Everyone needs an art friend. Art spaces can feel exclusive and art can be confusing, obtuse, even boring. But, especially with the right context, everyone can be a critic.
So let the MPR News arts team be your guide, your Art Friend.
Rob Morton: It’s a little, it’s a bit disturbing, it evokes — the obvious is death. But then there’s this mystery behind it because of the fact that — you can’t see if there is indeed a person in there, first off.
Alex V. Cipolle (voice-over): That’s my friend Rob Morton. He’s looking at a piece of art I brought to show him at the Walker Art Center. But we’re getting ahead of ourselves. Let’s meet Rob first.
MPR News is supported by Members. Gifts from individuals power everything you find here. Make a gift of any amount today to become a Member!
Rob: I am a musician. I’m a teacher. I’m a father, new father to Zippy. Six months old.
Alex V. Cipolle and Rob Morton stand at the entrance to the “Multiple Realities: Experimental Art in the Eastern Bloc, 1960s–1980s” exhibit at the Walker Art Center.
Ben Hovland | MPR News
Alex (voice-over): I’ve known Rob for about 20 years. He’s very pro-democracy, very punk rock.
Alex: This exhibition is called “Multiple Realities: Experimental Art in the Eastern Bloc, 1960s–1980s.”
Rob: Oh, exciting. Okay.
Alex: What do you think of when you hear that?
Rob: When I hear Eastern Bloc countries, especially when I hear Eastern Germany I think of drab, brutalist, very cold kind of architecture, which is probably unfair.
Alex: That’s probably my assumption. I mean, you think of like, Soviet era, you think of communism and like, yeah, brutalist architecture. Lots of like concrete.
Alex (voice-over): The exhibition features hundreds of works by one hundred artists, most who are unknown to U.S. audiences. Our assumptions were wrong. The world presented — that of East Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, and Yugoslavia in the 1960s-1980s — here is far from drab.
It’s wide-ranging and vibrant, playful and subversive, sensual and chilling. But there’s one spectacularly strange piece I wanted to show Rob.
Alex V. Cipolle and Rob Morton discuss Gyula Konkoly’s “Bleeding Monument” piece in the “Multiple Realities” exhibit at the Walker Art Center.
Ben Hovland | MPR News
Alex: Tell me what you see.
Rob: All right, so what we’re standing in front of is kind of like a gurney with what appears to be a body inside, wrapped up in gauze. There’s red around the edges, appears to be blood-like.
Alex (voice-over): This is “Bleeding Monument” by Gyula Konkoly. The Hungarian artist first made this human-sized work in 1969. It’s the first time it’s been on view outside Europe. It’s become a sort of celebrity in its own right since its debut in Minneapolis in November, where it’s been shocking and moving visitors.
Rob: It almost like looks wrapped up in a special sort of way as the burial right of some kind? Burial rite?
Alex: So what does it make you feel like?
Rob: It’s a little, it’s a bit disturbing, it evokes — the obvious is death. But then there’s this mystery behind it because of the fact that — you can’t see if there is indeed a person in there.
Alex (voice-over): Konkoly created the piece in response to the violent suppression of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, started by students who opposed the ongoing Soviet dominance of their country. Soviet troops killed thousands of Hungarians. Konkoly also made it a year after the Prague Spring, another movement crushed by the Soviets.
Rob Morton and Alex V. Cipolle check out an Eastern Bloc map at the Walker Art Center.
Ben Hovland | MPR News
Alex: It’s also like a more fleshy or more human version of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.
Rob: Yeah. Right.
Alex: It’s like this anonymous victim.
Rob: It’s much more visceral version of it, you know, very in your face.
Alex: It doesn’t sterilize the horrors of war. So I need to tell you what this is made of.
Rob: So what’s this made of?
Alex: So “Bleeding Monument” is a massive block of ice, a human-sized block of ice that is wrapped in gauze bandages that have been soaked in different chemicals. And as the ice melts, the chemicals in the bandages turn red. So when I came here …
Rob: Oh Wow!
Alex: Right. So when I came here two weeks ago, this was all white, and almost more of a rectangle.
Rob: Huh
Alex: By the time this exhibition closes, it’s going to be a dried pile of brown and red bandages.
Rob: That’s amazing! I love that. That’s amazing. Wow. That is cool. That’s some of my favorite stuff. Whenever an artist, you know, pours all this time and effort into something that is transient, that will only be there for, you know, however long it either takes the elements to destroy it, or whatever the process is to break it down.
Alex: Okay, so this is a re-creation. Did he come here and do this?
Rob: Yeah, that’s a question I was gonna ask, do you know?
Gyula Konkoly’s “Bleeding Monument” piece at the Walker Art Center.
Ben Hovland | MPR News
Alex (voice-over): I didn’t know. So I reached out to Pavel Pyś, the Walker curator who’s been organizing this show for years.
Pavel Pyś: It’s a show that is full of color, vibrancy, joy, pleasure, solidarity, friendship, it’s a story that is full of surprises.
Alex (voice-over): I shared our reaction and questions about “Bleeding Monument.”
Pavel: It’s perhaps one of the few works in the show that has very direct political meaning that’s very legible.
So I think at that time it had of course a meaning that was very tied to those events when the memory of carrying wooden wounded citizens through city streets was quite fresh, I think in people’s minds today. When you see the work, it brings into mind, certainly some contemporary events.
Alex: So did Konkoly come to the Walker to re-create this?
Pavel: He sent detailed instructions on how to make the piece and our crew made the work after many different tests of mini — what were described as “ice burritos” in the basement — just to get the right amount of potassium on the ice.
(Dial tone)
Rob: Alex!
Alex: Rob!
Alex (voice-over): I call Rob with some answers.
Rob: So, okay, so that’s crazy, baby-sized, baby-size burrito versions of the art. That’s nuts.
Alex V. Cipolle and Rob Morton discuss the “Multiple Realities” exhibit at the Walker Art Center.
Ben Hovland | MPR News
Alex (voice-over): I wanted to know if this changed Rob’s opinion on the piece.
Rob: My initial reaction to that is kind of, Oh, that’s too bad, that it was, you know, it’s very much a re-creation of it. And to hear that the artist themselves did not have, as, you know, as personal of a role in creating what we saw.
But my view on how artists create is kind of evolved, to the point where I kind of view art not as something that is, like, created by a person, like one person — there’s a genius and they are to be lauded, and it was 100 percent their creation — and I don’t really think that way anymore. I think more like, everything is a culmination of human experience.
So in a way, you know, we all make every piece of art in every book, and every, you know, song,
And so in that regard, like, the fact that the artist just sent some instructions to the people at the Walker and said, you know, here’s how you do it, here’s the specification, here’s the chemicals to use. That’s kind of awesome.
Alex: It must be so liberating for the art artists to be like, here’s this idea. I’m setting it free.
There’s something kind of democratic about that too, which is really cool in a show that, you know, deals so much with non-democratic places and times.
Alex (voice-over): A few weeks had passed since we saw the show so I wanted to know if anything else had come up for Rob, about “Bleeding Monument” or the show in general.
Rob: These pieces that we saw, are they relics of a past that is to be pitied? And we shake our heads, thinking about just how far we’ve come? Or do we look at that and think, my God, we have not come very far at all.
Alex: I feel that a little bit the same way. What can you do with that, you know, like, if at that have a lot of this art was made, you know, 50-60 years ago?
Rob: Yeah, but then, it’s sort of inspiring to think that people will make what moves them, regardless of what repressive governments tell them they can and can’t do. Ultimately the human spirit is inconquerable.
Alex: Rob, thank you so much.
Rob: I mean, I’m honored to be the first person to go on this art friend journey with you.
“Multiple Realities: Experimental Art in the Eastern Bloc, 1960s–1980s” is on view at the Walker Art Center through March 10.
“Multiple Realities: Experimental Art in the Eastern Bloc” gallery
9 of 9
“Baubrigade der Sportstudenten (Sports Students’ Builders Brigade),” 1964, by Jürgen Wittdorf.
Courtesy of the Walker Art Center
1 of 9
“Vérző emlékmű (Bleeding Monument),” 1969/2023, by Gyula Konkoly. Made with metal, ice, cotton wool, gauze, potassium permanganate and polythelene.
LONDON (AP) — With a few daubs of a paintbrush, the Brontë sisters have got their dots back.
More than eight decades after it was installed, a memorial to the three 19th-century sibling novelists in London’s Westminster Abbey was amended Thursday to restore the diaereses – the two dots over the e in their surname.
The dots — which indicate that the name is pronounced “brontay” rather than “bront” — were omitted when the stone tablet commemorating Charlotte, Emily and Anne was erected in the abbey’s Poets’ Corner in October 1939, just after the outbreak of World War II.
They were restored after Brontë historian Sharon Wright, editor of the Brontë Society Gazette, raised the issue with Dean of Westminster David Hoyle. The abbey asked its stonemason to tap in the dots and its conservator to paint them.
“There’s no paper record for anyone complaining about this or mentioning this, so I just wanted to put it right, really,” Wright said. “These three Yorkshire women deserve their place here, but they also deserve to have their name spelled correctly.”
It’s believed the writers’ Irish father Patrick changed the spelling of his surname from Brunty or Prunty when he went to university in England.
Raised on the wild Yorkshire moors, all three sisters died before they were 40, leaving enduring novels including Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre,” Emily’s “Wuthering Heights” and Anne’s “The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.”
Rebecca Yorke, director of the Brontë Society, welcomed the restoration.
“As the Brontës and their work are loved and respected all over the world, it’s entirely appropriate that their name is spelled correctly on their memorial,” she said.
