Real eState
Toronto-area home prices down 18% from last February, sales halved: real estate board – CBC.ca


Greater Toronto Area home prices fell almost 18 per cent from last February — the largest year-over-year drop on record
— as the number of properties sold was halved, the region’s real estate board said.
The Toronto Regional Real Estate Board (TRREB) said Friday that the average selling price for February totalled $1,095,617, roughly five per cent higher than the average January price of $1,038,390.
It attributed the swings to higher borrowing costs prompted by a quick succession of interest rate hikes, which have weighed on the market and offset the dramatic drop in prices that has materialized in recent months.
But Davelle Morrison, a Toronto broker with Bosley Real Estate Ltd., cautioned against reading too much into the steep year-over-year price drop. She sees 2022 as an anomaly because COVID-19 contributed to a massive demand for homes that was unlikely to be sustained for years to come.
While conditions are not as frantic as they were in the pandemic, she sees housing activity picking up again.
“With a few of my clients over the last couple of months, we’ve been in bidding wars, and we kind of thought bidding wars were over, but this year has really proven … they are back with a vengeance,” she said.
“I had a client a few days ago who lost out on a townhouse where there were 19 offers.”
First-time homebuyers who shied away from purchases as mortgage rates rose are returning to the market along with people who simply need to move or have outgrown their homes.
“There are people that need to buy, they’re not playing games and they’re not really trying to time the market.”
Yet, even as prices have come down from pandemic highs, some buyers have sat on the market’s sidelines awaiting further decreases and more supply, which has been lacking as prospective sellers lament the pricing slump.
Morrison fears they will miss an opportune time to buy.
“I think some of them might have missed their moments already by sitting and waiting and waiting,” she said.
However, she thinks there could be a further price decline in April or May, if more supply comes on the market.
February’s pricing data signals average selling prices are levelling off after trending lower through the spring and summer of last year, TRREB said.
The trend has pushed some buyers to purchase a lower-priced home.
Sales, new listings lower than 1 year ago
TRREB found the share of home purchases below $1 million sat at 57 per cent last month, up from 38 per cent during the same time period last year.
Overall sales remain far lower than they were a year ago, when the market was soaring, buyers dropped conditions and feisty bidding conditions were the norm.
February sales totalled 4,783, down 47 per cent from 9,028 a year earlier. In comparison, January recorded 3,094 sales.
A shift in sales could help prices level out, suggested Priscilla Thiagamoorthy, a senior economist at BMO Capital Markets.
“With the Bank of Canada signalling a pause after aggressively tightening for the past year, we could see some price stability if sales pick up,” she wrote in a Friday note to investors.
What happens to sales will largely depend on new listings, which also lag figures from a year ago, amounting to 8,367 in February. That number is down 41 per cent from a year earlier, but TRREB sees changes coming.
Ipsos polling the board has seen suggests buying intentions have picked up for 2023, said Jason Mercer, TRREB’s chief market analyst.
“This increased demand will run up against a constrained supply of listings and lead to increased competition between buyers,” he said in a news release.
“This will eventually lead to renewed price growth in many segments of the market, especially those catering to first-time buyers facing increased rental costs.”
Continue Reading
Real eState
New York Fed board member warns of commercial real-estate risks – Reuters
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/F5KD56GBYNIQHMAJFTZVAI2L6A.jpg)
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/F5KD56GBYNIQHMAJFTZVAI2L6A.jpg)
NEW YORK, March 24 (Reuters) – An executive who also serves on the board overseeing the New York Federal Reserve warned on Twitter of potentially systemic problems in the real estate finance market and called on the industry to work with authorities to avoid things getting out of hand.
Noting there is $1.5 trillion in commercial real estate debt set to mature in the next three years, Scott Rechler, who is CEO of RXR, a large property manager and developer, tweeted: “The bulk of this debt was financed when base interest rates were near zero. This debt needs to be refinanced in an environment where rates are higher, values are lower, & in a market with less liquidity.”
Rechler said he’s joined with the Real Estate Roundtable “in calling for a program that provides lenders the leeway and the flexibility from regulators to work with borrowers to develop responsible, constructive refinancing plans.”
“If we fail to act, we risk a systemic crisis with our banking system & particularly the regional banks” which make up over three quarters of real estate lending, which will in turn put pressure on local governments that depend on property taxes to fund their operations, Rechler wrote.
The executive weighed in amid broad concern in markets that aggressive Fed rate hikes aimed at lowering high inflation will also break something in the financial sector, as collateral damage to the core monetary policy mission.
The Fed nearly held off on raising its short-term rate target on Wednesday after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank rattled markets. The failure of Silicon Valley Bank was linked to the firm’s trouble in managing its holdings as markets repriced to deal with higher Fed short-term interest rates.
The real-estate sector has also been hard hit by Fed rate rises and commercial real estate has also been hobbled by the shift away from in-office work during the pandemic.
Also weighing in via Twitter, the former leader of the Boston Fed, Eric Rosengren, offered a warning on real estate risks, echoing a long-held concern of his dating back a number of years.
Pointing to big declines in real estate investment indexes, he said “many bank lenders will be pulling back just as leases roll, with high office vacancies and high interest rates. Regional bank shock and troubled offices will be negatively reinforcing.”
Real estate woes are on the Fed’s radar, but leaders believe banks can navigate the challenges.
Speaking at a press conference Wednesday following the Fed’s quarter percentage point rate rise, central bank leader Jerome Powell said “we’re well-aware of the concentrations people have in commercial real estate,” while adding “the banking system is strong, it is sound, it is resilient, it’s well-capitalized,” which he said should limit other financial firms from hitting the trouble that felled SVB.
Rechler serves as what’s called a Class B director on the 12-person panel of private citizens who oversee the New York Fed. That class of director is elected by the private banks of the respective regional Feds to represent the interest of the public. Each of the quasi-private regional Fed banks are also operated under the oversight of the Fed’s Board of Governors in Washington, which is explicitly part of the government.
The boards overseeing each of the regional Fed banks are made up of a mix of bankers, business and non-profit leaders. These boards provide advice in running large organizations and local economic intelligence. Their most visible role is helping regional Fed banks find new presidents, although bankers who serve as directors are by law not part of this process.
Central bank rules say that directors are not involved in bank oversight and regulation activities, which are controlled by the Fed in Washington.
Reporting by Michael S. Derby; Editing by Andrea Ricci
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
Real eState
China's Mysteriously Resilient Real Estate Prices: New Economy Saturday – Bloomberg – Bloomberg
[unable to retrieve full-text content]
China’s Mysteriously Resilient Real Estate Prices: New Economy Saturday – Bloomberg Bloomberg
Source link
Real eState
Widow's battle to resell burial space underscores Metro Vancouver's real estate crunch – CBC.ca
A little more than 25 years ago, John Douglas Carnahan bought the rights to two burial plots in the northeast corner of a hilly cemetery in a dense area of Burnaby, B.C.
Back then, they cost $750 each.
As years passed and space grew scarce, the cost of a single plot in the same cemetery surged to more than $10,000.
After Carnahan’s death at 91, his widow decided not to use the plots. Her battle for the right to sell the plots privately to any buyer at market value has now spilled over into B.C. Supreme Court in a case experts say again proves the region’s real estate crunch is also squeezing its graveyards.
“We are running out of space, particularly in the Lower Mainland,” said architect Bill Pechet, who’s worked in cemetery design for roughly 30 years.
“Just like we have a housing crisis for the living, we’re also encountering a housing crisis for those who want to be buried.”
Cemetery blocking resale, widow says
Carnahan bought both plots at Pacific Heritage Cemetery in March 1998. At the time, there was a clause in the purchase agreement saying cemetery directors “may” buy back owner’s plots at the original purchase price.
Carnahan’s widow, Sheila Carnahan, contacted the cemetery after her husband’s death in 2021 to ask how she could go about privately selling the plots she no longer needed to a third-party buyer.
Her claim said staff told her in an email last October that, according to its bylaws, she could only sell her plots back to the cemetery for the original purchase price of $750 each.


Sheila Carnahan has argued the cemetery “misinterpreted” its own bylaws because the clause said cemetery directors “may purchase” plots back — not “must purchase.”
“The claimants say that the position taken by the [cemetery], while invalid in law, effectively prevents a sale to third parties because the [cemetery] controls the ownership record and the operation of the cemetery, including the preparation of the grave for use,” the lawsuit said.
“The [cemetery] could effectively prevent the new owner from using the plot.”
The cemetery has not responded to her claim in court.
In B.C., rights to interment sold in perpetuity
In B.C., buying a plot is just buying the right to interment, meaning a buyer is paying for the right to be buried in the space but not purchasing the land itself. Those rights are sold in perpetuity, so buyers can hold plots for however long they choose — unless a plot has been empty for more than 50 years and the rightsholder is more than 90 years old, in which case a cemetery can launch the complex process of applying to get the space back.
Each cemetery sets its own rules around resales. Some bylaws allow private sales, others don’t.
Most cemeteries in Metro Vancouver are full or nearly full. As the value of real estate has skyrocketed over the last decade, so has the value of that scarce burial space — especially in urban areas. Private plots in Metro Vancouver have been listed on Craigslist or Kijiji for anywhere from $5,000 to $50,000.
Resales are common enough to warrant caution from Consumer Protection B.C., urging buyers to check online ads carefully to ensure whether cemeteries honour private sales.
Limited space, poor planning part of the problem
There’s a shortage of traditional cemetery space in B.C. for the same reason there’s a shortage of space for new homes — builders have nowhere else to go.
“The housing crisis that we’re encountering is a result of our inability to expand horizontally because we encounter the mountains on one side and the ocean on the other,” said Pechet.
“We have a land shortage for housing, and cemetery spaces are a form of housing.”
City planning was also an issue.
“For some reason, the Metro Vancouver area seems to have significantly less cemetery space through some planning than most other municipalities,” said Glen Hodges, who manages Mountain View Cemetery, the only graveyard in Vancouver.
“It’s some magical mystery as to why.”
Some European countries, like Switzerland, Sweden, Italy, France and Germany, limit cemetery leases to anywhere between three and 30 years to free up more plots.
In Spain and the United Kingdom, bones can be moved after a certain period so the plot can be recycled to be sold again. The City of London Cemetery, for example, reuses graves left untouched after 75 years.
In 2019, the City of Vancouver passed a series of bylaws to save space at its only cemetery. Gravesites at Mountain View Cemetery are now allowed to be shared by multiple families, and the cemetery can decide when additional remains can be added to an existing space.
Pechet said B.C. might have to consider vertical cemeteries, like those in Japan, or find a way to tactfully incorporate gravesites into existing public parks. Recycling could also be an option.
“I think it will inevitably have to lead to a lot of invention,” he said.
-
Real eState24 hours ago
Macomb County real estate developer accused of illegally destroying 18.4 acres of wetlands
-
Health24 hours ago
Thousands of students in the northeast are behind on routine immunizations, say health units
-
Art15 hours ago
Gagosian’s DALL-E–Enabled Art Exhibition Throws Us Headfirst into the Uncanny Valley
-
Business22 hours ago
Stock market today: Stocks open lower as further bank-related fears percolate
-
Investment15 hours ago
Here’s how much money you’d have if you invested $1,000 in Nike 10 years ago
-
Media21 hours ago
4 ways to use social media to advance your career
-
News19 hours ago
What can I give on Mother’s Day?
-
News23 hours ago
U.S., Canada may end Safe Third Country Agreement loophole