adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

What Impact Would a U.S. Government Shutdown Have on the Economy?

Published

 on

With the U.S. Congress struggling to pass funding bills and appropriations set to lapse on Oct. 1, the federal government could be headed for a shutdown.

So far, Congress has not enacted any of the 12 appropriations bills that make up the discretionary spending budget. The Senate passed a continuing resolution on Tuesday that would temporarily fund the government until Nov. 19, but that legislation faces an uncertain fate in the House of Representatives. DBRS Morningstar does not foresee any immediate credit implications for the United States’ AAA rating. Still, a prolonged shutdown would intensify headwinds for the economy, as well as the chances of a recession.

Not all government spending would be affected by a shutdown. Congress passes annual appropriations acts to fund discretionary spending. In total, these account for 25%-30% of federal expenditure. Mandatory spending—such as Social Security, Medicare, or interest payments—is governed by other laws, and these areas would not be affected by a lapse in appropriations.

A Shutdown Would Disrupt Federal Agencies That Rely on Discretionary Spending

Moreover, not all funding gaps affect the entire discretionary budget. During some previous shutdowns, Congress passed one or more of the 12 appropriations bills, limiting the scope of those shutdowns to just the agencies whose funding had lapsed. In this case, however, Congress has not passed any of the 12 bills, suggesting this could be a full rather than a partial shutdown.

Economic Costs of a Shutdown Would Be Modest – In the Short Term

A shutdown would primarily affect the economy through three channels. First, there is a loss of output due to furloughed federal workers. During shutdowns, a majority of federal workers are deemed “excepted” and therefore continue to work and contribute to economic activity. However, the number of furloughed workers can still be meaningful from a macro perspective. During the full shutdown in 2013, about 850,000 workers were furloughed out of 2.1 million federal employees and an economywide labour force of 155 million. A similar dynamic could materialize if a full shutdown commences next week, with the lost output from furloughed workers likely having a relatively negligible but direct impact on GDP.

Second, a shutdown could adversely affect the economy through delayed payments to firms, contractors, and employees. Businesses may pull back on operations and workers may postpone purchases as they wait for the government to pay for their goods and services. However, these effects would likely be small and temporary. Any postponed spending would likely take place once the government reopens. In addition, federal workers are unlikely to significantly reduce consumption due to delayed salary payments, as they are entitled to back pay once the shutdown ends, regardless of whether they were furloughed.

Third, a shutdown could disrupt the delivery of government services to the private sector. This could include delays in permitting, licensing, and processing federal loans. It could also disrupt the tourism and transport sectors, as passport and visa applications go unprocessed and national parks, museums, and monuments potentially close to the public.

Cost of Shutdown Increases the Longer It Lasts

Overall, a shutdown would disrupt the economy, but the damage would likely be minimal. That said, the cost would increase the longer the shutdown lasts. There have been 20 government funding gaps since 1976, which was when the current budgetary framework was put in place. The average length of a shutdown has been eight days (although this includes funding gaps prior to 1981 that did not lead to a shutdown). The longest shutdown was in 2018-19 and lasted 35 days.

With the Republican Party holding a narrow majority in the House and the Democrats controlling the Senate, a bipartisan agreement is needed to keep the government open. Congress could act quickly to avoid a shutdown by passing the 12 appropriations through omnibus legislation and sending it to President Joe Biden for his signature. Alternatively, congressional leaders may find a way to pass a continuing resolution to extend funding for a short period while negotiations over full-year appropriations continue. However, in that case, the risk of a shutdown may merely be postponed. Finding bipartisanship in today’s polarized political environment could take time.

A shutdown next week would come at a delicate moment for the U.S. The economy continued to perform remarkably well through the summer months. The strength of jobs and retail spending data in July and August suggest headline GDP will likely reflect solid growth in the third quarter. However, a shutdown would add to the mounting headwinds already facing the economy.

These headwinds include the resumption of federal student loan repayments, striking auto workers, and the lagged effects of tight monetary policy. Combined with these pressures, a prolonged shutdown would reinforce our expectations of a marked deceleration in growth over the next two or three quarters and increase the odds of a recession.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending