Connect with us

Investment

Chorus acquisition proposal talks end without deal, potential investment talks remain – Yahoo Canada Finance

Published

 on


CBC

Obstacles to voting may throw N.L. election outcome into doubt, political scientist says

A political scientist in St. John’s said Friday Newfoundland and Labrador’s election campaign — disrupted last week by a province-wide lockdown — has been riddled with irregularities and is at serious risk of a result that could be challenged in court, if not the court of public opinion. “When it is complete, we won’t know for sure if the House that we’ve elected is legitimate,” Kelly Blidook, who teaches political science at Memorial University, told the St. John’s Morning Show. Blidook said chief electoral officer Bruce Chaulk was too late in offering accommodations to people with disabilities that would allow them to vote. “The message seemed very, very broad, which was basically: if you have a problem we will try to accommodate you,” Blidook said. “The day before the deadline seems like an odd time to really have that sort of wide-open message.” Blidook said voters need more detail about these accommodations, as well as what else Elections NL is doing to adapt to an election that had been originally scheduled to end Feb. 13. The deadline to apply for a special ballot kit is Friday evening at 8 p.m. NT. Ballots need to be received by Elections NL by March 5 in order to be counted. In an interview, Blidook was sharply critical of how Chaulk has managed the election delay, including some of the answers he gave in an interview CBC published earlier this week. “Some of [Chaulk’s] answers in that, I actually think will be used in court cases afterwards, to show that the chief electoral officer was not taking people’s concerns seriously,” he said. A large part of this confusion, according to Blidook, arose from a breakdown in communication early on between Elections NL and Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Janice Fitzgerald. He said Chaulk appear to brush off legitimate medical concerns. “If we have people who are isolating for a period of two weeks, how could these people go to the mailbox to get their ballot and come back?” asked Blidook. “Bruce Chaulk’s comments on this in his Q&A the other day seemed to kind of diminish these people — these people should not be diminished.” Blidook said constituents have a constitutional right to vote, and the government has a duty to facilitate that right. “If they have not come up with a way to facilitate that, then they are essentially not meeting that charter right.” When it comes to options for voters, Blidook said it’s hard to know what the plan is. There’s still uncertainty about how voters with disabilities will receive or cast their ballots. “I realize that we might be talking about a very small portion of the population in terms of those who can’t use the systems in place, but I also feel like to this point, the communication has been vague,” he said. When asked if there’s a particular benchmark of voter turnout that would impact the legitimacy of the election, Blidook said there’s no clear answer. “Given that past elections have been in the ballpark of 60 per cent turnout, we should expect about 60 per cent turnout,” said Blidook, but “certainly if we hit that same number, that doesn’t mean the election is suddenly legitimate.” Ultimately, a court would have to look at the election on a district-by-district basis, he said, to determine if and where people may have been disenfranchised. If there’s a legitimate drop in turnout, however, a margin of 10 per cent may be enough of an indication to call this election into question. “I can’t say the exact number, but I think we actually need to start having this discussion,” said Blidook, “because what is quite likely to come from this election is that we will have uncertainty when it’s done.” Disabled, homeless face challenges Chaulk said he’s endeavouring to not leave anyone out. “If you identify yourself to us and let us know what disability you have that prevents you from a home vote, then we will figure out a way to let you vote,” he said. But some people with disabilities have still felt excluded from this election, and by the challenges that a shift to mail-in voting posed. “That takes away my pride, independence, integrity,” said Terry Gardner, a Corner Brook resident who lost his sight to glaucoma. He has had to rely on family in order to cast his own vote in this election. “For somebody who’s blind, and lots of people with physical disabilities … it’s non-democratic, is what it is.” Nancy Reid, who heads the St. John’s-based Coalition for Persons with Disabilities, said her daughter’s experience has been revealing. Her daughter is non-verbal and cannot write, but “she can read and mark an X on a piece of paper.” But for a mail-in ballot, more than an X is needed — and her daughter cannot fill it out on her own. Reid said her daughter’s right to vote should also come with privacy. “She loves to vote. It’s something she takes great pride in, and that’s been denied,” she said. Dan Meades, who has worked for years in St. John’s with people who are homeless, said this year’s election campaign has been filled with barriers to people who live on the margins. “It’s hard to imagine a process that’s less inclusive than this,” said Meades, provincial coordinator of the Transition House Association of Newfoundland and Labrador. Meades said many of those people lack identification and a home address where a ballot kit can be sent, much less a phone or a computer and internet service to request it. Public libraries, which provide a public service, are closed under current lockdown orders. “There’s just too many barriers this time to expect folks that are marginalized to do it,” Meades said. Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Teaming Up To Accelerate Justicetech Startups And Investment – Forbes

Published

 on


Justicetech is at a pretty nascent stage. While there are some startups and investors in the area, much of the activity has happened in bits and pieces, without a comprehensive community or network, or even an agreed-upon understanding of what justicetech is. (One definition: technology startups focused on addressing problems faced by people who have been arrested, are incarcerated or are formerly incarcerated).

For that reason, impact accelerator Village Capital and impact investor American Family Insurance Institute for Corporate and Social Impact recently started teaming up to research and assess justicetech startups and investors and find ways to address their most pressing needs.

What they’ve found is that the most urgent need these startups face is raising capital.

“Our ultimate goal is to determine how we can mobilize capital toward justicetech solutions and startups,” says Marcia Chong Rosado, director, economic opportunity at Village Capital.

Assessing the Landscape

Their work started over the summer, when the two organizations got to talking about justicetech and what it means. Village Capital was looking closely at the sector, while, at the same time,  AmFam Institute had started to make VC investments in the area, but was having trouble identifying  the companies that best fit. “We were both struggling in our own worlds with the same issues,” says Nyra Jordan, AmFarm Institute’s social impact investment director. So they decided to work together.

The first phase included conducting a research and market assessment of the justicetech landscape. A report with those findings is slated to be released in March. Researchers identified six verticals within the sector, as well as different stages of the justice system, like incarceration and re-entry,  that startups focus on. The verticals include:

  • Financial health. Helping justice-involved people and their families achieve financial security and the ability to thrive.
  • Future of work. Expanding access to education and employment.
  • Government. Focusing on government systems—for example, making court systems more accessible and efficient.
  • Healthcare. Supporting the physical and mental health of justice-involved people.
  • Legal. Expanding access to civil and legal resources, as well as legal representation.
  • Communications. Helping people in the system stay connected with family and friends and also link up with other service providers.

Money, Not Mentors

Conversations with advisory board members revealed that by far the biggest challenge startups face is finding funding. That is, entrepreneurs don’t need mentors. They need money. And, because many are BIPOC, groups that typically have trouble finding investors, the problem is particularly acute.

That finding seemed to cry out for the need to convene existing investors, as well as new ones looking to learn more about the area, and build a justicetech investor network, thereby addressing the highly fragmented nature of the current ecosystem. To that end, in April, the team will seek out 10-12 mostly pre-seed and seed-stage investors to join the network.

Part of the work after that will involve creating a justicelens investing framework, starting by investigating such issues as appropriate business models and exit strategies, as well as how it all fits into the broader set of tools in impact measurement and management systems.

Vote of Confidence

The findings they’ve so far uncovered have, in fact, already changed how Jordan is approaching working with early-stage companies. Shortly after AmFam Institute was formed in 2018, the folks there began sponsoring local accelerator programs and boot camps aimed at what they called justicetech or criminal justice reform, though without a more-formulated definition. But the recent research caused them to rethink how to provide financial support. “People are saying we don’t need any more mentorship. We need capital,” says Jordan.

That’s meant, for example, re-assessing when to give grants vs. equity investments. Thus, while awarding, say, a $10,000 grant might be helpful in certain situations, in others an equity investment might be more useful. “If you invest with equity, you’re supporting that startup for the long-term and banking on that business,” she says. Such a message also might be likely to attract more money from other investors who would be influenced by that vote of confidence.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Which Is a Better Investment Account: TFSA versus RRSP? – Yahoo Finance UK

Published

 on


IMAGE OF A NOTEBOOK WITH TFSA WRITTEN ON IT

Are you considering investing and searching for the top stocks to buy? Before doing so, you should know that whatever money you earn from investing entails a tax. You get a T5 slip which gives you a summary of your investment income. The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) encourages Canadians to save money by offering many registered savings accounts with tax benefits. Two popular accounts are Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs) and Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs).

TFSA versus RRSP

The purpose of TFSA and RRSP is different, and the CRA designed them accordingly. If you use them optimally, you can make the most of them.

The TFSA, as the name suggests, encourages a savings culture. Hence, it levies a tax on your contribution but allows your investment to grow tax-free. Moreover, you can withdraw partial or complete amounts anytime without adding them to your taxable income.

As there is a tax benefit involved, there is a cap on how much you can invest. For 2021, the contribution limit is $6,000, which you can carry forward next year. If you were over 18 years of age in 2009, when the TFSA started, you can invest a lump sum of $75,500, the accumulated contribution of all these years.

The RRSP is the exact opposite of the TFSA. The RRSP promotes retirement savings, which require you to stay invested till you retire. For that, the CRA deducts the RRSP contribution from your taxable income but adds the withdrawals to your taxable income. And if you withdraw before age 71, it deducts an additional withholding tax of 10%-30%.

Similar to the TFSA, the RRSP also has a contribution limit, which is 18% of your income or a maximum amount the CRA decides. For 2020, the maximum amount is $27,230, which you can carry forward next year.

In both the accounts, over contribution brings a 1% tax. The TFSA and RRSP combined allow you to invest $33,000/year in a tax-efficient manner. You can also check out other registered accounts for more tax-efficient investing.

Maximize returns and tax savings using the TFSA and RRSP

Now that you understand the mechanics of the TFSA and the RRSP, you can maximize your returns and minimize your tax bill. You should look at three aspects when choosing the savings account:

  • Will the security you are investing in yield high returns?

  • What is your tax bill for the year?

  • How much can you save for the long term?

The TFSA investing strategy

Use the TFSA to invest in high-growth and high-dividend stocks, which can grow your money multiple folds in few years. This is because your investment income will be higher than your contribution, and the TFSA will exclude the investment earnings from your taxable income. TFSA is popular among households with after‑tax income under $80,000, according to the 2016 Census.

The iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (TSX:XIT) is a good choice for the TFSA. The ETF has surged 267% in the last five years, converting $10,000 into $36,700. It gives you exposure to the top tech stocks trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange. This 267% growth is when the sector was at a nascent stage. It has now entered the growth stage, and the cloud, 5G, and artificial intelligence revolution will drive the wave. The ETF has holdings in some top stocks like Shopify and BlackBerry, which even tops the Motley Fool Canada recommendations.

The RRSP investing strategy

While high growth stocks are good, they come with high risk, so balance your portfolio with some resilient stocks with stable returns using RRSP. Choose this account when the tax-saving trade-off is worth it.

If your taxable income is $105,000, around $8,000 of your income falls under the 26% tax bracket. But if you put this $8,000 in RRSP, you will save over $2,062 in the federal tax bill. Now that is a good trade-off. You can invest this amount in Canadian Utilities and earn $440 in annual dividend, bringing your total savings for the year to $2,500.

Optimize the benefits of the TFSA and the RRSP and plan your investments in a tax-efficient manner.

The post Which Is a Better Investment Account: TFSA versus RRSP? appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada.

More reading

Fool contributor Puja Tayal has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Tom Gardner owns shares of Shopify. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Shopify and Shopify. The Motley Fool recommends BlackBerry and BlackBerry.

The Motley Fool’s purpose is to help the world invest, better. Click here now for your free subscription to Take Stock, The Motley Fool Canada’s free investing newsletter. Packed with stock ideas and investing advice, it is essential reading for anyone looking to build and grow their wealth in the years ahead. Motley Fool Canada 2021

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Onex fourth-quarter profit rises helped by private equity and credit investment gains – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


Onex Corp. ONEX-T reported its fourth-quarter profit rose compared with a year ago, helped by gains in its private equity and credit investments.

The Toronto-based private equity manager, which keeps its books in U.S. dollars, says it earned a net profit of US$597 million or $6.61 per diluted share for the quarter ended Dec. 31.

The result compared with net earnings of US$187 million or $1.86 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Story continues below advertisement

Onex reported segment net earnings — which exclude certain items — of US$708 million or US$7.72 per diluted share for its fourth quarter, up from US$211 million or $2.04 per diluted share a year earlier.

Onex manages and invests money on behalf of its shareholders, institutional investors and high net worth clients.

It also owns wealth management firm Gluskin Sheff.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending