‘Should never have ended like that’: Inuk man killed by police in Quebec’s Far North

OTTAWA – Canadian cabinet ministers are offering reassurances and urging calm after learning former president Donald Trump will be heading back to the White House after a campaign in which he promised punishing tariffs and mass deportations.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the world is an even more complicated place than it was the first time Trump won a U.S. election in 2016, and he’s committed to working with Trump for the good of both countries.

“We’re going to make sure that this extraordinary friendship and alliance between Canada and the United States continues to be a real benefit to Canadians,” Trudeau said.

Trump staged a major political comeback, securing the necessary 270 electoral college votes to win the presidency in the early hours of Wednesday morning after a turbulent campaign that included him being convicted of 34 felonies in a hush-money scandal and surviving two assassination attempts.

Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said she understands the anxiety some Canadians are feeling. The deep ties between the two countries bind everything from culture to economics and trade.

“A lot of Canadians were anxious throughout the night and I want to say with utter sincerity and conviction to Canadians that Canada will be fine,” she said.

That anxiety is not without merit, as questions remain about the impact of Trump’s pledge to implement 10 per cent tariffs on all imports coming into the U.S.

The Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, negotiated during the first Trump presidency to replace NAFTA, is up for review in 2026, opening the door for renegotiation.

“What is really important about our economic partnership, and I believe this is at the core of what is important for President Trump and his team, is that our partnership is good for American workers,” Freeland said.

When asked about the government’s message to industries rattled by the uncertainty, Innovation Minister François-Philippe Champagne’s message was: “Let’s be calm.”

He said the Liberal government laid the groundwork during the last Trump administration and that will help protect Canadian interests. As evidence, he said members of Trump’s team were already responding to his texts Wednesday morning.

“The work that we’ve done is paying off. We have a relationship. They understand how strategically important we are in critical minerals, in semiconductors, in the energy sector. We will make the case for Canada. We made it last time,” he said.

Trump’s next presidency presents other unknowns, including how it will impact the war in Ukraine. Trump has pledged to negotiate a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, but it is not clear how his intervention will be received.

Republicans have been highly critical of the billions of dollars in military aid the U.S. has sent to Ukraine since the full-scale Russian invasion began in February 2022.

Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly said she spoke with her Ukrainian counterpart, Andrii Sybiha, on Wednesday morning.

“Canada is a country that understands, really well, the U.S. What I’m seeing right now is many of our partners and friends are calling us to make sure that we can help them understand what is going on in the U.S.,” Joly said.

“We can help our friends go through sometimes geopolitical turbulences, but at the same time my job is to always find common ground with the U.S. and defend our interests.”

Joly added that Ukraine is fighting not just for its freedom, “but also ours.” She said Canada needs to reinforce its partnership with Ukraine, and be in strong position for continental defence.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy shared a statement on X congratulating Trump, and he said the two spoke about the Ukraine-U.S. strategic partnership in September.

“I appreciate President Trump’s commitment to the ‘peace through strength’ approach in global affairs. This is exactly the principle that can practically bring just peace in Ukraine closer. I am hopeful that we will put it into action together,” Zelenskyy said.

“We look forward to an era of a strong United States of America under President Trump’s decisive leadership. We rely on continued strong bipartisan support for Ukraine in the United States.”

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre extended his congratulations to Trump in a statement, saying he will work with the president-elect if he becomes prime minister.

In question period, Poilievre launched into an attack on Trudeau for allowing the United States to impose buy-American policies that impact Canadian industries.

“A newly elected American president wants to take our jobs for Americans. We understand why Mr. Trump wants to take Canadian jobs, but why does our prime minister want to help him?” he asked in the House of Commons Wednesday.

Trudeau said his government defended Canadian steel and aluminum workers and supply managed industries in Canada the last time it negotiated trade with Trump and will do it again.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh called on Trudeau to come out clearly in opposition to potentially harmful Trump proposals like the tariff policy.

Singh said this could threaten Canadian jobs and drive up the cost of goods at home and called for Canada to work with allies to be a strong voice for peace and diplomacy abroad.

“When I say that (Trump’s) plans are going to hurt people I think about a Trump administration’s approach to Ukraine. I think about Gaza and the fact that if we saw an emboldened (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu in a campaign of violence and genocide against the people of Gaza, imagine what that’s going to be under a Trump administration, with even further supports to engage in that type of activity” Singh said.

“I’m deeply worried about what this means across the world.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

MONTREAL – Quebec Premier François Legault says his government is prepared to use the notwithstanding clause to force doctors trained in Quebec universities to begin their careers in the province’s public system.

Speaking to reporters at the legislature on Wednesday, the premier said his government is considering requiring medical graduates in Quebec to reimburse the government for the cost of their education unless they practise in the province for an unspecified period.

“It’s too important,” Legault said. “We’re short of doctors. The doctors we train at taxpayers’ expense must practise in Quebec.”

Legault, leader of the Coalition Avenir Québec, acknowledged that such a move may contravene the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, saying he had looked into the issue when he was minister of education for his old political party, the Parti Québécois.

He said he had concluded that the government would have to use the notwithstanding clause to override Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which deals with equality rights and discrimination.

The notwithstanding clause is a provision in the Charter that allows federal, provincial and territorial governments to pass laws that override certain Charter rights for up to five years, a period that can be renewed by a vote in the legislature.

The premier’s comments expanded on Health Minister Christian Dubé’s announcement on Sunday that he will table legislation requiring family doctors and specialists to start their careers in Quebec’s public network.

Constitutional lawyer and Université de Montréal instructor Frédéric Bérard says the Legault government’s proposal would violate Canadians’ mobility rights — the right to move to any part of the country to take up residence or make a living — which are guaranteed in Section 6 of the Charter, not Section 15.

The Constitution, however, says the notwithstanding clause cannot be used on Section 6; it can only be used on Section 2, which guarantees fundamental freedoms like conscience and religion, and on Sections 7 through 15.

“If Legault is saying that he wants to invoke the notwithstanding clause, it means that he knows a fundamental right is violated,” said Bérard.

“(Legault) is instrumentalizing the rule of law for political gain.”

The Quebec government estimates that it costs between $435,000 and $790,000 to train a doctor, including during their residency.

On Monday, a spokesperson for Dubé said that 400 of the 2,536 doctors who completed their studies between 2015 and 2017 left the province. Currently, 2,355 doctors trained in Quebec are practising in Ontario, including 1,675 who attended McGill University.

Data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information show that 60 per cent of family doctors who had recently graduated in Quebec were still practising in the province in 2022, while nearly 20 per cent had moved to Ontario.

The government has also said that 775 of Quebec’s 22,479 practising physicians are working exclusively in the private sector, an increase of 70 per cent since 2020, with the trend especially prevalent among new doctors.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona voters have approved a constitutional amendment guaranteeing abortion access up to fetal viability, typically after 21 weeks — a major win for advocates of the measure in the presidential battleground state who have been seeking to expand access beyond the current 15-week limit.

Arizona was one of nine states with abortion on the ballot. Democrats have centered abortion rights in their campaigns since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. Abortion-rights supporters prevailed in all seven abortion ballot questions in 2022 and 2023, including in conservative-leaning states.

Arizona for Abortion Access, the coalition leading the state campaign, gathered well over the 383,923 signatures required to put it on the ballot, and the secretary of state’s office verified that enough were valid. The coalition far outpaced the opposition campaign, It Goes Too Far, in fundraising. The opposing campaign argued the measure was too far-reaching and cited its own polling in saying a majority of Arizonans support the 15-week limit. The measure allows post-viability abortions if they are necessary to protect the life or physical or mental health of the mother.

Access to abortion has been a cloudy issue in Arizona. In April, the state Supreme Court cleared the way for the enforcement of a long-dormant 1864 law banning nearly all abortions. The state Legislature swiftly repealed it.

Voters in Arizona are divided on abortion. Maddy Pennell, a junior at Arizona State University, said the possibility of a near-total abortion ban made her “depressed” and strengthened her desire to vote for the abortion ballot measure.

“I feel very strongly about having access to abortion,” she said.

Kyle Lee, an independent Arizona voter, does not support the abortion ballot measure.

“All abortion is pretty much, in my opinion, murder from beginning to end,” Lee said.

The Civil War-era ban also shaped the contours of tight legislative races. State Sen. Shawnna Bolick and state Rep. Matt Gress are among the handful of vulnerable Republican incumbents in competitive districts who crossed party lines to give the repeal vote the final push — a vote that will be tested as both parties vie for control of the narrowly GOP-held state Legislature.

Both of the Phoenix-area lawmakers were rebuked by some of their Republican colleagues for siding with Democrats. Gress made a motion on the House floor to initiate the repeal of the 1864 law. Bolick, explaining her repeal vote to her Senate colleagues, gave a 20-minute floor speech describing her three difficult pregnancies.

While Gress was first elected to his seat in 2022, Bolick is facing voters for the first time. She was appointed by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to fill a seat vacancy in 2023. She has not emphasized her role in the repeal vote as she has campaigned, instead playing up traditional conservative issues — one of her signs reads “Bolick Backs the Blue.”

Voters rejected a measure to eliminate retention elections for state Superior Court judges and Supreme Court justices.

The measure was put on the ballot by Republican legislators hoping to protect two conservative justices up for a routine retention vote who favored allowing the Civil War-era ban to be enforced — Shawnna Bolick’s husband, Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick, and Justice Kathryn Hackett King. Since the measure did not pass, both are still vulnerable to voter ouster, though those races hadn’t been decided by early Wednesday morning.

Under the existing system, voters decide every four to six years whether judges and justices should remain on the bench. The proposed measure would have allowed the judges and justices to stay on the bench without a popular vote unless one is triggered by felony convictions, crimes involving fraud and dishonesty, personal bankruptcy or mortgage foreclosure.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.