adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Tech

Nvidia RTX 4080 Vs RTX 4090 Vs RTX 3090 Ti: Which Should You Buy? – Forbes

Published

 on


Today Nvidia (Nasdaq:NVDA) is allowing us to lift the lid on GeForce RTX 4080 performance figures and this huge, expensive, but ultimately extremely powerful – the second Ada Lovelace architecture GPU to be released behind the RTX 4090 – will set you back a minimum of $1,199.

That’s a lot for a graphics card, but these kinds of prices aren’t new, even outside of crypto mining crazes. Even with a PC budget of $2,000, this won’t leave you with much for the rest of your gear, especially if you want to build a balances gaming PC.

In this GeForce RTX 4080 Founders Edition review, we’ll be comparing it to a bunch of other cards so if you do have a serious budget for your gaming PC or upgrade, you’ll know if it’s right for you.

300x250x1

The specifications are interesting because in a lot of ways the RTX 4080 is a lesser card than the likes of the RT 3090 Ti – a narrower memory bus, less memory, fewer Cuda cores – but trounces it with a massive 2.5GHz peak boost frequency, next generation Tensor and RT cores and an L2 cache ten times the size. There’s also DLSS 3.0 that for now is RTX 4000-only.

Is my case big enough?

This is a big graphics card and the same size as the RTX 4090 – at least in Founders Edition guise. it’s 5.4in wide, requires three PCI slots and plenty of clearance underneath for cooling. It’s also 12in long. Most standard cases will be fine, but it’s worth checking these requirements, especially with smaller cases.

Test system and benchmarks

The test system uses the Nvidia release driver for the RTX 4080 and the latest drivers as of November 10th 14th for other Nvidia and AMD cards along with a fully up to date version of Windows 11. I used an Intel Core i9-12900K, Asus ROG Strix Z690 Apex motherboard, Kingston 6,000MHz Fury DDR5 memory, a Kingston Fury Renegade SSD and Thermaltake Toughpower GF3 1350W PSU.

Other GPUs were the RTX 3090 and RTX 3090 Ti OC, courtesy of Palit in the form of its GameRock models and AMD RX 6950 XT

I started testing at 2,560 x 1,440 as the RTX 4080 makes no sense for 1080p gaming, and used a mixture of ray tracing/DXR tests, enabling DLSS mostly at the top of the resolution scale to show fps scaling.

Benchmarks

First up is Rainbow Six Extraction and at 1440p both new RTX 40 cards were outrageously fast, but the RTX 4090 had a significant lead over the RTX 4080. However, the latter was again much faster than the next best card, which was the AMD RX 6950 XT followed closely by the RTX 3090 Ti.

Stepping up to 4K below and the RTX 4080 was again a lot faster than any other card except the RTX 4090, which again enjoyed a huge advantage. Still, the RTX 3090 Ti was well and truly beaten by the new card which added more than 20fps to the minimum 99th percentile frame rate and also a 58 percent improvement over the RTX 3080.

Finally at 4K but with DLSS enabled in balanced mode, and again the RTX 4080 was much faster than the RTX 3090 Ti while the RTX 4090 was even faster, edging out a significant lead.

Next in Forza Horizon 5, which certainly favors AMD handing second and third place to RX 6900 GPUs, the RTX 4080 had a decidedly average minimum 99th percentile, but much more competitive average frame rate that was second overall.

Stepping up to 4K saw the RTX 4080 leapfrog the RX 6900 XT and would be the pick over the RX 6950 XT too given it offered a much higher average frame rate again. However, there wasn’t as big a difference between it and previous generation RTX cards as in other games.

Microsoft Flight Simulator is a tricky game to net big increases in frame rates and at 1440p, there clearly seems to be bottlenecks in other parts of the system – this is where DLSS 3.0 can help which we’ll get to in a minute. Without it, there’s very little difference between the cards on test.

4K was a similar picture although with greater difference between the RTX 4080 and RTX 3080 -not really enough to warrant the upgrade costs though.

Adding in DLSS didn’t really help much seeing as bottlenecks were still hampering things, but a few frames were added mostly to the average frame rates in some cases.

The ray tracing performance of the RTX 4080 was on full display here in Metro Exodus and here the average frame rates again impressed the most, streaking off into the distance with the RTX 4090 having more of a lead on the minimum 99th percentile over the RTX 4080. There were some significant gains for the RTX 4080 over previous generation cards too

At 4K the RTX 4090 edged a bigger lead, but the RTX 4080 was still significantly faster than other cards, with a 21 percent lead over the RTX 3090 Ti’s minimum 99th percentile.

With DLSS added into the equation it was a similar story, edging out the RTX 3090 Ti with some significant leads, especially with the average frame rate, while the RTX 4090 was much faster on the minimum 99th percentile.

AMD has improved its stance with DXR enabled in Watch Dogs, but still has some work to do as the RTX 3080 was still quicker than both RX 6000 cards. This meant they were easy targets for the RTX 4080, which was far quicker than anything except the RTX 4090 and again enjoying a 21 percent lead over the RTX 3090 Ti’s minimum 99th percentile – the same as in Metro Exodus at the same resolution.

At 4K it was again an impressive showing, this time hitting a 34 percent lead over the RTX 3090 Ti and 72 percent over the RTX 3080, again with the RTX 4090 giving everything a bloody nose.

Adding in DLSS and we have yet more impressive numbers compared to the RTX 3090 Ti and strangely here the RTX 4090 lost a lot of its lead. If you needed a benchmark to warrant the extra outlay over the RTX 3080, this is probably it, with the RTX 4080 enjoying a 76 percent performance gain.

Halo Infinite’s campaign mode wasn’t the picture of consistency, but offered an insight into this popular game’s performance and was another title to see the RTX 4080 benefit more with the average frame rate than the minimum 99th percentile.

At 4K it was even more the case with those average frame rates and also the RTX 4090’s prowess here is quite clear too. There was a 33 percent boost to the average frame rate over the RTX 3090 Ti, but only a handful of frames on the minimum 99th percentile.

DLSS has established itself as a highly useful and worthwhile feature and in Flight Simulator, frate rates are king, especially if you’re more concerned about responsiveness than anything else. With DLSS 3.0, as discussed in the RTX 4090 review, games like this that are bottlenecked by other areas of the system benefit massively. Here, a different benchmark to the one above due to the limited nature of the Nvidia beta that enables DLSS 3.0, although this should be a native feature as you read this courtesy of the new 40th Anniversary Update package.

This is the way to get big frame rate improvements in Flight Simulator, nearly doubling the performance to not using DLSS at all and even at 4K you’re getting frame rates that will cater for most high refresh rate monitors too.

Cyberpunk 2077 was no exception, with the RTX 4080 with DLSS 3.0 actually beating the RTX 4090 with DLSS 2.0 and trebling the performance of the standard RTX 4090 benchmark.

Power consumption is high, but actually less than the RTX 3080 and far less than the RTX 3090, so in terms of bang for your watt, the RTX 4080 packs a punch and likely won’t need a power supply upgrade.

Temperatures usually hovered around 60°C, and with the power draw above you’d kind of hope to see such low gaming temperatures given the absolutely enormous cooler. In fact, I’d sooner see a smaller cooler and add 10°C to that temperature.

Conclusions

If anything the RTX 4080 has reaffirmed what a monstrously fast graphics card the RTX 4090 is, with it enjoying lofty leads in a lot of games. However, the RTX 4080 was also quicker than anticipated, sticking close to the flagship in a lot of benchmarks and often enjoying huge leads over the RTX 3090 Ti, leaving a huge gulf between it and the RTX 3080.

There isn’t much left to say other than this is a huge, powerful and extremely expensive way to add a graphics card to your gaming PC, but with the addition of a reasonably quiet cooler, low temperatures and a potentially very useful feature in DLSS 3.0, the RTX 4080 certainly won’t disappoint if you can afford it. Of course, it’s also worth waiting to see what AMD has in store with its RTX 7900 XTX that’s released soon.

Follow me here on Forbes using the blue follow button below or or check me out on YouTube, Instagram, Twitter and Facebook to see the latest PC hardware news and reviews.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Reviews Of The New HomePod Reveal The Tech Media Has Work To Do In Appreciating Accessibility – Forbes

Published

 on


The advent of the second generation HomePod brings with it yet another opportunity to acknowledge the smart speaker’s accessibility to people with disabilities. Besides ecosystem-centric amenities like Handoff, Apple supports a bevy of accessibility features in the device; they include VoiceOver, Touch Accommodations, and much more. This is an important distinction to point out, as I’ve done in this space before. This column is precisely the forum for it.

It’s important to mention because, quite frankly, most reviewers fail to do so.

As a lifelong stutterer who has always felt digital assistants—and by extension, smart speakers—are exclusionary due to its voice-first interface paradigm, it disheartens me to see my peers in the reviewer racket continually undervalue the actual speech component of using these devices. It’s understandable—it’s difficult, if not downright impossible, to consider a perspective which you cannot fully comprehend. Yet there is room for empathy—and really, empathy is ultimately what earnest DEI initiatives are meant to reflect—with regards to how privileged it is for the majority of journalists (and their readers) to effortlessly shout into the ether and have Alexa or Siri or the Google Assistant swiftly spring into action.

300x250x1

Look no further than the embargoed HomePod 2 reviews that dropped earlier this week ahead of the product’s general availability starting on Friday. Every single one of them, whether in print or on YouTube, focuses solely on the sound quality. While perfectly sensible to do so, it’s cringeworthy to watch everyone utter not a single word about the speaker’s accessibility features or how verbally accessible Siri may be to someone with a speech delay. Again, expertise is hard—but empathy is not. Put another way, there are very real and very important characteristics of Apple’s new smart speaker that largely go ignored because it’s presumed (albeit rightly so, given how language models are typically trained) that a person is able to competently communicate with the thing. The elephant in the room is there’s far more to tell concerning the HomePod’s story. It’s counterintuitive to most, but it isn’t all about sound quality or smarts or computational audio or ecosystem.

Of course, the responsibility rests not on the tech press alone. Smart speaker makers in Apple, Amazon, Google, Sonos, and others all have to do their part on a technical level such that using a HomePod is a more accessible experience for those with speech impairments. Back in early October, I reported on tech heavyweights Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft coming together “in a way that would make Voltron blush” on an initiative with the University of Illinois to help make voice-centric products more accessible to people with speech disabilities. The project, called the Speech Accessibility Project, is described as “a new research initiative to make voice recognition technology more useful for people with a range of diverse speech patterns and disabilities.” The essential idea here is current speech models favor typical speech, which makes sense for the masses, but which critically leaves out those who speak using atypical speech patterns. Thus, it’s imperative for engineers to make the technology as inclusive as possible by feeding the artificial intelligence the most diverse dataset possible.

“There are millions of Americans who have speech differences or disabilities. Most of us interact with digital assistants fairly seamlessly, but for folks with less intelligible speech, there can be a barrier to access,” Clarion Mendes, a clinical professor in speech and hearing science and a speech-language pathologist, told me in an interview ahead of my report from October. “This initiative [the Speech Accessibility Project] lessens the digital divide for individuals with disabilities. Increasing access and breaking down barriers means improved quality of life and increased independence. As we embark on this project, the voices and needs of folks in the disability community will be paramount as they share their feedback.”

Astute readers will note what Mendes ultimately expresses: empathy!

It should be stressed the thrust of this piece is not to throw my colleagues and friends under the bus and denigrate their work. They aren’t unfeeling people. The thrust here is simply that, as a stutterer, I feel extremely marginalized and underrepresented when I watch, say, MKBHD hurl rapid-fire commands at Siri or another without trouble. By and large, the smart speaker category has long felt exclusionary to me for the speech issue alone. The uneasiness doesn’t go away just because Apple’s HomePod line sounds great and fits nicely with my use of HomeKit. These are issues Apple (and its contemporaries) must reckon with in the long-term to create the most well-rounded digital assistant experience possible. Software tools like Siri Pause Time, a feature new to iOS 16 that allows users to tell Siri how long to wait until a person stops speaking to respond, is limited in its true effectiveness. The problem is, it sidesteps the problem rather than meet it at the source. It puts a band-aid on something that requires more intricate treatment.

All told, what the new HomePod reviews illustrate so well is the fact the technology media still has a ways to go yet—despite making big strides in recent times—in truly embracing accessibility as a core component of everyday coverage. The expectation shouldn’t be to ask mainstream reviewers to suddenly become experts at assistive technologies to assess stuff; that’s unrealistic. What is highly realistic, however, is to carry an expectation that editors and writers would seek the knowledge they don’t have. It’s conceptually (and practically) no different than an outlet investing in other social justice reporting—in the AAPI and Black communities, for example, especially important nowadays given recent events.

If reviewers can endlessly lament the perceived idiocy of Siri, it isn’t a stretch to acknowledge the adjacency of Siri’s lack of gracefulness in parsing atypical speech. Moreover, it shouldn’t be akin to pulling teeth to ask newspeople to consider regularly running more nuanced takes on products alongside the more overviewing ones. The disability viewpoint is not esoteric; it matters. It’s long past time disability inclusion (and disabled reporters) figure prominently at the tech desks of newsrooms the world over. Accessibility deserves a seat at the table too.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Samsung Galaxy Unpacked 2023: all the news and updates from the event – The Verge

Published

 on


This year’s first Samsung Galaxy Unpacked event will take place in front of an audience in San Francisco’s Masonic Auditorium, marking the first in-person event for Samsung in three years. It kicks off on Wednesday, February 1st, at 1PM ET / 10AM PT, and we’re expecting some exciting announcements.

There have already been tons of rumors (and plenty of leaks) about its Galaxy S23 phones, which could cost a bit more than their S22 predecessors. Other leaks indicate that the flagship S23 Ultra could come with an upgraded 200-megapixel camera along with a 6.8-inch OLED display.

Unlike Galaxy Unpacked events in the recent past, Samsung’s product reservation page suggests that the company’s also planning to release several new laptops instead of new earbuds or smartwatches. We could see up to five variations of its brand-new Galaxy Book 3 laptops, featuring thinner and lighter OLED panels with sensors embedded directly into the touchscreens.

300x250x1

If you’re looking to stay up to date on this year’s Galaxy Unpacked, The Verge will keep you posted on all the news and product announcements from the event.

  • hr]:last:border-none”>

  • hr]:last:border-none”>

    Feb 1, 2023, 2:00 PM UTCUmar Shakir

    These new 45W and 25W GaN fast chargers are compatible with Samsung’s Super Fast Charging 2.0 tech to quickly fill up the batteries in Galaxy phones.


  • hr]:last:border-none”>

  • hr]:last:border-none”>

  • hr]:last:border-none”>

  • hr]:last:border-none”>

  • hr]:last:border-none”>

  • hr]:last:border-none”>

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Why Live Casinos are Taking the Canadian Gaming Community by Storm

Published

 on

Live Casinos

Were you aware that there are currently more than 2,100 online casinos which solely cater to Canadian players? Ever since the dawn of high-speed Internet, a growing number of fans have become attracted to these platforms thanks to their flexibility and decidedly user-friendly nature. Whether referring to slots, poker or a quick game of bingo, there are numerous options to explore.

However, it is also wise to take a look at some of the latest trends. Perhaps the most interesting involves the notion of live casinos. What do these portals offer, what makes them different than traditional platforms and why might live dealer games represent the next digital wave of the future?

The Basic Concept of Live Online Casinos

The main principle associated with any live casino involves the ability to interact with a human. This normally comes in the form of a dealer. As opposed to playing games that rely solely upon random number generation (RNG), a human dealer will be present via a live streaming portal. This helps to provide what some have called a rather “organic” nature to the games themselves.

For instance, a live casino ontario may offer players the ability to take part in a game of virtual poker. They will be competing against other members of the same table while taking careful note of which cards are dealt. In many ways, this level of interaction closely mirrors the experiences associated with a physical gaming establishment.

300x250x1

What Games Can be Accessed?

Now that we have taken a quick look at the fundamental principles of live casinos, what types of games can users play? Answering this question will partially depend on the portal itself as well as the software technology that is present. However, live dealer games can nonetheless be segmented into a handful of general categories including:

  • Table games such as blackjack and poker
  • Bingo
  • Slots
  • “Combination” games such as poker that leads into a final round of jackpot slots

Those who wish to learn more should navigate to the site in question and peruse the types of live games that are offered. It could also be wise to contact a representative to address any additional questions.

Are There Any Possible Downsides?

Live casinos are certainly set to make their presence known throughout the nation. Still, it is wise to point out a few potential obstacles that may need to be overcome. One possible issue involves the relatively limited number of games when compared to standard online platforms. It could also be difficult to access certain competitions due to a sudden influx of players. Finally, live online streaming requires a relatively fast and extremely stable high-speed Internet connection. This may present a problem for those who live within the more remote regions of Canada.

Having said this, live casinos are already enjoyed by countless Canadian players. It is a foregone conclusion that they will become even more popular in the near future.

 

Continue Reading

Trending