Connect with us

Tech

The disappointment is real for people who got 'fake AirPods' for Christmas – CTV News

Published

 on


TORONTO —
As kids, teens and young adults alike tackled wrapping paper Christmas morning, many had only one thought on their minds: is this the year I finally get those AirPods I asked for?

For a lot of people, it seems that answer is no. But the worst part? The biggest injustice, they say?

Many received what they’re calling “Fake Airpods.”

AirPods are Apple’s wireless earbuds, which boast up to five hours of listening time, according to the tech giant’s website.

They also cost CAD$219. And that’s just for the basic model. For another $100, you can get the AirPods Pro, which are sweat- and water-resistant and have a customizable fit.

This holiday season, parents looking to cut corners — and avoid buying a teenager who can’t even remember to clean their room an extremely expensive tech device they will likely lose in a week — found every other alternative to fill the brief of a) earbuds, b) without wires.

Skypods, Smartpods, Souljapods — every pod possible, it seems, except the coveted AirPods.

The disappointment is real. So real that numerous downtrodden, heinously wronged folk took to Twitter to express their despair.

A Twitter moment called “The great AirPods disappointment of Christmas 2019” compiled some of the best of the sadness.

Users tweeted out they had specifically asked for “AIRpods,” and then attached photos of the imitation brand they had received instead. Some Twitter users lamented that their siblings had received the Apple product instead of them.

In one tweet, a photo-shopped Baby Yoda clutches a pair of socks underneath the caption “Me watching my brother get AirPods and an Apple Watch while I get socks.”

Others tweeted out their own versions of AirPods. One user twisted Q-tips into the familiar “L” shape of the iconic Pod. Another gushed about how their Mom had gotten them AirPods and was the “best when it comes to Christmas” — and then attached a picture showing an empty hand with a sketch of earbuds drawn on top of it.

AirPods were first introduced in 2016 when Apple decided that the headphone jack was a thing of the past and removed it from all of its phones moving forward. At the beginning, the move was soundly mocked, and AirPods were viewed as inaccessible and silly.

But after celebs started repping them, the AirPods quickly became a status symbol. What better way to signal your wealth and success than by having two strips of white protruding from your ears at all times?

Once the AirPods caught on, it wasn’t long before other companies put out their own wireless earbuds, many with significantly smaller price tags than Apple’s.

For the uber-trendy, it seems a cheaper copy is not good enough.

But there’s good news for those who didn’t receive AirPods this Christmas, or who were broke enough to never consider asking for them in the first place.

Model Bella Hadid was spotted wearing headphones WITH WIRES only a few days ago — an event so thrilling it warranted a Vogue story and a storm of tweets. Maybe the wires are coming back.

The original earbuds, with wires, are still on sale on Apple’s website. They go for only $40.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

U.S. lawmakers urge speedy action on U.S semiconductor chips funding

Published

 on

A bipartisan group of 38 U.S. House lawmakers on Thursday urged leaders in Congress to immediately set a path to advance legislation providing $52 billion for U.S. semiconductor production including $2 billion in support for chips used by the automotive industry.

The  U.S. Senate voted 68-32 in June to approve a sweeping package of legislation intended to boost the country’s ability to compete with Chinese technology, including providing $52 billion for chips, but the measure has stalled in the House.

The House lawmakers in a letter warned of the “dire consequences the automotive industry as a whole—and the nation—faces if we fail to advance legislation soon.”

 

(Reporting by David Shepardson)

Continue Reading

Tech

MacBook Pro's M1 Max GPU is Over 3x Faster Than M1 in First Metal Benchmark – MacRumors

Published

 on


Multiple benchmarks have already given us a general estimate of the CPU performance of the M1 Max chip, but we’ve had little insight into GPU performance. The ‌M1‌ Max is equipped with up to 32 graphics cores, marking a vast improvement over the 8-core GPU of the ‌M1‌, which was Apple’s first chip.


The first Metal benchmark for the ‌M1‌ Max surfaced this afternoon, with the chip earning a score of 68870. Comparatively, the ‌M1‌ chip in the 13-inch MacBook Pro has a Metal score of 20581, and the Radeon Pro 5600M, which was the highest-end GPU option for the prior Intel-based 16-inch model, has a Metal score of 42510.

Compared to the fastest chip available in Apple’s previous-generation 16-inch MacBook Pro, the ‌M1‌ Max is 62 percent faster, and it’s 3x faster than the ‌M1‌ chip in the 13-inch MacBook Pro, based on the Metal score we have so far.

It’s not clear if this ‌M1‌ Max chip is the 24-core variant or the 32-core variant. This is also just one result, so we should be able to get a better picture of the graphics performance when additional benchmarks are available.

According to Apple, the 32-core GPU in the ‌M1‌ Max is up to 4x faster than the ‌M1‌. Apple has said that the chip delivers performance “comparable to a high-end GPU in a compact pro PC laptop” while consuming up to 40 percent less power.

Since we last shared CPU benchmarks for the ‌M1‌ Max/Pro chip, several additional results have surfaced. Comparing multiple benchmarks, the ‌M1‌ Max/Pro earns an average single-core score 1742 and an average multi-core score of 12135.

The chip has the highest single-core score of any Mac to date, and it is only beaten in multi-core performance by the 16, 18, 24, and 28-core Intel Xeon chips used in the higher-end iMac Pro and Mac Pro models.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

News

U.S. safety board says driver, passenger seats occupied during fatal Tesla crash

Published

 on

National Transportation Safety Board(NTSB) said on Thursday that both the driver and passenger seats were occupied during an April 17 fatal crash of a Tesla Model S in Spring, Texas.

Local police previously said witness statements indicated there was nobody in the driver’s seat of the Model S when it crashed into a tree. The NTSB said a review of vehicle data show “both the driver and the passenger seats were occupied, and that the seat belts were buckled when the (event data recorder) recorded the crash.”

 

(Reporting by David Shepardson)

Continue Reading

Trending