adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

What Matters: Our economy and the way we live have been changed for good – CNN

Published

 on


A version of this story appeared in CNN’s What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here.
The direct result is that a stupefying number of American workers — nearly 10 million in two weeks — filed for first-time unemployment benefits.
But while it is now agonizingly clear the pandemic outbreak is nowhere near finished, the economic crater being dug to deal with the health crisis seems likely to last even longer and is already much worse than anyone predicted. That means it will be much harder for the government to put back together the economy it took apart in order to save lives.
At the same time, it’s already possible to see how this outbreak will permanently change our lives.
I talked to David Wessel, who is director of the Hutchins Center on Fiscal & Monetary Policy at the Brookings Institution, about exactly how unprecedented all of this is and how we all might go about putting back together a decimated economy. Read more from Brookings on this here.
Our conversation, edited slightly for flow, follows:

Totally unprecedented “kill switch”

ZBW: It seems safe to say there is no precedent for what’s taking place since, rather than fighting a war or dealing with failures in the economic system, the US and other countries intentionally hit the “kill switch” on economic activity. What parallels do you see between this and previous global events?
DW: It’s hard to find a historical precedent. The closest is the 1918 influenza epidemic.
This is like a major war in some respects, but it’s really unusual for the government to hit the “kill switch” and tell everyone to stay home, not go to work or to shop, and to close so many businesses. In wartime, we try to mobilize resources to increase production; this time, we are doing the opposite.
There’s an interesting new paper by some San Francisco Fed economists that compares the long-run economic effects of major deadly pandemics to deadly wars: They note that wars destroy lots of physical capital; pandemics don’t.
And think how different this is from the days following 9/11 when President George W. Bush told us all the patriotic duty was to go shopping; now it’s the opposite.

Moving quickly is key

ZBW: In the Great Recession, the economy dug out for a long period after the housing crisis. But in this case the government has gone to extraordinary lengths almost before the worst of the pandemic has hit. Will that have any effect on how and whether the extraordinary measures by the Fed and the government work?
DW: Answer: Yes!
Both the Fed and Congress moved forcefully and quickly. At least some folks in power learned a few lessons from the Great Recession.
The fiscal and monetary responses are aimed both at cushioning the blows to people hit hard by Covid-19 AND at keeping businesses and other employers on life support so we can more quickly restart the economy when the virus passes.
I have no doubt the recession will be shorter and shallower and the recovery stronger than they would have been without these measures. But we’re still going to have a deep recession, and a lot of people will get hurt economically. And unless all the virus disappears with unanticipated speed, Congress probably will need to do more.

Hoping for a quick bounce back

ZBW: What do you make of the idea that since the economy appeared to be on solid footing and is now dealing with a “force majeure rather than a fundamental problem, that it will bounce back?
DW: Answer: Hope so.
It’s true that the economy was in good shape before the virus hit, and that’s a plus. We’re a lot better off than Europe in that respect.
We don’t yet know, though, how we will re-start the economy — presumably in stages — or whether the virus will return or how much damage we’ve done to the economy’s capacity to produce goods and services.
If a lot of firms go under, if consumers are frightened, if banks are reluctant to lend, if travel and tourism is depressed for a long time, then the recovery could be painfully weak.

This will change the way we live

ZBW: What’s your best guess as to what the US economy look like on the other side of this? Will this lead to permanent changes in the way Americans interact, work and trade.
DW: Answer: Good question, hard to answer.
We’ll surely — I hope — be investing more in public health after this. I suspect that the expansion of tele-medicine will last beyond the Covid-19 crisis.
More people may work from home with implications for transit systems and office space.
We may find that virtual conferences are a reasonably good substitute for in-person meetings and travel less often.
And perhaps this’ll show us the pros (and cons) of online education.
One thing seems likely: interest rates will be very low for a long time. That’s bad for savers, good for borrowers.
Will people save money for retirement and save differently, given the declines in their 401(k) plans?
We’ll surely be re-examining the wisdom of importing so much from abroad, and will probably be sure we are producing more health care gear here at home.
I think a really big question is whether we emerge from this with more sense of common purpose — of helping each other — or with even more xenophobia and hostility to immigrants and foreigners than we had before.
We all thought life would never be the same after 9/11, and in some respects, it isn’t. We all had to get used to TSA screening at the airports. But New York City didn’t wither, as some predicted. And until Covid-19 hit, I didn’t sense any widespread anxiety about terrorism (other than the cyber kind) that changed the way we live.

Worse by far than the Great Recession

ZBW: Around 10 million Americans have filed a first unemployment claim in the past two weeks. How should we all view these staggering figures in the weeks ahead?
DW: Answer: Staggering is the right word.
We’ve never seen anything like this before. More people have filed for unemployment claims in the last two weeks than in the first six months of the Great Recession. It’s an indication of just how abruptly we shut down the economy and how widespread the pain.
The good news, if there is any, is that 6.6 million people managed to file claims despite all the reports of crashing computer systems and long waits on phone lines at state unemployment offices.
And it underscores the importance of the the expansions of the unemployment insurance safety net that Congress just approved — more workers eligible and $600/week extra in every check. This will help millions of people get through this awful period, and will reduce the depth of the Covid-19 recession.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

IMF's Georgieva warns "there's plenty to worry about'' in world economy — including inflation, debt – Yahoo Canada Finance

Published

 on


WASHINGTON (AP) — The head of the International Monetary Fund said Thursday that the world economy has proven surprisingly resilient in the face of higher interest rates and the shock of war in Ukraine and Gaza, but “there is plenty to worry about,” including stubborn inflation and rising levels of government debt.

Inflation is down but not gone,” Kristalina Georgieva told reporters at the spring meeting of the IMF and its sister organization, the World Bank. In the United States, she said, “the flipside” of unexpectedly strong economic growth is that it ”taking longer than expected” to bring inflation down.

Georgieva also warned that government debts are growing around the world. Last year, they ticked up to 93% of global economic output — up from 84% in 2019 before the response to the COVID-19 pandemic pushed governments to spend more to provide healthcare and economic assistance. She urged countries to more efficiently collect taxes and spend public money. “In a world where the crises keep coming, countries must urgently build fiscal resilience to be prepared for the next shock,” she said.

300x250x1

On Tuesday, the IMF said it expects to the global economy to grow 3.2% this year, a modest upgrade from the forecast it made in January and unchanged from 2023. It also expects a third straight year of 3.2% growth in 2025.

ADVERTISEMENT

The world economy has proven unexpectedly sturdy, but it remains weak by historical standards: Global growth averaged 3.8% from 2000 to 2019.

One reason for sluggish global growth, Georgieva said, is disappointing improvement in productivity. She said that countries had not found ways to most efficiently match workers and technology and that years of low interest rates — that only ended after inflation picked up in 2021 — had allowed “firms that were not competitive to stay afloat.”

She also cited in many countries an aging “labor force that doesn’t bring the dynamism” needed for faster economic growth.

The United States has been an exception to the weak productivity gains over the past year. Compared to Europe, Georgieva said, America makes it easier for businesses to bring innovations to the marketplace and has lower energy costs.

She said countries could help their economies by slashing bureaucratic red tape and getting more women into the job market.

Paul Wiseman, The Associated Press

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Nigeria’s Economy, Once Africa’s Biggest, Slips to Fourth Place – BNN Bloomberg

Published

 on


(Bloomberg) — Nigeria’s economy, which ranked as Africa’s largest in 2022, is set to slip to fourth place this year and Egypt, which held the top position in 2023, is projected to fall to second behind South Africa after a series of currency devaluations, International Monetary Fund forecasts show.

The IMF’s World Economic Outlook estimates Nigeria’s gross domestic product at $253 billion based on current prices this year, lagging energy-rich Algeria at $267 billion, Egypt at $348 billion and South Africa at $373 billion. 

Africa’s most industrialized nation will remain the continent’s largest economy until Egypt reclaims the mantle in 2027, while Nigeria is expected to remain in fourth place for years to come, the data released this week shows.   

300x250x1

Nigeria and Egypt’s fortunes have dimmed as they deal with high inflation and a plunge in their currencies.

Bola Tinubu has announced significant policy reforms since he became Nigeria’s president at the end of May 2023, including allowing the currency to float more freely, scrapping costly energy and gasoline subsidies and taking steps to address dollar shortages. Despite a recent rebound, the naira is still 50% weaker against the greenback than what it was prior to him taking office after two currency devaluations.

Read More: Why Nigeria’s Currency Rebounded and What It Means: QuickTake

Egypt, one of the emerging world’s most-indebted countries and the IMF’s second-biggest borrower after Argentina, has also allowed its currency to float, triggering an almost 40% plunge in the pound’s value against the dollar last month to attract investment.

The IMF had been calling for a flexible currency regime for many months and the multilateral lender rewarded Egypt’s government by almost tripling the size of a loan program first approved in 2022 to $8 billion. This was a catalyst for a further influx of around $14 billion in financial support from the European Union and the World Bank. 

Read More: Egypt Avoided an Economic Meltdown. What Next?: QuickTake

Unlike Nigeria’s naira and Egypt’s pound, the value of South Africa’s rand has long been set in the financial markets and it has lost about 4% of its value against the dollar this year. Its economy is expected to benefit from improvements to its energy supply and plans to tackle logistic bottlenecks.

Algeria, an OPEC+ member has been benefiting from high oil and gas prices caused first by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and now tensions in the Middle East. It stepped in to ease some of Europe’s gas woes after Russia curtailed supplies amid its war in Ukraine. 

©2024 Bloomberg L.P.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Limiting Global Warming to 1.5C Would Avoid Two-Thirds of Economic Toll – Bloomberg

Published

 on


Climate inaction will depress the world’s economy more than previously estimated, according to a new study that takes into account the impacts of weather extremes and variability such as temperature spikes and intense rainfall.

A scenario in which global temperatures rise 3C on average will reduce the world’s gross domestic product by about 10%, doctoral researcher Paul Waidelich of ETH Zurich and colleagues write, with less developed countries paying the worst toll. By comparison, limiting global warming by 2050 to 1.5C — as sought by the Paris Agreement — will reduce that impact by about two-thirds.

Adblock test (Why?)

300x250x1

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending