Every Monday, TVO.org provides a primer on what to look for in the coming week in Ontario politics, and features some stories making news now.
Here’s what we’ve got our eye on:
Queen’s Park Keywords
Government ads: CTV News reports the Progressive Conservatives will not honour an election promise to restore the Auditor General’s oversight over government advertising. The Auditor General has the ability to ban government advertising her office deems overly-partisan. But in 2015, the then-Liberal government watered down the language around what could be considered a partisan ad. In 2018, the Progressive Conservatives promised to restore the old language. But now they say they’re not. “We have a great working relationship with the auditor general when it comes to government advertising and are maintaining the status quo at this time,” Ivana Yelich, a spokeswoman for Premier Doug Ford, said in a statement.
Inspector layoffs: More than 30 inspectors with the Ontario College of Trades have received layoff notices as the agency is dissolved and its responsibilities are handed over to the Ministry of Labour and Skilled Trades Ontario. During the 2018 election campaign, Doug Ford promised that no public sector workers would be laid off under a Progressive Conservative government. He later amended his language in 2019 by saying “no front-line workers” would face layoffs. “Doug Ford said no one would lose their jobs,” Terry Dorgan, an inspector facing layoff, told CBC News. “We trusted him.”
Our journalism depends on you.
You can count on TVO to cover the stories others don’t—to fill the gaps in the ever-changing media landscape. But we can’t do this without you.
Painful renewals: Disabled persons and their advocates tell CBC News the province makes renewing health cards difficult for some of them. People with drivers’ licenses can get their health cards renewed online. But people who don’t drive need to renew at a Service Ontario location in person. For those with disabilities that make travel difficult or extremely painful, that’s a problem. “If they could find a way that renewing online could be made possible for everybody involved, disabled and able-bodied people alike, it would just be so much easier all around,” said Crystal Barnard, who is recovering from major back surgery.
Order of business
Here is some of what the legislature is scheduled to discuss this week:
- Monday: There will be a ministerial statement from Minister for Municipal Affairs and Housing Steve Clark in honour of National Housing Day. There will also be notice of government motion number 8, which proposes that orders made in response to the pandemic under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act be extended until March 28, 2022.
- Tuesday: There will be discussion of the aforementioned government motion number 8. As well, two private member’s bills will be discussed: One by NDP MPP Jill Andrew (Toronto—St. Paul’s), and one by NDP MPP Teresa Armstrong (London—Fanshawe).
- Wednesday: The morning will see more debate around the reply to the Oct. 4 speech from the throne. The afternoon will be an opposition day, where the opposition parties get to set the agenda. Also, NDP MPP for University—Rosedale Jessica Bell will introduce a private members’ bill.
- Thursday: There will be third reading of the Working for Workers Act, the government’s attempt to reform the province’s labour laws. There will also be discussion of a private member’s bill by NDP MPP for London North Centre Terence Kernaghan. In addition, a moment of silence will be observed for Trans Day of Remembrance.
Beyond the Pink Palace
COVID-19 case numbers: The province reported 741 new COVID-19 cases yesterday. The seven-day average for new cases was about 645, up from 573 a week earlier.
Vaccinating kids: The first batch of COVID-19 vaccine doses for children aged 5 to 11 arrived in Canada yesterday on a plane that touched down in Hamilton. If you’re a parent who has questions about getting your child vaccinated, the Toronto Star tries to provide some answers.
Senator dies: Josée Forest-Niesing, a life-long resident of Sudbury who had represented Ontario in the Canadian Senate since 2018, has died from COVID-19. Forest-Niesing was fully vaccinated against the virus, but was considered especially vulnerable because of an autoimmune condition that had affected her lungs for the last 15 years. A Franco-Ontarian, she was known as an advocate for French-language rights. She was 56.
Upcoming Ontario politics coverage on TVO
On Tuesday, listen to the latest edition of the #onpoli podcast, hosted by Steve Paikin and John Michael McGrath.
On Thursday, The Agenda will examine what’s behind the Progressive Conservatives’ push to be on the side of workers. Labour Minister Monte McNaughton joins a group of stakeholders to discuss his party’s new labour policies, whether union leaders actually like what they see, and the politics of it all. The Agenda airs weeknights on TVO at 8 p.m. and 11 p.m.
And on TVO.org, you can expect the latest from our regular political columnists, John Michael McGrath and Matt Gurney.
This article was updated at 6:20 a.m.
Study: Politics Outweighed COVID Severity in Reopening Decisions – Inside Higher Ed
The political leaning of the county in which a college or university is located is the factor most closely associated with whether it offered in-person or remote instruction in fall 2020, research released Tuesday shows. The article, published in Springer’s Research in Higher Education, finds that the severity of the pandemic near a college and sociopolitical factors in its state were also associated with institutional decisions on how to offer instruction.
State political factors were a stronger factor for four-year public institutions than for four-year private or community colleges, while county political preferences had a stronger effect on four-year private and two-year public institutions.
“Given that in-person instruction was associated with increased COVID-19 incidence in the local area,” the authors write, “polarization, political identification, and institutions feeling compelled to operate as politicized entities (to stay close to the ‘in-group’) likely made the severity of the pandemic worse. These outcomes are aligned with the general findings [of previous research] that institutions seemed to give more weight to sociopolitical features over pandemic severity when choosing in-person instruction for Fall 2020.”
Why American Politics Is So Stuck — and What New Research Shows About How to Fix It – POLITICO Magazine
Why does American politics feel so stuck these days, with bipartisan bills vanishingly rare and solutions seemingly taking a back seat to constant attacks?
Our newly published research suggests an answer — and maybe a way to get un-stuck.
Most policies are rife with trade-offs. They have an intended outcome and some regrettable side-effects. Our recent studies suggest that political polarization in the United States runs so deep that it leads partisans to see the other side’s intended outcome as a ruse and the side effects as the real intention. In other words, Democrats and Republicans not only disagree about policy matters; they believe the other party’s agenda is intentionally designed to do harm.
We call this tendency the partisan trade-off bias, and it applies to both parties. To a Democrat, the purpose of an environmental policy that reduces carbon emissions, for example, is to preserve the environment, and a corresponding loss of coal mining jobs is an unfortunate side effect. But a Republican, our research finds, might look at that same policy and see a plot to eradicate jobs in the fossil fuels industry. Meanwhile, a Democrat might presume a Republican push to lower corporate tax rates is more about helping the wealthy and hurting the poor than fueling economic growth.
Of course, skepticism about motives is sometimes warranted. But, oftentimes, it is misguided, and the deeper it runs, the harder it is to get anything through the policymaking process. Unless politicians find a way to lessen the effects of the partisan trade-off bias, we’re likely to keep seeing stalemates on important policy issues.
We documented the partisan trade-off bias across five studies using online samples of a total of 1,236 participants, a mix of Republicans and Democrats. As an example, in one of our studies participants were randomly assigned to view a set of policy trade-offs, some proposed by Republicans and some proposed by Democrats. The policies dealt with taxes, environmental regulation, gun control and voting rights. Participants then rated how intentional they perceived the negative side effects of each policy to be. The more participants identified with the Republican Party, the more intentional they perceived the side effects of the Democratic-proposed policies to be, and the more participants identified with the Democratic Party, the more intentional they perceived the side effects of Republican-proposed policies to be.
In a nutshell, our studies showed that the negative side effects associated with different policy trade-offs are not interpreted by opponents as side effects at all, but as intended goals of the policy.
To date, the political science literature has shown that political polarization leads partisans not only to dislike each other, but to see the other side increasingly as a threat to the country. Our identification of the partisan trade-off bias reveals a psychological tendency that might help to explain this perception of threat. After all, how can you get along with someone who you perceive as intentionally trying to do harm?
The good news is that by identifying the partisan trade-off bias, our research points a path forward: Policymakers who pay more attention to this bias might be better equipped to achieve compromise. This means that rather than focusing only on the main goal of a policy, they need to communicate clearly to the public what is intentional and what is a regrettable side-effect of that goal.
Fortunately, our studies also suggest this might be achievable. The partisan trade-off bias happens not because people don’t understand a given policy, but because they don’t trust the policymakers who are pushing that policy. We found that the level of trust a person feels toward a policymaker proposing a policy is a crucial driver of the partisan trade-off bias. And when we were able to increase people’s trust in the policymaker in our studies, we saw the partisan tradeoff bias decrease substantially.
Existing research suggests there are many ways politicians can earn others’ trust, but one of the most powerful is also the simplest: making sure people feel their voices are heard and listened to before a policy is announced, including both those inclined to like and dislike a policy. When we told participants in our studies that a policymaker spoke with stakeholders from all sides of the political spectrum before rolling out a proposal, the partisan tradeoff bias subsided.
Practically speaking, these findings suggest that announcing a big policy goal, and then doing press tours and campaigns to tout its benefits, likely does little to build trust. What happens before the policy is announced is crucial to building broad support for the policy. Politicians need to make it clear that they are speaking with and listening to those likely to be affected by a policy’s side effects. In the context of climate policy, a politician might visit coal miners in West Virginia or oil and gas workers in Texas while in the process of formulating a plan to reduce emissions, for example. The more widely the politician can advertise these efforts — across multiple types of media and across the ideological spectrum — the better.
Giving people a voice in the process does not mean they will change their minds about the value of the policy. But it does increase the chances that they will see the policy as a sincere attempt to solve problems rather than a form of hidden malice. That, in turn, can help lower the temperature and de-escalate the cycle of polarization. The same lesson holds for those of us who are not policymakers but ordinary citizens who want to have better conversations about politics. If you think you know what the other side’s real intentions are, think again. What you see as malice might be an unintended side effect. And if you want someone to give you the benefit of the doubt, put in the work of making them feel heard before you make yourself heard.
A new reason to move: politics – Yahoo Canada Finance
Blue states will get bluer, and red redder, in coming years, as more Americans factor political issues into their relocation decisions and head for places with like-minded tribes.
That’s the forecast from real-estate brokerage Redfin, which included “more migration for political reasons” in its outlook for the housing market in 2022. The deepening political polarization of the country includes new city- and statewide laws likely to attract adherents and repel detractors, driving political issues deeper into community life. Texas this year passed the nation’s strictest anti-abortion law, for instance. A Mississippi anti-abortion law could lead the Supreme Court to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that made abortion legal everywhere. If the Supreme Court overturns Roe, states will once again be free to set their own abortion statutes, creating a drastic dividing line between permissive and restrictive states.
Another Supreme Court case, involving gun rights, could make it easier to carry concealed weapons in New York and 7 other states, eroding gun-control efforts propagated largely by Democratic governors and mayors. On the other hand, marijuana is now legal in 19 mostly blue and purple states. Cities such as Philadelphia, San Francisco and New York are experimenting with police reform meant to cut down on lower-level arrests. Public-school curricula is a new flash point between parents who want racial and social justice taught in schools, and traditionalists who feel threatened by “wokeness.”
The Covid pandemic led to sharp disparities in masking rules, school opening policies and business restrictions among states and cities. That’s on top of longstanding differences in regulation and taxation between traditionally Democratic and Republican states. While there’s nothing new about regional differences in governing styles, policy polarization is making it easier for Americans to live in areas they find ideologically compatible. It’s also getting harder for liberals to find a comfortable enclave in conservative states, and vice versa.
[Click here to get Rick Newman’s stories by email.]
Moving patterns reflect politics
Americans seem increasingly likely to sort themselves into ideological groups by geography. “We know people are leaving blue counties and moving to red counties,” says Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at Redfin. “I think this will start to happen at the state level and at the neighborhood level. After next year’s midterm elections, we’ll be able to see if neighborhoods become more polarized.”
Up till now, the migration from blue states to red states has largely been driven by affordability. Blue states along the coasts typically have higher living costs and taxation levels than, say southern red states such as Texas and Florida. More and more, however, moving patterns reflect overt political choices.
An October Redfin survey of people who recently moved, for instance, found that 40% said they would prefer or insist on living in a place where abortion is fully legal. The portion taking the opposite view—saying they would prefer or refuse to live in an area where abortion is fully legal—was 32%. It’s not unusual for survey respondents to express strong opinions on abortion, but it may be new for people to factor such views into moving decisions. If the Supreme Court overturns Roe and more states ban or severely restrict abortion, it could become a bigger factor in relocation.
The Redfin survey of movers also gauged attitudes toward other touchy political topics. Larger percentages favored living in areas with liberal policies such as strong voter protections, gender anti-discrimination laws and legal weed. But 23% said they don’t want to live in places with strong anti-discrimination laws, 22% don’t want to live in a state with legal weed, and 16% don’t want to live where there are strong voter protections.
Americans consider many factors when deciding where to live, and some of those factors have political overtones. Many parents base home-buying decisions on the quality of schools, which drives up home prices in the best school districts and creates de facto segregation. The white-flight phenomenon has a similar effect, with whites who can afford to leaving urban areas for places where they consider quality of life better.
But those types of location decisions are based more on family-first attitudes than the liberal-conservative divide that’s taking root now. Americans choose a political tribe when they vote, donate money to political causes and decide which cable-news station to watch. Perhaps it’s only natural that Americans want to live among their political comrades, as well. Like much of America, real-estate listings are trending toward liberal or conservative.
Rick Newman is the author of four books, including “Rebounders: How Winners Pivot from Setback to Success.” Follow him on Twitter: @rickjnewman. You can also send confidential tips.
Islander living with HIV for 3 decades reflects on World AIDS Day – CBC.ca
In the boreal forest, nature inspires art – Prince Albert Daily Herald
Peel Hunt Reports Record First-Half Investment Banking Revenue – BNN
Silver investment demand jumped 12% in 2019
Europe kicks off vaccination programs | All media content | DW | 27.12.2020 – Deutsche Welle
Iran anticipates renewed protests amid social media shutdown
Science22 hours ago
Meet Comet Leonard: After keeping us waiting for months, the brightest comet of 2021 is now set to pass near Earth – Times Now
Sports12 hours ago
Soccer-Canada added to four-team women’s tournament in England
Sports16 hours ago
Tiger Woods fighting to return after car crash severely injured leg – Toronto Sun
Business24 hours ago
Amazon workers in Alabama will get another shot to unionise – Aljazeera.com
Health17 hours ago
COVID-19 detected in wastewater samples in Deer Lake, says Health Department – CBC.ca
Art6 hours ago
Princess Diana photo exhibition tours three U.S. cities
Business5 hours ago
Asian factories shake off supply headaches but Omicron presents new risks
News19 hours ago
Canada may need to do ‘more’ to combat Omicron COVID-19 variant, Trudeau says – Globalnews.ca