Connect with us

Media

Legendary announcer Vin Scully, 92, joins social media – Canoe

Published

on


Article content

Legendary Los Angeles Dodgers broadcaster Vin Scully, who retired after the 2016 season, is jumping back into media.

Social media.

The 92-year-old Hall of Fame broadcaster is launching Twitter and Instagram sites on Wednesday (both @TheVinScully). A Facebook account and website (www.dodgersvinscully.com) will come later, USA Today reported.

It will be his first venture into social media.

“I was a fan before I was a broadcaster, and I want to see and hear and engage with people,” he told USA Today.

That’s contact Scully is lacking now. He is confined to his Los Angeles-area home after taking a fall in April that sent him to the hospital for five days.

The newspaper said former agent Dennis Gilbert is helping him in the effort.

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

[embedded content]

“It’s a great way for Vin to reconnect to his fans,” Gilbert said. “It will be a virtual Vin Scully museum.”

The social media sites are set to include snippets from his 67 years of calling Dodgers games, including Henry Aaron’s 715th career home run.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Media

'Absolutely huge': Media groups optimistic after Liberal pledge to make internet giants pay for content – Financial Post

Published

on


Article content continued

A way to ensure that people pay a fair fee to producers of the content, not a penalty, nothing punitive

Daniel Bernhard, Friends of Canadian Broadcasting

Canada’s stab at a law might follow Australia’s proposed effort based on fair trading. Canberra legislators may have a final draft of it within weeks, Rod Sims, chair of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, told the Associated Press this month.

Facebook warned Australia that it might simply bar local news rather than pay for it, while Google said it could impact its search results and user data, according to the AP report.

Efforts in Europe to rein in the tech giants through copyright laws so far haven’t been successful.

“There’s a real virtue in the Australian model in that it’s very fast and it’s direct negotiations with the government,” Hinds said. “The European model is a little more complicated.”

The best option is to adopt a pay-for-use fee structure, Bernhard said, so the money goes directly to creators, not as a tax on tech companies to the government — something similar to how music is billed to radio stations. He cited a study by Jean Hugues-Roy, of Université de Québec à Montréal, saying Facebook alone costs Canadian newspapers $135 million a year in lost revenue.

“This is about market power and finding a way to ensure that people pay a fair fee to producers of the content, not a penalty, nothing punitive, just a fair compensation,” Bernhard said.

Zimbel said he recently chanced upon old sales slips showing the band’s income from as recently as 2007 and how they dwarfed today’s receipts because of online streaming. “You don’t get rich playing in a nine-piece jazz band,” he said. “But I could not believe the numbers. They were huge compared to what we see now.”

The musician said he typically sees a rate of $50 for 250,000 streams, whereas the first month of a record release 13 years ago netted $7,800.

“It’s not only that you’re not making money from streaming,” Zimbel said. “It’s that all physical sales and downloading sales have evaporated now as well because people are only streaming.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Donald Trump Jr. blasts media for ignoring Hunter Biden report: 'I was front page news for weeks' while Bid… – Fox News

Published

on


Donald Trump Jr. slammed the media for largely ignoring the damning revelations from the GOP-led Senate report on Hunter Biden’s foreign financial ties.

The Senate Homeland Security and Finance Committees on Wednesday released an interim report on their months-long joint investigation into Hunter Biden’s role on the board of Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings and his alleged “extensive and complex financial transactions,” but also highlighted his questionable transactions with Russian and Chinese nationals.

None of the revelations, however, were given much coverage by many of the major news networks.

CNN and all three nightly news programs on ABC, CBS and NBC avoided the subject. MSNBC host Rachel Maddow was the only host on the network to address the Senate report but spent those roughly two minutes of coverage downplaying it.

Trump Jr. blasted the lack of coverage of the Senate report, suggesting a stark double standard between himself and the former VP’s son.

CNN, BROADCAST NETWORKS IGNORE HUNTER BIDEN REVELATIONS, OTHERS DOWNPLAY SENATE REPORT

“When they thought they had me for something much less significant than direct payments from an associate of Vladimir Putin & direct links to human trafficking/prostitution in Russia, I was front page news for weeks on end but the Bidens get a pass for their corruption as always!” Trump Jr. exclaimed on Thursday.

Trump Jr. was likely referring to the infamous Trump Tower meeting with Russian nationals that he attended during the 2016 election that was intensely scrutinized by both the Mueller investigation and the mainstream media.

The news outlets that did cover the Hunter Biden report, however, portrayed the Senate Republicans’ findings as if there were no new revelations.

HEMINGWAY: JOE BIDEN BRIEFED ON SON’S BURISMA INVOLVEMENT, SENATE REPORT SAYS

The New York Times ran the headline, “Republican Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden.” Politico similarly ran, “GOP senators’ anti-Biden report repackages old claims” as did BuzzFeed News’ “Republicans’ Hunter Biden Report is Filled With Old, Unsubstantiated Allegations and Debunked Theories.”

The Washington Post went even further to exonerate the former VP with its headline, “GOP senators’ report calls Hunter Biden’s board position in Ukraine ‘problematic’ but doesn’t show it changed US policy.”

Critics also pointed out that many of the written reports neglected to mention the Senate report’s key findings regarding Hunter Biden’s $3.5 million Russian wire transfer and his business ties with Chinese nationals.

In addition to new findings regarding Biden’s ties to Burisma, the report states that Senate investigators found millions of dollars in “questionable financial transactions” between Hunter Biden, who is a son of Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden, and his associates and foreign individuals, including the wife of the former mayor of Moscow as well as individuals with ties to the Chinese Communist Party.

HANNITY: HUNTER BIDEN REPORT SHOULD DISQUALIFY FATHER FROM PRESIDENCY

According to the report, an investment firm co-founded by Hunter Biden, Rosemont Seneca Thornton, “received $3.5 million in a wire transfer” from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of the Russian capital.

The report goes further and alleges that not just Hunter Biden but other members of the Biden family “were involved in a vast financial network that connected them to foreign nationals and foreign governments across the globe.”

In one instance, the report stated that Hunter Biden “opened a bank account” with a Chinese national linked to China’s communist government, which “financed a $100,000 global spending spree” for the former vice president’s brother, James Biden, and his wife, Sara Biden.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates on Wednesday blasted the investigation, and Johnson directly, for pursuing a “conspiracy theory.”

“As the coronavirus death toll climbs and Wisconsinites struggle with joblessness, Ron Johnson has wasted months diverting the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee away from any oversight of the catastrophically botched federal response to the pandemic, a threat Sen. Johnson has dismissed by saying that ‘death is an unavoidable part of life.’ Why? To subsidize a foreign attack against the sovereignty of our elections with taxpayer dollars — an attack founded on a long-disproven, hardcore rightwing conspiracy theory that hinges on Sen. Johnson himself being corrupt and that the Senator has now explicitly stated he is attempting to exploit to bail out Donald Trump’s re-election campaign,” Bates said in a statement Wednesday.

Fox News’ Brooke Singman contributed to this report.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Advocacy group urging social media platforms be held accountable for content they publish – inthehammer.com

Published

on


 

One of the advantages of the internet is it provides a wealth of knowledge to anyone who has a device that can access it.

However, one of the downsides is with so much information available, a lot of it is unverified, while some of it can even be so inaccurate it becomes harmful.

Because of this, many believe social media companies, such as Facebook and YouTube should be held accountable for the information shared on their websites.

A new research report released by watchdog group FRIENDS of Canadian Broadcasting argues these companies should be considered publishers, and thus held accountable for user-generated content published to their platforms.

“Our elected officials don’t need to create new laws to deal with this problem. They don’t need to define harmful content, police social media, or constrain free expression in any new way. All government needs to do is apply existing laws,” Daniel Bernhard, Executive Director for FRIENDS, said in a news release.

“But if a judge decides that content circulated on social media breaks the law, the platform which publishes and recommends that illegal content must be held liable for it,” he continued.

In their defense, social media companies have argued that they simply function as bulletin boards that display user-generated content without editorial control–they posit that it would be impossible to discover illegal content from among the 100 billion daily posts.

Platforms such as Facebook claim to advertisers that they have technology that recognize content users post before it is published and pushed out to others.

Additionally, Facebook routinely exercises editorial control by promoting content users have never asked to see, including extreme content that would land other publishers in legal trouble, as well as conceals content from users without consulting them–another form of editorial control.

“Facebook and other social media platforms have complaints processes where they are alerted to potentially illegal or otherwise objectionable content. Yet it is their own community standards, not the law, which dictates whether they will remove a post,” George Carothers, director of research for FRIENDS, said in the same release.

“Even then Facebook employees say that the company does not apply its own standards when prominent right-wing groups are involved,” he continued.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending