adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Business

Banking regulator says pandemic uncertainty means now is not the time to consider higher dividends, share buybacks

Published

 on

Bank buildings at Toronto’s financial district on Sept. 3, 2020.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

Canada’s banking regulator will not yet consider lifting restrictions on banks’ dividends and share buybacks introduced at the start of the pandemic, even though the largest lenders continue to amass growing stockpiles of surplus capital.

As parts of the country move into deeper phases of lockdown, Jeremy Rudin, the head of the regulator, said he is waiting to see “a clear path to a durable recovery” and less “economic uncertainty” before considering any changes.

Since March, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) has told banks to not increase quarterly dividend payments or total executive pay, or buy back stock from investors, in order to preserve capital to absorb shocks from the coronavirus pandemic. That is a major reason why capital reserves have grown by billions of dollars at each of Canada’s big banks since then.

Even with no end to the restrictions in sight, bank CEOs are starting to look for opportunities to spend some of that excess cash. But for now, their hands are still partly tied, as the public-health outlook appears set to worsen before it gets better.

300x250x1

“The fact that lockdowns of indefinite duration and uncertain severity are spreading across the country really means that we’re moving away from the situation of reduced uncertainty that we’ll be looking for, rather than towards it,” Mr. Rudin of OSFI said at a conference hosted by Royal Bank of Canada on Monday.

At the same conference, the chief executives of several banks expressed growing optimism about economic recovery in the latter half of their fiscal year, which ends Oct. 31. Each acknowledged there will be tough months to come, but most predicted a pickup in consumer confidence and business investment as federally led vaccination programs start to curb some of the worst outbreaks of the novel coronavirus.

Royal Bank of Canada CEO Dave McKay estimated that between four million and 4.5 million high-risk Canadians need to be vaccinated before the national economy can start to reopen in earnest. If enough doses of the vaccine are available, “we could achieve that in 100 days,” he said.

Bank of Montreal CEO Darryl White said he is “pretty bullish” on the outlook for the back half of 2021. “You have to kind of think about two time frames. Over the next two to four months, we’re going to witness the race between the vaccine and the virus, and it’ll be a difficult race,” he said. “Beyond that, my confidence just continues to increase.”

Mr. White predicts that global economic growth could rebound to 5 per cent or 5.5 per cent in 2021, and that Canada and the U.S. may not be far behind, with gross domestic product (GDP) projected to rise 4.5 per cent to 5 per cent this year. The big question for 2022 would be whether that rate of growth can be sustained, he said, estimating it could settle between 3 per cent and 4 per cent.

Victor Dodig, the CEO of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, was slightly more measured as his bank’s economists are forecasting GDP growth “in the 4-per-cent range in both markets.”

Story continues below advertisement

A bounce back in economic growth could unleash spending and demand for new loans that have been in short supply through the pandemic. Many households and businesses have curbed spending, stashed away savings and paid down debt, helped by massive amounts of government stimulus. As a results, banks have had a harder time deploying the surplus cash sitting on their balance sheets to earn new revenue, and that has dragged profits lower.

A surge in demand for mortgages has been a notable exception, as a sudden shift to remote work created a spike in demand for homes with more space – often outside major urban centres – that has continued so far this year. But those home loans generate lower profit margins for banks than credit cards or commercial lending.

The result, compounded by OSFI’s restrictions preventing banks from returning more capital to shareholders, is that lenders are generating more capital than they can use. On Monday, bank CEOs sketched out varying strategies to put those funds to use.

Three of the Big Six banks have signalled their willingness to pursue mergers and acquisitions. Toronto-Dominion Bank is often cited as the most likely candidate, and CEO Bharat Masrani said Monday that the bank has a track record of taking advantage of major downturns to make large deals. “If something makes sense … would we look at it? Yes, we would,” he said. “I expect something will show up given the level of dislocations that have taken place. But that does not necessarily mean that we’ll do the deal.”

Mr. White and Mr. McKay both said they would consider making a deal to get stronger outside their core footprints in the United States – BMO is strongest in the Midwest, and RBC in California and New York. But both CEOs also said they will invest first in their existing businesses. “We don’t feel a compulsion to transact,” Mr. White said.

Bank of Nova Scotia has shown little appetite for more deals after buying and selling a number of businesses in recent years. But its leaders are keen to return capital to shareholders. “I’ve been very clear, when the regulator gives us the green flag, the next day we’ll be out buying our stock back,” CEO Brian Porter said. “We think our stock is inexpensive.”

With OSFI showing no sign of budging on shareholder payouts in the near term, however, investors may have to be patient. “I don’t expect that that will change until the back half of this year,” Mr. Dodig said. “So we kind of live with that.”

 

 

Source: – The Globe and Mail

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Tesla Promises Cheap EVs by 2025 | OilPrice.com – OilPrice.com

Published

 on



Tesla Promises Cheap EVs by 2025 | OilPrice.com



300x250x1


Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Related News

Tesla

Tesla has promised to start selling cheaper models next year, days after a Reuters report revealed that the company had shelved its plans for an all-new Tesla that would cost only $25,000.

The news that Tesla was scrapping the Model 2 came amid a drop in sales and profits, and a decision to slash a tenth of the company’s global workforce. Reuters also noted increased competition from Chinese EV makers.

Tesla’s deliveries slumped in the first quarter for the first annual drop since the start of the pandemic in 2020, missing analyst forecasts by a mile in a sign that even price cuts haven’t been able to stave off an increasingly heated competition on the EV market.

Profits dropped by 50%, disappointing investors and leading to a slump in the company’s share prices, which made any good news urgently needed. Tesla delivered: it said it would bring forward the date for the release of new, lower-cost models. These would be produced on its existing platform and rolled out in the second half of 2025, per the BBC.

Reuters cited the company as warning that this change of plans could “result in achieving less cost reduction than previously expected,” however. This suggests the price tag of the new models is unlikely to be as small as the $25,000 promised for the Model 2.

The decision is based on a substantially reduced risk appetite in Tesla’s management, likely affected by the recent financial results and the intensifying competition with Chinese EV makers. Shelving the Model 2 and opting instead for cars to be produced on existing manufacturing lines is the safer move in these “uncertain times”, per the company.

Tesla is also cutting prices, as many other EV makers are doing amid a palpable decline in sales in key markets such as Europe, where the phaseout of subsidies has hit demand for EVs seriously. The cut is of about $2,000 on all models that Tesla currently sells.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Related posts

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Why the Bank of Canada decided to hold interest rates in April – Financial Post

Published

 on


Article content

Divisions within the Bank of Canada over the timing of a much-anticipated cut to its key overnight interest rate stem from concerns of some members of the central bank’s governing council that progress on taming inflation could stall in the face of stronger domestic demand — or even pick up again in the event of “new surprises.”

“Some members emphasized that, with the economy performing well, the risk had diminished that restrictive monetary policy would slow the economy more than necessary to return inflation to target,” according to a summary of deliberations for the April 10 rate decision that were published Wednesday. “They felt more reassurance was needed to reduce the risk that the downward progress on core inflation would stall, and to avoid jeopardizing the progress made thus far.”

Article content

300x250x1

Others argued that there were additional risks from keeping monetary policy too tight in light of progress already made to tame inflation, which had come down “significantly” across most goods and services.

Some pointed out that the distribution of inflation rates across components of the consumer price index had approached normal, despite outsized price increases and decreases in certain components.

“Coupled with indicators that the economy was in excess supply and with a base case projection showing the output gap starting to close only next year, they felt there was a risk of keeping monetary policy more restrictive than needed.”

In the end, though, the central bankers agreed to hold the rate at five per cent because inflation remained too high and there were still upside risks to the outlook, albeit “less acute” than in the past couple of years.

Despite the “diversity of views” about when conditions will warrant cutting the interest rate, central bank officials agreed that monetary policy easing would probably be gradual, given risks to the outlook and the slow path for returning inflation to target, according to the summary of deliberations.

Article content

They considered a number of potential risks to the outlook for economic growth and inflation, including housing and immigration, according to summary of deliberations.

The central bankers discussed the risk that housing market activity could accelerate and further boost shelter prices and acknowledged that easing monetary policy could increase the likelihood of this risk materializing. They concluded that their focus on measures such as CPI-trim, which strips out extreme movements in price changes, allowed them to effectively look through mortgage interest costs while capturing other shelter prices such as rent that are more reflective of supply and demand in housing.

Recommended from Editorial

  1. Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem during a news conference in Ottawa.

    BoC ‘committed to finishing the job’ on inflation:‘ Macklem

  2. Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem at a press conference in Ottawa.

    Time for Macklem to turn before it’s too late

  3. Canada's inflation rate picked up slightly in March, but the consumer price index (CPI) release suggested that core inflation continued to slow.

    ‘Welcome news’ on inflation raises odds of rate cut

They also agreed to keep a close eye on immigration in the coming quarters due to uncertainty around recent announcements by the federal government.

“The projection incorporated continued strong population growth in the first half of 2024 followed by much softer growth, in line with the federal government’s target for reducing the share of non-permanent residents,” the summary said. “But details of how these plans will be implemented had not been announced. Governing council recognized that there was some uncertainty about future population growth and agreed it would be important to update the population forecast each quarter.”

• Email: bshecter@nationalpost.com

Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the business news you need to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.

Share this article in your social network

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Meta shares sink after it reveals spending plans – BBC.com

Published

 on


Woman looks at phone in front of Facebook image - stock shot.

Shares in US tech giant Meta have sunk in US after-hours trading despite better-than-expected earnings.

The Facebook and Instagram owner said expenses would be higher this year as it spends heavily on artificial intelligence (AI).

Its shares fell more than 15% after it said it expected to spend billions of dollars more than it had previously predicted in 2024.

300x250x1

Meta has been updating its ad-buying products with AI tools to boost earnings growth.

It has also been introducing more AI features on its social media platforms such as chat assistants.

The firm said it now expected to spend between $35bn and $40bn, (£28bn-32bn) in 2024, up from an earlier prediction of $30-$37bn.

Its shares fell despite it beating expectations on its earnings.

First quarter revenue rose 27% to $36.46bn, while analysts had expected earnings of $36.16bn.

Sophie Lund-Yates, lead equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said its spending plans were “aggressive”.

She said Meta’s “substantial investment” in AI has helped it get people to spend time on its platforms, so advertisers are willing to spend more money “in a time when digital advertising uncertainty remains rife”.

More than 50 countries are due to have elections this year, she said, “which hugely increases uncertainty” and can spook advertisers.

She added that Meta’s “fortunes are probably also being bolstered by TikTok’s uncertain future in the US”.

Meta’s rival has said it will fight an “unconstitutional” law that could result in TikTok being sold or banned in the US.

President Biden has signed into law a bill which gives the social media platform’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, nine months to sell off the app or it will be blocked in the US.

Ms Lund-Yates said that “looking further ahead, the biggest risk [for Meta] remains regulatory”.

Last year, Meta was fined €1.2bn (£1bn) by Ireland’s data authorities for mishandling people’s data when transferring it between Europe and the US.

And in February of this year, Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg faced blistering criticism from US lawmakers and was pushed to apologise to families of victims of child sexual exploitation.

Ms Lund-Yates added that the firm has “more than enough resources to throw at legal challenges, but that doesn’t rule out the risks of ups and downs in market sentiment”.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending