adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Pierre Poilievre: Rooted in Western Canadian Conservative Populism. Who does He Represent?

Published

 on

House of Commons to break for the holidays, return in January

Where do Pierre Poilievre’s loyalties lay? With those who support him financially and politically, or with Canadian citizens and the nation he wants to lead. Can it be both?

Poilievre has an ideology based on the Reform-conservative Tradition of Western Canada. Not a centralist, nor beholding to the urban centers of Canada, this man claims to represent those within our nation that are unrepresented by any other political party, those whose voice has been ignored, misunderstood, and misrepresented by the progressive forces that presently rule Canada. He claims to represent the little guy while racking in the millions of dollars donated to his party by corporations, businesses, and wealthy folk.

What is his plan of attack against the Liberals, but to attack the CBC, a Canadian Institution that does much that private broadcasters will not do, like represent and reach all areas of Canada? Does he institute new and innovative ideas that will protect Canadian Culture and create jobs? No, he wants to close the CBC down or at least sell it to one of Canada’s Communications multi-monopolies like Bell or Rogers. Conservatism with no grasp of what Canadians want, a movement that represents Big Corporations, believing in ideals of the past while ignoring the present.

Can Pierre represent the little guy while accepting truckloads of funds from the oil, agricultural and corporate sectors? Encana(Oil), TransCanada(Energy), Enbridge(Energy), TransAlta(Energy), and so on, with the names of many of Canada’s largest corporations, competing to donate their funds to who they believe may be Canada’s new Prime Minister very soon from now. Convoy donors gave the CPC over $406,000 during their leadership race, many in favor of the present leader. Pierre had many a selfie with these convoy participants, drawing upon any media attention he could get. Did Pierre call the immediate dismantling of the convoy protest with the immediate arrest of the convoy leadership? Not for 2-3 weeks. I guess he believes in the old adage “My enemies enemy is my friend. The convoy’s enemy was Prime Minister Trudeau, and the extraordinary – health protocols applied by the Liberal Administration. Instead of showing clear opposition against the protestor’s illegal actions, he showed hidden hushed support for them, hoping upon hope that the Liberal Administration’s popularity would be harmed.

Pierre Poilievre hopes to become Canada’s Trump, lifted to power through public grass-rooted support. Pierre Poilievre is not a Doug Ford. Not even close. Pierre is a true populist Conservative, owned by Western Canada’s Energy Sector, hoping to conserve this sector’s influence and economic power. Populism does not mean progressive folks, and he is not progressive. Doug Ford has been able to apply for progressive programs while attempting to remain fiscally grounded. Pierre Poilievre wishes to run the Canadian Government like a Corporation, and we know just how much corporations give a damn about the average Johnny Canuck eh? Look at your cost of living, with food, clothing, transportation, education, and basically, all costs skyrocketing upward. Who controls those costs by the way? Well, Pierre Poilievre’s good friends the corporations of Canada. Pierre says profit is not a bad word, and indeed it is not, but greed, inflation, and mass profiteering surely are, especially when the money taken/given comes from the public pocketbooks.

Pierre Poilievre’s insistence that Canadians rely entirely upon the creative momentum of private enterprise, to create jobs, and protect our environment and economic structure is simplistic at best. Lower taxes and less regulation he proclaims will grow our economy, all the while trusting corporations to carry out their business with the average Johnny Canuck always in mind, Canadian’s needs and wishes respected fully. Yeah, Right.

Political Conservatism: Committed to traditional values and ideas with opposition to change or innovation. Favoring views of “free enterprise”, private ownership, and socially traditional ideals.

Political Progressive: To make a better world. Progress from the old tired tried values to newer innovatively progressive ones, that are hopefully better than past ideals/methodology.

Note: sourced from Canada.ca, CRS, and Statistics Canada

Steven Kaszab
Bradford, Ontario
skaszab@yahoo.ca

Politics

Political Earthquake in British Columbia: Kevin Falcon Suspends B.C. United Campaign, Backs Conservatives

Published

 on

In a move that sent shockwaves through British Columbia’s political landscape, B.C. United leader Kevin Falcon announced on Wednesday that his party would suspend its campaign for the upcoming provincial election and throw its support behind John Rustad’s resurgent B.C. Conservatives. This unprecedented decision has left political watchers and analysts scrambling to make sense of the ramifications for the province’s political future.

Kevin Falcon, who took the reins of the B.C. Liberals—now rebranded as B.C. United—in February 2022, delivered the stunning news at a press conference that left many in disbelief. The former cabinet minister, known for his confidence and assertiveness, appeared uncharacteristically somber and introspective as he explained the rationale behind his decision.

Shachi Kurl, president of the Angus Reid Institute, observed the stark contrast in Falcon’s demeanor. “This is a man who has always exuded confidence, even cockiness, throughout his political career. But today, he seemed on the brink of tears, visibly struggling with the weight of this decision,” Kurl noted. The emotional toll of Falcon’s announcement was evident, underscoring the gravity of the situation both personally and professionally for the B.C. United leader.

The roots of B.C. United’s collapse can be traced back to two key decisions made by Falcon: the expulsion of John Rustad from the party and the controversial rebranding from the B.C. Liberals to B.C. United. Rustad, who was removed from the party in February 2023 for questioning climate change science, quickly capitalized on his dismissal by revitalizing the dormant B.C. Conservative Party. Since then, Rustad has attracted a growing number of former B.C. United MLAs and candidates to his cause, turning the B.C. Conservatives into a formidable political force.

The decision to rebrand the B.C. Liberals as B.C. United, which was meant to signal a fresh start for the party, has been widely criticized as poorly timed and poorly executed. Bill Bennett, a former Liberal cabinet minister, lamented the lack of public understanding of the new brand. “There was no real effort to rebrand and help the public grasp who B.C. United was. The entire process lacked sufficient resources, which ultimately led to its failure,” Bennett said.

Political scientists have been quick to analyze the implications of Falcon’s decision to suspend B.C. United’s campaign. Stewart Prest, a political science lecturer at the University of British Columbia (UBC), expressed shock at the sudden turn of events. “This was a party that, just moments ago, was preparing to compete in this election. To suddenly wave the white flag and step aside in favor of another party is unprecedented. We haven’t seen anything quite like this before,” Prest remarked.

The move has also raised questions about Falcon’s leadership and the future of B.C. United. Gerald Baier, an associate professor of political science at UBC, suggested that Falcon’s decision to expel Rustad may be viewed as the pivotal moment in his leadership. “If Falcon could go back and change one decision, it would likely be the expulsion of Rustad. That move set off a chain reaction that ultimately led to the party’s collapse,” Baier explained.

With B.C. United stepping aside, the B.C. Conservatives are now positioned to become the main opposition to the ruling B.C. NDP in the upcoming election, scheduled for October 19. However, the transition will not be without its challenges. The Conservatives will need to decide which B.C. United candidates to include on their slate, a process that could leave some candidates and voters in a state of uncertainty.

As the political landscape in British Columbia shifts dramatically, the upcoming election promises to be one of the most closely watched and hotly contested in recent memory. The decision by Falcon to back the B.C. Conservatives has not only upended the election but has also reshaped the future of politics in the province. As the dust settles, all eyes will be on John Rustad and his ability to capitalize on this newfound momentum.

In conclusion, Kevin Falcon’s decision to suspend B.C. United’s campaign and endorse the B.C. Conservatives marks a pivotal moment in British Columbia’s political history. The move has raised numerous questions about the future of B.C. United, the leadership of the B.C. Conservatives, and the upcoming election itself. As the province braces for what promises to be a highly volatile election season, one thing is clear: British Columbia’s political landscape will never be the same.

Continue Reading

Politics

No conflict in handling of B.C. zero-emission grants, says auditor general

Published

 on

 

VICTORIA – British Columbia’s auditor general says his office has found no evidence of a conflict of interest in the handling of provincial grants for the zero-emission vehicle sector, after an accusation by a truck maker earlier this year.

Michael Pickup says in a statement the investigation looked into accounting firm MNP’s handling of Advanced Research and Commercialization grant applications, reviewing “a significant amount of information” from the company, the government and all applicants.

Pickup says the results show no evidence MNP wrote grant applications for clients, influenced the evaluation process to benefit clients or used its administering of the program to “recruit” clients for the company’s other services.

In April, the provincial legislature unanimously directed Pickup’s office to examine allegations by electric-hybrid truck maker Edison Motors that MNP was both administering the grants and offering services to help businesses with applications.

The Office of the Auditor General says the allegations from Edison, which is based in Merritt, B.C., suggested MNP “was offering to write grant applications in exchange for a success fee while also deciding who received grant funding.”

MNP said at the time that the allegations were “false and misleading.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 28, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Prime Ontario agricultural land to be protected amid energy expansion, minister says

Published

 on

 

Certain solar farms will be banned on prime agricultural land in Ontario as the province expands energy production to meet demand in the coming decades, Energy Minister Stephen Lecce said Wednesday.

Ontario is looking to add some 5,000 megawatts of energy to the grid, with Lecce directing the Independent Electricity System Operator to secure “technology agnostic” energy resources. That means the province will use a mix of natural gas, hydroelectric, renewables, nuclear and biomass energy sources, he said.

But the province is making efforts to protect key agricultural areas in the process, the minister said.

Ground-mounted solar panels will be prohibited on prime agricultural farmland, said Lecce, who pledged the province would “never misuse” those lands.

“Our farmers need more energy more than ever,” Lecce said.

“They need access to to affordable energy and so we made a commitment to work with them on a policy that ultimately will respect prime agricultural land.”

Other energy products being considered on prime agricultural land will now require an impact assessment before proceeding.

The province is also giving power to municipalities to decide if they want a particular energy project.

“Long gone are the days where Queen’s Park imposes projects on unwilling communities, undermining those agricultural areas,” Lecce said.

The news is welcome to farmers, said Drew Spoelstra, the president of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture.

“The new energy procurement framework is a major step forward for Ontario,” he said.

“Reliable and affordable energy is incredibly important to the growth of the Ontario economy, including food production, food processing and the agri-food sector.”

Farmers and Premier Doug Ford’s government have had an up-and-down relationship in recent years in light of the Greenbelt scandal.

The province had said they were going to build 50,000 homes on the protected Greenbelt, which includes prime agricultural land. But several investigations by provincial bodies found the process was flawed as it favoured some developers with ties to the government over others.

Farmers did not like the possible encroachment onto farmland and joined the chorus to denounce the Greenbelt move. Last summer, amid mounting public pressure to reverse course, Ford walked back those Greenbelt plans.

Lecce’s announcement Wednesday comes as the province’s electricity demand is expected to grow by about two per cent each year, although that could be even higher depending on electrification within the broader economy.

The IESO has said the province will need at least 60 per cent more energy by 2050.

Ontario has also recently been adding electricity storage projects, with an eye to about 2,500 megawatts, and the IESO said the province’s emerging battery fleet will pair well with wind and solar, so that the power generated by those methods can be stored and injected into the grid when needed.

Ford cancelled 750 renewable energy contracts shortly after his Progressive Conservatives formed government in 2018, after the former Liberal government faced widespread anger over the long-term contracts with clean power producers at above-market rates.

The province is also moving ahead with nuclear energy expansion, including seeking to refurbish units at the Pickering nuclear plant, build small modular reactors at the Darlington nuclear plant and exploring a new, large-scale plant at Bruce Power.

In 2021, the electricity system was 94 per cent emissions free, but that is now down to 87 per cent as it uses natural gas to meet demand.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 28, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending