adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Motor Mouth: The politics of building pickups in Oshawa – Driving

Published

 on


It was perhaps the most astonishing Canadian automotive announcement of the last 10 years: General Motors’ Oshawa assembly plant, shuttered since last December, is being re-opened. And not just some kind of token keep-Unifor-out-of-our-hair-for-the-next-four-years symbolic reshuffling of some soon-to-be-discontinued sedan that nobody wants.

No siree, Bob! Perilously close to death — it was scheduled to become a parts-stamping facility and autonomous vehicle testing ground — Oshawa has been granted the nearest thing the North American auto industry has to a fountain of youth; it will produce pickups. Indeed, it will hold the exalted status of being the only GM plant in the world to produce both light- and heavy-duty trucks. Forget astonishing, this is the paradigm shift that may save Oshawa’s 111-year history of auto manufacturing.

Credit where credit is due, outgoing Unifor president Jerry Dias really pulled one out of thin air. Oh, sure, Ford’s Oakville plant deal and the pact with FCA to keep Windsor alive were coups. But those contracts merely saved jobs (and maybe not all of them) that already existed. Oshawa’s reopening actually brought jobs back to Canada. There were barely 300 Unifor members prowling the cavernous 10-million-square-foot facility — talk about echoes — and despite the fact the closure was officially dubbed a “pause” back in May 2019, few had any expectations those jobs would ever return. Instead, depending on who was talking, anywhere between 1,400 and 1,700 jobs could be revived by the end of 2022, God and cheap gas willing.

More than a few pundits have credited Dias’ recent success — the contracts he signed with the Detroit 3 represent investments of $4.7-billion in Canadian automotive production — to his close relationship with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. And while it’s true our fearful leader has insinuated himself fairly dramatically in recent automotive dealings, I’d posit it was GM’s relationship with another, far more important, politician that was key to getting the deal signed.

That would be the President of the United States, and I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say GM CEO Mary Barra probably made a calculated bet that Donald Trump wasn’t going to get a second term before approving the shift in pickup production to Oshawa. In fact, I’ll go even farther: I’m not sure this deal would have been signed if Barra had thought Trump would be around to haunt her for the next four years.

The calculus is quite simple. For one thing, unlike Ford and FCA’s recent deals, The Donald probably would have made a big stink about GM producing pickups in Canada. He could give a damn if Ford produces “globalist” electric vehicles in Oakville or FCA makes electrified minivans in Windsor. His loyal supporters don’t buy ’em, don’t care about ’em and sure as shootin’ aren’t calling him out on Fox News for letting production of “elitist” EVs head north of the 49th. Hell, if The Donald had his way, there’d probably be no electric vehicles sold in America, so shifting production of a few plug-ins to Canada wouldn’t even rate a half-hearted riposte at a campaign stop in lonely Elko, Nevada.

But building trucks anywhere other than in the good ole US of A, well, that would be a freaking tweetfest. The “base” — that loyal 40 per cent or so of America that would vote Republican even if Trump shot somebody “in the middle of 5th Avenue” — well, they buy pickups, don’t they? And if you’ve ever read the comment section of Breitbart.com, you’d know we Canadians often fare no better in the “godless socialists” sweepstakes than any of the usual suspects.

Barra has already been under this microscope. Earlier this year, Trump got on her case, claiming GM was demanding “top dollar” for then-much-needed ventilators (never mind the company was producing them at cost), singling out Barra specifically with an “always a mess with Mary B” tweet. Before that, the closing of the Lordstown, Ohio plant that raised his ire, his tweets imploring GM to “close a plant in China or Mexico” while threatening in a subsequent tweet “you better get back there soon.”

I’ll say that again: A U.S. president urged his fellow Americans to stop shopping Harley-Davidson … simply to seek revenge for an impasse he himself created.

And that was just a half-Trump. He didn’t really have his heart in it. If you want to see Trump at his most manically destructive, look what he did to Harley-Davidson. In 2018, in response to the EU raising taxes on motorcycles built in the U.S. by some 25 per cent, Milwaukee announced it was shifting some of its production to Thailand. Now, never mind that the European Union’s move was a response to Trump’s own decision to impose duties on steel and aluminum imported from Europe, or that it would cost Harley, by its own estimation, some US$2,200 more to export a motorcycle from York, Pa., or Kansas City — HD’s then two main plants in the States — because of these retaliatory restrictions.

Trump went on the warpath nonetheless, starting with messages bullying HD’s management, and eventually calling on his supporters — many long-time one-percenters — to boycott Harley-Davidson. I’ll say that again: A U.S. president urged his fellow Americans to stop shopping Harley-Davidson — perhaps the most recognized American institution in the world — simply to seek revenge for an impasse he himself created.

And it worked. There are lots of reasons why Harley has been in the dumps lately (misguided action plans, poor execution of its new entry-level models, etc.) but having the Leader of the Free World — again, who’s loyalty is so absolute that he could shoot someone and they’d still follow him up Hamburger Hill — call for a boycott of your product is not a good thing. Harley still hasn’t recovered, the recriminations starting a downward spiral that has yet to stabilize despite the fact the rest of America’s motorcycle market has rebounded quite dramatically post-pandemic.

So, was Barra prescient in her reading of the political tea leaves? Did GM Canada’s recent rebirth really hinge on The Donald’s election collapse? I don’t know. But would Barra have risked the wrath of Trump if the polls had given him a Biden-like lead going into Nov. 3 election? Would anyone willingly walk into that kind of abuse? Those thinking it wasn’t a significant part of GM’s calculations before the deal was signed are fooling themselves — Jerry Dias’ genius notwithstanding, of course.


LISTEN: Electrifying Canada’s extensive truck and bus fleets

Subscribe to Plugged In on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, and Google Podcasts.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending