adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Art

New York’s Art World Faces the Coronavirus Shutdown – The New Yorker

Published

 on


The Metropolitan Museum of Art will reportedly only meet its payroll through the first week of April, which will make layoffs inevitable.Photograph by Mark Kauzlarich / Bloomberg / Getty

Art offers a refuge in times of crisis. But what happens when the refuge goes dark? Among the many incomprehensible victims of the coronavirus are New York City’s museums and galleries, all of which are now closed until further notice. The first to shut down was the city’s largest, the Met. On March 12th, the museum announced that it was temporarily closing all three of its branches—the Beaux-Arts headquarters on Fifth Avenue, the Cloisters, and the Met Breuer—to help flatten the curve of the pandemic. Worse news arrived on March 18th, when the Times leaked a letter to the museum’s senior staff, from Max Hollein and Daniel H. Weiss, the director and the president and C.E.O., about a new plan to keep its doors closed until July, to help stave off financial disaster. The projected losses in revenue to the institution are a staggering hundred million dollars. One sad irony about this unimaginable moment is that those of us who have spent recent years complaining that talk of money has hijacked conversations about art now have no choice but to see numbers.

Of course, the Met’s closure is devastating in terms of cultural deprivation. In a perfect world, I’d be quarantined in one of the period rooms, curled up with a book on that comfy-looking white sofa in the opulent boudoir of the eighteenth-century Hôtel de Crillon. (The bed that Claudia slept on in “From the Mixed-up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler” is in storage.) But it’s hard to focus on aesthetics alone when, with the Met as a bellwether, the economic implications for other precincts of the New York art world are so catastrophic. The Met, which has an endowment of roughly three billion dollars, even accounting for current market turmoil, is unlikely to face total collapse before it can reopen. Smaller institutions may face bigger challenges. The Tenement Museum, on the Lower East Side, has closed its doors and reduced its full-time and part-time staff from a hundred and thirty-eight people to five. The Alliance of American Museums is lobbying Congress for a four-billion-dollar relief package, citing the estimated fifty billion dollars a year that arts and history institutions contribute to the U.S. economy, not to mention the twelve billion dollars in tax revenue. (On Tuesday morning, the Met announced #CongressSaveCulture, a campaign to support the measure.) The A.A.M. is also seeking a short-term “universal charitable deduction” tax incentive to encourage donations; such solicitations are a tough ask in the best of times, let alone in a climate of panic. But the patrons of New York City have already taken action: on March 20th, eighteen New York-based philanthropies banded together to create a seventy-five-million-dollar “NYC COVID-19 Response & Impact Fund” for the city’s arts and social-services nonprofits.

As vital as cultural institutions are to the life of this city, it’s the living artists who are its heart. When I learned that the Met will reportedly only meet its payroll through the first week of April, which will make layoffs inevitable, I thought of all the artists who might lose their jobs. Many of the rank-and-file employees at any museum make art themselves; even Jeff Koons once manned the ticket booth and then the membership desk at the MOMA. For those artists who are lucky enough to support themselves with their art alone, it’s commercial galleries, not museums, that provide revenue. The big international chains (Gagosian, Zwirner, Hauser & Wirth) may grab most of the headlines, but some of the city’s most exciting young spaces (Bureau, Lomex, Situations) operate on a relative shoestring.

These are small businesses, some so small that their staff consists of a part-time assistant (if that) and a network of freelancers—art handlers, graphic designers, archivists, database managers, electricians, conservators, photographers, and Ph.D. candidates who moonlight writing press releases. But this nimble model makes such galleries ineligible for the emergency-relief measures that the city put in place for small businesses earlier this month, when the pandemic began taking its toll. What’s more, many of those contracted workers are self-employed and not incorporated, meaning that they don’t qualify for relief, either.

Amid the unprecedented uncertainty of this emergency, there is one comforting fact: artists don’t stop making art. The Met is a monument to that persistence, stocked with five thousand years’ worth of evidence. It will reopen, and the city’s gallery scene will survive, too, however battered and reconfigured. While the Met is closed, there are any number of ways to find shelter there from afar. A time-lapse video of the Egyptian Temple of Dendur, which has survived since 15 B.C., compresses an entire day, from dawn to twilight, into two fleeting minutes. As the scene shifts from tranquil to bustling, it feels like both an endorsement of solitude and a reassurance of collective pleasures.


A Guide to the Coronavirus

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

Art and Ephemera Once Owned by Pioneering Artist Mary Beth Edelson Discarded on the Street in SoHo – artnet News

Published

 on


This afternoon in Manhattan’s SoHo neighborhood, people walking along Mercer Street were surprised to find a trove of materials that once belonged to the late feminist artist Mary Beth Edelson, all free for the taking.

Outside of Edelson’s old studio at 110 Mercer Street, drawings, prints, and cut-out figures were sitting in cardboard boxes alongside posters from her exhibitions, monographs, and other ephemera. One box included cards that the artist’s children had given her for birthdays and mother’s days. Passersby competed with trash collectors who were loading the items into bags and throwing them into a U-Haul. 

“It’s her last show,” joked her son, Nick Edelson, who had arranged for the junk guys to come and pick up what was on the street. He has been living in her former studio since the artist died in 2021 at the age of 88.

300x250x1

Naturally, neighbors speculated that he was clearing out his mother’s belongings in order to sell her old loft. “As you can see, we’re just clearing the basement” is all he would say.

Cardboard boxes in the street filled with an artist's book.

Photo by Annie Armstrong.

Some in the crowd criticized the disposal of the material. Alessandra Pohlmann, an artist who works next door at the Judd Foundation, pulled out a drawing from the scraps that she plans to frame. “It’s deeply disrespectful,” she said. “This should not be happening.” A colleague from the foundation who was rifling through a nearby pile said, “We have to save them. If I had more space, I’d take more.” 

Edelson’s estate, which is controlled by her son and represented by New York’s David Lewis Gallery, holds a significant portion of her artwork. “I’m shocked and surprised by the sudden discovery,” Lewis said over the phone. “The gallery has, of course, taken great care to preserve and champion Mary Beth’s legacy for nearly a decade now. We immediately sent a team up there to try to locate the work, but it was gone.”

Sources close to the family said that other artwork remains in storage. Museums such as the Guggenheim, Tate Modern, the Museum of Modern Art, the Brooklyn Museum, and the Whitney currently hold her work in their private collections. New York University’s Fales Library has her papers.

Edelson rose to prominence in the 1970s as one of the early voices in the feminist art movement. She is most known for her collaged works, which reimagine famed tableaux to narrate women’s history. For instance, her piece Some Living American Women Artists (1972) appropriates Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper (1494–98) to include the faces of Faith Ringgold, Agnes Martin, Yoko Ono, and Alice Neel, and others as the apostles; Georgia O’Keeffe’s face covers that of Jesus.

Someone on the streets holds paper cut-outs of women.

A lucky passerby collecting a couple of figurative cut-outs by Mary Beth Edelson. Photo by Annie Armstrong.

In all, it took about 45 minutes for the pioneering artist’s material to be removed by the trash collectors and those lucky enough to hear about what was happening.

Dealer Jordan Barse, who runs Theta Gallery, biked by and took a poster from Edelson’s 1977 show at A.I.R. gallery, “Memorials to the 9,000,000 Women Burned as Witches in the Christian Era.” Artist Keely Angel picked up handwritten notes, and said, “They smell like mouse poop. I’m glad someone got these before they did,” gesturing to the men pushing papers into trash bags.

A neighbor told one person who picked up some cut-out pieces, “Those could be worth a fortune. Don’t put it on eBay! Look into her work, and you’ll be into it.”

Follow Artnet News on Facebook:
Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

Biggest Indigenous art collection – CTV News Barrie

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Biggest Indigenous art collection  CTV News Barrie

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Art

Why Are Art Resale Prices Plummeting? – artnet News

Published

 on


Welcome to the Art Angle, a podcast from Artnet News that delves into the places where the art world meets the real world, bringing each week’s biggest story down to earth. Join us every week for an in-depth look at what matters most in museums, the art market, and much more, with input from our own writers and editors, as well as artists, curators, and other top experts in the field.

The art press is filled with headlines about trophy works trading for huge sums: $195 million for an Andy Warhol, $110 million for a Jean-Michel Basquiat, $91 million for a Jeff Koons. In the popular imagination, pricy art just keeps climbing in value—up, up, and up. The truth is more complicated, as those in the industry know. Tastes change, and demand shifts. The reputations of artists rise and fall, as do their prices. Reselling art for profit is often quite difficult—it’s the exception rather than the norm. This is “the art market’s dirty secret,” Artnet senior reporter Katya Kazakina wrote last month in her weekly Art Detective column.

In her recent columns, Katya has been reporting on that very thorny topic, which has grown even thornier amid what appears to be a severe market correction. As one collector told her: “There’s a bit of a carnage in the market at the moment. Many things are not selling at all or selling for a fraction of what they used to.”

300x250x1

For instance, a painting by Dan Colen that was purchased fresh from a gallery a decade ago for probably around $450,000 went for only about $15,000 at auction. And Colen is not the only once-hot figure floundering. As Katya wrote: “Right now, you can often find a painting, a drawing, or a sculpture at auction for a fraction of what it would cost at a gallery. Still, art dealers keep asking—and buyers keep paying—steep prices for new works.” In the parlance of the art world, primary prices are outstripping secondary ones.

Why is this happening? And why do seemingly sophisticated collectors continue to pay immense sums for art from galleries, knowing full well that they may never recoup their investment? This week, Katya joins Artnet Pro editor Andrew Russeth on the podcast to make sense of these questions—and to cover a whole lot more.

Follow Artnet News on Facebook:
Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending