adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Business

Traders grapple to find the bottom as Dow enters bear market territory with S&P 500 not far behind – CNBC

Published

 on


Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange during the opening bell on March 10, 2020 in New York.

Timothy A. Clary | AFP | Getty Images

300x250x1

We have touched an intraday 20% decline in the S&P 500 that many associate with bear market territory.  We also hit a bear market on the Dow Jones Industrial Average at Wednesday’s close. Typical metrics for a market bottom do not apply in this very unusual situation spawned by the novel coronavirus pandemic.

First off, internal indications of oversold conditions are not reliable in these kind of extreme events.  For example, we have had two days this week where 90% of the volume has been on the downside — an exceptionally rare occurrence that has usually indicated a selling climax, and a market bottom.  Except this is that rare event, that black swan, that traders have come to believe may be an exception to the rule.  Another example: The CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX,  over 50  on an intraday basis for the last four days, is also exceedingly rare.  The last time anything close to this happened was at the tail end of the financial crisis, when the VIX remained over 50 for nearly two months between October and December 2008. 

Second, earnings are impossible to determine.  How many times in the last few days have you heard the phrases “stocks are cheap” and “this is a buying opportunity?”  Maybe, but this only has meaning if we have some sense of what earnings will be over the next couple quarters.  We don’t.

So what rules of thumb might work for a trading range?   Traders are increasingly looking at recession ranges for the markets.  The S&P will typically see a drawdown of roughly 13% from high to low in a typical year, but in recession conditions — which are now actively under consideration by some — the S&P will typically drop 30% or more, implying another 10% downside to the markets. 

 Is this a reasonable assessment, or should we consider greater extremes — like the great recession, which produced a decline of 50% in the S&P from peak to trough?

Investor opinions are all over the map, but Brian Belski at BMO says no.  “In my 30 years, I have endured a lot — but nothing like this fear-first + analyze later phenomenon,” he said.  “That’s why recession anxiety lacks merit in our view.  Fundamentals are at the mercy of fears, rhetoric and headlines.”

For Matt Maley, chief market strategist at Miller Tabak, all the talk of a “bear market” is nonsense:  “A bear market is when you drop a lot, and then stay down,” he said, noting that 1987 — when the market dropped 22% in a single day in October — was not considered a bear market.  “We had a one-day drop and then the market snapped back,” he said.

Maley says he would look for a deeper correction.  He is watching the 200-week moving average, 2,640 for the S&P 500, which the market hit during the European crisis in 2011, and in early 2016.  “If we break that level, it will considerably raise the odds that this will be a real bear market and a recession,” he told me. 

What’s next?  The markets are moving on three data points:  oil; coronavirus headlines; and the content, size and timing of fiscal stimulus.  Absent any good news on these three fronts — and there was none today — markets will drift lower.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Business

Tesla Promises Cheap EVs by 2025 | OilPrice.com – OilPrice.com

Published

 on



Tesla Promises Cheap EVs by 2025 | OilPrice.com



300x250x1


Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Related News

Tesla

Tesla has promised to start selling cheaper models next year, days after a Reuters report revealed that the company had shelved its plans for an all-new Tesla that would cost only $25,000.

The news that Tesla was scrapping the Model 2 came amid a drop in sales and profits, and a decision to slash a tenth of the company’s global workforce. Reuters also noted increased competition from Chinese EV makers.

Tesla’s deliveries slumped in the first quarter for the first annual drop since the start of the pandemic in 2020, missing analyst forecasts by a mile in a sign that even price cuts haven’t been able to stave off an increasingly heated competition on the EV market.

Profits dropped by 50%, disappointing investors and leading to a slump in the company’s share prices, which made any good news urgently needed. Tesla delivered: it said it would bring forward the date for the release of new, lower-cost models. These would be produced on its existing platform and rolled out in the second half of 2025, per the BBC.

Reuters cited the company as warning that this change of plans could “result in achieving less cost reduction than previously expected,” however. This suggests the price tag of the new models is unlikely to be as small as the $25,000 promised for the Model 2.

The decision is based on a substantially reduced risk appetite in Tesla’s management, likely affected by the recent financial results and the intensifying competition with Chinese EV makers. Shelving the Model 2 and opting instead for cars to be produced on existing manufacturing lines is the safer move in these “uncertain times”, per the company.

Tesla is also cutting prices, as many other EV makers are doing amid a palpable decline in sales in key markets such as Europe, where the phaseout of subsidies has hit demand for EVs seriously. The cut is of about $2,000 on all models that Tesla currently sells.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Related posts

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Why the Bank of Canada decided to hold interest rates in April – Financial Post

Published

 on


Article content

Divisions within the Bank of Canada over the timing of a much-anticipated cut to its key overnight interest rate stem from concerns of some members of the central bank’s governing council that progress on taming inflation could stall in the face of stronger domestic demand — or even pick up again in the event of “new surprises.”

“Some members emphasized that, with the economy performing well, the risk had diminished that restrictive monetary policy would slow the economy more than necessary to return inflation to target,” according to a summary of deliberations for the April 10 rate decision that were published Wednesday. “They felt more reassurance was needed to reduce the risk that the downward progress on core inflation would stall, and to avoid jeopardizing the progress made thus far.”

Article content

300x250x1

Others argued that there were additional risks from keeping monetary policy too tight in light of progress already made to tame inflation, which had come down “significantly” across most goods and services.

Some pointed out that the distribution of inflation rates across components of the consumer price index had approached normal, despite outsized price increases and decreases in certain components.

“Coupled with indicators that the economy was in excess supply and with a base case projection showing the output gap starting to close only next year, they felt there was a risk of keeping monetary policy more restrictive than needed.”

In the end, though, the central bankers agreed to hold the rate at five per cent because inflation remained too high and there were still upside risks to the outlook, albeit “less acute” than in the past couple of years.

Despite the “diversity of views” about when conditions will warrant cutting the interest rate, central bank officials agreed that monetary policy easing would probably be gradual, given risks to the outlook and the slow path for returning inflation to target, according to the summary of deliberations.

Article content

They considered a number of potential risks to the outlook for economic growth and inflation, including housing and immigration, according to summary of deliberations.

The central bankers discussed the risk that housing market activity could accelerate and further boost shelter prices and acknowledged that easing monetary policy could increase the likelihood of this risk materializing. They concluded that their focus on measures such as CPI-trim, which strips out extreme movements in price changes, allowed them to effectively look through mortgage interest costs while capturing other shelter prices such as rent that are more reflective of supply and demand in housing.

Recommended from Editorial

  1. Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem during a news conference in Ottawa.

    BoC ‘committed to finishing the job’ on inflation:‘ Macklem

  2. Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem at a press conference in Ottawa.

    Time for Macklem to turn before it’s too late

  3. Canada's inflation rate picked up slightly in March, but the consumer price index (CPI) release suggested that core inflation continued to slow.

    ‘Welcome news’ on inflation raises odds of rate cut

They also agreed to keep a close eye on immigration in the coming quarters due to uncertainty around recent announcements by the federal government.

“The projection incorporated continued strong population growth in the first half of 2024 followed by much softer growth, in line with the federal government’s target for reducing the share of non-permanent residents,” the summary said. “But details of how these plans will be implemented had not been announced. Governing council recognized that there was some uncertainty about future population growth and agreed it would be important to update the population forecast each quarter.”

• Email: bshecter@nationalpost.com

Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the business news you need to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.

Share this article in your social network

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Meta shares sink after it reveals spending plans – BBC.com

Published

 on


Woman looks at phone in front of Facebook image - stock shot.

Shares in US tech giant Meta have sunk in US after-hours trading despite better-than-expected earnings.

The Facebook and Instagram owner said expenses would be higher this year as it spends heavily on artificial intelligence (AI).

Its shares fell more than 15% after it said it expected to spend billions of dollars more than it had previously predicted in 2024.

300x250x1

Meta has been updating its ad-buying products with AI tools to boost earnings growth.

It has also been introducing more AI features on its social media platforms such as chat assistants.

The firm said it now expected to spend between $35bn and $40bn, (£28bn-32bn) in 2024, up from an earlier prediction of $30-$37bn.

Its shares fell despite it beating expectations on its earnings.

First quarter revenue rose 27% to $36.46bn, while analysts had expected earnings of $36.16bn.

Sophie Lund-Yates, lead equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said its spending plans were “aggressive”.

She said Meta’s “substantial investment” in AI has helped it get people to spend time on its platforms, so advertisers are willing to spend more money “in a time when digital advertising uncertainty remains rife”.

More than 50 countries are due to have elections this year, she said, “which hugely increases uncertainty” and can spook advertisers.

She added that Meta’s “fortunes are probably also being bolstered by TikTok’s uncertain future in the US”.

Meta’s rival has said it will fight an “unconstitutional” law that could result in TikTok being sold or banned in the US.

President Biden has signed into law a bill which gives the social media platform’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, nine months to sell off the app or it will be blocked in the US.

Ms Lund-Yates said that “looking further ahead, the biggest risk [for Meta] remains regulatory”.

Last year, Meta was fined €1.2bn (£1bn) by Ireland’s data authorities for mishandling people’s data when transferring it between Europe and the US.

And in February of this year, Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg faced blistering criticism from US lawmakers and was pushed to apologise to families of victims of child sexual exploitation.

Ms Lund-Yates added that the firm has “more than enough resources to throw at legal challenges, but that doesn’t rule out the risks of ups and downs in market sentiment”.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending