Facing pressure over rising concerns around foreign interference in Canada Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will be naming a new special rapporteur to investigate.
Trudeau made the announcement on Monday as part of a suite of new measures aimed at addressing Canadians’ concerns over alleged election meddling by China during the last two federal campaigns.
One of the yet-to-be-selected independent official’s first orders of business will be to recommend to the federal government whether a formal inquiry or other form of probe or judicial review is the best next step.
The prime minister is also referring the issue of foreign election interference back to a top-secret committee known as the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP).
And, he’s asking the external expert body known as the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA) to examine the work done by Canadian intelligence bodies as it pertains to foreign interference.
“In the past few weeks, people have expressed many different views about the steps we should be taking to answer questions about foreign interference. To me, it comes down to two things: that our democratic institutions are safe from foreign interference, and that Canadians have confidence that it is so,” Trudeau said Monday.
Noting the mixed views among Canadians and experts around a public inquiry, Trudeau said the Liberals will “abide by” the guidance of the “eminent Canadian” chosen, on whether one is needed and if so, what its mandate and scope should be.
“Making sure that… whatever process is necessary, is unimpeachable from the very beginning is going to be part of reassuring Canadians.”
The special rapporteur will have a “wide mandate” and will make recommendations on combatting interference and strengthening Canada’s democracy, Trudeau said, vowing they will named “in the coming days.”
He said in time, the special rapporteur will be responsible for examining the entire national security landscape and tools to counter interference in Canadian affairs, to inform the future work of the federal government , as well as the work Elections Canada does to shore up federal campaigns from foreign interference.
This comes as opposition-led calls for the federal government to launch a public inquiry dominated the Commons’ return on Monday, with MP after MP rising in the House, imploring the government to act and provide more openness around the issue.
Trudeau was not present to field these calls, but during Monday’s address he detailed at length the various efforts the Liberals have taken since 2015 to try to enhance Canada’s ability to detect, deter and combat interference, as well as announcing what new measures are in the works.
Trudeau said the Liberals will be launching consultations this week on enacting a “foreign influence transparency registry”; will create a plan to implement outstanding recommendations from past interference reviews; and spend $5.5 million on building civil society organizations’ capacity to counter disinformation.
OPPOSITION INSIST INQUIRY STILL NEEDED
Early reaction from the opposition parties indicate that these steps will not be enough to satiate their desire to see a public inquiry called imminently.
The inquiry calls stem from a desire for more Liberal openness around the story that’s been dominating headlines over the last few weeks: intelligence sources alleging in reports from The Globe and Mail and Global News that China interfered in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections. The leaks are now under RCMP investigation.
Last week, opposition MPs on the Procedure and House Affairs Committee passed a motion calling for the federal government to launch a national public inquiry into allegations of foreign interference broadly, including in Canadian elections.
Those backing the motion wanted to see Trudeau strike an inquiry with the power to compel documents and key witnesses, and for the individual heading this inquiry to be unanimously selected by all recognized parties in the House of Commons.
This non-binding motion passed after hours of testimony from top intelligence officials who sought to assure that the integrity of Canada’s last two elections was upheld despite meddling attempts by China, while cautioning that they’d be limited in what more they could say in a public forum.
“All political leaders agree that the election outcomes in 2019 and in 2021 were not impacted by foreign interference… But even if it didn’t change the results of any of our elections, any interference attempt by any foreign actor is troubling and serious,” Trudeau said.
Reacting to the news, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said the Liberals continue to try to “cover up the truth,” and suggested the NSICOP was being used “to avoid accountability” and the special rapporteur would be limited in their powers.
“Parliament is supreme. A majority of the parties in the House of Commons have demanded a full public, independent inquiry and the continuation of the investigation by the parliamentary Committee. Anything less is wholly insufficient to respond to the gravity of the situation,” said Poilievre in a statement.
Both Poilievre and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said prior to Trudeau’s announcement on Monday that they wouldn’t be able to get behind any process that’s lacking transparency. They dismissed the idea of party leaders receiving secret briefings on classified material—which is not far off from how the NSICOP operates.
Singh said he didn’t think any new investigation should be conducted behind closed doors by politicians, while refusing to commit to making a full public inquiry a red line for the fate of the Liberal-NDP confidence-and-supply agreement that Poilievre has taken to calling the “cover-up coalition.”
“The process should be public,” said Singh prior to the prime minister’s press conference. Reacting to the news of NSICOP’s role, the NDP said in a statement that it was not “an acceptable substitute” for an inquiry and that “the way to stop foreign actors from acting in secret is to refuse to keep their secrets.”
In a statement in French, Bloc Quebecois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet echoed the responses of his fellow opposition leaders, continuing to call for a public inquiry.
Responding to Poilievre’s early accusation that the Liberals were trying to “sweep this under the rug,” during question period, Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc accused him of doing “absolutely nothing” on the file when CSIS identified foreign interference as a challenge during the time he was the minister responsible for democratic reform under former prime minister Stephen Harper.
After Monday’s raucous question period, Trudeau said Monday that foreign interference should “not be boiled down to sound bites and binary choices,” nor should it become a partisan issue. He then went on to repeat similar lines about Conservative inaction nearly a decade ago.
WHAT ROLE WILL SECURITY OVERSIGHT BODIES PLAY?
The NSICOP is a high-level oversight body was created in 2017. It mirrors similar committees set up in the other “Five Eyes” alliance countries. Members include MPs and senators from major parties, who must have the highest level of, or “top secret,” security clearance.
The mandate of the committee is to act as the oversight body for Canada’s national security and intelligence agencies, but it reports to Trudeau, and then tables declassified versions of its findings in Parliament.
The NSIRA is Canada’s independent expert review body for all national security and intelligence activities, created in 2019. It was designed in part to review agencies’ collection and use of sensitive intelligence.
Trudeau said Monday that he’d spoken with the heads of both bodies, to underscore that “Canadians need to have faith in their institutions and deserve answers and transparency,” and talked to them about taking on “urgent” work on this topic under their respective mandates.
This will include the NSICOP updating its last report reviewing foreign interference, with a focus on our elections, and NSIRA examining whether information on foreign interference is flowing properly across intelligence agencies and government departments. Both reports will be provided to Parliament.
“When democratic institutions are under attack, it is just that it’d be parliamentarians, elected officials who should be stepping up to protect those institutions,” Trudeau said Monday.
The NSICOP has previously studied the threat foreign interference poses to Canada and has reviewed the work of the Security and Intelligence Threats to Elections (SITE) Task Force in its monitoring of meddling in the last two general elections.
In 2019, the NSICOP issued a report calling the threat of foreign interference in Canada real, while flagging that the federal government needs to do more to counter what is a “significant and sustained” effort to meddle from China, Russia and other state actors.
The NSICOP report found the federal government slow to react to the threat of foreign interference. Its members have also spoken out against a lack of responses from the government to its various calls for actions. When asked what will change now, Trudeau admitted the Liberals need to do a better job of responding.
Trudeau has repeatedly pointed to the NSICOP as a better venue than an inquiry for officials to consider sensitive security issues such as this, behind closed doors.
Former NSICOP member and retired senator Vern White told CTV News he thinks the NSICOP is a better place to examine these concerns than a public inquiry as it could delve deeper, report back faster, and do so in a way with enough nuance to communicate adequate information without infringing on national security.
White pointed to NSICOP’s past report on Trudeau’s troubled trip to India as an example.
“You can go back and read any of the reports… I don’t think there’s ever been complaints about people reading those reports [that] they could not glean enough intelligence and information out of them to know what happened,” White said. “There are things that can’t be disclosed and that are redacted. But, I think any public inquiry of this sort would also find a fair amount of the information gleaned would have to be redacted.”
CHINESE CANADIANS CALL FOR TRANSPARENCY
Chinese Canadians have been among those calling for more transparency, in lockstep with careful consideration of how those involved are communicating that the concern is with the People’s Republic of China.
Ryan Chan of the Chinese Canadian National Council for Social Justice recently told CTV News that he thinks “some form of inquiry that’s public, non-partisan, that would look into issues of foreign government interference” should be called, but expressed concern about the potential and misplaced backlash against Chinese Canadians in the process.
“I think first and foremost… we’re focused on this issue of kind of dispelling myths or, or at least giving full public insights into what is actually going on,” he said.
“We broadly support a public inquiry as long as it’s neutral, as long as it’s transparent, that would shed light on foreign governments’ influenced into whether or not it affects our domestic politics,” said Chan.
During last week’s committee hearings, both MPs and top intelligence witnesses made the point of emphasizing that, as CSIS Director David Vigneault put it, “the threat does not come from the Chinese people, but rather from the Chinese Communist Party and the government of China.”
Vigneault noted that Chinese-Canadian parliamentarians and Chinese Canadians are often the primary victims of the People’s Republic of China’s foreign interference efforts in Canada and federal intelligence bodies continue to put efforts towards building relationships with this community and its leaders to “establish and sustain trust.”
“It’s a very delicate thing to communicate when going after the Chinese government and what they’re doing, versus what Chinese Canadians are doing,” Bert Chen, a former Conservative national council member, told CTV News.
“And we have to be very precise about these discussions and its public discourse, because as a country of immigrants talking about a country that people may have come from, it’s a very delicate balance to communicate what the state is doing back in a home country, and what Canadians here are doing now.”
Cheuk Kwan, past chair of the Toronto Association for Democracy in China, told CTV News that as a Chinese Canadian he doesn’t view raising questions about Chinese interference as racism, while noting that Chinese Canadians have for years been trying to draw attention to some of Beijing’s influence tactics.
“We are allowed to criticize China without being called racist… I think this is a normal way to deal with critics and, I believe that people are buying this line that that the CCP has been peddling all these years,” Kwan said. “We’re not dealing with denigrating Chinese people. Were just investigating a Chinese government, or any government for that matter.”
Some advocates have also voiced support for a foreign agent registry, as well as improved civic education and digital literacy resources as other actions that the federal government can take, in addition to as making it easier for members of the Chinese diaspora in Canada to flag to officials instances of political interference they experience.
“We need to rebuild that trust with the diaspora, allow them to safely come up their concerns, allow them to safely participate in any type of investigation or inquiry into any types of foreign interference,” said Cherie Wong, executive director of Alliance Canada Hong Kong.
“But I also believe that we need to take a country-agnostic, non-partisan and a cross-jurisdictional approach and looking at any type of foreign influence in Canadian elections.”
Speaking to the commitment to begin a public engagement on enacting a foreign agent registry on Monday evening, Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino noted the importance of bringing along “all communities.”
With files from CTV National News’ Judy Trinh and Glen McGregor
MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — The Australian government announced on Thursday what it described as world-leading legislation that would institute an age limit of 16 years for children to start using social media, and hold platforms responsible for ensuring compliance.
“Social media is doing harm to our kids and I’m calling time on it,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.
The legislation will be introduced in Parliament during its final two weeks in session this year, which begin on Nov. 18. The age limit would take effect 12 months after the law is passed, Albanese told reporters.
The platforms including X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook would need to use that year to work out how to exclude Australian children younger than 16.
“I’ve spoken to thousands of parents, grandparents, aunties and uncles. They, like me, are worried sick about the safety of our kids online,” Albanese said.
The proposal comes as governments around the world are wrestling with how to supervise young people’s use of technologies like smartphones and social media.
Social media platforms would be penalized for breaching the age limit, but under-age children and their parents would not.
“The onus will be on social media platforms to demonstrate they are taking reasonable steps to prevent access. The onus won’t be on parents or young people,” Albanese said.
Antigone Davis, head of safety at Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, said the company would respect any age limitations the government wants to introduce.
“However, what’s missing is a deeper discussion on how we implement protections, otherwise we risk making ourselves feel better, like we have taken action, but teens and parents will not find themselves in a better place,” Davis said in a statement.
She added that stronger tools in app stores and operating systems for parents to control what apps their children can use would be a “simple and effective solution.”
X did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday. TikTok declined to comment.
The Digital Industry Group Inc., an advocate for the digital industry in Australia, described the age limit as a “20th Century response to 21st Century challenges.”
“Rather than blocking access through bans, we need to take a balanced approach to create age-appropriate spaces, build digital literacy and protect young people from online harm,” DIGI managing director Sunita Bose said in a statement.
More than 140 Australian and international academics with expertise in fields related to technology and child welfare signed an open letter to Albanese last month opposing a social media age limit as “too blunt an instrument to address risks effectively.”
Jackie Hallan, a director at the youth mental health service ReachOut, opposed the ban. She said 73% of young people across Australia accessing mental health support did so through social media.
“We’re uncomfortable with the ban. We think young people are likely to circumvent a ban and our concern is that it really drives the behavior underground and then if things go wrong, young people are less likely to get support from parents and carers because they’re worried about getting in trouble,” Hallan said.
Child psychologist Philip Tam said a minimum age of 12 or 13 would have been more enforceable.
“My real fear honestly is that the problem of social media will simply be driven underground,” Tam said.
Australian National University lawyer Associate Prof. Faith Gordon feared separating children from there platforms could create pressures within families.
Albanese said there would be exclusions and exemptions in circumstances such as a need to continue access to educational services.
But parental consent would not entitle a child under 16 to access social media.
Earlier this year, the government began a trial of age-restriciton technologies. Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, the online watchdog that will police compliance, will use the results of that trial to provide platforms with guidance on what reasonable steps they can take.
Communications Minister Michelle Rowland said the year-long lead-in would ensure the age limit could be implemented in a “very practical way.”
“There does need to be enhanced penalties to ensure compliance,” Rowland said.
“Every company that operates in Australia, whether domiciled here or otherwise, is expected and must comply with Australian law or face the consequences,” she added.
The main opposition party has given in-principle support for an age limit at 16.
Opposition lawmaker Paul Fletcher said the platforms already had the technology to enforce such an age ban.
“It’s not really a technical viability question, it’s a question of their readiness to do it and will they incur the cost to do it,” Fletcher told Australian Broadcasting Corp.
“The platforms say: ’It’s all too hard, we can’t do it, Australia will become a backwater, it won’t possibly work.’ But if you have well-drafted legislation and you stick to your guns, you can get the outcomes,” Fletcher added.
TOKYO (AP) — A robot that has spent months inside the ruins of a nuclear reactor at the tsunami-hit Fukushima Daiichi plant delivered a tiny sample of melted nuclear fuel on Thursday, in what plant officials said was a step toward beginning the cleanup of hundreds of tons of melted fuel debris.
The sample, the size of a grain of rice, was placed into a secure container, marking the end of the mission, according to Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, which manages the plant. It is being transported to a glove box for size and weight measurements before being sent to outside laboratories for detailed analyses over the coming months.
Plant chief Akira Ono has said it will provide key data to plan a decommissioning strategy, develop necessary technology and robots and learn how the accident had developed.
The first sample alone is not enough and additional small-scale sampling missions will be necessary in order to obtain more data, TEPCO spokesperson Kenichi Takahara told reporters Thursday. “It may take time, but we will steadily tackle decommissioning,” Takahara said.
Despite multiple probes in the years since the 2011 disaster that wrecked the. plant and forced thousands of nearby residents to leave their homes, much about the site’s highly radioactive interior remains a mystery.
The sample, the first to be retrieved from inside a reactor, was significantly less radioactive than expected. Officials had been concerned that it might be too radioactive to be safely tested even with heavy protective gear, and set an upper limit for removal out of the reactor. The sample came in well under the limit.
That’s led some to question whether the robot extracted the nuclear fuel it was looking for from an area in which previous probes have detected much higher levels of radioactive contamination, but TEPCO officials insist they believe the sample is melted fuel.
The extendable robot, nicknamed Telesco, first began its mission August with a plan for a two-week round trip, after previous missions had been delayed since 2021. But progress was suspended twice due to mishaps — the first involving an assembly error that took nearly three weeks to fix, and the second a camera failure.
On Oct. 30, it clipped a sample weighting less than 3 grams (.01 ounces) from the surface of a mound of melted fuel debris sitting on the bottom of the primary containment vessel of the Unit 2 reactor, TEPCO said.
On Thursday, the gravel, whose radioactivity earlier this week recorded far below the upper limit set for its environmental and health safety, was placed into a safe container for removal out of the compartment.
The sample return marks the first time the melted fuel is retrieved out of the containment vessel.
Fukushima Daiichi lost its key cooling systems during a 2011 earthquake and tsunami, causing meltdowns in its three reactors. An estimated 880 tons of fatally radioactive melted fuel remains in them.
The government and TEPCO have set a 30-to-40-year target to finish the cleanup by 2051, which experts say is overly optimistic and should be updated. Some say it would take for a century or longer.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said there have been some delays but “there will be no impact on the entire decommissioning process.”
No specific plans for the full removal of the fuel debris or its final disposal have been decided.
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia – Gabriela Dabrowski of Ottawa and New Zealand’s Erin Routliffe rallied to defeat Americans Caroline Dolehide and Desirae Krawczyk 4-6, 6-3, (10-6) on Thursday at the WTA Finals.
With the win, Dabrowski and Routliffe completed the round-robin stage with a perfect 3-0 record at the season-ending tournament, which features the WTA Tour’s top eight women’s doubles teams.
The No. 2 seeds secured first place in their pool with the win, rallying from a set and break down to finish the match in 93 minutes.
Dolehide and Krawczyk, who defeated Dabrowski and Routliffe in the final at Toronto’s National Bank Open in August, closed their first WTA Finals with a 0-3 record.
Dabrowski and Routliffe will face American Nicole Melichar-Martinez and Australia’s Ellen Perez, who finished second in their group with a 2-1 record, in Friday’s semifinal.
The final is scheduled for Saturday.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.
