Connect with us

Health

Edmonton zone COVID-19 deaths climb to 20 as Alberta announces 37 more coronavirus cases – Global News

Published

on


EDITOR’S NOTE: This headline originally said Edmonton has recorded 20 COVID-19 deaths. It has been corrected to say the Edmonton zone has recorded 20 deaths. We regret the error.

Alberta Health announced three additional COVID-19 deaths on Thursday, all linked to a coronavirus outbreak at Edmonton’s Misericordia Hospital.

The deaths brings the total number of COVID-19 fatalities in Alberta to 161 and in the Edmonton zone to 20.

For more information on the outbreak at the hospital in Edmonton, click here.

[ Sign up for our Health IQ newsletter for the latest coronavirus updates ]

READ MORE: 3 more deaths linked to COVID-19 outbreak at Edmonton’s Misericordia Hospital 

At the same time, health officials said 37 new COVID-19 cases have been confirmed in the province over the past 24 hours. Currently, there are 584 active cases in Alberta.

Story continues below advertisement

The Calgary zone currently has the most actives cases of the disease with 220, and the Edmonton zone is close behind with 215. There are 90 active cases in the South zone, 42 in the North zone, 11 in the Central zone and there are six cases that have not been connected to any particular zone.

Forty-six Albertans are currently in hospital with COVID-19 and seven of those are in intensive care units.

READ MORE: Alberta doctors warn some COVID-19 patients may see long-term health impacts 

As of Thursday afternoon, 507,169 coronavirus tests had been conducted in Alberta since the pandemic first hit the province in March.

Of Alberta’s total of 8,519 confirmed COVID-19 cases, 7,774 have seen people recover.

© 2020 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Union calls for Brandon Maple Leaf plant to shut down amid COVID-19 concerns – Winnipeg Sun

Published

on


The union representing more than 2,000 employees at the Maple Leaf plant in Brandon is calling for it to be shut down for further investigation and cleaning after four members have reportedly tested positive for COVID-19.

UCFW Local 832 president Jeff Traeger said they were advised of a first case on Sunday and then three more cases Wednesday evening.

“Maple Leaf has done everything that they could do to prevent COVID getting into their plant, however, in the end that has not been successful,” he said. “That is why you hear UFCW calling to shut down the plant until all of those they are waiting for test results on come back and also to do a real thorough cleaning.”

The union expressed these concerns in a letter to the Minister of Health, Seniors and Active Living Cameron Friesen in a letter on Thursday morning. The minister defferred to Dr. Brent Roussin, the provincial chief public health officer.

Take Our Poll

The province announced 18 new cases in a Brandon cluster on Thursday, bringing the total to 28, and a spokesman for the province said three of the four cases are considered part of the cluster.

Traeger said Maple Leaf has met all safety recommendations when it comes to prevention during the pandemic and in some cases gone beyond that, including PPE, touchpoint and additional cleaning every day and screening people before entering the site.

There are more than 2,300 people who work at the plant.

With outbreaks at other plants like the Cargill plant in Alberta that had more than 900 workers infected with community spread hitting a total of 1,500 people. The union is calling for further precautions to make sure that is not bubbling under the surface here.

“(Our members) are scared. They’re very scared,” said Traeger. “They think this is a highly unusual risk to have to take to work. Many of them have asked to shut the plant down or if we can’t whether or not they can not go to work.”

Not going to work is not an option due to the precautions taken by Maple Leaf. The workers are also concerned that if they have a symptom and have to self-isolate whether or not they will get paid.

Janet Riley, vice president of communications, said in an email, that after an examination of the situation the transmission appears to be in the community not at the plant. She also said they have activated their COVID-19 response plan and have asked additional team members to self isolate out of precaution.

“We will continue to operate our Brandon plant as long as we believe we can provide an environment that will protect the safety of our people while working,” she said.

According to the union, Maple Leaf has been resistant to close the plant, believing the spread to be in the community not at the plant. The cluster of cases are believed to be linked to an individual travelling from Eastern Canada.

Roussin said the plant is not yet in a position where it needs to shut down.

“As we’re looking at things, we are not seeing evidence of transmission occurring in the workplace and so that would be the important thing that would concern us if we saw it,” he said.

Wab Kinew, leader of the opposition, called for the plant’s closure until Monday so it could be checked out thoroughly.

“In this case, when we’re seeing cases go up and the organization that’s alerting us to these cases, the union, is saying that there is an issue and we’ve got to hit the pause button, then we’ve got to support that,” he said.

According to their website, the Maple Leaf plant in Brandon processes 90,000 weekly, making it one of the biggest in the country. Other processing facilities in Canada have had to shut down, like the Olymel plant in Yamachiche, Que, and the hog industry is still dealing with the backlog.

Sylvain Charlebois, the senior director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University, said shutting down this plant would cause a major disruption for the industry.

“The challenge that we have with chicken and pork is the production cycle is unforgiving, it’s so tight. If you shut down the production cycle for a few weeks you end up with huge backlogs,” he said. “Shutting the plant down in Brandon should be a measure of last resort.”

jaldrich@postmedia.com

Twitter: @JoshAldrich03

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Facebook's dilemma: How to police claims about unproven virus vaccines – The Japan Times

Published

on


Since the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus an international health emergency in January, Facebook Inc. has removed more than 7 million pieces of content with false claims about the virus that could pose an immediate health risk to people who believe them.

The social media giant, which has long been under fire from lawmakers over how it handles misinformation on its platforms, said it had in recent months banned such claims as “social distancing does not work” because they pose a risk of “imminent” harm. Under these rules, Facebook took down a video post on Wednesday by U.S. President Donald Trump in which he claimed that children are “almost immune” to COVID-19.

But in most instances, Facebook does not remove misinformation about the new COVID-19 vaccines that are still under development, according to the company’s vaccine policy lead Jason Hirsch, on the grounds that such claims do not meet its imminent harm threshold. Hirsch said the company is “grappling” with the dilemma of how to police claims about new vaccines that are as yet unproven.

“There’s a ceiling to how much we can do until the facts on the ground become more concrete,” Hirsch said, talking publicly for the first time about how the company is trying to approach the coronavirus vaccine issue.

Tom Phillips, editor at one of Facebook’s fact-checking partners Full Fact, sees the conundrum this way: “How do you fact check about a vaccine that does not exist yet?”

For now, misinformation ranging from unfounded claims to complex conspiracy theories about the developmental vaccines is proliferating on a platform with more than 2.6 billion monthly active users, a review of posts by Reuters, Facebook fact-checkers and other researchers found.

Under its rules to delete posts that have the potential to cause “imminent harm,” Facebook took down a video post on Wednesday by U.S. President Donald Trump in which he claimed that children are “almost immune” to COVID-19. | REUTERS

The worry, public health experts said, is that the spread of misinformation on social media could discourage people from eventually taking the vaccine, seen as the best chance to stem a pandemic that has infected millions and killed hundreds of thousands worldwide, including 158,000 people in the United States alone.

At the same time, free speech advocates fret about increased censorship during a time of uncertainty and the lasting repercussions long after the virus is tamed.

Drawing the line between true and false is also more complex for the new COVID-19 vaccines, fact-checkers said, than with content about vaccines with an established safety record.

Facebook representatives said the company has been consulting with about 50 experts in public health, vaccines, and free expression on how to shape its response to claims about the new COVID-19 vaccines.

Even though the first vaccines aren’t expected to go to market for months, polls show that many Americans are already concerned about taking a new COVID-19 vaccine, which is being developed at a record pace. Some 28 percent of Americans say they are not interested in getting the vaccine, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted between July 15-21. Among them, more than 50 percent said they were nervous about the speed of development. More than a third said they did not trust the people behind the vaccine’s development.

The U.K.-based nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate reported in July that anti-vaccination content is flourishing on social media sites. Facebook groups and pages accounted for more than half of the total anti-vaccine following across all the social media platforms studied by the CCDH.

One public Facebook group called “REFUSE CORONA V@X AND SCREW BILL GATES,” referring to the billionaire whose foundation is helping to fund the development of vaccines, was started in April by Michael Schneider, a 42-year-old city contractor in Waukesha, Wisconsin. The group grew to 14,000 members in under four months. It was one of more than a dozen created in the last few months which were dedicated to opposing the COVID-19 vaccine and the idea that it might be mandated by governments, Reuters found.

Schneider said he is suspicious of the COVID-19 vaccine because he thinks it is being developed too fast to be safe. “I think a lot of people are freaking out,” he said.

Posts about the COVID-19 vaccine that have been labeled on Facebook as containing “false information” but not removed include one by Schneider linking to a YouTube video that claimed the COVID-19 vaccine will alter people’s DNA, and a post that claimed the vaccine would give people coronavirus.

Facebook said that these posts did not violate its policies related to imminent harm. “If we simply removed all conspiracy theories and hoaxes, they would exist elsewhere on the internet and broader social media ecosystem. This helps give more context when these hoaxes appear elsewhere,” a spokeswoman said.

In most instances, Facebook does not remove misinformation about the new COVID-19 vaccines that are still under development, according to the company's vaccine policy lead Jason Hirsch. | REUTERS
In most instances, Facebook does not remove misinformation about the new COVID-19 vaccines that are still under development, according to the company’s vaccine policy lead Jason Hirsch. | REUTERS

Facebook does not label or remove posts or ads that express opposition to vaccines if they do not contain false claims. Hirsch said Facebook believes users should be able to express such personal views and that more aggressive censorship of anti-vaccine views could also push people hesitant about vaccines towards the anti-vaccine camp.

At the crux of Facebook’s decisions over what it removes are two considerations, Hirsch said. If a post is identified as containing simply false information, it will be labeled and Facebook can reduce its reach by limiting how many people will be shown the post. For example, it took this approach with the video Schneider posted suggesting the COVID-19 vaccine could alter people’s DNA.

If the false information is likely to cause imminent harm, then it will be removed altogether. Last month, under these rules, the company removed a video touting hydroxychloroquine as a coronavirus cure — though only after it racked up millions of views.

In March 2019, Facebook said it would start reducing the rankings and search recommendations of groups and pages spreading misinformation about any vaccines. Facebook’s algorithms also lift up links to organizations like the WHO when people search for vaccine information on the platform.

Some public health experts want Facebook to lower their removal standards when considering false claims about the future COVID-19 vaccines. “I think there is a duty (by) platforms like that to ensure that they are removing anything that could lead to harm,” said Rupali Limaye, a social scientist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, who has been in talks with Facebook. “Because it is such a deadly virus, I think it shouldn’t just have to be ‘imminent.’”

But Jacob Mchangama, the executive director of Copenhagen-based think tank Justitia who was consulted by Facebook about its vaccine approach, fears the fallout from mass deletions: “This may have long-term consequences for free speech when this virus is hopefully contained,” he said.

For now, misinformation ranging from unfounded claims to complex conspiracy theories about the developmental vaccines is proliferating on a platform with more than 2.6 billion monthly active users, a review of posts by Reuters, Facebook fact-checkers and other researchers found. | Antara Foto/M Agung Rajasa / via REUTERS
For now, misinformation ranging from unfounded claims to complex conspiracy theories about the developmental vaccines is proliferating on a platform with more than 2.6 billion monthly active users, a review of posts by Reuters, Facebook fact-checkers and other researchers found. | Antara Foto/M Agung Rajasa / via REUTERS

Misinformation about other vaccines has rarely met Facebook’s threshold for risking imminent harm.

However, in Pakistan last year, the company intervened to take down false claims about the polio vaccine drive that were leading to violence against health workers. In the Pacific island state of Samoa, Facebook deleted vaccine misinformation because the low vaccination rate was exacerbating a dangerous measles outbreak.

“With regard to vaccines, it’s not a theoretical line … we do try to determine when there is likely going to be imminent harm resulting from misinformation and we try to act in those situations,” Hirsch said.

To combat misinformation that doesn’t meet its removal criteria, Facebook pays outside fact-checkers — including a Reuters unit — who can rate posts as false and attach an explanation. The company has said that 95 percent of the time, people who saw fact-checkers’ warning labels did not click through to the content.

Still, the fact-checking program has been criticized by some researchers as an inadequate response to the amount and speed of viral misinformation on the platforms. Fact-checkers also do not rate politicians’ posts and they do not judge posts that are exclusively in private or hidden groups.

Determining what constitutes a false claim regarding the COVID-19 shot is much harder than fact-checking a claim about an established vaccine with a proven safety record, Facebook fact-checkers said.

“There is a lot of content that we see and we don’t even know what to do with it,” echoed Emmanuel Vincent, founder of Science Feedback, another Facebook fact-checking partner, who said the number of vaccines in development made it difficult to debunk claims about how a shot would work.

In a study published in May in the journal Nature, physicist Neil Johnson’s research group found that there were nearly three times as many active anti-vaccination groups on Facebook as pro-vaccination groups during a global measles outbreak from February to October 2019, and they were faster growing.

Since the study was published, anti-vaccine views and COVID-19 vaccine conspiracies have flourished on the platform, Johnson said, adding, “It’s kind of on steroids.”

Coronavirus banner

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Manitoba processing plant with COVID-19 should learn from Alberta facilities and shut down, union leaders urge – CBC.ca

Published

on


Union leaders who witnessed a devastating COVID-19 outbreak at meat-packing facilities in Alberta are calling on a Brandon, Man., plant to shut down before its four cases of the novel coronavirus become many more.

There’s no time to waste, said Alexander Shevalier, president of the Calgary and District Labour Council.

He’s speaking from experience: In Alberta, 900 plus employees at a Cargill meat-packing plant tested positive for the virus and two died, while 600 employees were infected at a JBS plant.

“How many infections before the company takes it seriously? How many infections before the Manitoba government takes this seriously? Is it 10? Is it 100? Is it 1,000?” Shevalier asked.

“I would suggest that at four [cases] they can get a handle on it quite easily, and I would suggest at four it should prompt some sort of trigger testing to make sure that this is dealt with.”

In Brandon, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 832, which represents 2,000 employees at the processor, are calling on the company to temporarily cease production until at least Aug. 10, after four employees contracted the virus.

Outbreak rampant at Alberta meat processors

The union is asking to suspend operations until more information is known about the 60 outstanding tests among workers.

Their concerns are heightened by what happened at slaughterhouses to the west of them.

It took weeks for Cargill to succumb to pressure and close its plant near High River, Alta., but it was already well on its way to becoming the largest outbreak tied to a single facility in North America.

Only days before the plant was temporarily shuttered on Apr. 20, a provincial inspection by video concluded the plant could keep operating, while politicians held a telephone town hall to assure staff that their workplace was safe.

Several workers accused their employer of disregarding physical distancing rules and trying to lure people back to work from self-isolation.

Cargill, an Alberta meat-packing plant, reopened in May after more than 900 employees contracted COVID-19. (Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press)

But meat-packing outbreaks aren’t exclusive to Alberta. Across the continent, these businesses have emerged as dangerous hot spots for COVID-19, linked partially to employees’ inability to stay apart while standing shoulder to shoulder on the processing line.

Shevalier urged officials in Manitoba to act before it’s too late.

“It’s better if you get a handle on the outbreak early, so that you don’t have to close a plant for two weeks and create a lot of anxiety in the community.”

Although four employees at the Brandon plant are confirmed COVID-19 cases, Manitoba’s top doctor said Thursday there’s no evidence the virus has spread within the plant. 

“If we see evidence of transmission within a facility, [that] would be concerning to us,” Dr. Brent Roussin said.

Maple Leaf said it is reviewing the four cases while each of the employees recovers at home. The company does not plan to cease production in the meantime.

“We will continue to operate our Brandon plant as long as we believe we can provide an environment that will protect the safety of our people while working,” the statement says. 

One worker, who wasn’t on the production line, tested positive late last week and the three cases from Wednesday aren’t involved in production, UFCW Local 832 said.

Though the case numbers are low, it doesn’t allay the fears of Thomas Hesse, the union head representing workers at the Cargill plant in southern Alberta.

Union members in High River, Alta., protested the reopening of the Cargill meat-packing plant in May after a COVID-19 outbreak. (Dan McGarvey/CBC)

“The Cargill circumstance also started with a handful of employees and early on, it was hard to sort out what the origin of the outbreak was and what its connection was to the community,” said the president of UFCW Local 401, which is embroiled in a legal fight stemming from the union’s efforts to prevent the plant from reopening.

From what he’s heard from his counterparts in Manitoba, Maple Leaf worked diligently to acquire personal protective equipment, stagger breaks for workers and mandate temperature checks.

The company’s efforts should be applauded, Hesse said, but now, “Maple Leaf is at an intersection.” The right call is to shut down the plant temporarily, he said.

Experts are studying how meat-packing facilities became virus incubators. It’s believed the proximity of employees have played a role, and maybe the ventilation systems designed to control odours and prevent meat from spoiling.

“We’re seeing outbreaks related to a very specific industry. We should look hard at those and learn from industries where we don’t see outbreaks,” said Cynthia Carr, a Winnipeg epidemiologist and founder of EPI Research Inc.

Hesse said he doesn’t want another community to go through what happened at Cargill.

He’s spoken to families who’ve lost a loved one because they went to work. He knows of workers, who didn’t exhibit symptoms, living with the guilt they spread the disease to someone else. He’s talked with a young mother who was forced to isolate in her garage, while her kids cried inside her house.

His message to Maple Leaf: “When you see a lot of [COVID-19 case] numbers, you’ve got to step back and you’ve got to do the right thing.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending