adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Real eState

Selling Super Houses: every one of these wannabe estate agents is utterly useless – The Guardian

Published

 on


What happens when you combine the drone shots and growling pomp of The Apprentice with the super-prime real estate and saying-nothing-while-holding-a-champagne-glass glamour of Selling Sunset? Well, you get the same programme twice, actually: Crazy Rich Agents, which is BBC Two’s latest one, and Selling Super Houses, which is Channel 4’s.

Is it interesting or strange that two of the UK’s leading channels have essentially made the same show in different flavours (roughly: eight people compete in a series of half-challenges to prove they are the best high-end estate agent going; the last one standing gets a job)? The answer is: both. I needn’t tell you what’s going on with housing in this country – how’s your mortgage? Or worse, your rent? Well yeah, exactly – and the sheer real-lifeness of UK housing right now demands one of two TV reactions. Programmes either make hard-hitting demands for rent/interest-rate controls via gritty heart-changing documentaries that loudly whistle-blow about the corrupted future that looms if nothing is done. Or – and hear me out! Hear me out! – we all get to look at nice houses we can’t afford instead. So anyway, here’s Selling Super Houses.

Selling Super Houses sees Paul “PK” Kemsley (a feature of the Real Housewives extended universe) take on the Lord Sugar role, and he’s good at it: the same “I’m an East End geezer … and YOU’RE a bladdy mug!” boy-done-good disdain, the same strange-shaped jokes that don’t quite land, a similarly clipped silver stubble. He prowls into rooms and holds his hands together in a steeple and tells the agents that they all need to “hustle”. He keeps telling them “he wants everyone to win” because “if they make money, he makes money”. He wears an extraordinary range of bizarre zip-up cardigans instead of a suit. He keeps, keeps, keeps telling us he’s sold more than a billion dollars’ worth of real estate. And then he climbs into a tinted-out Range Rover and lets these idiots do nothing for 40 minutes.

The eight Selling Super Houses agents walk on a gravel drive past a garage and towards a big ivy-covered house

My preferred format of competition television is when every contestant is rubbish – this is why I love The Apprentice (morons) and feel indifference for Bake Off (nice people who practice hard). Selling Super Houses then, to me, is gorgeous: these people would struggle to sell ecstasy at a rave. They’re all almost complete amateurs when it comes to real estate, which adds some verve: there’s Pam, a fashion designer who calls in sick to the second day of the competiton; Mairead, an executive assistant who wants to be on the Forbes 30 Under 30 list within the next 18 months despite messing up the easiest part of this week’s task; Colin, a surveyor who already ran one estate agent business into the ground (the estate-agency industry is the closest this country has to a licence to print money, so how inept he had to be to do that, I don’t know) and clearly has designs on another. You get the idea a lot of these contestants are only taking the show half-seriously: Bobby tells everyone he had to skip a volleyball tournament to be here and does seem quite genuinely pained about that; Rasa, a customer executive with a casino background, kills every conversation dead by responding to everything ever said to her with a chilling: “Exactly.” My favourite is David, 41 years old and unemployed, who looks like a sort of distant Harry Styles cousin who spends every family barbecue gazing across the garden and wondering if he wasted the gifts of his youth. If any of them win, I hope it’s him.

Sadly, this all makes for very good brain-off television. There is nothing like looking at a rich person’s house (a three-bed in Bayswater with a shared garden: £4.m!) and thinking: “I may be poor but at least I have better taste than that.” You see disjointed floor plans and ghoulishly soulless furniture and feel a little bit better, at least, about your own sofa and chairs. You calculate how long it takes them to get from their outer-M25 mansion into town and feel good about your own proximity to the tube. Yes, they have a garden and a swimming pool and underfloor heating and four cars, but the art they put in the bathroom is repulsive, so at least there’s that. In an economy where not one of you reading this can afford to buy the housing in question, there is something perversely enjoyable about looking at it and knowing you don’t like it anyway.

There’s a lot going on with the housing market in this country, and a lot of talking points that I feel should probably be addressed in parliament but never will be. But for now this is TV, and we’ve opted to make the estate agents – the worst part of the industry by far – a little bit famous. Will we rue this decision one day? Undoubtedly. But for now: wow, look! Look at that house!

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

Here are some facts about British Columbia’s housing market

Published

 on

 

Housing affordability is a key issue in the provincial election campaign in British Columbia, particularly in major centres.

Here are some statistics about housing in B.C. from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s 2024 Rental Market Report, issued in January, and the B.C. Real Estate Association’s August 2024 report.

Average residential home price in B.C.: $938,500

Average price in greater Vancouver (2024 year to date): $1,304,438

Average price in greater Victoria (2024 year to date): $979,103

Average price in the Okanagan (2024 year to date): $748,015

Average two-bedroom purpose-built rental in Vancouver: $2,181

Average two-bedroom purpose-built rental in Victoria: $1,839

Average two-bedroom purpose-built rental in Canada: $1,359

Rental vacancy rate in Vancouver: 0.9 per cent

How much more do new renters in Vancouver pay compared with renters who have occupied their home for at least a year: 27 per cent

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Real eState

B.C. voters face atmospheric river with heavy rain, high winds on election day

Published

 on

 

VANCOUVER – Voters along the south coast of British Columbia who have not cast their ballots yet will have to contend with heavy rain and high winds from an incoming atmospheric river weather system on election day.

Environment Canada says the weather system will bring prolonged heavy rain to Metro Vancouver, the Sunshine Coast, Fraser Valley, Howe Sound, Whistler and Vancouver Island starting Friday.

The agency says strong winds with gusts up to 80 kilometres an hour will also develop on Saturday — the day thousands are expected to go to the polls across B.C. — in parts of Vancouver Island and Metro Vancouver.

Wednesday was the last day for advance voting, which started on Oct. 10.

More than 180,000 voters cast their votes Wednesday — the most ever on an advance voting day in B.C., beating the record set just days earlier on Oct. 10 of more than 170,000 votes.

Environment Canada says voters in the area of the atmospheric river can expect around 70 millimetres of precipitation generally and up to 100 millimetres along the coastal mountains, while parts of Vancouver Island could see as much as 200 millimetres of rainfall for the weekend.

An atmospheric river system in November 2021 created severe flooding and landslides that at one point severed most rail links between Vancouver’s port and the rest of Canada while inundating communities in the Fraser Valley and B.C. Interior.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

No shortage when it comes to B.C. housing policies, as Eby, Rustad offer clear choice

Published

 on

 

British Columbia voters face no shortage of policies when it comes to tackling the province’s housing woes in the run-up to Saturday’s election, with a clear choice for the next government’s approach.

David Eby’s New Democrats say the housing market on its own will not deliver the homes people need, while B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad saysgovernment is part of the problem and B.C. needs to “unleash” the potential of the private sector.

But Andy Yan, director of the City Program at Simon Fraser University, said the “punchline” was that neither would have a hand in regulating interest rates, the “giant X-factor” in housing affordability.

“The one policy that controls it all just happens to be a policy that the province, whoever wins, has absolutely no control over,” said Yan, who made a name for himself scrutinizing B.C.’s chronic affordability problems.

Some metrics have shown those problems easing, with Eby pointing to what he said was a seven per cent drop in rent prices in Vancouver.

But Statistics Canada says 2021 census data shows that 25.5 per cent of B.C. households were paying at least 30 per cent of their income on shelter costs, the worst for any province or territory.

Yan said government had “access to a few levers” aimed at boosting housing affordability, and Eby has been pulling several.

Yet a host of other factors are at play, rates in particular, Yan said.

“This is what makes housing so frustrating, right? It takes time. It takes decades through which solutions and policies play out,” Yan said.

Rustad, meanwhile, is running on a “deregulation” platform.

He has pledged to scrap key NDP housing initiatives, including the speculation and vacancy tax, restrictions on short-term rentals,and legislation aimed at boosting small-scale density in single-family neighbourhoods.

Green Leader Sonia Furstenau, meanwhile, says “commodification” of housing by large investors is a major factor driving up costs, and her party would prioritize people most vulnerable in the housing market.

Yan said it was too soon to fully assess the impact of the NDP government’s housing measures, but there was a risk housing challenges could get worse if certain safeguards were removed, such as policies that preserve existing rental homes.

If interest rates were to drop, spurring a surge of redevelopment, Yan said the new homes with higher rents could wipe the older, cheaper units off the map.

“There is this element of change and redevelopment that needs to occur as a city grows, yet the loss of that stock is part of really, the ongoing challenges,” Yan said.

Given the external forces buffeting the housing market, Yan said the question before voters this month was more about “narrative” than numbers.

“Who do you believe will deliver a better tomorrow?”

Yan said the market has limits, and governments play an important role in providing safeguards for those most vulnerable.

The market “won’t by itself deal with their housing needs,” Yan said, especially given what he described as B.C.’s “30-year deficit of non-market housing.”

IS HOUSING THE ‘GOVERNMENT’S JOB’?

Craig Jones, associate director of the Housing Research Collaborative at the University of British Columbia, echoed Yan, saying people are in “housing distress” and in urgent need of help in the form of social or non-market housing.

“The amount of housing that it’s going to take through straight-up supply to arrive at affordability, it’s more than the system can actually produce,” he said.

Among the three leaders, Yan said it was Furstenau who had focused on the role of the “financialization” of housing, or large investors using housing for profit.

“It really squeezes renters,” he said of the trend. “It captures those units that would ordinarily become affordable and moves (them) into an investment product.”

The Greens’ platform includes a pledge to advocate for federal legislation banning the sale of residential units toreal estate investment trusts, known as REITs.

The party has also proposed a two per cent tax on homes valued at $3 million or higher, while committing $1.5 billion to build 26,000 non-market units each year.

Eby’s NDP government has enacted a suite of policies aimed at speeding up the development and availability of middle-income housing and affordable rentals.

They include the Rental Protection Fund, which Jones described as a “cutting-edge” policy. The $500-million fund enables non-profit organizations to purchase and manage existing rental buildings with the goal of preserving their affordability.

Another flagship NDP housing initiative, dubbed BC Builds, uses $2 billion in government financingto offer low-interest loans for the development of rental buildings on low-cost, underutilized land. Under the program, operators must offer at least 20 per cent of their units at 20 per cent below the market value.

Ravi Kahlon, the NDP candidate for Delta North who serves as Eby’s housing minister,said BC Builds was designed to navigate “huge headwinds” in housing development, including high interest rates, global inflation and the cost of land.

Boosting supply is one piece of the larger housing puzzle, Kahlon said in an interview before the start of the election campaign.

“We also need governments to invest and … come up with innovative programs to be able to get more affordability than the market can deliver,” he said.

The NDP is also pledging to help more middle-class, first-time buyers into the housing market with a plan to finance 40 per cent of the price on certain projects, with the money repayable as a loan and carrying an interest rate of 1.5 per cent. The government’s contribution would have to be repaid upon resale, plus 40 per cent of any increase in value.

The Canadian Press reached out several times requesting a housing-focused interview with Rustad or another Conservative representative, but received no followup.

At a press conference officially launching the Conservatives’ campaign, Rustad said Eby “seems to think that (housing) is government’s job.”

A key element of the Conservatives’ housing plans is a provincial tax exemption dubbed the “Rustad Rebate.” It would start in 2026 with residents able to deduct up to $1,500 per month for rent and mortgage costs, increasing to $3,000 in 2029.

Rustad also wants Ottawa to reintroduce a 1970s federal program that offered tax incentives to spur multi-unit residential building construction.

“It’s critical to bring that back and get the rental stock that we need built,” Rustad said of the so-called MURB program during the recent televised leaders’ debate.

Rustad also wants to axe B.C.’s speculation and vacancy tax, which Eby says has added 20,000 units to the long-term rental market, and repeal rules restricting short-term rentals on platforms such as Airbnb and Vrbo to an operator’s principal residence or one secondary suite.

“(First) of all it was foreigners, and then it was speculators, and then it was vacant properties, and then it was Airbnbs, instead of pointing at the real problem, which is government, and government is getting in the way,” Rustad said during the televised leaders’ debate.

Rustad has also promised to speed up approvals for rezoning and development applications, and to step in if a city fails to meet the six-month target.

Eby’s approach to clearing zoning and regulatory hurdles includes legislation passed last fall that requires municipalities with more than 5,000 residents to allow small-scale, multi-unit housing on lots previously zoned for single family homes.

The New Democrats have also recently announced a series of free, standardized building designs and a plan to fast-track prefabricated homes in the province.

A statement from B.C.’s Housing Ministry said more than 90 per cent of 188 local governments had adopted the New Democrats’ small-scale, multi-unit housing legislation as of last month, while 21 had received extensions allowing more time.

Rustad has pledged to repeal that law too, describing Eby’s approach as “authoritarian.”

The Greens are meanwhile pledging to spend $650 million in annual infrastructure funding for communities, increase subsidies for elderly renters, and bring in vacancy control measures to prevent landlords from drastically raising rents for new tenants.

Yan likened the Oct. 19 election to a “referendum about the course that David Eby has set” for housing, with Rustad “offering a completely different direction.”

Regardless of which party and leader emerges victorious, Yan said B.C.’s next government will be working against the clock, as well as cost pressures.

Yan said failing to deliver affordable homes for everyone, particularly people living on B.C. streets and young, working families, came at a cost to the whole province.

“It diminishes us as a society, but then also as an economy.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending