin Moore, Kim Morel, Leslie Moranta, Lisa Dang, Loïc Albert, Marylou Fournier Tondreau, Michael Matesic, Neil Cook, Olivia Lim, Pierre-Alexis Roy, Romain Allart, Simon Delisle, Thomas Vandal and Vigneshwaran Krishnamurthy.

Pierre-Alexis: In my opinion, yes, there is life elsewhere in the galaxy. Now that we know planetary systems are common in our galaxy, it makes perfect sense to me to assume that there is life in other systems. Now, what would this life look like? I believe it would be very different from life on Earth; that’s the most precise answer I dare give!

Ariane: Of course! I think every astronomer hopes so. My scientific response is that it would probably be microscopic life. However, I’d love for us to find marine mammals with primate-like intelligence. Imagine a philosophical whale!

Jared: Given the size of the galaxy, I think life exists somewhere! While I think intelligent life elsewhere is less likely, it’s not impossible. Although we don’t yet have the ability to communicate with other forms of life, I hope that one day we can fulfill our dreams of space exploration, Star Trek-style!

Frédéric: Thanks to the thousands of exoplanets we’ve detected so far, we know a significant fraction of stars have planetary systems. Potentially billions of planets in just our galaxy! It’s hard to believe that we’d find life only on Earth. I believe there must be microbial life on several exoplanets.

Chris: I think the odds of finding intelligent extraterrestrial life are low, but with the vast number of planets in our galaxy, it seems almost certain that some form of life exists somewhere. And for the first time in human history, we have the technology to detect it. It’s very exciting!

Neil: I have no doubt that there must be life somewhere in the universe. The important question is how difficult it is for life to exist. The answer to that question will tell us whether life is widespread or very rare. Much of our exoplanet research is bringing us closer to answering that question!

Leslie: It seems egocentric to believe that Earth is the only planet in the Universe where life could have developed. Furthermore, I remain convinced that the discovery of extraterrestrial life would involve finding a form of life fundamentally different from ours.

Dereck: It seems statistically nearly impossible that we’re completely alone in the universe, especially if we’re talking about very simple life like bacteria. Other forms of intelligent life like ours, however, seem extremely improbable (though I’m not sure if that’s a good or bad thing)…

Dominic: I believe the emergence of simple microbial life is quite common in the galaxy, provided suitable conditions exist on an exoplanet. However, the emergence of more complex and especially intelligent life could be rarer, and humanity might be the only civilization existing in the current era of the galaxy.

Kim: I think we’ve somewhat won the life lottery, meaning we’ve had the immense luck for everything to align for life to develop on Earth. However, as with a lottery, while winners are rare, there are still many of them. So, I do believe there must be another place in the universe where life exists, but in a form different from ours, with a different kind of cell.

Olivia: I hope so! In addition to invisible microorganisms, I like to imagine there’s vegetation, animals, and other forms of life indescribable with our Earthling vocabulary elsewhere in the universe. But I have no idea if any of these speculations have any scientific basis!

Anne: I’m convinced that life exists elsewhere in our Galaxy. The challenge is finding it. I don’t think we’ll find “intelligent” life anytime soon, but certainly something equivalent to bacterial, fungal, or even plant life. I’d like to believe that somewhere in our galaxy, there’s another planet filled with the most exotic plants and flowers.

André: The galaxy is so vast that it’s inconceivable to me that life only happened by chance on a single planet among hundreds of billions. The real questions for me are: Can we detect this said life with today’s technology? And in 100 years? And in 1000 years? Will we ever be able to communicate with another intelligent species? I think we should never say never, but we’re still far from answering any of these questions. Exciting challenges for future generations!

Caroline: The past twenty years of exoplanet discoveries have revealed that most stars have at least one planet. With the hundreds of billions of trillions (!) of stars in the universe, I think it’s likely that there are a few other places besides Earth where conditions are right for life to emerge! I imagine that extraterrestrial life forms would probably not have much resemblance to the way aliens are portrayed in movies, which are very centered on life as we know it: it might just be life at the single-cell stage or a few cells!

Katherine: Yes, I believe there is life elsewhere in the galaxy! I like to think there are tiny bacteria living in a world of lava or perhaps a civilization more advanced than ours where the balance between the environment and life is respected. Whether intelligent or not, I believe life is very different from what we know here on Earth.

Étienne: To get a rough idea of what extraterrestrial life might look like, go snorkeling in the sea with a mask. Look at sea anemones, sea cucumbers, and jellyfish. I think the representation we have of a potential contact with an extraterrestrial civilization says much more about the humans who wrote the script than about potential extraterrestrials! Even those in the movie “Contact” have a language that’s way too clear. I’ll let you ponder what response you would give to a whiff of C7H9O2N blown your way… yet some living beings who share bits of DNA with you can interpret this message very well! If you want to see what encountering non-human intelligence looks like, watch the beautiful film “My Octopus Teacher.”

Romain: When we look at the starry sky, it’s hard to believe we’re alone in the Universe, and for good reason – the number of stars in our galaxy and galaxies in the Universe is so vast it’s incomprehensible. But knowing how life manifests on other worlds? Would there be more advanced life forms than single-celled beings? I don’t know, but assuming it might resemble something on Earth or what we can imagine would be a mistake. I prefer to believe that nature will always surprise us!

Michael M.: Statistically speaking, I expect that at least one of the hundreds of billions of other planetary systems in the Milky Way harbors life. Given the age of our galaxy, life could take the form of single-celled organisms or advanced civilizations.

If you want to hear other iREx astronomers discuss this important question, watch our video Y a-t-il de la vie ailleurs? from the Des exoplanètes et nous series (French with English subtitles available)

To read our astronomers’ answers to other questions, see the other articles in the series:

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Here’s how Helene and other storms dumped a whopping 40 trillion gallons of rain on the South

Published

 on

 

More than 40 trillion gallons of rain drenched the Southeast United States in the last week from Hurricane Helene and a run-of-the-mill rainstorm that sloshed in ahead of it — an unheard of amount of water that has stunned experts.

That’s enough to fill the Dallas Cowboys’ stadium 51,000 times, or Lake Tahoe just once. If it was concentrated just on the state of North Carolina that much water would be 3.5 feet deep (more than 1 meter). It’s enough to fill more than 60 million Olympic-size swimming pools.

“That’s an astronomical amount of precipitation,” said Ed Clark, head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Water Center in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. “I have not seen something in my 25 years of working at the weather service that is this geographically large of an extent and the sheer volume of water that fell from the sky.”

The flood damage from the rain is apocalyptic, meteorologists said. More than 100 people are dead, according to officials.

Private meteorologist Ryan Maue, a former NOAA chief scientist, calculated the amount of rain, using precipitation measurements made in 2.5-mile-by-2.5 mile grids as measured by satellites and ground observations. He came up with 40 trillion gallons through Sunday for the eastern United States, with 20 trillion gallons of that hitting just Georgia, Tennessee, the Carolinas and Florida from Hurricane Helene.

Clark did the calculations independently and said the 40 trillion gallon figure (151 trillion liters) is about right and, if anything, conservative. Maue said maybe 1 to 2 trillion more gallons of rain had fallen, much if it in Virginia, since his calculations.

Clark, who spends much of his work on issues of shrinking western water supplies, said to put the amount of rain in perspective, it’s more than twice the combined amount of water stored by two key Colorado River basin reservoirs: Lake Powell and Lake Mead.

Several meteorologists said this was a combination of two, maybe three storm systems. Before Helene struck, rain had fallen heavily for days because a low pressure system had “cut off” from the jet stream — which moves weather systems along west to east — and stalled over the Southeast. That funneled plenty of warm water from the Gulf of Mexico. And a storm that fell just short of named status parked along North Carolina’s Atlantic coast, dumping as much as 20 inches of rain, said North Carolina state climatologist Kathie Dello.

Then add Helene, one of the largest storms in the last couple decades and one that held plenty of rain because it was young and moved fast before it hit the Appalachians, said University of Albany hurricane expert Kristen Corbosiero.

“It was not just a perfect storm, but it was a combination of multiple storms that that led to the enormous amount of rain,” Maue said. “That collected at high elevation, we’re talking 3,000 to 6000 feet. And when you drop trillions of gallons on a mountain, that has to go down.”

The fact that these storms hit the mountains made everything worse, and not just because of runoff. The interaction between the mountains and the storm systems wrings more moisture out of the air, Clark, Maue and Corbosiero said.

North Carolina weather officials said their top measurement total was 31.33 inches in the tiny town of Busick. Mount Mitchell also got more than 2 feet of rainfall.

Before 2017’s Hurricane Harvey, “I said to our colleagues, you know, I never thought in my career that we would measure rainfall in feet,” Clark said. “And after Harvey, Florence, the more isolated events in eastern Kentucky, portions of South Dakota. We’re seeing events year in and year out where we are measuring rainfall in feet.”

Storms are getting wetter as the climate change s, said Corbosiero and Dello. A basic law of physics says the air holds nearly 4% more moisture for every degree Fahrenheit warmer (7% for every degree Celsius) and the world has warmed more than 2 degrees (1.2 degrees Celsius) since pre-industrial times.

Corbosiero said meteorologists are vigorously debating how much of Helene is due to worsening climate change and how much is random.

For Dello, the “fingerprints of climate change” were clear.

“We’ve seen tropical storm impacts in western North Carolina. But these storms are wetter and these storms are warmer. And there would have been a time when a tropical storm would have been heading toward North Carolina and would have caused some rain and some damage, but not apocalyptic destruction. ”

___

Follow AP’s climate coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/climate

___

Follow Seth Borenstein on Twitter at @borenbears

___

Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about AP’s climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Source link

Continue Reading

Science

‘Big Sam’: Paleontologists unearth giant skull of Pachyrhinosaurus in Alberta

Published

 on

 

It’s a dinosaur that roamed Alberta’s badlands more than 70 million years ago, sporting a big, bumpy, bony head the size of a baby elephant.

On Wednesday, paleontologists near Grande Prairie pulled its 272-kilogram skull from the ground.

They call it “Big Sam.”

The adult Pachyrhinosaurus is the second plant-eating dinosaur to be unearthed from a dense bonebed belonging to a herd that died together on the edge of a valley that now sits 450 kilometres northwest of Edmonton.

It didn’t die alone.

“We have hundreds of juvenile bones in the bonebed, so we know that there are many babies and some adults among all of the big adults,” Emily Bamforth, a paleontologist with the nearby Philip J. Currie Dinosaur Museum, said in an interview on the way to the dig site.

She described the horned Pachyrhinosaurus as “the smaller, older cousin of the triceratops.”

“This species of dinosaur is endemic to the Grand Prairie area, so it’s found here and nowhere else in the world. They are … kind of about the size of an Indian elephant and a rhino,” she added.

The head alone, she said, is about the size of a baby elephant.

The discovery was a long time coming.

The bonebed was first discovered by a high school teacher out for a walk about 50 years ago. It took the teacher a decade to get anyone from southern Alberta to come to take a look.

“At the time, sort of in the ’70s and ’80s, paleontology in northern Alberta was virtually unknown,” said Bamforth.

When paleontogists eventually got to the site, Bamforth said, they learned “it’s actually one of the densest dinosaur bonebeds in North America.”

“It contains about 100 to 300 bones per square metre,” she said.

Paleontologists have been at the site sporadically ever since, combing through bones belonging to turtles, dinosaurs and lizards. Sixteen years ago, they discovered a large skull of an approximately 30-year-old Pachyrhinosaurus, which is now at the museum.

About a year ago, they found the second adult: Big Sam.

Bamforth said both dinosaurs are believed to have been the elders in the herd.

“Their distinguishing feature is that, instead of having a horn on their nose like a triceratops, they had this big, bony bump called a boss. And they have big, bony bumps over their eyes as well,” she said.

“It makes them look a little strange. It’s the one dinosaur that if you find it, it’s the only possible thing it can be.”

The genders of the two adults are unknown.

Bamforth said the extraction was difficult because Big Sam was intertwined in a cluster of about 300 other bones.

The skull was found upside down, “as if the animal was lying on its back,” but was well preserved, she said.

She said the excavation process involved putting plaster on the skull and wooden planks around if for stability. From there, it was lifted out — very carefully — with a crane, and was to be shipped on a trolley to the museum for study.

“I have extracted skulls in the past. This is probably the biggest one I’ve ever done though,” said Bamforth.

“It’s pretty exciting.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 25, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

The ancient jar smashed by a 4-year-old is back on display at an Israeli museum after repair

Published

 on

 

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — A rare Bronze-Era jar accidentally smashed by a 4-year-old visiting a museum was back on display Wednesday after restoration experts were able to carefully piece the artifact back together.

Last month, a family from northern Israel was visiting the museum when their youngest son tipped over the jar, which smashed into pieces.

Alex Geller, the boy’s father, said his son — the youngest of three — is exceptionally curious, and that the moment he heard the crash, “please let that not be my child” was the first thought that raced through his head.

The jar has been on display at the Hecht Museum in Haifa for 35 years. It was one of the only containers of its size and from that period still complete when it was discovered.

The Bronze Age jar is one of many artifacts exhibited out in the open, part of the Hecht Museum’s vision of letting visitors explore history without glass barriers, said Inbal Rivlin, the director of the museum, which is associated with Haifa University in northern Israel.

It was likely used to hold wine or oil, and dates back to between 2200 and 1500 B.C.

Rivlin and the museum decided to turn the moment, which captured international attention, into a teaching moment, inviting the Geller family back for a special visit and hands-on activity to illustrate the restoration process.

Rivlin added that the incident provided a welcome distraction from the ongoing war in Gaza. “Well, he’s just a kid. So I think that somehow it touches the heart of the people in Israel and around the world,“ said Rivlin.

Roee Shafir, a restoration expert at the museum, said the repairs would be fairly simple, as the pieces were from a single, complete jar. Archaeologists often face the more daunting task of sifting through piles of shards from multiple objects and trying to piece them together.

Experts used 3D technology, hi-resolution videos, and special glue to painstakingly reconstruct the large jar.

Less than two weeks after it broke, the jar went back on display at the museum. The gluing process left small hairline cracks, and a few pieces are missing, but the jar’s impressive size remains.

The only noticeable difference in the exhibit was a new sign reading “please don’t touch.”

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending