adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Sports

What Atkins does next will be critical for Blue Jays after stunning setback

Published

 on

TORONTO – There’s no making what happened to the Toronto Blue Jays in Game 2 any better, nothing anyone can say to ease the anger, erase the hurt, or change the bitter outcome. Much like the 1985 American League Championship Series, the seven straight losses to close out 1987 and the playoff drubbings in 1989 and 1991, the wild-card series against the Seattle Mariners will be part of the franchise narrative until a new round of October success ensures it’s not.

This is the show-us-don’t-tell-us space in which the Blue Jays are now firmly planted.

Still, how general manager Ross Atkins and the baseball operations department process this is vital, because the next steps really matter.

Absent long-term extensions for cornerstones Vladimir Guerrero Jr., Bo Bichette and, time to include him in this category, Alek Manoah, the clock is ticking on this core. The bullpen can’t be a soft-spot again in 2023 after costing the club a trip to the playoffs in 2021 and undermining their chances against the Mariners this year. They can’t spend another summer working through the issues with consistency, focus and attention to detail that, particularly early in 2022, nearly submarined their season.

300x250x1

Having whiffed in the hiring of Charlie Montoyo, with whom it’s reasonable to wonder if he ever really meshed, Atkins must get the hiring of the next Blue Jays manager right, which is why he left himself some very notable wiggle room even after saying that, “I think it will be very difficult for us to find better than John Schneider.”

“Out of respect for the organization, out of respect for John Schneider, I do want time to work through the process with him,” Atkins added during his season-wrap meeting with media Tuesday.

Translated from executive-speak, every single thing the Blue Jays do must run through their beloved processes and they need to go through one before removing Schneider’s interim tag. That will involve, at a minimum, talking internally about a few other names but the bigger piece will be Atkins and Schneider both hammering out what a long-term relationship looks like.

It worked over 74 games this summer because it had to after Montoyo’s firing but, over the long-term, are they ready to work together? Do they see eye-to-eye on enough things, including a balance of control? Can they build a trust that never developed between Atkins and Montoyo? Can they avoid the same pitfalls?

No one should doubt Schneider’s commitment to the Blue Jays after two decades with the organization, but with four other vacancies around the majors, he’d be well within his rights to explore his options, too.

Still, given the way he worked to establish consistent requirements for his players, emphasized attention to detail, both publicly (think of him calling out Guerrero Jr. for poor baserunning) and privately quashed moments of carelessness, and tried to mould the clubhouse into a more cohesive group, he established himself as the right person for the job.

“If you think about his history with this organization and his history with the players, you’re seeing how he handled the pressure, seeing how he handled decision-making, how he handled communication, we feel that he’s a very strong candidate,” said Atkins. “And if you put all of those pieces together and then knowing what we know about external candidates, I feel like it would be very difficult to do better than him.”

Resolution on that front should come in the next two or three weeks, with decisions on the coaching staff to follow, and while there’s plenty more on the docket, in some ways it’s the platform for everything that’s to follow.

After all, no matter what the Blue Jays do from a roster standpoint, and we’ll delve into that in a bit, the players must be deployed effectively. To do so requires alignment from the moment of acquisition, ensuring that the coaching staff knows how the player fits and how to help him deliver optimal performance. There needs to be more trust all around.

The Blue Jays need only to look at how they didn’t perform to their talent level on a consistent basis until after Montoyo’s dismissal, going 46-42 under him before a 46-28 finish under Schneider. Further closing the gap between how ability and preparation translated into consistent execution on the field is essential.

“I just feel like you continue to work to make it better,” said Atkins. “John Schneider was a big step in that process and that’s why he’s put himself in a good position.”

Personnel is part of that equation and despite the post-season outcome, worth remembering is that the Blue Jays won 92 games and have consecutive 90-win seasons for just the second time franchise history, so the roster starts in a good position.

With Ross Stripling ($3.79 million) and David Phelps ($1.75 million) the club’s only pending free agents, very little money is coming off the books and with 13 players eligible for arbitration, simply retaining their current roster will be significantly more expensive. Based on MLB Trade Rumors’ projections, the cost of Guerrero Jr. ($14.8 million), Teoscar Hernandez ($14.1 million) and Bichette ($6.1 million) and Jordan Romano ($4.4 million) will rise roughly $20 million alone.

As a result, the likelihood is that the Blue Jays, having shopped in the upper-end aisles (signing Hyun Jin Ryu, George Springer, Kevin Gausman and extending Jose Berrios) the past three winters, will likely need to make trades to get back there this winter. The financial flexibility of years past won’t return until after 2023, when several significant contracts, including that of Ryu, comes of the books.

Hernandez is one name to watch either way, as Springer – who suffered a concussion and a shoulder sprain in his collision with Bichette on Saturday and will soon be cleared for travel to determine if he needs surgery to remove a bone spur on his troublesome right elbow – may be better off in right field instead of centre.

A left-handed or switch-hitting centre-fielder would be ideal and one could perhaps be acquired with their surplus of catchers. The St. Louis Cardinals, set to lose the retiring Yadier Molina, have Dylan Carlson and right-fielder Lars Nootbar and make for an interesting potential match.

Regardless, balancing out a right-handed heavy lineup has long been a desire but one that’s easier said than done when the acquisition cost is factored in for a potentially marginal gain. There’s little point in change for the sake of change.

Yet, worth noting is Atkins pointing out that “there is something to having similar types of hitters and game-planning for them that we need to dig deeper into and how we can account for that and offset that.” He is essentially acknowledging his lineup may need to be more diverse.

Stripling’s potential departure leaves a rotation fronted by Manoah, Gausman and Berrios, with Yusei Kikuchi and Mitch White as potential options for the mix. At least one, if not two arms is needed there while the bullpen needs more swing and miss, something Atkins acknowledged contributed to Saturday’s stunning setback.

Nate Pearson and Julian Merryweather are among internal options there, but like Kikuchi, they can’t be counted on to be major contributors. Building out a better layer of minor-league depth will be needed and there’s also a private acknowledgement that the Blue Jays should have done more on the minor-league free agent front coming out of the lockout, rather than counting on Bowden Francis, Thomas Hatch, Anthony Kay and Pearson to provide a layer of protection.

All of it will be done with the aim of avoiding a repeat of the weekend, when the Blue Jays went into a series with the Mariners expecting to be in Houston facing the Astros this week instead of home, pondering what went wrong and how to get better.

There will be a deep dive into that, too, trying to decide how much to read into a two-game sample, although one that came amid the highly charged pressures of the post-season.

“Some, for sure. We definitely want to think about why that occurred,” said Atkins. “Why were we out in two games and what needs to change to decrease the likelihood of that? But I still feel that the hardest thing to do is to win a division to get into the playoffs and you put yourself in those positions to then be successful. But yes, we definitely need to be thinking about that and determine how to weigh that we’ve just started that process.”

After adding to the wrong end of franchise lore, it’s the only path forward for the Blue Jays.

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

NHL teams, take note: Alexandar Georgiev is proof that anything can happen in the playoffs

Published

 on

It’s hard to say when, exactly, Alexandar Georgiev truly began to win some hearts and change some minds on Tuesday night.

Maybe it was in the back half of the second period; that was when the Colorado Avalanche, for the first time in their first-round Stanley Cup playoff series against the Winnipeg Jets, actually managed to hold a lead for more than, oh, two minutes or thereabouts. Maybe it was when the Avs walked into the locker room up 4-2 with 20 minutes to play.

Maybe it was midway through the third, when a series of saves by the Avalanche’s beleaguered starting goaltender helped preserve their two-goal buffer. Maybe it was when the buzzer sounded after their 5-2 win. Maybe it didn’t happen until the Avs made it into their locker room at Canada Life Centre, tied 1-1 with the Jets and headed for Denver.

At some point, though, it should’ve happened. If you were watching, you should’ve realized that Colorado — after a 7-6 Game 1 loss that had us all talking not just about all those goals, but at least one of the guys who’d allowed them — had squared things up, thanks in part to … well, that same guy.

300x250x1

Georgiev, indeed, was the story of Game 2, stopping 28 of 30 shots, improving as the game progressed and providing a lesson on how quickly things can change in the playoffs — series to series, game to game, period to period, moment to moment. The narrative doesn’t always hold. Facts don’t always cooperate. Alexandar Georgiev, for one night and counting, was not a problem for the Colorado Avalanche. He was, in direct opposition to the way he played in Game 1, a solution. How could we view him as anything else?

He had a few big-moment saves, and most of them came midway through the third period with his team up 4-2. There he was with 12:44 remaining, stopping a puck that had awkwardly rolled off Nino Niederreiter’s stick; two missed posts by the Avs at the other end had helped spring Niederreiter for a breakaway. Game 1 Georgiev doesn’t make that save.

There he was, stopping Nikolaj Ehlers from the circle a few minutes later. There wasn’t an Avs defender within five feet, and there was nothing awkward about the puck Ehlers fired at his shoulder. Game 1 Georgiev gets scored on twice.

(That one might’ve been poetic justice. It was Ehlers who’d put the first puck of the night on Georgiev — a chip from center ice that he stopped, and that the crowd in Winnipeg greeted with the ol’ mock cheer. Whoops.)

By the end of it all, Georgiev had stared down Connor Hellebuyck and won, saving nearly 0.5 goals more than expected according to Natural Stat Trick, giving the Avalanche precisely what they needed and looking almost nothing like the guy we’d seen a couple days before. Conventional wisdom coming into this series was twofold: That the Avs have firepower, high-end talent and an overall edge — slight as it may be — on Winnipeg, and that Georgiev is shaky enough to nuke the whole thing.

That wasn’t without merit, either. Georgiev’s .897 save percentage in the regular season was six percentage points below the league average, and he hadn’t broken even in expected goals allowed (minus-0.21). He’d been even worse down the stretch, putting up an .856 save percentage in his final eight appearances, and worse still in Game 1, allowing seven goals on 23 shots and more than five goals more than expected. That’s not bad; that’s an oil spill. Writing him off would’ve been understandable. Writing off Jared Bednar for rolling him out there in Game 2 would’ve been understandable. Writing the Avs off — for all of Nathan MacKinnon and Cale Makar’s greatness — would’ve been understandable.

It just wouldn’t have been correct.

The fact that this all went down now, four days into a two-month ordeal, is a gift — because the postseason thus far has been short on surprises, almost as a rule. The Rangers and Oilers are overwhelming the Capitals and Kings. The Hurricanes are halfway done with the Islanders. The Canucks are struggling with the Predators. PanthersLightning is tight, but one team is clearly better than the other. BruinsMaple Leafs is a close matchup featuring psychic baggage that we don’t have time to unpack. In Golden KnightsStars, Mark Stone came back and scored a huge goal.

None of that should shock you. None of that should make you blink.

Georgiev being good enough for Colorado, though? After what we saw in Game 1? Strange, surprising and completely true. For now.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

"Laugh it off": Evander Kane says Oilers won’t take the bait against Kings | Offside

Published

 on

The LA Kings tried every trick in the book to get the Edmonton Oilers off their game last night.

Hacks after the whistle, punches to the face, and interference with line changes were just some of the things that the Oilers had to endure, and throughout it all, there was not an ounce of retaliation.

All that badgering by the Kings resulted in at least two penalties against them and fuelled a red-hot Oilers power play that made them pay with three goals on four chances. That was by design for Edmonton, who knew that LA was going to try to pester them as much as they could.

That may have worked on past Oilers teams, but not this one.

300x250x1

“We’ve been in a series now for the third year in a row with these guys,” Kane said after practice this morning. “We know them, they know us… it’s one of those things where maybe it makes it a little easier to kind of laugh it off, walk away, or take a shot.

“That type of stuff isn’t gonna affect us.”

Once upon a time, this type of play would get under the Oilers’ skin and result in retaliatory penalties. Yet, with a few hard-knock lessons handed down to them in the past few seasons, it seems like the team is as determined as ever to cut the extracurriculars and focus on getting revenge on the scoreboard.

Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, the longest-tenured player on this Oilers team, had to keep his emotions in check with Kings defender Vladislav Gavrikov, who punched him in the face early in the game. The easy reaction would be to punch back, but the veteran Nugen-Hopkins took his licks and wound up scoring later in the game.

“It’s going to be physical, the emotions are high, and there’s probably going to be some stuff after the whistle,” Nugent-Hopkins told reporters this morning. “I think it’s important to stay poised out there and not retaliate and just play through the whistles and let the other stuff just kind of happen.”

Oilers head coach Kris Knoblauch also noticed his team’s discipline. Playoff hockey is full of emotion, and keeping those in check to focus on the larger goal is difficult. He was happy with how his team set the tone.

“It’s not necessarily easy to do,” Knoblauch said. “You get punched in the face and sometimes the referees feel it’s enough to call a penalty, sometimes it’s not… You just have to take them, and sometimes, you get rewarded with the power play.

“I liked our guy’s response and we want to be sticking up for each other, we want to have that pack mentality, but it’s really important that we’re not the ones taking that extra penalty.”

There is no doubt that the Kings will continue to poke and prod at the Oilers as the series continues. Keeping those retaliations in check will only get more difficult, but if the team can continue to succeed on the scoreboard, it could get easier.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Thatcher Demko injured, out for Game 2 between Canucks and Predators

Published

 on

Thatcher Demko returned from injury just in time for the start of the Stanley Cup Playoffs but now is injured again.

After the Vancouver Canucks’ victory in Game 1, Demko was not made available to the media as he was “receiving treatment.” This is not unusual, so was not heavily reported at the time. Monday’s practice was turned into an optional skate — just nine players participated — so Demko’s absence did not seem particularly significant.

But when Demko was also missing from Tuesday’s gameday skate, alarm bells started going off.

According to multiple reports — and now the Canucks’ head coach, Rick Tocchet —Demko will not play in Game 2 and is in fact questionable for the rest of their series against the Nashville Predators.

300x250x1

Demko made 22 saves on 24 shots, none bigger — and potentially injury-inducing — than his first-period save on Anthony Beauvillier where he went into the full splits.

While this is not necessarily where Demko got injured, it would be understandable if it was. Demko still stayed in the game and didn’t seem to be experiencing any difficulties at the time.

Demko is a major difference-maker for the Canucks and his injury casts a pall over the team’s emotional Game 1 victory.

Tocchet confirmed that Demko will not start in Game 2 but said Demko did skate on Monday on his own. He also said that Demko’s injury is unrelated to the knee injury he suffered during the season that caused him to miss five weeks. Instead, Tocchet suggested Demko was day-to-day, leaving open the possibility for his return in the first round.

TSN’s Farhan Lalji, however, has reported that Demko’s injury could indeed be to the same knee, even if it is not the same exact injury.

If Demko does indeed miss the rest of the series, the pressure will be on Casey DeSmith, who had a strong season when called upon intermittently as the team’s backup but struggled when thrust into the number-one role when Demko was injured. Behind DeSmith is rookie Arturs Silovs, who has come through with heroic performances in international competition for Latvia but hasn’t been able to repeat those performances at the NHL level.

DeSmith played one game against the Predators this season, making 26 saves on 28 shots in a 5-2 victory in December.

While DeSmith has limited experience in the Stanley Cup Playoffs, his one appearance was spectacular.

On May 3, 2022, DeSmith had to step in for the injured Tristan Jarry for the Pittsburgh Penguins, starting their first postseason game against the New York Rangers. DeSmith made 48 saves on 51 shots before leaving the game in the second overtime with an injury of his own, with Louis Domingue stepping in to make 17 more saves for the win.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending