Connect with us

Media

Conservative media decry Capitol riot, but grievances remain – EverythingGP

Published

 on


Similarly, Fox News Channel’s Tucker Carlson said that voting is democracy’s pressure relief valve but trouble ensues when people lose faith in the act.

“Millions of Americans sincerely believe the last election was fake,” Carlson said. “You can dismiss them as crazy, you can call them conspiracy theorists, you can kick them off Twitter, but that won’t change their minds.”

Opponents would rather silence these people — many of whom have made Carlson television’s top-rated political opinion host — than understand them, he said.

“It’s not your fault,” he said. “It’s their fault.”

There was little talk, though, about how none of the allegations of widespread voter fraud have been found true. To the contrary, Red State’s Mike Ford said it was “not even debatable” that November’s presidential election was stolen from President Donald Trump.

Results were certified in all 50 states, many by Republican officials, without finding major problems and the president has consistently had his challenges to the election rejected by state and federal courts.

Carlson’s colleague, Sean Hannity, denounced the violence. Like his show has consistently over the past few months, however, he amplified Trump’s claims of wrongdoing. Hannity said the vast majority of people who attended Trump’s rally in Washington were peaceful. While he talked, the screen flashed a picture of a demonstrator holding a flag that depicted a Rambo-like Trump clutching a rocket launcher.

While Fox’s Laura Ingraham said there are legitimate concerns about the election, “if you were a Trump supporter hoping to display your support for the president, well, today’s antics at the Capitol did just the opposite.”

Fox highlighted its lineup of prime-time opinion stars Wednesday, in contrast to networks like ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and MSNBC, which focused more on members of Congress speaking about the election certification.

A number of Fox personalities expressed disgust in the riot’s wake, including Stuart Varney, Karl Rove and Geraldo Rivera. “Fox & Friends” host Brian Kilmeade on Thursday said Trump’s behaviour since the election has been “terrible.”

Fox did not make an executive available to talk about the network’s approach.

Several figures in conservative media suggested liberal politicians and mainstream media outlets are more outraged when Trump supporters are violent than they were about civil rights demonstrations last summer.

Leading Newsmax’s website for part of Thursday was a story headlined “Media Have Hypocritical Double Standard on Trump vs. BLM Protests.”

Tim Graham, director of media analysis at the conservative Media Research Center, objected to that approach in a tweet on Thursday: “This is not a time for calling out double standards. This is a time for standards. Respecting the home of Congress is the lowest possible standard for American civilization.”

Another popular theme was the suggestion, to date unsubstantiated, that Antifa demonstrators infiltrated the crowd at the Capitol to cause trouble. “Were left-wing provocateurs leading the way into the Capitol?” questioned Thomas Lifson of American Thinker.

Newsmax has discussed that theory on its website and TV network. But its personalities have been instructed to note that the company has no evidence that Antifa was in any way involved, said Chris Ruddy, the company’s CEO.

In much the same way that Trump’s critics have accused him of inciting Wednesday’s riot, media outlets that appeal to conservatives face questions about the impact repeated coverage of the president’s election claims have on his fans.

Ruddy said it has been an important issue to cover since it has consumed so much of the president’s time.

“I think our coverage has been fair,” he said. “We’ve been going out of our way to get other sides of this.”

Howard Polskin, whose website “The Righting” follows conservative media, said he’s seen no examples of second-guessing following the riot, no questioning about the effect of the attention paid to Trump’s unfounded claim that the election was stolen from him.

“It doesn’t seem like a note that they hit,” he said.

Many conservative media figures have sold themselves as truth-tellers and admitting error isn’t good for business, said Brian Rosenwald, author of “Talk Radio America” and a scholar in residence at the University of Pennsylvania.

Neither is bucking a popular president, he said.

“Introspection and regret would require peeling back the curtain and admitting that in the interest of putting on the best show possible, they often use hyperbolic or … extreme presentations because they are more gripping or entertaining than nuance,” Rosenwald said.

The king of talk radio, Rush Limbaugh, on Thursday dismissed demonstrators at the Capitol who “breached the doors and took some selfies,” which he depicted as far less violent as civil rights demonstrations last summer.

“There’s a lot of conservatives on social media who say that any violence or aggression at all is unacceptable, regardless of the circumstances,” Limbaugh said. “I’m glad Sam Adams, Thomas Paine, the actual Tea Party guys, the men at Lexington and Concord — didn’t feel that way.”

___

Associated Press writers Lynn Elber in Los Angeles and Jocelyn Noveck in New York contributed to this report.

David Bauder, The Associated Press

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Social Media Reacts To Trump's Second Articles Of Impeachment Being Delivered To The Senate – Forbes

Published

 on


On Monday, members of the U.S. House of Representatives walked the article of impeachment against former Donald Trump to the U.S. Senate. Nine members from the House, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland), will serve as managers – acting as prosecutors – in the trial, which is set to begin on February 9.

The entirety of the House Democrats, along with 10 Republicans, voted on January 13 to charge the former President with inciting insurrection earlier in January. That resulted in the storming of the Capitol Building, which left five people dead after a violent mob smashed windows, occupied offices and even the very Senate chamber where the trial will be held.

Soon after the second articles of impeachment were delivered to the Senate at around 7pm ET comments began to circulate on social media. Much of it was simply lawmakers sharing the facts – but it is clear opinions even on the very fact that a trial is being held was divided along partisan lines.

Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colorado), was among those who delivered the articles, and made that point clear on social media, “Tonight, I had the solemn duty of joining my fellow managers in delivering the article of impeachment to the United States Senate.”

The sentiment was shared by fellow Colorado Democrat Rep. Diana DeGette, who tweeted, ” Article of Impeachment: Delivered Trial: Ready to Begin”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) (@SenWarren) at least explained why she supports the trial, “Donald Trump incited an insurrection at the US Capitol. The House has fulfilled its constitutional duty by delivering an article of impeachment to the Senate. Now the Senate must fulfill its constitutional duty by convicting and barring him from ever holding office again.”

Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y) (@RepLeeZeldin) countered, “Absolutely no one should be playing along with this total farce of an impeachment of a President who isn’t even in office anymore.”

Senator Jeff Merkley (@SenJeffMerkley) (D-Oregon) expressed frustration with his Republican colleagues and vented on social media, “Articles of Impeachment have arrived at the Senate. Only 3 of 50 Republican senators showed up. Very disturbing to see this visual message that they don’t plan to take seriously their constitutional responsibility.”

Sen. Merkley added that it was the responsibility of every Senator to hear the evidence – but as has been noted, this wasn’t actually the trial.

Media Reactions

Some in the media also have taken notice of how this unprecedented and historic trial could unfold.

Andrew Desiderio (@AndrewDesiderio), congressional reporter for Politico, posted, “SCHUMER on witnesses during the impeachment trial: ‘I don’t think there’s a need for a whole lot of witnesses. We were all witnesses.”

Andrew Prokop (@awprokop), senior politics correspondent at Vox.com, questioned the procedures as they are still unfolding, “What McConnell’s play on the organizing resolution reminds me of is Pelosi withholding the impeachment articles from the Senate last year. A kind of goofy procedural overreach that doesn’t achieve anything substantive and ends in a climbdown that’s tried to be spun as a victory”

Reporter Samantha-Jo Roth (@SamanthaJoRoth) showed some unnecessary glee in the fact that the nation will experience another Senate trial, tweeting, “Insurrection, inauguration & now impeachment trial – bring it on!”

However, legal expert Elie Honig (@eliehonig) took a less partisan approach and simply explained why the Senate trial is even necessary. He tweeted, “Yes, the Senate should be able to try a former president. Anything else would lead to unaccountable chaos. But this defense threatens to give Senators an off-ramp and potentially to derail the proceedings.”

Office Of The Former President

While it is likely that former President Trump followed Monday’s event as it unfolded, there was a clear effort to deflect as well. Earlier in the day, Trump officially opened the “Office of the Former President” but what it can actually do (if anyting) isn’t clear.

@Truth_Gazette was one of the few social media accounts to simply share the announcement, tweeting: “President Trump will always be a champion of the American People. The Office will be responsible for managing President Trump’s correspondence, public statements, appearances, and activities.”

However, it was apparent by evening that the announcement was largely just the subject of mockery across social media. There were more than 60,000 tweets by the late evening but few were supportive of the new office. Yet, it is worth noting that it did allow Trump to get back onto Twitter in quite a roundabout way – but certainly didn’t bring the expected response he would have liked.

What is also clear from social media on Monday is that opponents of the President still believe a trial will somehow heal the country. Time will tell if that is the case, or if it just another wedge that further divides the nation.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Social media campaign targets COVID-19 misinformation with science – KitchenerToday.com

Published

 on


Microsoft founder Bill Gates did not create the virus that causes COVID-19 and he is not forcing microchips into your body through vaccinations.

Those pieces of misinformation are examples of what a group of Canadian scientists and health professionals is trying to discredit through a new campaign tackling inaccurate theories about the pandemic.

About 40 misinformation debunkers are using the hashtag #ScienceUpFirst to provide science-based evidence on social media.

“There’s been misinformation about all kinds of things that you can do to treat COVID with crazy treatments like cow urine and bleach,” said Prof. Timothy Caulfield, Canadian research chair in health law and policy at the University of Alberta.

Caulfield is spearheading the #ScienceUpFirst movement.

“And now we’re in the middle of trying to roll out the vaccine and we know that misinformation is having an adverse impact on vaccination. 

“Things like the vaccine will change your DNA. No, it won’t. The idea that the vaccine is associated with infertility. No, it’s not,” Caulfield said Monday in a phone interview.

“There is just an incredible amount of misinformation out there about COVID. I’ve been studying misinformation for decades. I’ve never seen anything like this.”

He said the campaign was already trending on Twitter on Monday, the day of its launch.

Caulfield is known for taking actor Gwyneth Paltrow’s wellness brand Goop to task in his book “Is Gwyneth Paltrow Wrong about Everything?” as well as for a Netflix series called “A User’s Guide to Cheating Death.”

The initiative is in collaboration with the Canadian Association of Science Centres, COVID-19 Resources Canada, and the Health Law Institute at the University of Alberta.

“There’s been research that has shown that the spread of misinformation is having an adverse impact on health and science policy, it’s led to increased stigma and discrimination, and it’s just added to the chaotic information environment that we all have to deal with,” Caufield said.

“The evidence tells us that debunking does work if you do it well, so we’re trying to do it well. We’re trying to listen. We’re trying to be empathetic in our approach. We’re trying to be creative in our messaging and, hopefully, even if we move the needle a little bit, we can make a difference.”

A spokesperson for #ScienceUpFirst says the campaign is pushing to involve Canadian athletes and celebrities to get the word out about tackling misinformation.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 25, 2021.

— — —

This story was produced with the financial assistance of the Facebook and Canadian Press News Fellowship.

Fakiha Baig, The Canadian Press

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Media

New social media campaign targets COVID-19 misinformation with science – Global News

Published

 on


Microsoft founder Bill Gates did not create the virus that causes COVID-19 and he is not forcing microchips into your body through vaccinations.

Those pieces of misinformation are examples of what a group of Canadian scientists and health professionals is trying to discredit through a new campaign tackling inaccurate theories about the pandemic.

About 40 misinformation debunkers are using the hashtag #ScienceUpFirst to provide science-based evidence on social media.

“There’s been misinformation about all kinds of things that you can do to treat COVID with crazy treatments like cow urine and bleach,” said Prof. Timothy Caulfield, Canadian research chair in health law and policy at the University of Alberta.

Read more:
Misinformation is spreading as fast as coronavirus. It will ‘take a village’ to fight it

Story continues below advertisement

Caulfield is spearheading the #ScienceUpFirst movement.

“And now we’re in the middle of trying to roll out the vaccine and we know that misinformation is having an adverse impact on vaccination.

“Things like the vaccine will change your DNA. No, it won’t. The idea that the vaccine is associated with infertility. No, it’s not,” Caulfield said Monday in a phone interview.

“There is just an incredible amount of misinformation out there about COVID. I’ve been studying misinformation for decades. I’ve never seen anything like this.”


Click to play video 'Coronavirus: Hinshaw touts safety of both COVID-19 vaccines'



1:45
Coronavirus: Hinshaw touts safety of both COVID-19 vaccines


Coronavirus: Hinshaw touts safety of both COVID-19 vaccines

He said the campaign was already trending on Twitter on Monday, the day of its launch.

Read more:
Cabbage, cavemen and miracle cures: how fast-moving COVID-19 science can confuse the public

Story continues below advertisement

Caulfield is known for taking Gwyneth Paltrow’s wellness brand Goop to task in his book Is Gwyneth Paltrow Wrong about Everything? and a Netflix series A User’s Guide to Cheating Death.

[ Sign up for our Health IQ newsletter for the latest coronavirus updates ]

The initiative is in collaboration with the Canadian Association of Science Centres, COVID-19 Resources Canada, and the Health Law Institute at the University of Alberta.


Click to play video 'Tim Caulfield Targets Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop'



3:38
Tim Caulfield Targets Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop


Tim Caulfield Targets Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop – Sep 6, 2017

“There’s been research that has shown that the spread of misinformation is having an adverse impact on health and science policy, it’s led to increased stigma and discrimination, and it’s just added to the chaotic information environment that we all have to deal with,” Caufield said.

“The evidence tells us that debunking does work if you do it well, so we’re trying to do it well. We’re trying to listen. We’re trying to be empathetic in our approach. We’re trying to be creative in our messaging and, hopefully, even if we move the needle a little bit, we can make a difference.”

Story continues below advertisement

A spokesperson for #ScienceUpFirst says the campaign is pushing to involve Canadian athletes and celebrities to get the word out about tackling misinformation.

© 2021 The Canadian Press

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending