adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Tech

‘Immortals of Aveum’ Is a Shooter That Swaps Gunfire for Spell-Casting

Published

 on

Like many first-person shooters before it, Immortals of Aveum is a game about war. It stars a young soldier who fights across battlefields. Its plot revolves around a conflict between opposing nations, each fielding armies set on the destruction of one another. It is also a game in which all of these familiar martial themes are explored through a fantasy setting where stone citadels float high in the air, currents of rippling energy snake through the sky, and, most notably, players engage in combat not with guns and grenades, but by casting brightly colored magic spells from the protagonist’s outstretched hands.

The debut release from developer Ascendant Studios, Aveum is a fantasy take on the first-person shooter made by a studio with years of experience in the genre. Its director and cowriter, Ascendant CEO Bret Robbins, previously worked as creative director on several entries to the Call of Duty series and 2008’s sci-fi horror shooter, Dead Space. In a call with WIRED, Robbins described the creation of Aveum as his “first opportunity to really make my own game,” a break from the hardnosed militarism of more realistic war games.

“I knew I wanted to do a shooter,” Robbins said of the game’s origin. “I knew I wanted it to be magic and not guns.”

From this starting point, Robbins began to conceptualize what would become Immortals of Aveum through “a back and forth, sort of organic process of thinking about combat and thinking about game mechanics and then thinking about the [game’s] world as well.”

That combat, which sees players swapping between an arsenal of offensive and defensive magical spells, is Aveum’s most compelling feature, in part because it stands in stark contrast to the gunplay of so many first-person shooters. The novelty that makes its battles compelling also created difficulties, though. Robbins said that “getting the magic to feel as good as shooting a gun was challenging,” especially since he didn’t want players to “hide behind a bush and shoot over it,” waiting for their health to regenerate as in a Call of Duty game. The goal, instead, was to have players feel like a “gunslinger, bad-ass battle mage who could walk into an area, have [their] own protection with the shield, and be able to deal with anything in front of [them].”

Central to this approach is a method of fight design that encourages players to experiment with their entire arsenal of spells. The fantasy setting allows for various enemy types—some monstrous, some human—sporting color-coded vulnerabilities. To overcome them, the player has to think on their feet, juggling various spells in a manner not unlike the frenetic gunplay of the Doom series. Avoiding and casting streaks of blue lightning or bright green energy orbs doesn’t create the same sense of danger as the explosions and cracks of passing bullets found in many other shooters, but Aveum’s fighting is still an engaging, often rewardingly tense approach to a different kind of first-person combat design.

Courtesy of Electronic Arts

The context for the game’s action, initially, seems like a disappointedly standard riff on well-established sci-fi and fantasy storytelling tropes. Its protagonist, Jak, is born in the slums of a congested city unequally divided along strict class lines. As is always the case with this setup, he is plucked from obscurity and raised to a position of importance due to his unique magical talents, inborn heroism, and desire to enact revenge on the enemy nation.

Jak is hard to like. He’s a real smartass, jaggedly cut from the same cloth as Harrison Ford’s roguish wisecrackers, though without those characters’ charm. The supporting cast isn’t much more imaginative or endearing. His commander is a stern, no-nonsense veteran, and he fights alongside an affable, posh soldier and a taciturn giant whose cold exterior hides a warm heart. There’s a sort of “made for TV” fantasy aesthetic to Aveum’s early goings, defined by villains in gaudy helmets and monstrous aliens threatening our heroes so they can retort with a steady stream of grating, strained jokes.

As the plot unfolds, though, these faults become less glaring, and the game reveals itself to be a far more compelling approach to genre convention than it initially seems. It becomes clear that Aveum is well aware of the character archetypes and plot trappings it draws from, and has points to make on subjects ranging from the useful gullibility of angry young men in warfare to the dangers of fanaticism, prejudice, and militarism in light of pending environmental catastrophe.

It’s easy to read the appearance of these themes as a response to the state of the mainstream first-person shooter. Aveum, as a whole, is a game informed by its creators’ past efforts.

Robbins said that he “really enjoyed working on Call of Duty,” describing his work as creative director on several of the series’ campaigns as being akin to “making a summer blockbuster.” He also said the confines of the series “did feel limiting” from a design standpoint.

“After a while, you know that the box within which we are designing [Call of Duty] is fairly narrow,” he explained. “It has to be realistic; it has to be military; it has to be all these things. Even when we made more exotic Call of Dutys, like [2014’s] Advanced Warfare, which was a little bit futuristic, it still had to be very, very grounded, and you never wanted to pull the audience too far away from what they’re used to.”

The possibilities afforded by a fantasy setting opened up greater possibilities not just for combat, but for narrative and visual design as well. “That was very liberating as a designer,” Robbins said of the departure. “Being able to think about any kind of enemy or ability, spell, weapon, level location, anything.”

Screenshot from the game 'Immortals of Aveum' featuring a wide angle view of a battle between humans and beasts
Courtesy of Electronic Arts

Abstracting the kind of war stories featured in Call of Duty—a series whose single-player plots often consist of feverish Tom Clancy–style nightmares of international diplomacy in violent fallout—also allows Aveum to discuss some of the same topics with a degree of remove. “You don’t trigger the kneejerk reaction,” Robbins said. “People can actually think about [these themes] because maybe they’re not even thinking of it as an analogy until later.” Rather than directly reference pressing issues by name, the inventions of horror, sci-fi, and fantasy can provide a lens that does away with specific preconceptions and real-world complications.

“I think this has been done for forever in genre fiction,” Robbins said. He pointed to Invasion of the Body Snatchers as one example of a horror movie “speaking to the cultural fears of the time,” and credits genre fiction with allowing audiences to examine real-world problems “under a microscope to some degree, in a maybe emotionally safer place.”

“We definitely wanted to have certain messages resonate throughout,” Robbins said, adding that he “wanted the story to be a little messy” in its portrayal of war and the complexity of its characters’ moral standing within that conflict.

Recent releases like Tango Gameworks’ GhostWire: Tokyo and Luminous Productions’ Forspoken have, like Immortals of Aveum, swapped guns for magic spells in what could otherwise have been fairly standard takes on first- and third-person shooter design. Their goals—and the success of their approach—may have been different, but, together, they show the possibilities inherent in shooters set outside of strictly realistic settings.

Immortals of Aveum is an uneven game, and its greatest successes in narrative and combat are obscured by sluggish opening hours that hide the greater complexity in both aspects for too long. But it’s a commendable, imaginative departure from its creators’ past, and a strong proof of concept for Ascendant’s vision of a mainstream, big-budget shooter that has plenty to say about the world we live in while creating a new, fantastical one to explore.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

News

The Internet is Littered in ‘Educated Guesses’ Without the ‘Education’

Published

 on

Although no one likes a know-it-all, they dominate the Internet.

The Internet began as a vast repository of information. It quickly became a breeding ground for self-proclaimed experts seeking what most people desire: recognition and money.

Today, anyone with an Internet connection and some typing skills can position themselves, regardless of their education or experience, as a subject matter expert (SME). From relationship advice, career coaching, and health and nutrition tips to citizen journalists practicing pseudo-journalism, the Internet is awash with individuals—Internet talking heads—sharing their “insights,” which are, in large part, essentially educated guesses without the education or experience.

The Internet has become a 24/7/365 sitcom where armchair experts think they’re the star.

Not long ago, years, sometimes decades, of dedicated work and acquiring education in one’s field was once required to be recognized as an expert. The knowledge and opinions of doctors, scientists, historians, et al. were respected due to their education and experience. Today, a social media account and a knack for hyperbole are all it takes to present oneself as an “expert” to achieve Internet fame that can be monetized.

On the Internet, nearly every piece of content is self-serving in some way.

The line between actual expertise and self-professed knowledge has become blurry as an out-of-focus selfie. Inadvertently, social media platforms have created an informal degree program where likes and shares are equivalent to degrees. After reading selective articles, they’ve found via and watching some TikTok videos, a person can post a video claiming they’re an herbal medicine expert. Their new “knowledge,” which their followers will absorb, claims that Panda dung tea—one of the most expensive teas in the world and isn’t what its name implies—cures everything from hypertension to existential crisis. Meanwhile, registered dietitians are shaking their heads, wondering how to compete against all the misinformation their clients are exposed to.

More disturbing are individuals obsessed with evangelizing their beliefs or conspiracy theories. These people write in-depth blog posts, such as Elvis Is Alive and the Moon Landings Were Staged, with links to obscure YouTube videos, websites, social media accounts, and blogs. Regardless of your beliefs, someone or a group on the Internet shares them, thus confirming your beliefs.

Misinformation is the Internet’s currency used to get likes, shares, and engagement; thus, it often spreads like a cosmic joke. Consider the prevalence of clickbait headlines:

  • You Won’t Believe What Taylor Swift Says About Climate Change!
  • This Bedtime Drink Melts Belly Fat While You Sleep!
  • In One Week, I Turned $10 Into $1 Million!

Titles that make outrageous claims are how the content creator gets reads and views, which generates revenue via affiliate marketing, product placement, and pay-per-click (PPC) ads. Clickbait headlines are how you end up watching a TikTok video by a purported nutrition expert adamantly asserting you can lose belly fat while you sleep by drinking, for 14 consecutive days, a concoction of raw eggs, cinnamon, and apple cider vinegar 15 minutes before going to bed.

Our constant search for answers that’ll explain our convoluted world and our desire for shortcuts to success is how Internet talking heads achieve influencer status. Because we tend to seek low-hanging fruits, we listen to those with little experience or knowledge of the topics they discuss yet are astute enough to know what most people want to hear.

There’s a trend, more disturbing than spreading misinformation, that needs to be called out: individuals who’ve never achieved significant wealth or traded stocks giving how-to-make-easy-money advice, the appeal of which is undeniable. Several people I know have lost substantial money by following the “advice” of Internet talking heads.

Anyone on social media claiming to have a foolproof money-making strategy is lying. They wouldn’t be peddling their money-making strategy if they could make easy money.

Successful people tend to be secretive.

Social media companies design their respective algorithms to serve their advertisers—their source of revenue—interest; hence, content from Internet talking heads appears most prominent in your feeds. When a video of a self-professed expert goes viral, likely because it pressed an emotional button, the more people see it, the more engagement it receives, such as likes, shares and comments, creating a cycle akin to a tornado.

Imagine scrolling through your TikTok feed and stumbling upon a “scientist” who claims they can predict the weather using only aluminum foil, copper wire, sea salt and baking soda. You chuckle, but you notice his video got over 7,000 likes, has been shared over 600 times and received over 400 comments. You think to yourself, “Maybe this guy is onto something.” What started as a quest to achieve Internet fame evolved into an Internet-wide belief that weather forecasting can be as easy as DIY crafts.

Since anyone can call themselves “an expert,” you must cultivate critical thinking skills to distinguish genuine expertise from self-professed experts’ self-promoting nonsense. While the absurdity of the Internet can be entertaining, misinformation has serious consequences. The next time you read a headline that sounds too good to be true, it’s probably an Internet talking head making an educated guess; without the education seeking Internet fame, they can monetize.

______________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a self-described connoisseur of human psychology, writes about what’s

on his mind from Toronto. You can follow Nick on Twitter and Instagram @NKossovan.

 

Continue Reading

Tech

Tight deadlines on software projects can put safety at risk: survey

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – A new survey says a majority of software engineers and developers feel tight project deadlines can put safety at risk.

Seventy-five per cent of the 1,000 global workers who responded to the survey released Tuesday say pressure to deliver projects on time and on budget could be compromising critical aspects like safety.

The concern is even higher among engineers and developers in North America, with 77 per cent of those surveyed on the continent reporting the urgency of projects could be straining safety.

The study was conducted between July and September by research agency Coleman Parkes and commissioned by BlackBerry Ltd.’s QNX division, which builds connected-car technology.

The results reflect a timeless tug of war engineers and developers grapple with as they balance the need to meet project deadlines with regulations and safety checks that can slow down the process.

Finding that balance is an issue that developers of even the simplest appliances face because of advancements in technology, said John Wall, a senior vice-president at BlackBerry and head of QNX.

“The software is getting more complicated and there is more software whether it’s in a vehicle, robotics, a toaster, you name it… so being able to patch vulnerabilities, to prevent bad actors from doing malicious acts is becoming more and more important,” he said.

The medical, industrial and automotive industries have standardized safety measures and anything they produce undergoes rigorous testing, but that work doesn’t happen overnight. It has to be carried out from the start and then at every step of the development process.

“What makes safety and security difficult is it’s an ongoing thing,” Wall said. “It’s not something where you’ve done it, and you are finished.”

The Waterloo, Ont.-based business found 90 per cent of its survey respondents reported that organizations are prioritizing safety.

However, when asked about why safety may not be a priority for their organization, 46 per cent of those surveyed answered cost pressures and 35 per cent said a lack of resources.

That doesn’t surprise Wall. Delays have become rampant in the development of tech, and in some cases, stand to push back the launch of vehicle lines by two years, he said.

“We have to make sure that people don’t compromise on safety and security to be able to get products out quicker,” he said.

“What we don’t want to see is people cutting corners and creating unsafe situations.”

The survey also took a peek at security breaches, which have hit major companies like London Drugs, Indigo Books & Music, Giant Tiger and Ticketmaster in recent years.

About 40 per cent of the survey’s respondents said they have encountered a security breach in their employer’s operating system. Those breaches resulted in major impacts for 27 per cent of respondents, moderate impacts for 42 per cent and minor impacts for 27 per cent.

“There are vulnerabilities all the time and this is what makes the job very difficult because when you ship the software, presumably the software has no security vulnerabilities, but things get discovered after the fact,” Wall said.

Security issues, he added, have really come to the forefront of the problems developers face, so “really without security, you have no safety.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 8, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:BB)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Beware of scams during Amazon’s Prime Big Deal Days sales event: cybersecurity firm

Published

 on

 

As online shoppers hunt for bargains offered by Amazon during its annual fall sale this week, cybersecurity researchers are warning Canadians to beware of an influx of scammers posing as the tech giant.

In the 30 days leading up to Amazon’s Prime Big Deal Days, taking place Tuesday and Wednesday, there were more than 1,000 newly registered Amazon-related web domains, according to Check Point Software Technologies, a company that offers cybersecurity solutions.

The company said it deemed 88 per cent of those domains malicious or suspicious, suggesting they could have been set up by scammers to prey on vulnerable consumers. One in every 54 newly created Amazon-related domain included the phrase “Amazon Prime.”

“They’re almost indiscernible from the real Amazon domain,” said Robert Falzon, head of engineering at Check Point in Canada.

“With all these domains registered that look so similar, it’s tricking a lot of people. And that’s the whole intent here.”

Falzon said Check Point Research sees an uptick in attempted scams around big online shopping days throughout the year, including Prime Days.

Scams often come in the form of phishing emails, which are deceptive messages that appear to be from a reputable source in attempt to steal sensitive information.

In this case, he said scammers posing as Amazon commonly offer “outrageous” deals that appear to be associated with Prime Days, in order to trick recipients into clicking on a malicious link.

The cybersecurity firm said it has identified and blocked 100 unique Amazon Prime-themed scam emails targeting organizations and consumers over the past two weeks.

Scammers also target Prime members with unsolicited calls, claiming urgent account issues and requesting payment information.

“It’s like Christmas for them,” said Falzon.

“People expect there to be significant savings on Prime Day, so they’re not shocked that they see something of significant value. Usually, the old adage applies: If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.”

Amazon’s website lists a number of red flags that it recommends customers watch for to identify a potential impersonation scam.

Those include false urgency, requests for personal information, or indications that the sender prefers to complete the purchase outside of the Amazon website or mobile app.

Scammers may also request that customers exclusively pay with gift cards, a claim code or PIN. Any notifications about an order or delivery for an unexpected item should also raise alarm bells, the company says.

“During busy shopping moments, we tend to see a rise in impersonation scams reported by customers,” said Amazon spokeswoman Octavia Roufogalis in a statement.

“We will continue to invest in protecting consumers and educating the public on scam avoidance. We encourage consumers to report suspected scams to us so that we can protect their accounts and refer bad actors to law enforcement to help keep consumers safe.”

Falzon added that these scams are more successful than people might think.

As of June 30, the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre said there had been $284 million lost to fraud so far this year, affecting 15,941 victims.

But Falzon said many incidents go unreported, as some Canadians who are targeted do not know how or where to flag a scam, or may choose not to out of embarrassment.

Check Point recommends Amazon customers take precautions while shopping on Prime Days, including by checking URLs carefully, creating strong passwords on their accounts, and avoiding personal information being shared such as their birthday or social security number.

The cybersecurity company said consumers should also look for “https” at the beginning of a website URL, which indicates a secure connection, and use credit cards rather than debit cards for online shopping, which offer better protection and less liability if stolen.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 8, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending