Connect with us

Science

Earth's Magnetic North Pole Keeps Moving Towards Siberia at a Mysteriously Fast Pace – ScienceAlert

Published

 on


Our planet is restless, and its poles are wandering. Of course, the geographic north pole is in the same place it always was, but its magnetic counterpart – indicated by the N on any compass – is roaming towards Siberia at record-breaking speeds that scientists don’t fully comprehend.

It’s worth stating that while the pace is remarkable, the movement itself isn’t. The magnetic north pole is never truly stationary, owing to fluctuations in the flow of molten iron within the core of our planet, which affect how Earth’s magnetic field behaves.

“Since its first formal discovery in 1831, the north magnetic pole has travelled around 1,400 miles (2,250 km),” the NOAA’s National Centres for Environmental Information (NCEI) explains on its website.

“This wandering has been generally quite slow, allowing scientists to keep track of its position fairly easily.”

That slow wander has quickened of late. In recent decades, the magnetic north pole accelerated to an average speed of 55 kilometres (34 miles) per year.

The most recent data suggest its movement towards Russia may have slowed down to about 40 kilometres (25 miles) annually, but even so, compared to theoretical measurements going back hundreds of years, this is a phenomenon scientists have never witnessed before.

“The movement since the 1990s is much faster than at any time for at least four centuries,” geomagnetic specialist Ciaran Beggan from the British Geological Survey (BGS) told FT.

“We really don’t know much about the changes in the core that’s driving it.”

While researchers can’t fully explain the core fluctuations affecting the north pole’s extreme restlessness, they can map Earth’s magnetic field and calculate its rate of change over time, which helps us to predict how it may be distributed in the future.

(NOAA NCEI/CIRES)

That system produces what is called the World Magnetic Model (WMM): a representation of the field that powers everything from navigational tools like GPS to mapping services and consumer compass apps, not to mention systems used by NASA, the FAA, and the military, among other institutions.

Despite is importance, the WMM’s powers of foresight – like the magnetic north pole itself – are not set in stone, and the readings need to be updated every five years to keep the model accurate.

“Provided that suitable satellite magnetic observations are available, the prediction of the WMM is highly accurate on its release date and then subsequently deteriorates towards the end of the five-year epoch, when it has to be updated with revised values of the model coefficients,” the NCEI explains.

That’s the point we’re up to now, with the bodies that maintain the WMM – the NCEI and the BGS – having finally updated the model last week.

The refresh actually comes a whole year ahead of schedule due to the unusual speed with which the magnetic north pole has been drifting, meaning that the WMM’s predictions have deteriorated faster than usual this cycle, despite the recent slowdown.

While the speed fluctuations seem crazy, it’s actually a more moderate range of pole movement than has happened in Earth’s history: when the magnetic poles move far enough out of position, they can actually flip, something that happens every few hundreds of thousands of years.

There’s no telling for sure when that might happen next, but if and when it does happens, it could have serious implications for humanity.

In the meantime, the new WMM data is good until 2025, and rest assured, no imminent flipping is predicted for now.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Science

A new Cretaceous thyreophoran from Patagonia supports a South American lineage of armoured dinosaurs | Scientific Reports – Nature.com

Published

 on


Abstract

The early evolution of thyreophoran dinosaurs is thought to have occurred primarily in northern continents since most evidence comes from the Lower and Middle Jurassic of Europe and North America. The diversification into stegosaurs and ankylosaurs is obscured by a patchy fossil record comprising only a handful of fragmentary fossils, most with uncertain phylogenetic affinities. Here we report the discovery of a new armoured dinosaur from the early Late Cretaceous of Argentina, recovered phylogenetically using various datasets either as a basal thyreophoran or a stem ankylosaur, closely related to Scelidosaurus. It bears unusual anatomical features showing that several traits traditionally associated with the heavy Cretaceous thyreophorans did not occur universally. Jakapil kaniukura gen. et sp. nov. is the first definitive thyreophoran species from the Argentinian Patagonia. Unlike most thyreophorans, it seems to show a bipedal stance, as in Scutellosaurus. Jakapil also shows that early thyreophorans had a much broader geographic distribution than previously thought. It is a member of an ancient basal thyreophoran lineage that survived until the Late Cretaceous in South America.

Introduction

Thyreophora is a clade of ornithischian dinosaurs characterized by the presence of dermal bone armour on their backs1. Although most thyreophorans are grouped within Eurypoda (Ankylosauria + Stegosauria), basal thyreophorans show unresolved phylogenetic placements. Traditionally, they have been recovered as non-eurypodan thyreophorans2,3,4,5. Alternatively, new research suggests them as non-ankylosaurian ankylosauromorphs6 (also suggested by Refs.7,8). The most representative of these forms are Scutellosaurus, Emausaurus and Scelidosaurus, from the Lower Jurassic of the USA, Germany and England, respectively. Scutellosaurus is a small (1.5–2 m body length) and slender thyreophoran with a bipedal life style9 whereas the larger Scelidosaurus (4.5 m body length) is thought to be facultatively bipedal10 (body length has not been confidently estimated for Emausaurus). Both Scutellosaurus and Scelidosaurus represent part of the early locomotor diversity of early ornithischians, with obligate quadrupedality evolving in later and larger ankylosaurs and stegosaurs9.

The fossil record of Thyreophora is mainly known from the northern hemisphere, and its presence in the Gondwanan continents remains poorly known, with only a few ankylosaurian or stegosaurian species, and several indeterminate materials4,11,12,13,14,15.

We present here a new thyreophoran genus and species from the Late Cretaceous of South America. The remains were found near the locality of Cerro Policía within the ‘La Buitrera Paleontological Area’ (LBPA), close to the E. Ramos Mexía Dam, in North Patagonia, Río Negro Province, Argentina. The outcrops exposed in the LBPA represent the upper section of the Candeleros Formation (Cenomanian). They are interpreted as aeolian accumulations of the Kokorkom Desert (a ~ 826 km2 paleoerg16), with shifts between arid and semi-arid climatic conditions17. Most fossils in the LBPA were found between beds of migrating dunes. The new specimen was found as a close association of elements in a small area (~ 1.5 m × 1 m), isolated from any other individual, as generally occurs in the Candeleros Formation in the LBPA. The remains were found disarticulated, and with a slight southwestern-northeastern orientation due to dune transport.

The LBPA comprises a few localities such as La Buitrera, Cerro Policía, La Escondida and El Pueblito. This rich fossiliferous site produces three-dimensional, largely undeformed fossil vertebrates, including theropod dinosaurs18, uruguaysuchid crocodyliforms19, eilenodontine sphenodontians20, limbed snakes21, lizards22, chelid turtles23, dryolestoid mammals24, dipnoans16 and undescribed pterosaurs. Fragmentary sauropod skeletons and dinosaur tracks have also been recorded16. This new thyreophoran discovery from the LBPA provides new information about the structure of the early Late Cretaceous North Patagonian communities and the role of the still poorly known ornithischian component. In addition, this specimen provides new information about the early diversification and distribution of this cosmopolitan group.

Institutional abbreviations

AMNH, American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA; BRSMG: Bristol City Museum, Bristol, England; NHMUK: Natural History Museum, London, England; MNA: Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff, USA; MPCA-PV: Colección de Paleovertebrados, Museo Provincial Carlos Ameghino, Cipolletti, Argentina; ZMNH: Zhejiang Museum of Natural History, Hangzhou, China.

Systematic paleontology

Dinosauria—Owen, 184225,

Ornithischia—Seeley, 188726,

Thyreophora—Nopcsa, 191527,

Jakapil kaniukura gen. et sp. nov. (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, Suppl. Figs. 2, 3).

Figure 1

Holotype of Jakapil kaniukura (MPCA-PV-630), skull bones. (a) Skull bones in right lateral view (dashed contours based on Scelidosaurus10); (b) basisphenoid in left lateral view. af anterior foramen, btp basipterygoid process, bt basal tubera, cp cultriform process, df double foramen, ene external naris edge, jf jugal facet of the maxilla, Mx maxilla, mxe maxillary emargination, Pmx premaxilla, vc Vidian canal, vp ventral process.

Figure 2
figure 2

Holotype of Jakapil kaniukura (MPCA-PV-630), lower jaw bones. (a) left mandible in lateral view; (b) left mandible in lateral view, interpreted bone contours; (c) left mandible in medial view; (d) left mandible in medial view, interpreted bone contours; (e) right surangular in lateral view (mirrored); (f) transversal section of the posterior half of the left mandible, cranial view; (g) articular bone in occlusal view; (h) predentary bone in occlusal view. A angular, af adductor fossa, Ar articular, Ar (gl) glenoid fossa of the articular, ce coronoid eminence, D dentary, de dentary emargination, dfo dentary foramen, dmp dorsomedial process of the articular, dr dentary rugosities, hi subhorizontal inflection (dashed line), imf internal mandibular fenestra, lp lateral process of the predentary, mc Meckelian canal, Pa prearticular, Pd predentary, rp retroarticular process, S surangular, saf surangular facet for the glenoid articulation, safo surangular foramen (canal), Sp splenial, st surangular tubercle, sy mandibular symphysis, vmc ventral mandibular crest.

Figure 3
figure 3

Holotype of Jakapil kaniukura (MPCA-PV-630), teeth. Maxillary teeth in labial (a,b) and lingual (c,d); (d) highlight the wear facet) views; dentary teeth in lingual (e,gj); (h,j) highlight the wear facets) and labial (f) views. dwf dentary tooth wear facet, me prominent mesial edge, mwf maxillary tooth wear facet.

Figure 4
figure 4

Holotype of Jakapil kaniukura (MPCA-PV-630), postcranial bones. Speculative silhouette showing preserved elements (a); osteoderm distribution is speculative and partial to show non-osteodermal elements); dorsal vertebra elements in dorsal (b), right lateral (c) and anterior (d,e) views; sacral vertebra in left lateral view (f); mid-caudal vertebra in left lateral view (g); fragment of the mid-shaft of a dorsal rib in posterior view (the enlarged, broken posterior edge is highlighted (h); expanded distal ends of two dorsal ribs (i); left scapula in lateral view (j); right scapula in lateral view (k); right coracoid in lateral view (l); left and right humeri in anterior view (m); probable right ulna in lateral view (n); metacarpals, non-ungual and ungual phalanx in dorsal views (o); left femur elements in anterior view (p); proximal end of the right fibula in lateral view (q); distal end of the left tibia in anterior view (r); ischial elements in side view (s); cervical osteoderms in dorsal view (t), flat scutes in dorsal view (u), spine-like osteoderm in side view (v) and ossicle in dorsal view (w). ac acromial crest, aco asymmetrical cervical osteoderm, alp anterolateral process, ap acromial process, at anterior trochanter, bb basal bone, ebr expanded broken rib edge, di diapophysis, dpc deltopectoral crest, ft fourth trochanter, gl glenoid, mc metacarpals, nc neural canal, ncs neurocentral suture, ph non-ungual phalanx, pp pubic peduncle, poz postzygapophyses, rug marginal rugosities, sb scapular blade, sc scute, tp transverse process, uph ungual phalanx.

Etymology

The genus, Jakapil (Ja-Kapïl: shield bearer), comes from the ‘gananah iahish’, Puelchean or northern Tehuelchean language. The specific epithet, comprising kaniu (crest) and kura (stone), refers to the diagnostic ventral crest of the mandible, and comes from the Mapudungun language. These languages, currently spoken by more than 200,000 people, have been combined as a tribute to both of the coexisting native populations of North Patagonia, South America.

Holotype

MPCA-PV-630 is a partial skeleton of a subadult individual (see Supplementary Information) that preserves fragments of some cranial bones (premaxilla, maxilla and basisphenoid), approximately 15 partial teeth and fragments, a nearly complete left lower jaw plus an isolated surangular, 12 partial vertebral elements, a complete dorsal rib and fifteen rib fragments, a partial coracoid, a nearly complete left scapula, a partial right scapula, two partial humeri, a possible partial right ulna, a complete and a partial metacarpal bone, three ischial and two femoral fragments, the distal end of a right tibia, the proximal end of a right fibula, three pedal phalanges, and more than forty osteoderms.

Referred specimens

MPCA-PV-371, two partial conical osteoderms.

Locality and horizon

Upper beds of the Candeleros Formation, early Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian, ~ 94–97 My, see16, and references therein), locality of Cerro Policía, Río Negro Province, North Patagonia, Argentina (Suppl. Fig. 1).

Diagnosis

Jakapil differs from all other thyreophorans in having: a large, ventral crest on the posterior half of the lower jaw, which is composed of the dentary, the angular and the splenial (medially hidden by the crest); a dorsomedially directed process in the short retroarticular process; leaf-shaped tooth crowns with a prominent mesial edge on their labial surface; maxillary and dentary tooth crowns differ from each other in their apical contour, the former being pointed and strongly asymmetrical, and the latter slightly curved distally with a more rounded and less asymmetrical contour; elongated (articular surface almost or completely beyond the posterior centrum face) and slender (width of less than a half postzygapophyses length) postzygapophyses in dorsal vertebrae; a strongly reduced humerus relative to the femur (proximal humeral width smaller than distal femoral width, see Supplementary Information), with a deep proximal fossa distally delimited by a curved ridge; a very large fibula relative to the femur (anteroposterior length of the proximal end almost comparable to the distal width of the femur); flattened and thin disk-like postcranial osteoderms.

Summarized description

A detailed description of the holotype is provided in the Supplementary Information. Jakapil is a small thyreophoran dinosaur (the subadult holotype is estimated to have been less than 1.5 m in body length and to have weighed 4.5–7 kg; see Supplementary Information, femoral description), with several novelties for a thyreophoran dinosaur.

A short skull is suggested by the size of the skull and jaw bones, and the reduced number of dentary tooth positions (eleven), compared with most non-ankylosaurid thyreophorans28,29. The antorbital and mandibular fenestrae seem absent, as in ankylosaurs29 (Fig. 1a; the mandibular fenestra is also absent in Scelidosaurus10). Dentary and maxillary emarginations are present, as usual in ornithischians30 (Fig. 1a). The block-like basisphenoid is strongly similar to that of Scelidosaurus10, with Vidian canals opened posterodorsally to the basipterygoid processes, the basipterygoid processes lateroventrally projected (unlike the anteriorly directed processes of stegosaurs28 and ankylosaurs29), and a strong cultriform process (as in Lesothosaurus31, Thescelosaurus32 and probably Scelidosaurus10; Fig. 1b).

Jakapil also bears the first predentary bone (Fig. 2a–d) with a plesiomorphic shape in a thyreophoran. It is subtriangular and quite similar to that of Lesothosaurus31, and externally it is ornamented by sulci and foramina, suggesting the presence of a keratinous beak. A beak is also supported in the edentulous and subtly ornamented preserved part of the premaxilla, as in derived thyreophorans28,29. The posterior half of the short lower jaw (Fig. 2a–f) is strongly dorsoventrally expanded, resembling the general shape of the heterodontosaurid33 and basal ceratopsian jaws34. This expansion is composed of a well-developed coronoid eminence (Fig. 2a–d, ce; similar to that in the stegosaur Huayangosaurus35 and most ankylosaurs36) and a large ventral crest at the dentary-angular contact that is unique among thyreophorans (Fig. 2a–d,f, vmc; resembling that of some ceratopsians, see SI). The dentary symphysis is slightly spout-shaped, as in most ornithischians37. Anteriorly, the dentary oral margin is subhorizontal in lateral view (Fig. 2a–d, D), unlike the strongly downturned line of most thyreophorans30,37. There is no evidence of a mandibular osteoderm as occurs in Scelidosaurus and ankylosaurs10. A surangular tubercle (Fig. 2a, st) adjacent to the glenoid fossa seems anteriorly continued by a subtly developed subhorizontal inflection of the anterior lamina (Fig. 2e, hi), in the position of the surangular ridge (synapomorphy of Thyreophora37), though the first is poorly developed. The glenoid fossa is roughly aligned with the tooth row in lateral view (Fig. 2a–d). The short retroarticular process bears a dorsomedially directed process resembling that of several theropods (Fig. 2g, dmp; see Discussion). This process is absent in all other thyreophorans 9,10,35,36.

The tooth crowns are leaf-shaped as in basal ornithischian and thyreophorans10,28,29,38 (Fig. 3). The tooth crowns are swollen labially at their base and lack both cingulum and ornamentation, unlike those of derived eurypodans28,29, heterodontosaurids33 and most neornithischians30,32. The mesial edge of the labial surface in the maxillary and dentary tooth crowns is prominent as in Scelidosaurus10, and ends distally in a denticle-like structure in Jakapil (Fig. 3, me). This prominent edge delimits anteriorly the wear facets of the dentary teeth. A striking difference with respect to most thyreophorans is that the maxillary and dentary tooth crowns are quite different (see Supplementary Information). The maxillary teeth (Fig. 3a–d) show seven/eight mesial and four distal denticles, a vertical apical denticle, and a straighter mesial denticle row (resembling those of non-ankylosaurid and non-stegosaurid thyreophorans10,35,36). The dentary teeth (Fig. 3e–j) bear seven mesial and five/six distal denticles, and a distally curved apical-most denticle. Also, the mesial denticle row is lingually recurved, as in Huayangosaurus35. Large, high-angled wear facets are present (Fig. 3d,h,j; dwf and mwf).

The axial elements are similar to those of Scelidosaurus39 (Fig. 4). The posterior articular surface of an isolated cervical centrum is flattened and seems almost as wide as high. A large foramen is placed just posteroventral to the parapophysis. The dorsal centra are cylindrical and elongated, with subcircular articular surfaces, and are biconcave (Fig. 4c,e). The neural arch is low but the neural canal is larger (Fig. 4d,e, nc). A dorsal neurocentral suture is visible (Fig. 4c, ncs). The diapophyses are laterodorsally directed almost 40° from the horizontal (Fig. 4d, di), at a lower angle than in stegosaurs28 and most ankylosaurs29, unlike the horizontal processes of basal ornithischians38. The postzygapophyses are medially fused in a slender (width of less than a half postzygapophyses length) and strongly elongated posteriorly structure (Fig. 4b, poz; more than in some ankylosaurs, such as Euoplocephalus and Polacanthus; see40,41). An isolated mid-caudal vertebra shows an equidimensional centrum in lateral view, with concave, oval articular surfaces (Fig. 4g). Transverse processes are very small and button-like (Fig. 4g, tp). Postzygapophyses are medially fused and do not extend beyond the centrum edge (Fig. 4g, poz). Proximally, the cross-section of the dorsal ribs is T-shaped. The low curvature of the shaft suggests a wide torso, as occurs in Emausaurus42, Scelidosaurus39, and ankylosaurs29. Some rib fragments with expanded (though broken) posterior edges suggest the presence of intercostal bones (Fig. 4h, ebr), as in Scelidosaurus39, Huayangosaurus43,44, some ankylosaurids45 (and references therein) and some basal ornithopods46. Some ribs are distally expanded (Fig. 4i) like the anterior dorsal ribs of Scelidosaurus39 and Huayangosaurus43.

Girdle and limb bones (see also Suppl. Figs. 2, 3) are mostly broken and with boreholes (probably due to bioerosion) at their ends. The scapular blade (Fig. 4j, sb) is elongated and parallel-sided, without distal expansion, an overall shape that resembles that of several theropods47, contrasting the distally expanded condition in most ornithischians30. A straight and parallel sided scapular blade is common in ankylosaurids29,40. The proximal scapular plate with a high acromial process (Fig. 4j,k, ap) is stegosaurian-like, and the lateral acromial crest (Fig. 4j,k, ac) is developed as in Huayangosaurus43. A low distinct ridge rises posterior to the glenoid fossa and represents the insertion site for the muscle triceps longus caudalis, as occur in ankylosaurids 40. The incomplete coracoid (Fig. 4l) is much shorter than the scapula, unlike that of ankylosaurs29,40, which bear a large coracoid. The coracoid and the scapula are not fused. The partial humeri (Fig. 3m) are strongly reduced in size, with overall limb proportions resembling those of basal ornithischians3,38 and several theropods47. A possible proximal end of the ulna (Fig. 4n) resembles that of other basal ornithischians, though more strongly laterally compressed. The anterolateral process is present (Fig. 4n, alp), and the olecranon process seems absent or poorly developed, as in Scutellosaurus9 and Scelidosaurus39. The ischia are poorly preserved (Fig. 4s). The pubic peduncle is separated from the iliac articulation, unlike the continuous cup-shaped structure of most ankylosaurs29. The shaft of the ischium is straight and parallel-edged, as in Scutellosaurus9 and Scelidosaurus39, and distally tapers as in stegosaurs28. The preserved femoral pieces (Fig. 4p) resemble those of basal ornithischians38,39. The bases of both the broken anterior and fourth trochanters (Fig. 4p, at, ft) are large, suggesting large elements; the fourth trochanter is proximally placed on the femoral shaft (near the height of the base of the anterior trochanter); and the distal end of the femur is slightly curved posteriorly. The proximal end of the right fibula (Fig. 4q) is much larger than that of all other thyreophorans (compared with both the femoral and tibial distal ends) and bears a large anterior curved crest. The block-like non-ungual phalanges and a bluntly pointed hoof-like ungual (Fig. 4o, ph, uph) are similar to those of Scelidosaurus39.

At least five osteoderm types are preserved in the holotype of Jakapil. The cervical elements are composed of an external, low-crested scute (Fig. 4t, sc) over a fused, smooth bone base (Fig. 4t, bb), as in Scelidosaurus48 and several ankylosaurs2,49. A probable cervical element is also composed of a concave base of smooth bone fused to a high, asymmetrical osteoderm (Fig. 4t, aco). The bases of these dermal elements present strong rugosities at one edge, suggesting a sutural contact between (Fig. 4t, rug), as in Scelidosaurus48 and some ankylosaurs (such as Pinacosaurus and Scolosaurus40,49,50). Scute-like post-cervical osteoderms (Fig. 4u) are strongly flattened, disk-shaped, and suboval with a very low crest, resembling those of few ankylosaurs such as Gastonia and Gargoyleosaurus51 (‘body osteoderms’ sensu Kinneer et al.52; see also49). Only one scute shows a high triangular cross-section like those of Scelidosaurus48. Also present are a few conical, spike-like osteoderms with deep concave bases (Fig. 4v), and many flat, disk-shaped, minute (7–10 mm) ossicles without crests (Fig. 4w).

Phylogeny

The phylogenetic analysis using the matrix of Soto-Acuña et al.5 recovers Jakapil within Thyreophora, as the sister taxon of Ankylosauria (Fig. 5). The branch support for the basal thyreophorans is considerably lower than that obtained by Soto-Acuña et al.5, although the support of Stegosauria and some less inclusive eurypodan clades is slightly better (ceratopsians and pachycephalosaurs also show a lower support). The Jakapil autapomorphies in this analysis are: ventrally orientated basipterygoid processes (char. 134; shared with Agilisaurus, Hypsilophodon, Zalmoxes, Tenontosaurus, Dryosaurus, Liaoceratops, Yamaceratops, Leptoceratops, Bagaceratops and Protoceratops); lateral orientation of the basipterygoid process articular facet (char. 136; shared with Homalocephale, Prenocephale, Stegoceras and Yinlong); a straight dentary tooth row in lateral view (char. 166; shared with the ornithischians Lesothosaurus, Eocursor, Scutellosaurus, Pinacosaurus, Euoplocephalus, heterodontosaurids and neornithischians); the presence of a ventral flange on the dentary (char. 170; shared with Psittacosaurus, Yamaceratops and Protoceratops); a well-developed coronoid process (char. 174; shared with heterodontosaurids and neornithischians); a surangular length of more than 50% the mandibular length (char. 183; shared with Stegoceras, Psittacosaurus, Yinlong, Chaoyangsaurus and Hualianceratops); less than 15 dentary teeth (char. 204; shared with heterodontosaurids, Gasparinisaura, Hypsilophodon, Wannanosaurus, Tenontosaurus, Dryosaurus and ceratopsians); apicobasally tall and blade-like cheek teeth crowns (char. 205; shared with Laquintasaura, Psittacosaurus, Yinlong, Chaoyangsaurus and Hualianceratops). Alternative phylogenetic analyses using the data matrices of Maidment et al.4, Norman6 and Wiersma and Irmis8 recover Jakapil as the sister taxon of Eurypoda (Stegosauria + Ankylosauria) and as a basal ankylosaur, respectively (see Supplementary Information). Being recovered either as an ankylosauromorph or a stem-eurypodan, Jakapil is closely related to Scelidosaurus in all analyses. Detailed phylogenetic results and discussion are provided in the Supplementary Information.

Figure 5
figure 5

Time-calibrated strict consensus of 26,784 most parsimonious trees (L = 1267) with the Soto-Acuña et al.5 matrix. CI 0.359, RI: 0.708. Branch supports are figured (Bremer/bootstrap). Record ages references are listed in the Supplementary Information (Suppl. Fig. 4).

A novel thyreophoran anatomy

The discovery of Jakapil in the Cenomanian of Argentina shows a completely new thyreophoran lineage for the Southern Hemisphere. The new taxon shares many features with basal ornithischians and thyreophorans (even with ankylosaurids, see Supplementary Information), but also bears several novelties. The relatively short mandible of Jakapil (Fig. 2a–d), with a large adductor fossa, extensively ornamented surangular, and a well-developed coronoid eminence (even higher than that of Scelidosaurus), resembles that of heterodontosaurids33 and basal ceratopsians34, suggesting a quite strong bite for a thyreophoran36,53. The wear facets of Jakapil (Fig. 3, dwf, mwf) indicate dental occlusion; they are larger than those of most basal thyreophorans and stegosaurs, resembling those of the adult lectotype of Scelidosaurus10, ankylosaurs, ceratopsids and hadrosaurids36,54. Scelidosaurus shows a patched arrangement of wear along the tooth rows10. In Jakapil, the wear on functional cheek teeth is large and high angled, and seems largely distributed along the tooth rows, from the anteriormost teeth backward, as in heterodontosaurids and cerapodans33,54. On the whole, it is probable that Jakapil had a masticatory system that was more efficient than the early thyreophorans in processing vegetation. The en echelon arrangement of tooth crowns suggests a mainly orthal motion for chewing, as in most thyreophorans6,36,53 (and references therein). In Scelidosaurus and other thyreophorans, the ventrally curved tooth row allows a ‘scissor’ effect of the anteriormost teeth10. By contrast, the straight, narrow snout of Jakapil suggests a different feeding strategy, not cutting leaves but selecting elements that require harder processing36. Thus, Jakapil expands the record of herbivorous vertebrates from the Kokorkom paleodesert, complementing this trophic level that contains the lepidosaur Priosphenodon20.

The predentary bone is the first known for a basal thyreophoran. Despite the variably complete lower jaws in Scutellosaurus9, Emausaurus42, Scelidosaurus10, “Tatisaurus55 and “Bienosaurus56, a predentary bone is absent. Norman10 suggested that this may be cartilaginous in Scelidosaurus. The presence of an ossified predentary bone in Jakapil contrasts with that hypothesis. Its plesiomorphic morphology mainly resembles that of the basal ornithischian Lesothosaurus31. It also shows some similarities with the predentary of stegosaurs35 and is very unlike the broad predentary of ankylosaurs29, suggesting a more selective food strategy36. Several features of the predentary, such as the large ventral process, are shared with some basal ceratopsians34. However, this process is usually very robust and proportionally larger that the lateral processes in basal ceratopsians when comparing with Jakapil.

The presence of a dorsomedial process in the articular (Fig. 2c,d,g, dmp) is a new component in a thyreophoran jaw. Some ankylosaurids bear a medial shelf of the glenoid formed by a medial expansion of the articular36. In Jakapil, the glenoid fossa is not medially extended, and the pointed dorsomedial process arises from the retroarticular process. A rather similar process is present in various coelurosaurian theropods, such as dromaeosaurids57, Tyrannosaurus58, Gobipteryx, and ornithurine birds59. In Neornithes, the dorsomedial process of the articular is more anteriorly placed, medial to the mandibular articulation (F. J. R., pers. obs. based on specimens in the Fundación Azara collection: Bubo, Guira, Pterocnemia and Eudromia; see also60), and receives the pterygoid adductor musculature61. In living crocodilians and lepidosaurs, the pterygoid musculature is usually attached to the posteroventral edge of the mandible (also inferred for non-avian dinosaurs61). However, the presence of a medial process in Jakapil may suggest a new placement of the pterygoid musculature, as in birds. If this were the case, the free ventral crest of the mandible (Fig. 2a–d,f, vmc) could have had an exhibition function, rather than being used as an enlarged musculature attachment. In fact, the rugged texture across the mandibular edge resembles an ornamentation element (as in Scelidosaurus10 and Pinacosaurus29; and references therein) with no obvious muscular scar. Otherwise, the crest may represent an enlargement of the surface for musculature insertion, increasing the efficiency of the chewing process (see above).

The armour of Jakapil is also peculiar. Almost all the recovered osteoderms are extremely low, unlike those of basal thyreophorans (Fig. 4r,s,u). The Morphotype A osteoderms of Scutellosaurus62 are very low and bear a central keel, being roughly similar to the disk-shaped osteoderms of Jakapil (Fig. 4s; although the keel of the osteoderms in the latter is smoother). Larger scutes in Jakapil show twice the radial extension of those of Scutellosaurus. Some ankylosaurs, such as Gastonia52 and Gargoyleosaurus51, bear depressed plate-like osteoderms (with or without a low, sharp keel) resembling those of Jakapil. In Scelidosaurus, the osteoderms develop a strong keel48, much higher than that seen in the Jakapil osteoderms. By contrast, large, high-keeled osteoderms and spikes are rare in Jakapil.

The above-mentioned features appear to be novelties, probably due to the poorly known record of thyreophorans in the Southern Hemisphere4,11,12,13,14,15. Moreover, the mixture of plesiomorphic, stegosaurian and ankylosaurian characters of Jakapil may also suggest a basal phylogenetic placement (outside Eurypoda) for this taxon (contra6). In addition, the incorporation of Jakapil into the data matrices of Soto-Acuña et al.5, Norman6, Maidment et al.4, and Wiersma and Irmis8 generates a general decrease in branch support. This demonstrates that the early diversification of thyreophorans is still poorly understood due to their poor Lower-Middle Jurassic fossil record and the scarcity of Gondwanan material4,11, and may explain the ambiguous phylogenetic placement of Jakapil and the early thyreophorans2,4,6.

Bipedalism in armoured dinosaurs

Regarding locomotion, the evolutionary trends observed in thyreophorans are associated with the transition between small, bipedal species and large or graviportal quadrupedal forms, observed in Ankylosauria and Stegosauria1. The transitional state has been attributed to the facultative quadruped Scelidosaurus39. In Jakapil, the relative dimensions of the forelimb, hind limb, and cranial remains (Fig. 4a) bear a greater resemblance to those of the bipedal theropods47, basal ornithischians38 and heterodontosaurids33 than thyreophorans. Moreover, the elongated, non-expanded scapular blade and the strong reduction in the humeri resemble those of specific theropod clades (e.g., abelisaurids47), and unlike the shorter, distally expanded scapular blade of the fully quadrupedal ornithischians and sauropods.

A comparison of the limb elements of some thyreophorans (Suppl. Fig. 4) shows the strong reduction in size of the humerus in Jakapil. Considering a reconstruction of the elements based on Scelidosaurus (the nearest taxon to Jakapil in all phylogenetic analyses), Scutellosaurus (a basal form) and Jinyunpelta (an ankylosaur), the reduction in size is evident. Despite the incompleteness of the material, we quantified this reduction comparing the proximal humeral (PHW) and the distal femoral widths (DFW; the distal end of the femur in Jakapil was measured in the only well-preserved transversal section, although this is not the most distal). The proximal humeral width/distal femoral width ratio (HFR) is lower in the basal taxa (Jakapil, Scutellosaurus and Scelidosaurus) with respect to the ankylosaurs Jinyunpelta and Euoplocephalus, showing a widening of the humerus in the quadrupedal taxa reaching a comparable width (ratio ~ 1). Such widening in the proximal humeral end is evident in the lack of fit of the Jakapil bones in the Jinyunpelta proportions, also suggesting limb proportions more similar to those of basal forms. Moreover, the incomplete distal end of the femur in Jakapil allows even smaller values of the HFR ratio (and of the humerus size). Also, a shortening of the humerus relative to the femur is present in the obligate quadrupedal Ankylosauria. Regardless of the unknown humeral length, the lack of a robust humerus in Jakapil allows us to reject a fully quadrupedal stance like that of the heavily built ankylosaurs.

In summary, the overall limb dimensions and estimations (with forelimb and olecranon process both reduced63), and the femoral anatomical similarities to the basal ornithischians and thyreophorans39 (e.g., large trochanters and a non-columnar element) suggest a bipedal stance in the specimen. However, the incompleteness of the remains demands caution to define the stance of Jakapil. To make more complex the scenery, Jakapil still retains quadruped-associated features, such as a probable anterolateral process in the ulna, and stout metacarpals63 (and references therein). More complete material is needed to make accurate quantitative comparisons with other taxa and clarify its stance.

Paleobiogeography of early thyreophorans

The Early Jurassic thyreophoran record consists of basal forms known from several continents showing a Pangean distribution. These comprise Scutellosaurus (Hettangian-Toarcian of the USA9), Scelidosaurus (Sinemurian of the UK; see 6,10), Emausaurus (Toarcian of Germany42), ‘Lusitanosaurus’ (Sinemurian of Portugal1), ‘Bienosaurus’, ‘Tatisaurus’ (both from the Hettangian-Sinemurian of China; see55,56) and Yuxisaurus (late Sinemurian-Toarcian64). Some recent papers recover the unarmoured ornithischians Lesothosaurus (Hettangian-Sinemurian of South Africa and Lesotho; see3,31) and Laquintasaura (Hettangian of Venezuela; see3,4,65) as Gondwanan basal members of Thyreophora. However, alternative studies show their phylogenetic position as controversial3,6,65, so they cannot be confidently assigned to Thyreophora.

The extensive distribution of armoured basal thyreophorans (excluding both Lesothosaurus and Laquintasaura) across the northern landmasses during the Early Jurassic shows a rapid diversification after the origin of the clade. However, basal thyreophoran remains from Gondwana known from the Middle Jurassic of Niger66, along with problematic material from the Lower Jurassic (Sinemurian-Pliensbachian) of India (see55,67 and references therein), suggest a more extensive distribution for the early thyreophorans. In addition, the early distribution of stegosaurs and ankylosaurs shows a similar pattern. The presence of the Middle Jurassic basal stegosaur Isaberrysaura from the Bajocian of Argentina68,4 and the stegosaurid Adratiklit from the Bathonian-Callovian of Morocco4 depict a distribution of the early stegosaurs that extends into southern landmasses. The Middle Jurassic thyreophoran fossil record also includes the stegosaur Loricatosaurus from the Callovian of England and France, the ankylosaurs Sarcolestes and ‘Cryptosaurus’ from the Callovian of England, the ankylosaur Spicomellus from the Bathonian-Callovian of Morocco15, the ankylosaur ‘Tianchisaurus’ from the Callovian of China, and indeterminate remains from Europe and Asia (see4,67 and references therein). On the whole, the Pangean distribution of early thyreophorans across the Early-Middle Jurassic makes it difficult to recognize a source area for Thyreophora and the most inclusive clades within it.

In this context, Jakapil not only increases the poor Gondwanan record of thyreophorans, but also establishes a theoretical framework for Gondwanan basal thyreophoran evolution and distribution (Fig. 5). Whether Jakapil is recovered as an ankylosaur or a non-eurypodan thyreophoran, it is closely related to Scelidosaurus (see Supplementary Information). The presence of a basal thyreophoran in the early Late Cretaceous of South America shows that an ancient Gondwanan lineage of early thyreophorans evolved independently from those of the Northern Hemisphere, whose relationships have to be traced during the Early-Middle Jurassic Pangean rupture and the consequent isolation of Gondwana and later South America. Accordingly, early Gondwanan thyreophorans survived a long time after the Pangean breakup, whereas the northern early thyreophorans seem to have gone extinct by the Middle Jurassic. The persistence of a Gondwanan lineage of thyreophorans finds support in new thyreophoran remains recovered from the Lower Cretaceous rocks of the Bajada Colorada Formation (Berriasian-Hauterivian), also from the Argentinian Patagonia (Neuquén Province). These remains are composed of a diversity of osteoderms, showing either a mixture of thyreophorans at the site, or a new, still poorly understood lineage69.

A new lineage of Gondwanan thyreophorans was recently proposed by Soto-Acuña et al.5, Parankylosauria. This clade includes Antarctopelta (Campanian-Maastrichthian of Antarctica), Stegouros (Campanian-Maastrichthian of South America), and the traditionally basal ankylosaur Kunbarrasaurus (Albian-Cenomanian of Australia)5. Despite their extensive Gondwanan distribution during the Cretaceous, anatomical differences with Jakapil are remarkable. Parankylosaurs show ankylosaurian features, like broad ornamented skulls, depressed caudal vertebrae, similar limb proportions, and a columnar femur with both reduced anterior and fourth trochanters (among others), which contrast with the mixture of features of Jakapil. Even more, ankylosaurian features present in Jakapil were recognized as convergent with ankylosaurids within Euankylosauria (e.g., a straight dentary tooth row in lateral view, a small diastema on the dentary, a shallow symphysis, scapular blade shape; see Supplementary Information) rather than with parankylosaurs. Therefore, a close phylogenetic relation between them is unlikely. Until more records contribute to the understanding of Gondwanan thyreophorans, both Jakapil and parankylosaurs belong to two different lineages. This shows that Gondwanan thyreophorans were a diverse clade with morphologically disparity.

On the other hand, further work will help to fill the extensive gap between the early thyreophorans and the Cretaceous remains from South America. Recent research is reflected in an increase in the thyreophoran fossil record from South America, with all its implications for thyreophoran evolution11,12,13,14,69,70; and this paper). The discovery of Jakapil not only supports the presence of a new Gondwanan lineage of early thyreophoran dinosaurs that persisted in Gondwana for a long time, but has also brought to light the importance of the Gondwanan fossil record in the study of the origin and evolution of dinosaurs (and other clades).

Methods

Morphological datasets

We used the dataset of Soto-Acuña et al.5, that comprises a broad sample of ornithischians suitable to test the phylogenetic position of Jakapil, a specimen with a complex mixture of features complete enough to include both several outgroups (non-thyreophoran ornithischians) and also both groups of thyreophorans. The dataset consists of 75 taxa and 383 morphological characters (see character list in Soto-Acuña et al.5 and references therein). Marasuchus was fixed as the outermost outgroup taxon. All characters were unweighted. Characters 2, 23, 31, 39, 125, 163, 196, 203, 204, 222, 227, 238, 243, 247, 268, 292, 296, 302, 306, 320 and 361 were treated as additive. Memory space was made for 1,500,000 trees.

Phylogenetic analyses

Phylogenetic analyses of the morphological matrix were carried out in TNT v1.5 (see Supplementary Information). A Traditional search was applied with 10,000 replicates of Wagner trees under the tree bisection reconnection (TBR) algorithm, saving 10 trees per replication. Trees saved in memory were resampled with an additional round of TBR. The support for each node in the trees was assessed in TNT. Bremer values were also recorded with Traditional searches until 22 suboptimal trees. Bootstrap analysis was carried out using 10,000 pseudoreplicates with a Traditional search, and Absolute frequencies. Consistency and retention indexes (from the archive STATS.RUN), character mapping, and moving taxon positions over the consensus to test parsimony, were carried out in TNT. The detailed phylogenetic methods are provided in the Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Norman, D. B., Witmer, L. M. & Weishampel, D. B. Basal Thyreophora. In The Dinosauria 2nd edn (eds Weishampel, D. B. et al.) 335–342 (University of California Press, 2004).

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  2. Arbour, V. M. & Currie, P. J. Systematics, phylogeny and palaeobiogeography of the ankylosaurid dinosaurs. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 14, 385–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2015.1059985 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  3. Baron, M. G., Norman, D. B. & Barrett, P. M. Postcranial anatomy of Lesothosaurus diagnosticus (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) from the Lower Jurassic of southern Africa: Implications for basal ornithischian taxonomy and systematics. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 179, 125–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12434 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  4. Maidment, S. C. R., Raven, T. J., Ouarhache, D. & Barrett, P. M. North Africa’s first stegosaur: Implications for Gondwanan thyreophoran dinosaur diversity. Gondwana Res. 77, 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2019.07.007 (2020).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  5. Soto-Acuña, S. et al. Bizarre tail weaponry in a transitional ankylosaur from subantarctic Chile. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04147-1 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  6. Norman, D. B. Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen, 1861 (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) from the Early Jurassic of Dorset, England: Biology and phylogenetic relationships. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 191, 1–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa061 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  7. Carpenter, K. Phylogenetic analysis of the Ankylosauria. In The Armored Dinosaurs (ed. Carpenter, K.) 455–483 (Indiana University Press, 2001).


    Google Scholar
     

  8. Wiersma, J. P. & Irmis, R. B. A new southern Laramidian ankylosaurid, Akainacephalus johnsoni gen. et sp. nov., from the Upper Campanian Kaiparowits formation of southern Utah. PeerJ 6, e5016. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5016 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  9. Breeden, B. T., Raven, T. J., Butler, R. J., Rowe, T. B. & Maidment, S. C. R. The anatomy and palaeobiology of the early armoured dinosaur Scutellosaurus lawleri (Ornithischia: Thyreophora) from the Kayenta Formation (Lower Jurassic) of Arizona. R. Soc. Op. Sci. 8, 201676. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201676 (2021).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  10. Norman, D. B. Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen, 1861 (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) from the Early Jurassic of Dorset, England: Cranial anatomy. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 188, 1–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz074 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  11. Pereda-Suberbiola, X., Díaz-Martínez, I., Salgado, L. & De Valais, S. Síntesis del registro fósil de dinosaurios tireóforos en Gondwana. In: M. Fernández y Y. Herrera (Eds.) Reptiles Extintos—Volumen en Homenaje a Zulma Gasparini. Publ. Electr. Asoc. Paleontol. Arg. 15(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.5710/PEAPA.21.07.2015.101 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  12. Leahey, L. G., Molnar, R. E., Carpenter, K., Witmer, L. M. & Salisbury, S. W. Cranial osteology of the ankylosaurian dinosaur formerly known as Minmi sp. (Ornithischia: Thyreophora) from the Lower Cretaceous Allaru Mudstone of Richmond, Queensland, Australia. PeerJ 3, e1475l. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1475 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  13. Murray, A., Riguetti, F. & Rozadilla, S. New ankylosaur (Thyreophora, ornithischia) remains from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 96, 102320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2019.102320 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  14. Rauhut, O. W. M., Carballido, J. L. & Pol, D. First osteological record of a Stegosaur (Dinosauria, Ornithischia) from the Upper Jurassic of South America. J. Vert. Paleontol. 40, e1862133. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2020.1862133 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  15. Maidment, S. C. R. et al. Bizarre dermal armour suggests the first African ankylosaur. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01553-6 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  16. CandiaHalupczok, D. J., Sánchez, M. L., Veiga, G. D. & Apesteguía, S. Dinosaur tracks in the Kokorkom Desert, Candeleros Formation (Cenomanian, Upper Cretaceous), Patagonia Argentina: Implications for deformation structures in dune fields. Cret. Res. 83, 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2017.10.017 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  17. Pérez-Mayoral, J., Argüello Scotti, A., Apesteguía, S. & Veiga, G. D. High-resolution analysis of an erg-margin system from the Cretaceous Candeleros Formation (La Buitrera Paleontological Area, Río Negro Province, Argentina): An approach to different scales of fluvial-aeolian interactions. Lat. Am. J. Sedim. Basin Anal. 28(1), 37–59 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  18. Makovicky, P. J., Apesteguía, S. & Agnolín, F. L. The earliest dromaeosaurid theropod from South America. Nature 437, 1007–1011. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03996 (2005).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  19. Fernández Dumont, M. L., Bona, P., Pol, D. & Apesteguía, S. New anatomical information on Araripesuchus buitreraensis with implications for the systematics of Uruguaysuchidae (Crocodyliforms, Notosuchia). Cret. Res. 113, 104494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104494 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  20. Apesteguía, S. & Novas, F. E. Large Cretaceous sphenodontian from Patagonia provides insight into lepidosaur evolution in Gondwana. Nature 425, 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01995 (2003).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  21. Garberoglio, F. F. et al. New skulls and skeletons of the Cretaceous legged snake Najash, and the evolution of the modern snake body plan. Sci. Adv. 5, 5833. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax5833 (2019).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  22. Apesteguía, S., Agnolín, F. L. & Lio, G. L. An early Late Cretaceous lizard from Patagonia, Argentina. C. R. Palevol. 4(4), 311–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2005.03.003 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  23. Maniel, I. J. et al. Cranial and postcranial remains of a new species of Prochelidella (Testudines: Pleurodira: Chelidae) from ‘La Buitrera’ (Cenomanian of Patagonia, Argentina), with comments on the monophyly of this extinct chelid genus from southern Gondwana. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 20(12), 1033–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2020.1721579 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  24. Rougier, G. W., Apesteguía, S. & Gaetano, L. C. Highly specialized mammalian skulls from the Late Cretaceous of South America. Nature 479, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10591 (2011).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  25. Owen, R. Report on British fossil reptiles. Part 2. Rep. Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. (Plymouth) 11, 60–204 (1842).


    Google Scholar
     

  26. Seeley, H. G. On the classification of the fossil animals commonly named Dinosauria. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 43, 165–171 (1887 [1888]).

  27. Nopcsa, F. Die Dinosaurier des siebenbürgischen Landesteile Ungarns. Mitt. Jahrb. Ungar. Geol. Reichsanst. Budapest 23, 3–24 (1915).


    Google Scholar
     

  28. Galton, P. M. & Upchurch, P. Stegosauria. In The Dinosauria 2nd edn (eds Weishampel, D. B. et al.) 343–362 (University of California Press, 2004).

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  29. Vickaryous, M. K., Maryańska, T. & Weishampel, D. B. Ankylosauria. In The Dinosauria 2nd edn (eds Weishampel, D. B. et al.) 363–392 (University of California Press, 2004).

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  30. Butler, R. J., Upchurch, P. & Norman, D. B. The phylogeny of the ornithischian dinosaurs. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 6, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477201907002271 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  31. Porro, L. B., Witmer, L. M. & Barrett, P. M. Digital preparation and osteology of the skull of Lesothosaurus diagnosticus (Ornithischia: Dinosauria). PeerJ 3, e1494. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1494 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  32. Boyd, C. A. The cranial anatomy of the neornithischian dinosaur Thescelosaurus neglectus. PeerJ 2, e669. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.669 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  33. Sereno, P. C. Taxonomy, morphology, masticatory function and phylogeny of heterodontosaurid dinosaurs. ZooKeys 226, 1–225. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.226.2840 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  34. You, H.-L. & Dodson, P. Basal Ceratopsia. In The Dinosauria 2nd edn (eds Weishampel, D. B. et al.) 478–493 (University of California Press, 2004).


    Google Scholar
     

  35. Sereno, P. C. & Dong, Z. The skull of the basal stegosaur Huayangosaurus taibaii. J. Vert. Paleontol. 11, 318–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1992.10011463 (1992).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  36. Ősi, A., Prondvai, E., Mallon, J. & Bodor, E. R. Diversity and convergences in the evolution of feeding adaptations in ankylosaurs (Dinosauria: Ornithischia). Hist. Biol. 29, 539–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2016.1208194 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  37. Boyd, C. A. The systematic relationships and biogeographic history of ornithischian dinosaurs. PeerJ 3, e1523. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1523 (2015).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  38. Norman, D. B., Witmer, L. M. & Weishampel, D. B. Basal ornithischians. In The Dinosauria 2nd edn (eds Weishampel, D. B. et al.) 325–334 (University of California Press, 2004).

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar
     

  39. Norman, D. B. Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen, 1861 (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) from the Early Jurassic of Dorset, England: Postcranial endoskeleton. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 189, 47–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz078 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  40. Arbour, V. M. & Currie, P. J. Euoplocephalus tutus and the diversity of ankylosaurid dinosaurs in the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada, and Montana, USA. PLoS ONE 8, e62421. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062421 (2013).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  41. Blows, W. T. British Polacanthid Dinosaurs—Observations on the History and Palaeontology of the UK Polacanthid Armoured Dinosaurs and Their Relatives 220 (Siri Scientific Press, 2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  42. Haubold, H. Ein neuer Dinosaurier (Ornithischia, Thyreophora) aus dem unteren Jura des nördlichen Mitteleuropa. Rev. Paléobiol. 9, 149–177 (1990).


    Google Scholar
     

  43. Zhou, S. The Middle Jurassic Dinosaurian fauna from Dashanpu, Zigong, Sichuan, Vol. 2 (Stegosaurs). Chengdu. Sich. Sci. Tech. Publ. House. 2, 52 (1984).


    Google Scholar
     

  44. Maidment, S. C. R., Wei, S. & Norman, D. B. Re-description of the postcranial skeleton of the Middle Jurassic stegosaur Huayangosaurus taibaii. J. Vert. Paleontol. 26, 944–956. https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[944:ROTPSO]2.0.CO;2 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  45. Park, J.-Y. et al. A new ankylosaurid skeleton from the Upper Cretaceous Baruungoyot Formation of Mongolia: Its implications for ankylosaurid postcranial evolution. Sci. Rep. 11, 4101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83568-4 (2021).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  46. Brown, C. M., Boyd, C. A. & Russell, A. P. A new basal ornithopod dinosaur (Frenchman Formation, Saskatchewan, Canada), and implications for late Maastrichtian ornithischian diversity in North America. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 163, 1157–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00735.x (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  47. Burch, S. H. Osteological, myological, and phylogenetic trends of forelimb reduction in nonavian theropod dinosaurs. PhD Dissertation. Stony Brook University (2013).

  48. Norman, D. B. Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen, 1861 (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) from the Early Jurassic of Dorset, England: Dermal skeleton. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 190, 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz085 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  49. Ford, T. L. A review of ankylosaur osteoderms from New Mexico and a preliminary review of ankylosaur armor. New Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. Bull. 17, 157176 (2000).


    Google Scholar
     

  50. Burns, M. E., Tumanova, T. A. & Currie, P. J. Postcrania of juvenile Pinacosaurus grangeri (Ornithischia: Ankylosauria) from the upper Cretaceous Alagteeg Formation, Alag Teeg, Mongolia: Implications for ontogenetic allometry in ankylosaurs. J. Paleontol. 89, 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2014.14 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  51. Kilbourne, B. & Carpenter, K. Redescription of Gargoyleosaurus parkpinorum, a polacanthid ankylosaur from the Upper Jurassic of Albany County, Wyoming. Neu. Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol. Abhandlungen. 237, 111–160. https://doi.org/10.1127/njgpa/235/2005/111 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  52. Kinneer, B., Carpenter, K. & Shaw, A. Redescription of Gastonia burgei (dinosauria: Ankylosauria, Polacanthidae), and description of a new species. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol. Abh. 282, 37–80. https://doi.org/10.1127/njgpa/2016/0605 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  53. Barrett, P. M. Tooth wear and possible jaw action of Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen and a review of feeding mechanisms in other thyreophoran dinosaurs. In The Armored Dinosaurs (ed. Carpenter, K.) 25–52 (Indiana University Press, 2001).


    Google Scholar
     

  54. Mallon, J. C. & Anderson, J. S. The functional and palaeoecological implications of tooth morphology and wear for the megaherbivorous dinosaurs from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Upper Campanian) of Alberta, Canada. PLoS ONE 9(6), e98605. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098605 (2014).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  55. Norman, D. B., Butler, R. J. & Maidment, S. C. R. Reconsidering the status and affinities of the ornithischian dinosaur Tatisaurus oehleri Simmons, 1965. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 150, 865–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1096-3642.2007.00301.X (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  56. Raven, T. J., Barrett, P. M. & Maidment, S. C. R. A reassessment of the purported ankylosaurian dinosaur Bienosaurus lufengensis from the Lower Lufeng of Yunnan, China. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 64, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.4202/app.00577.2018 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  57. Norell, M. A. et al. A new dromaeosaurid theropod from Ukhaa Tolgod (Ömnögov, Mongolia). Am. Mus. Novit. 3545, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3545[1:ANDTFU]2.0.CO;2 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  58. Brochu, C. A. Osteology of Tyrannosaurus rex: Insights from a nearly complete skeleton and high-resolution computed tomographical analysis of the skull. J. Vert. Paleontol. 22(4), 1–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2003.10010947 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  59. Elzanowski, A. A comparison of the jaw skeleton in theropods and birds, with a description of the palate in the Oviraptoridae. In: Olson SL (ed) Avian Paleontology at the close of the 20th century: Proceedings of the 4th International meeting of the Society for Avian Paleontology and Evolution, Washington, D.C., 4–7 June 1996. Smith. Contrib. Paleobiol. 89, 311–323 (1999).


    Google Scholar
     

  60. Mayr, G. Cenozoic mystery birds—On the phylogenetic affinities of bony-toothed birds (Pelagornithidae). Zool. Scr. 40, 448–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2011.00484.x (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  61. Holliday, C. M. & Witmer, L. M. Archosaur adductor chamber evolution: integration of musculoskeletal and topological criteria in jaw muscle homology. J. Morphol. 268, 457–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10524 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  62. Breeden, B. T. III. & Rowe, T. B. New specimens of Scutellosaurus lawleri Colbert, 1981, from the Lower Jurassic Kayenta Formation in Arizona elucidate the early evolution of thyreophoran dinosaurs. J. Vert. Paleontol. 40, e1791894. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2020.1791894 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  63. Maidment, S. C. R. & Barrett, P. M. Osteological correlates for quadrupedality in ornithischian dinosaurs. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 59(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2012.0065 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  64. Yao, X., Barrett, P. M., Yang, L., Xu, X. & Bi, S. A new early branching armored dinosaur from the Lower Jurassic of southwestern China. Elife 11, e75248. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75248 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  65. Barrett, P. M. et al. A palaeoequatorial ornithischian and new constraints on early dinosaur diversification. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20141147. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1147 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  66. Ridgwell, N. & Sereno, P. C. A basal thyreophoran (Dinosauria, Ornithischia) from the Tiouraren Formation of Niger. J. Vert. Paleontol. 30(2), 150A–151A (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  67. Galton, P. M. Earliest record of an ankylosaurian dinosaur (Ornithischia: Thyreophora): dermal armor from the lower Kota Formation (Lower Jurassic) of India. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol. Abh. 291, 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1127/njgpa/2019/0800 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  68. Salgado, L. et al. A new primitive neornithischian dinosaur from the Jurassic of Patagonia with gut contents. Sci. Rep. 7, 42778. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42778 (2017).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  69. Riguetti, F., Gallina, P., Apesteguía, S. & Canale, J. I. New thyreophoran (Dinosauria, Ornithischia) remains from the lower Cretaceous Bajada Colorada Formation (Neuquén, Argentina). Reunión de Comunicaciones de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, 2019. Publ. Electr. Assoc. Paleontol. Arg. 20(1), R49 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  70. Rozadilla, S., Agnolín, F., Manabe, M., Tsuihiji, T. & Novas, F. E. Ornithischian remains from the Chorrillo Formation (Upper Cretaceous), southern Patagonia, Argentina, and their implications on ornithischian paleobiogeography in the Southern Hemisphere. Cret. Res. 125, 104881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2021.104881 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank to Mariluan family for kindly allowing us the access to the fossiliferous locality of Cerro Policía and to the Secretaría de Cultura of the Río Negro Province for allowing the respective permits; to the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación (projects PICT 2014-0564 and PICT 2018-04598), the Fundación Azara-Universidad Maimónides, the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación e Universidades and the European Regional Development Fund (projects CGL2017-85038-P and PID2021-122612OB-I00), and the Gobierno Vasco/EJ (research group IT1418-19) for the funding. F. J. R. thanks to I. Díaz-Martínez, A. Martinelli, L. Leahey, R. Molnar, A. Vargas Milne, S. Soto Acuña, and M. Baron for digital material; to L. Pazo and J. Kaluza for the material preparation; to the members of the Area de Paleontología of the Fundación Azara, especially F. Garberoglio, L. Fernández Dumont and J. P. Garderes, for all the helping; to R. Ponti for the thin sectioning, and I. Cerda for his advice on histological aspects; to S. Bogan, S. M. Álvarez and J. Meluso for facilitate the access to the Fundación Azara collections. S. A. acknowledges J. Kaluza for identifying key materials. Thanks to R. Glasgow for reviewing the English text of the manuscript. Special thanks to the reviewers Susannah Maidment, Victoria Arbour, and an anonymous reviewer, whose comments strongly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.J.R. undertook the anatomical description, phylogenetic analyses, discussion, and produced the figures. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and discussions. S.A. led the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Facundo J. Riguetti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riguetti, F.J., Apesteguía, S. & Pereda-Suberbiola, X. A new Cretaceous thyreophoran from Patagonia supports a South American lineage of armoured dinosaurs.
Sci Rep 12, 11621 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15535-6

Download citation

  • Received: 04 December 2021

  • Accepted: 24 June 2022

  • Published: 11 August 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15535-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Science

Scientists and researchers are expected to gather on Parliament Hill today to call for a raise.

Published

 on

OTTAWA — Hundreds of scientists and researchers are expected to gather on Parliament Hill today to call for a raise.

Organizers of the “Support our Science” rally say they will present an open letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Science and Innovation Minister François-Philippe Champagne that has been signed by thousands of scientists and measures more than 60 metres long.

The group says many graduate and post-doctoral scholars receive funding from three federal agencies, but often the scholarships amount to less than minimum wage.

They also say graduate students have not seen a raise since 2003, and post-doctoral scholars have only had wages rise by 12.5 per cent in those 19 years.

As a result, many researchers leave the country or leave their fields altogether.

The group wants the federal government to increase the value of that funding by 48 per cent to match inflation since 2003, and to create 50 per cent more graduate scholarships and post-doctoral fellowships.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 11, 2022.

 

The Canadian Press

Continue Reading

Science

Meteor shower set to fill the sky both Thursday and Friday night – St Thomas Today

Published

 on


Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending