adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Economy

Why The Biden Pandemic Stimulus Bill Won’t Help The Economy – Forbes

Published

 on


President Biden’s proposed stimulus/relief bill won’t help the economy, though it may help some at the expense of others. Neither cold logic nor the numbers support the idea that an additional $1.9 trillion of federal spending will provide any impact to the overall economy.

For the logical experiment, begin with the sectors that are sub-par now: leisure and hospitality, which includes restaurants, bars, hotels, theaters, professional sports, museums and so forth. How much federal money would induce my neighbors and me to go out to dinner? Unless our governor is bribed to allow restaurants to re-open, no amount of money will do the trick. That pretty much holds true for all other weak parts of the economy.

In addition to leisure and hospitality, school employment is down, both for public and private education. Many teachers are working remotely thanks to Zoom and other platforms, but the unused buildings don’t need janitors and the cafeterias don’t need cooks and servers. New federal money won’t will get the schools to reopen.

Some weakness occurs in other industries, but mostly that’s attributable to leisure and hospitality and education. Wholesale trade is down, for example, but that sector includes the people who sell paper products to restaurants and schools. Stimulus won’t get those sectors to expand.

That’s the logical story. The numbers reach the same conclusion through a different path, described recently by Larry Summers. Let’s assume that stimulus would get those activities going, or some substitutes. That is, with enough federal stimulus the unemployed waiters, hotel clerks and school janitors would find work elsewhere. How much stimulus would that take? Even that question assumes that everyone were willing to shift quickly, for a temporary new opportunity. But let’s make the assumption.

At the end of 2020, the economy was running about $0.7 trillion per year short of its potential. Potential GDP is a clear concept, though roughly estimated. The concept is how much our country would produce at full employment of people who wanted to work, and full utilization of factories and offices. Full employment does not mean zero unemployment; rather it means that the time it takes someone to find a job is normal. Similarly, it does not assume that every factory is running three shifts, but that they are running at normal pace, accounting for occasional shutdowns for maintenance and upgrades. The actual estimate is soft but unlikely to be grossly wrong.

So we ended 2020 with a $0.7 trillion shortfall from GDP potential. Then at the end of December, Congress passed and President Trump signed $0.9 trillion of stimulus. That happened too late to affect our final GDP report, so it’s all going into 2021. Consider this: a gap of $0.7 trillion was countered with $0.9 trillion of stimulus in December, and now we are considering another $1.9 trillion.

How will that money be spent? Most discussions focused on $1400 checks, Additional payments to unemployed people, state and local governments and for child care round out the large categories. Most people will use the payments to pay down debt and increase their bank balances—which are already very high. In fact, people in poorer zip codes are now spending much more than they spent a year ago, at the economic peak before Covid-related layoffs and lockdowns. There are some individuals in need of relief, but many laid-off workers received extra unemployment insurance payments that boosted their take-home pay above working wages.

If most people tried to spend their stimulus money, we’d all be fighting to purchase the same things. We’re pretty much producing at full capacity for the open part of the economy, such as grocery stores and online gear. Computer chip shortages plague electronics and automobile producers, illustrating the limits of our productive capability.

Eventually, pushing too much money into people’s hands—when productive capacity cannot match the spending—will prove inflationary. Early signs in inflation may show in 2021 and be clearly evident by the end of 2022 and certainly by 2023. At some point government debts come due, so if people have not paid for the stimulus through inflation reducing the value of their assets, then higher tax rates and higher interest rates will take a toll on the public.

The bottom line for the economy with the stimulus bill is no noticeable change in total spending, production and employment until Covid dies out, and then too many dollars chasing too few goods and services.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending