adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Investment

Mandryk: First Nation/Metis investment mess will set back relations – Regina Leader-Post

Published

 on


Consider how bloody condescending this must be to First Nations who managed to entrepreneurial investment success without the Sask. Party.


Minister Responsible for SGI Joe Hargrave speaks about the upcoming changes to distracted driving penalties coming into effect Feb. 1, 2020.


TROY FLEECE / Regina Leader-Post

According to Crown Investment Corp. (CIC) Minister Joe Hargrave, the point of investing millions of tax dollars in the First Nations and Metis Fund (FNMF)  is “engagement.”

300x250x1

Evidently, it’s not to actually create needed jobs in the First Nations and Metis communities or to make profits on the millions of tax dollars invested or spent on fund management fees. Heck, why worry about breaking even?

This is now all about “engagement” — inspiring First Nations people to walk down the glorious path of venture capital investment.

For the moment, let’s set aside how ridiculous it is for a minister of the Crown to suggest we shouldn’t necessarily be concerned about an $8-million loss. (After all, no Saskatchewan Party MLA has ever fretted over investment losses like the ones CIC was making 15 to 20 years ago under the NDP government on Spudco or U.S. dot-coms.)

Let’s set aside the $11.5 million in management fees paid to Westcap Management Ltd., whose CEO Grant Kook is a well-connected Sask. Party donor who turned his role as master of ceremonies for the opening of the Jim Pattison Children’s Hospital into a political event and who remains an appointee on SaskTel’s board.

To be clear, Westcap has enjoyed success in the fund management business, and, as Hargrave eagerly points out, Kook was first hired to manage the FNMF by the previous NDP government. That would hardly seem “a Sask. Party insider slush fund,” as described by NDP MLA Cathy Sproule in Thursday’s question period.

That said, Sproule also notes fund management has clearly evolved from small business, job-creation-oriented investments under the NDP to larger-scale investments in the the potash and oil sector, without any clear explanation from Kook (whose requested appearance before a legislative committee has been stymied by Sask. Party government MLAs) or successive CIC ministers.

Let’s set aside the failed $3-million First Nations potash investment that created no jobs. To this, Hargrave first said in Thursday’s question period that  “it’s about investing in people and we won’t apologize for trying to strengthen Aboriginal participation.” He then later told  reporters: “It wasn’t just about the jobs. It was about engagement.”

Let’s also set aside that Hargrave can’t pin down the total number of jobs created in the history of the FNMF to anything better than somewhere between 84 and 185 or even tell us how many of those jobs were created since his Sask. Party government took power 12-plus years ago.

And we can also set aside the specifics of the $1.8-million investment to Brigden Welding (also accused of having close Sask. Party connections) that was later written down to $250,000  and that created only four jobs — only two of which went to Aboriginals.

Let’s set aside Hargrave’s game-playing nonsense that this is not a FNMF issue because the money flowed through a Metis company called Infinite Investment (what Sproule suggested is a shell company). Let’s ignore how laughable this is in light of Wendy Gervais, Infinite Investment’s director, saying she has no knowledge whereabouts of the assets Hargrave (who said Thursday he had no idea who Gervais was) spoke about.

Let’s simply focus on how Hargrave’s view that this all comes down to creating “engagement” with First Nations people who have now been inspired to make capital investments (although Hargrave could not point to one example where this was the actual case) because of what they are seeing in the FNMF.

Consider how condescending this must be to First Nations who managed entrepreneurial investment successes without the Sask. Party: Tron Construction, Athabasca Basin Development and Kitaski Development are all heavily involved in mining; Meadow Lake Tribal Council Resource Development; File Hills Qu’Appelle Developments; Prince Albert Development Corporation; Montreal Lake Business Ventures; Whitecap Development Corporation; First Nations Bank of Canada (Canada’s chartered bank independently controlled by Indigenous shareholders); Polar Oils; Onion Lake Energy, and; Tomahawk Energy.

Consider how much this whole sorry affair is setting back First Nations business relations.

Mandryk is the political columnist for the Regina Leader-Post and Saskatoon StarPhoenix.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Private equity gears up for potential National Football League investments – Financial Times

Published

 on

By


Standard Digital

Weekend Print + Standard Digital

$75 per month

Complete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.

300x250x1

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Investment Opportunities With Hot Inflation, Higher-for-Longer Interest Rates – Bloomberg

Published

 on

By


Like a bad houseguest, hotter-than-expected inflation continues to linger in the US.

Traders had hoped by now the Federal Reserve would be free to start cutting interest rates — boosting rate-sensitive stocks and unlocking a largely frozen real estate market. Instead, stubborn price growth has some on Wall Street rethinking whether the central bank will lower rates at all this year.

Adblock test (Why?)

300x250x1

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Want to Outperform 88% of Professional Fund Managers? Buy This 1 Investment and Hold It Forever. – The Motley Fool

Published

 on

By


You don’t have to be a stock market genius to outperform most pros.

You might not think it’s possible to outperform the average Wall Street professional with just a single investment. Fund managers are highly educated and steeped in market data. They get paid a lot of money to make smart investments.

But the truth is, most of them may not be worth the money. With the right steps, individual investors can outperform the majority of active large-cap mutual fund managers over the long run. You don’t need a doctorate or MBA, and you certainly don’t need to follow the everyday goings-on in the stock market. You just need to buy a single investment and hold it forever.

300x250x1

That’s because 88% of active large-cap fund managers have underperformed the S&P 500 index over the last 15 years thru Dec. 31, 2023, according to S&P Global’s most recent SPIVA (S&P Indices Versus Active) scorecard. So if you buy a simple S&P 500 index fund like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO -0.23%), chances are that your investment will outperform the average active mutual fund in the long run.

Image source: Getty Images.

Why is it so hard for fund managers to outperform the S&P 500?

It’s a good bet that the average fund manager is hardworking and well-trained. But there are at least two big factors working against active fund managers.

The first is that institutional investors make up roughly 80% of all trading in the U.S. stock market — far higher than it was years ago when retail investors dominated the market. That means a professional investor is mostly trading shares with another manager who is also very knowledgeable, making it much harder to gain an edge and outperform the benchmark index.

The more basic problem, though, is that fund managers don’t just need to outperform their benchmark index. They need to beat the index by a wide enough margin to justify the fees they charge. And that reduces the odds that any given large-cap fund manager will be able to outperform an S&P 500 index fund by a significant amount.

The SPIVA scorecard found that just 40% of large-cap fund managers outperformed the S&P 500 in 2023 once you factor in fees. So if the odds of outperforming fall to 40-60 for a single year, you can see how the odds of beating the index consistently over the long run could go way down.

What Warren Buffett recommends over any other single investment

Warren Buffett is one of the smartest investors around, and he can’t think of a single better investment than an S&P 500 index fund. He recommends it even above his own company, Berkshire Hathaway.

In his 2016 letter to shareholders, Buffett shared a rough calculation that the search for superior investment advice had cost investors, in aggregate, $100 billion over the previous decade relative to investing in a simple index fund.

Even Berkshire Hathaway holds two small positions in S&P 500 index funds. You’ll find shares of the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEMKT: SPY) in Berkshire’s quarterly disclosures. Both are great options for index investors, offering low expense ratios and low tracking errors (a measure of how closely an ETF price follows the underlying index). There are plenty of other solid index funds you could buy, but either of the above is an excellent option as a starting point.

Adam Levy has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending