adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

How extreme weather affects prices along the food supply chain

Published

 on

 

Extreme weather events like fires, floods, heat waves and droughts pose an increasing risk to Canada’s food supply chain, putting pressure on prices all the way to the grocery store shelf, say experts.

“Anytime you have major weather-related events, it tends to increase costs,” said Frank Scali, vice-president of industry affairs at Food, Health & Consumer Products Of Canada.

These kinds of events are becoming more frequent and intense in Canada and around the globe.

A 2019 federal government report said temperatures are projected to keep increasing, driven by human influence, while precipitation is also projected to increase.

Weather plays a big role in food production, and factors like too much or too little heat or moisture can affect not only the volume of food produced, but also the prevalence of pests and diseases, said Amanda Norris, senior economist at Farm Credit Canada.

“Weather can also impact activities further down the supply chain,” she said. “For example, you might have damaged infrastructure from floods that changes transportation routes and the ability to move those products along the food supply chain.”

Shortages caused by extreme weather can alsodrive food prices higher if supply isn’t able to meet demand, she said.

According to a July report from the Canadian Agri-Food Policy Institute, the agriculture industry has faced a “cascade of challenges” recently, including climate change, with the ripple effects of these headwinds reverberating throughout the supply chain.

In a survey for the report, respondents from the industry as well as members of government identified extreme weather as one of the top risks to the agricultural sector.

Major flooding in B.C. three years ago hit farmers hard, with hundreds of thousands of chickens and other farm animals dying after atmospheric rivers caused flooding and landslides.

Drought in 2023 strained crop production in Saskatchewan, with output declining almost 11 per cent, two years after a historic 47-per-cent production decline due to extreme heat and drought in 2021.

The agriculture industry has been able to make itself somewhat more resilient to things like drought by changing some of its practices, said Tyler McCann, managing director at the agri-food policy institute, such as using a no-till technique to keep more moisture in the earth. Those practices can’t protect crops from the most extreme weather, he said, but they do help in other years.

Extreme weather in other parts of the world can also affect farmers if input costs, like fertilizer, go up, or if there’s a shortage of a major crop that wreaks havoc on commodity prices, said McCann.

“An extreme weather event in China or India at the wrong time could lead to pretty significant, devastating consequences, because there really isn’t enough wheat in the rest of the world to make up for the potential losses,” he said.

While farmers often see direct impacts from extreme weather events, for those further along the supply chain, like manufacturers and processors, the effects are usually indirect, said Scali.

Supply chains are generally designed to keep the lowest cost in mind, meaning the risk of disruption is higher, he said, such as having one large factory instead of multiple smaller ones, or being reliant on a single source for an important input. A disruption on one part of the supply chain can create a “domino effect,” he said.

However, the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting supply chain snarls have shown companies that sometimes the lowest-cost option is too risky, said Scali. Lots of companies have mapped their supply chains, turning to multiple sources for inputs or identifying backups.

“It really put everybody a step ahead,” he said.

But these kinds of changes can’t mitigate every potential disruption, said Scali, and shortages and price volatility are likely to get worse.

Extreme weather doesn’t just affect the commodities themselves, it can also disrupt transportation.

Fires in Western Canada are the most recent example, Scali said, where rail lines were shut down.

“Yes, you can put stuff on trucks, but there’s never enough truck capacity in the country to make up for rail. So things will be delayed, and it’ll get more expensive,” he said.

If it’s a one-time disruption, the company usually tries to absorb it, he said, but longer-term disruptions or changes usually mean prices will have to go up.

Canadians may notice the effects of extreme weather events on their food in two ways: when prices go up, and when items are suddenly no longer available.

In November 2022, lettuce prices spiked amid a shortage of iceberg and romaine, attributed to a virus in a major lettuce-growing area in California. The following spring, the valley was hit by severe rain and storms, causing flooding.

Earlier this year, spiking cocoa futures highlighted the effects of high temperatures, weather conditions and disease in West Africa, where crop yields were damaged.

Orange juice prices saw a similar spike this spring, as flooding and drought damaged harvests in Brazil, a year after Spain and Florida both suffered lower orange production amid drought and Hurricane Ian, respectively.

Strawberries are also at risk. According to the University of Waterloo, the berries are set to become more rare and costly as temperatures rise. It noted Canada is a major importer of strawberries from California.

This year, many of the food categories that saw volatility in recent years have stabilized, Michelle Wasylyshen, spokeswoman for the Retail Council of Canada, said in an email. However, current extreme heat in Western Canada and the U.S. could affect some prices in the fall and winter, she said.

Geopolitical conflicts add to the mix, she said. “The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has made us more dependent on Canadian grain, so when that is impacted by extreme weather, it has more of an impact than before.”

— With files from The Associated Press

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 12, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Mark Carney to present his economic vision for the Liberals to caucus

Published

 on

 

NANAIMO, B.C. – Former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney will present his vision for the Liberals’ economic policy when he meets with MPs in Nanaimo, B.C., today.

The party announced Carney’s new role as chair of a Liberal task force on economic growth as MPs arrived for the caucus retreat Monday, where they are planning their strategy for the upcoming election year.

Carney will be reporting directly to the prime minister and the committee responsible for drafting the Liberal election platform.

The former bank governor’s comments will be made privately to caucus, but he is expected to address the media afterwards.

The Liberals have made other attempts to focus on economic and affordability issues since taking a major hit in the polls last year, but those efforts haven’t resonated in the polls.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is also expected to address his caucus as a whole for the first time since several of his MPs have expressed privately and publicly that he is not the person to lead the party into the next election.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 10, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

The Use of Humanitarian Aid in a Conflict Zone

Published

 on

The Israeli Government is carrying out a Starvation Campaign against the People of Gaza, or so says Democracy Now and the United Nations. While multiple trucks filled with humanitarian supplies and food wait to enter Gaza, the Israeli Forces hold them back for inspection and security reasons, so few enter this region of crisis.
Well over a year has passed as Israeli Forces continue to besiege Gaza claiming to be trying to eliminate Hamas as a military force. What many journalists, international politicians and Middle Eastern Specialists see is a nation-state military trying to drive millions of Palestinians out of their homeland by whatever means possible. Airstrikes, and tank and armoured vehicle movements strive to destabilize life in Gaza and make these native residents fear for their lives and very survival. Similar actions were carried out by the Germans when they invaded Poland long ago. Military actions have seemed to remain the same, as to their purpose. Eradication of the “Palestinian Problem” has been the goal of the Netanyahu Government all along, seizing Gaza for Israeli use and driving the perceived Palestinian threat away for good.
The United Nations special rapporteur on the right of food Michael Fakhri accused Israel of carrying out a starvation campaign against a civilian population. This action is internationally viewed as criminal and answerable to the International Courts in the Hague. 2.2 million people in Gaza need food urgently and they are being treated as pawns within a game of international intrigue and conflict management by the superpowers and their allies.
Look to the American elections as a time when Israel will open the doors to humanitarian aid just as election day arrives. Israel’s leader Netanyahu is a friend of former president Trump. Interesting idea?
Steven Kaszab
Bradford, Ontario
skaszab@yahoo.ca
Note: Remember when Iran held American Hostages only to release them just before a election. That action empowered Ronald Reagan to victory. Interesting methodology of Republicans eh?
Continue Reading

News

Business lobby group warns Ottawa digital services tax could ‘imperil’ trade talks

Published

 on

 

WASHINGTON – One of Canada’s most influential business lobby groups is warning Ottawa about damage to the relationship with the United States after the Biden administration escalated efforts to halt the federal government’s tax on large foreign digital services companies.

The Business Council of Canada called for the digital services tax to be revoked after the Office of the United States Trade Representative requested dispute settlement consultations under the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement.

In a Sept. 9 letter to Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland and International Trade Minister Mary Ng, Goldy Hyder, the council’s president and CEO, said retaliatory measures by the U.S. would be harmful to Canadian families, businesses and the economy, while also negating any projected tax revenues.

Hyder cautioned the tax could also be destructive to Canada’s relationship with the U.S. ahead of the review of the trade agreement in 2026.

“In successive meetings with senior U.S. officials, we have been repeatedly told that if Canada’s unilateral DST remains in place it will imperil the upcoming mandatory review of the CUSMA,” Hyder wrote.

Americans have been critical of the three per cent levy on foreign tech giants that generate revenue from Canadian users. It means the companies will have to pay taxes on that revenue in Canada.

U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai, after requesting dispute consultations in August, called the tax discriminatory and said it is inconsistent with Canada’s commitments not to treat U.S. businesses less favourably than Canadian ones.

If the two countries are unable to resolve America’s concerns within 75 days, the U.S. may request a dispute settlement panel to examine the issue.

Ng and Freeland have remained steadfast behind the tax. They said last month that consultations under the trade agreement’s dispute mechanism will demonstrate Canada is meeting its obligations.

Hyder said Ottawa’s strategy will neither address nor assuage U.S. concerns. Instead it will risk undermining the trade agreement and “our most important trade and investment partnership,” he said.

The digital tax was part of the Liberal election platform during the 2019 campaign. Both the Conservatives and New Democrats proposed similar levies.

The Liberal government, however, delayed its implementation in order to give more time to global efforts to establish a broader, multinational taxation plan.

But after significant delays to that process at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Canada went ahead with its own tax.

The Canadian ministers have said the preference has always been a multilateral agreement.

Greta Peisch, the former general counsel for the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, said concerns around Canada’s approach to the tax have been raised for a long time.

“I think the United States has been clear about how serious it is,” said Peisch, a partner at Wiely Rein in Washington, D.C.

“The argument is not that you can’t have a DST, it’s just that it should be neutral and not be inconsistent with our trade agreement.”

Peisch said the issue is around global revenue. Canada’s tax applies to foreign and Canadian digital services providers that earn total annual revenue from all sources of 750 million euros or more, and annual Canadian revenue more than $20 million a year.

Peisch explained American’s issue with the tax: if two companies provide the same service and have the same revenue from people in Canada, the foreign company will be treated differently.

“We have commitments in our trade agreements not to discriminate based on national origin among the trade agreement partners, that would be inconsistent with our trade obligations,” Peisch said.

The digital services tax has drawn opposition from trade associations and business groups on both sides of the international border.

Last month, Google announced it will implement a 2.5 per cent surcharge for ads displayed in Canada starting in October. Groups representing Canadian advertisers have warned other companies could follow the tech giant’s lead.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 10, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending