Another four flights have been added to the BC Centre for Disease Control’s COVID-19 exposures list.
All four either arrived or departed from Vancouver late last month. Three were domestic, while one was international.
The first flight landed in Vancouver from Toronto on July 24. The flight number is Air Canada 119, and rows 12 to 18 are believed to be most at risk of exposure to the virus.
The second flight departed from Vancouver for Edmonton three days later, on July 27. That flight number is WestJet 186. People in rows two to eight may be most at risk of COVID-19 exposure.
The same route – WestJet 186 from Vancouver to Edmonton – also had a COVID-19 exposure on July 30. The highest-risk rows on that day’s flight were rows six to 12.
Finally, a July 29 flight that landed in Vancouver after leaving from Amsterdam was also added to the BCCDC’s list. That flight, KLM 681, had an exposure somewhere in rows 31 to 35.
Since the start of July, 21 domestic flights and 21 international flights have been added to B.C.’s exposures list.
Anyone on one of the domestic flights should self-monitor for symptoms for 14 days. Anyone arriving internationally is required to isolate and monitor themselves for symptoms for 14 days.
B.C. health officials no longer directly contact people who were seated near a confirmed case of COVID-19 on a flight. Instead, the BCCDC provides updates on flights with confirmed cases as it becomes aware of them.
A full list of recent exposures can be found on the BCCDC’s website.
SOURCE: – CTV News Vancouver
Averting a COVID-19 vaccination crisis will take careful communication – The Verge
President Donald Trump’s relentless talk about interference with the COVID-19 vaccine approval process is setting the stage for a vaccination crisis. Even before a vaccine has been approved, public health experts are watching as confidence in a hypothetical vaccine plummets — and they’re already trying to figure out how to win back the public’s trust.
In May, 72 percent of people said that they would get vaccinated, according to a Pew Research Center survey. By September, only half of people said that they would. That drop ispartly driven by the swirling drama around the still-unproven vaccines. Data and study protocols that normally wouldn’t draw much attention are subject to intense scrutiny.
Now, many people who are normally comfortable with vaccines say that they’re worried. They think the process is being driven by politics, not science. They’re concerned that the Trump administration is pressuring federal agencies to authorize a vaccine before there’s enough testing to show that it’s safe or that it works.
It’s still early days, and vaccine development is still in progress. It seems to be unfolding appropriately — at least so far — and it’s still too soon to say what might happen after initial data from the trials is released by pharmaceutical companies. But the drop-off in confidence before a vaccine is available still concerns public health experts. A vaccine won’t be able to help protect people if they don’t take it. If too many people refuse, the population won’t be able to build herd immunity.
Fortunately, there will likely be a long lag between vaccine authorization and the time when most people will actually have the option to get a vaccine. That gives experts room to analyze the data and, if it’s warranted, alleviate some of those fears, says Melanie Kornides, an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing who studies vaccine hesitancy. They’ll probably handle it similar to how they handle parents who are scared of the measles vaccine. “We need to address people’s concerns, and talk about the benefits of vaccination,” she told The Verge.
This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.
How warranted are those fears around a politically motivated push to bring a vaccine out too quickly?
I think that we need to remember that a vaccine hasn’t come out yet, and that’s because they haven’t finished safety and efficacy testing. If people are concerned that it’s maybe being pushed through too fast, that hasn’t played out yet because we don’t have a vaccine. I think that we can be confident in communicating that scientists and pharmaceutical companies are taking the right approach of balancing safety and efficacy testing with wanting to end a very dangerous and deadly pandemic as quickly as possible.
Is there a difference between hesitancy around a COVID-19 vaccine and the hesitancy around childhood vaccinations, like the measles vaccine?
I think that there are actually a lot of similarities between the hesitancy that we’re seeing around the COVID-19 vaccine and the normal vaccine hesitancy that we see around childhood vaccinations. As I’m looking at things that people are saying on social media about the COVID-19 vaccine, we see a lot of the same things that people tend to express about childhood vaccination. Those include worries that it’s not effective or worries about unknown, long-term side effects. There are worries that it’s pushed through for commercial profit or to make the government look better. And to some extent, we see with childhood vaccinations this belief that natural immunity might be safer and better, and we’re seeing a little bit of that too with the COVID vaccine.
But the big difference is that this is much more widespread. Many people are saying that they normally get vaccinated and they normally accept vaccines, but they have particular concerns about this vaccine.
Have we seen similar things before, when people who are usually comfortable with vaccines balk at one?
My research before this was really focused on hesitancy around the HPV vaccine. It’s really similar because, like the COVID vaccine, a lot of parents that choose not to vaccinate their children for HPV are not anti-vaxxers. They just say they have these worries that maybe the HPV vaccine wasn’t thoroughly tested, or they’ve seen something on Instagram or Twitter saying that there have been negative side effects that are being taken seriously. You get these parents who are hesitant but, in general, are not anti-vaxxers.
Will the same strategies we use to overcome those worries with HPV vaccines work for a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine? Are they different from the way you’d talk to someone who is stridently anti-vaccine?
In general, it’s just much harder to convince somebody who has really strong beliefs that vaccinations are dangerous to move over to the pro-vaccine camp. What we do with parents and children is we try to appeal the idea that everybody cares about their child and wants what’s best for their child. It’s about explaining or making them understand that, even though we don’t see these childhood illnesses anymore, they’re very dangerous, and they’re very deadly.
There’s lots of studies showing that the important thing is the trust in the person who’s giving the information to you. I think with COVID-19, what’s going to be important is making sure that health care providers have been really well-trained in communicating the safety and efficacy and importance of the vaccine. That is what goes a long way.
If most of the people who say they won’t get a COVID-19 vaccine are normally okay with vaccines, does that make it easier to help them understand why they should actually take it?
Absolutely. A lot of it is going to depend on how well the safety and efficacy of the vaccine is communicated through the media, through the pharmaceutical companies, and then also through health care providers. But assuming that we do a good job of that, I think that it will move the needle, and a lot of people that are saying they won’t get vaccinated will move over.
If the worst-case scenario does happen — a vaccine actually does get authorized without scientists feeling confident in the data, and there are negative side effects — what might happen?
I think that would definitely be damaging. We have had instances where vaccines have been pulled from the market because they weren’t as safe as the initial safety data suggested. When that happens, it’s usually that the number of negative outcomes is small, but on a population-level, you want to prevent that.
Ideally, hopefully, they’ll have several vaccines around the same time — so if one has to be pulled, the others will continue to be safe and effective.
Feds pledge $440 million to join international vaccine program – CTV News
Canada will spend $440 million to join an international program which is trying ensure COVID-19 vaccines aren’t just hoarded by rich countries, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Friday.
But Canada is spending more than twice that to gain private access to millions of doses of some of the most promising vaccines in development. That includes a sixth deal announced Friday with AstraZeneca for up to 20 million doses of its vaccine candidate, which is in the third and final phase of clinical trials.
The federal government has committed more than $1 billion to buying vaccines for Canada, much of which is not refundable even if the vaccines are never approved.
Trudeau also unveiled Canada’s financial commitment for the COVID-19 Vaccine Global Access Facility, known as COVAX.
Canada is among 64 high-income countries that have committed to joining COVAX.
Canada is joining both parts of the initiative: one which secures access to millions of doses of vaccines for Canada, and the other which has wealthier nations pooling their funds to help lower and middle-income countries secure doses as well.
The $440 million is split equally between the two parts, with half securing 15 million doses of vaccines for Canada from COVAX, and the other half going to help poorer countries get doses as well.
“Canadians must have access to a safe and effective vaccine against COVID-19 no matter where it is developed,” Trudeau said at a news conference in Ottawa.
But he said to eliminate the virus in Canada, it also needs to be eliminated around the world.
The Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research and the Canadian Society for International Health have both criticized Canada for acting to buy doses of vaccine for itself, saying it hinders efforts to ensure successful vaccines are distributed fairly around the world.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 25, 2020.
S&P 500, Dow set to extend longest losing spree in a year – Reuters
(Reuters) – Wall Street’s main indexes rose on Friday, led by technology-related stocks, but were still set for their longest weekly losing streak in a year as fears about the coronavirus’ impact on the economy weighed on investor sentiment.
Shares of tech mega-caps including Facebook Inc FB.O, Alphabet Inc GOOGL.O, Amazon.com Inc AMZN.O, Apple Inc AAPL.O and Netflix Inc NFLX.O, which are perceived as relatively safe assets at a time of economic uncertainty, climbed between 0.4% and 1.9%.
“We’ve been down for a number of days and the market is such that it’s looking for opportunities to buy,” said Barry James, portfolio manager at James Investment Research in Ohio.
All the three major U.S. stock indexes are on course for their fourth straight week of declines – their longest weekly losing streak since August 2019.
Volatility .VIX has also shot up as investors look for clarity on more Congressional stimulus ahead of the Nov. 3 presidential election.
At 11:40 a.m. ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average .DJI was up 97.00 points, or 0.36%, at 26,912.44, the S&P 500 .SPX was up 19.02 points, or 0.59%, at 3,265.61, and the Nasdaq Composite .IXIC was up 116.18 points, or 1.09%, at 10,788.44.
The S&P industrials sector .SPLRCI added 0.8% as data showed new orders for key U.S.-made capital goods jumped in August, while a 0.7% slide in energy stocks .SPNY put them on course for one of their worst weeks since the coronavirus-driven crash in March.
Costco Wholesale Corp COST.O fell 2.6% as the warehouse chain recorded high coronavirus-related costs for the second straight quarter.
Boeing Co BA.N gained 3.6% after Europe’s chief aviation safety regulator said the planemaker’s grounded 737 MAX could receive regulatory approval to resume flying in November and enter service by the end of the year.
Novavax Inc NVAX.O jumped 11.3% after the drugmaker launched a late-stage trial of its experimental COVID-19 vaccine in the UK.
Advancing issues outnumbered decliners 1.29-to-1 on the NYSE and 2.09-to-1 on the Nasdaq.
The S&P index recorded one new 52-week high and no new low, while the Nasdaq recorded 14 new highs and 30 new lows.
Reporting by Devik Jain in Bengaluru; Editing by Arun Koyyur and Anil D’Silva
Opinion: Smart solutions needed to create circular economy for plastics – Edmonton Journal
National Real Estate Deal Roundup 9.25.20 – Real Estate Daily Beat
Averting a COVID-19 vaccination crisis will take careful communication – The Verge
Silver investment demand jumped 12% in 2019
Iran anticipates renewed protests amid social media shutdown
Richmond BBQ spot speaks out about coronavirus rumours Vancouver Is Awesome
- Economy18 hours ago
If Donald Trump drags the U.S. economy down, Canada's economy is going along for the ride – Toronto Star
- Health23 hours ago
Ontario College of Teachers asks retired teachers to return to the classroom to address teaching shortage during pandemic – CTV Edmonton
- News21 hours ago
Ontario sees 409 new COVID-19 cases, rolls out $1B updated testing and contact-tracing plan – CBC.ca
- News17 hours ago
CP Holiday Train won't roll across Canada this year due to pandemic – CBC.ca
- Business21 hours ago
Tech stocks lift Wall Street as economic rebound slows – Reuters
- News20 hours ago
U.S. cosmetics chain Ulta scraps Canadian expansion plans – CBC.ca
- Art17 hours ago
Pandemic-inspired art exhibit – News 1130
- Media16 hours ago
'Absolutely huge': Media groups optimistic after Liberal pledge to make internet giants pay for content – Financial Post