NDP urges government to recognize Palestinian statehood, sanction Israeli officials

CHICAGO (AP) — Tyler Bertuzzi played for three teams in the past two NHL seasons. He is hoping to stick around Chicago for a while.

Bertuzzi is ramping up with the Blackhawks after agreeing to a $22 million, four-year contract on the first day of free agency this summer. He has been playing on a line with Connor Bedard and Taylor Hall at the start of training camp, indicating his new team has big plans for the gritty winger.

“It’s learning every day,” Bertuzzi said after Monday’s practice. “I played with Hallsy a little bit in Boston, so I know him a little bit coming in here. Obviously we have a couple more practices and some preseason games to kind of figure things out.”

Coach Luke Richardson said he plans to look at some new lines as soon as Tuesday, and there will be more combinations throughout the season. But the trio of Bertuzzi, Bedard and Hall makes some sense.

Bertuzzi’s ability to win puck battles and his willingness to go to the front of the net seems like a complementary skillset for the scoring ability of Bedard and Hall.

“He’s a very skilled player. … Really good in puck battles and getting the puck back,” Bedard said. “There’s obviously a reason he’s been a really good player for a while, so it’s been fun so far.”

Bertuzzi, 29, was a second-round pick by Detroit in the 2013 draft. His uncle, Todd, also played in the league for 18 years.

Tyler Bertuzzi made his NHL debut in 2016 and spent his first six-plus seasons with the Red Wings. He set career highs when he had 30 goals and 32 assists during the 2021-22 season.

“Around the front of the net, he’s strong,” Richardson said. “He’s got a good presence physically and he’s kind of greasy scoring goals around there. He’s got a good strong stick and he can take the physicality and still make his plays, whether it be score or make good plays down low to other players. He can play with anybody; that type of player.”

Bertuzzi was an impending free agent when he was traded to Boston for two draft picks in March 2023, providing some depth for the Bruins with Hall sidelined by an injury. He made it to the playoffs for the first time with Boston, collecting five goals and five assists in seven games in a first-round loss to Florida.

It was a short stay with the Bruins. He signed a $5.5 million, one-year contract with Toronto and had 21 goals and 22 assists in a career-high 80 games in his only season with the Maple Leafs.

Back in free agency, Bertuzzi knew what he was looking for in a new team. Chicago was coming off a last-place finish in the Central Division, but it had Bedard in place as part of a group of promising young players. It also offered some stability for Bertuzzi with a four-year offer.

“A young team that’s hungry and looking to try and slowly build something,” he said. “I went through it with Detroit. Hopefully here I can stick it out and be here for the turnaround. It was an opportunity to play, play with good players.”

It sounds as if it has been a good fit so far. Richardson said it seems like everybody loves Bertuzzi.

“He’s walking through the dressing room real bubbly, smiling, and he just seems like he’s got that carefree attitude off the ice,” Richardson said, “but on the ice, he’s all business, and that’s what we needed.”

___

AP NHL:

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Max Verstappen said a bad word — it started with an F — in a formal news conference to describe how his race car was performing. The man who called for Verstappen to be punished also drew sharp criticism for his own choice of words.

Verstappen’s sanction for his egregious behavior? The three-time Formula 1 champion was ordered by the sport’s governing body to complete a day of community service because the FIA has apparently banned cursing.

The crackdown had been foreshadowed — Ferrari team principal Fred Vasseur and Mercedes boss Toto Wolff were both summoned to speak to the stewards last November about their language at a news conference in Las Vegas — and FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem publicly rebuked cursing earlier this month.

Motorsport.com reported that the FIA had asked Formula One Management to better limit the naughty language broadcast during races. While the curse words — said on team radio that is accessible to the public — are bleeped out on television, Ben Sulayem found the frequency of the poor language unsettling.

“We have to differentiate between our sport — motorsport — and rap music,” Ben Sulayem said. “We’re not rappers, you know.”

Lewis Hamilton, who already felt he’d been personally targeted by Ben Sulayem when the president banned the wearing of jewelry during competition upon election, felt the comments had a racial element to them.

“I don’t like how he has expressed it. Saying ‘rappers’ is very stereotypical,” said Hamilton, the only Black driver in F1. “If you think about it, most rappers are Black. So it says, ‘We are not like them.’ So I think those are the wrong choice of words and there is a racial element there.”

So Verstappen shouldn’t have been surprised when the FIA actually slapped his wrist for cursing. The Dutch driver responded with his own form of protest by trolling every remaining news conference of the Singapore Grand Prix.

It felt a bit “I’m just here so I won’t get fined” Marshawn Lynch-like in that Verstappen showed up to his required media obligations, but offered only the briefest of answers. He made clear he was doing so because he no longer felt he could speak freely in official F1 settings.

He invited reporters to follow him out to the paddock for an unmonitored and unfiltered exchange both Saturday and Sunday, when he added this over-policing to the list of reasons why the 26-year-old may have a very short F1 career.

Verstappen was the youngest driver to ever start an F1 race, the youngest F1 race winner, and has made clear he doesn’t plan to stick around to become the oldest winner in the sport’s history. This latest drama may hasten his timeline for retirement.

“For sure, these kinds of things definitely decide my future,” Verstappen said. “When you can’t be yourself, or you have to deal with these kinds of silly things, I think now I’m at the stage of my career that you don’t want to be dealing with this all the time. It’s really tiring.”

He was also critical of Carlos Sainz Jr. being sanctioned for crossing the track on foot under a red flag after Sainz crashed in qualifying.

“I mean, what are we talking about? He knows what he’s doing. We’re not stupid. These kinds of things, like when I saw it getting noted, I was like, ‘My God,'” Verstappen said.

F1 considers its drivers the most elite in the world, so it isn’t wrong for Ben Sulayem to want to hold them to a high standard. But his standards are likely rooted in his own beliefs and not in sync to the realities of professional sports.

Globally, audiences are accustomed to hearing an occasional curse word caught on a live mic during a sporting event. Sometimes the words are said casually because what’s considered a slur in your country might be commonly accepted slang in another.

But many times the cursing is out of anger or frustration because of the high stakes, minimal margins for error, and intense effort put into each athletes craft.

And, the cursing is very rarely done openly for the entire world to hear. In racing, specifically, it is a privilege that spectators can eavesdrop on team communications over the radio. The FIA could eliminate that capability if it was truly worried about offending listeners.

In the case of Verstappen — or even Wolff and Vasseur — their cursing came in news conferences that aren’t designed to be consumed by the general public. F1 at any time could stop cutting clips and posting them online and truly make the sessions media-only.

But F1 is now owned by a media company and Liberty Media knows exactly what it is doing in delivering content any way possible.

Verstappen is right. This all seems rather silly, to the point of childish, especially from an organization that has refused all year to comment on the complaint against Red Bull boss Christian Horner filed by a suspended employee to the FIA ethics committee.

The same ethics committee, mind you, that investigated and cleared within a month a pair of whistleblower complaints filed against Ben Sulayem. Susie Wolff, the wife of the Mercedes boss and head of F1’s all-female F1 Academy, has also filed a criminal complaint in France against the FIA over its brief December conflict of interest investigation into the alleged sharing of confidential information between husband and wife.

Ben Sulayem has made strides in cleaning up online abuse, has fought to get Michael Andretti and Cadillac onto the grid and tackled other legitimate issues facing motorsports and F1. But some of the fights he’s honed in on seem small and Hamilton has a right to question if they are personal.

In the case of Verstappen saying a bad word, it seems the champion was punished to make an example. Verstappen made sure it backfired to look as silly as it is.

___

AP auto racing:

TORONTO – A new Charter challenge that got underway Monday will test the constitutionality of a controversial Ontario law that allows hospitals to place discharged patients into long-term care homes not of their choosing or face a $400-per-day charge if they refuse.

The Advocacy Centre for the Elderly and the Ontario Health Coalition argue the law, known as the More Beds Better Care Act or Bill 7, violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The province disagrees.

One core item the court will address is whether the new law has fulfilled its purpose by improving the flow of patients. Documents filed with court reveal the two sides have reached different conclusions on that question.

Premier Doug Ford’s government rammed Bill 7 through the legislature within days in September 2022, bypassing public hearings.

The law allows hospital placement co-ordinators to choose a nursing home for a patient who has been deemed by a doctor as requiring an “alternate level of care,” or ALC, without consent.

They can also share the patient’s health information to such homes without consent. Patients can also be sent to nursing homes up to 70 kilometres from their preferred spot in southern Ontario and up to 150 kilometres away in northern Ontario. The law sparked outrage among seniors.

In its factum filed with court, the organizations opposing Bill 7 say it has not had its intended effect of reducing the number of so-called ALC patients. They point to government data from Ontario Health that shows the number of these patients has actually increased by 30 per cent more than a year after the law took effect.

There were about 2,300 discharged patients waiting in hospital for a spot in a nursing home at the end of January, the court documents say.

“The evidence belies any contention that Bill 7 has actually expedited the transition from hospital for the vast majority of ALC-LTC patients,” the organizations say.

The primary reason for the bottleneck is not the patients’ fault, they say.

“The most significant cause of delay in transitioning from the hospital is simply the lack of long-term care beds as evidenced by the very long wait lists for admissions particularly for homes that provide better and more suitable care,” the organizations wrote.

Because the law is ineffective, they argue, it is arbitrary. They say the law should be struck down.

Ford defended the law Monday, but lamented the threat of fines.

“I’m never in favour of that,” he said at an unrelated news conference.

He said hospitals need bed capacity and that discharged patients should be in a long-term care home, not a hospital. The hospitals appreciate the new law, he said.

“There’s no one happier than the CEOs of all the hospitals, I’ve talked to them, and it’s the right thing to do for elderly people,” Ford said.

The Ontario government argues in court documents that the increased number of so-called ALC patients is not proof of the law’s ineffectiveness, but due to a spike in population growth.

The province also points to evidence of several hospital administrators who support the law and say it has increased patient flow.

Trillium Health Partners, which runs two large hospitals in Mississauga, Ont., said the law has helped move 240 ALC patients to nursing homes over a recent three-month span.

“In the absence of Bill 7, I expect patient flow would decrease, as more acute beds would be occupied by patients who do not require acute care, leading to more patients waiting for a bed,” Scott Jarrett, the chief operating officer of Trillium, said in an affidavit.

Other hospital leaders cited similar progress.

The Advocacy Centre and the Ontario Health Coalition also say the law largely targets seniors of poor mental and physical health and deprives them of their ability to choose where to live and how their health information is shared.

More than 80 per cent of ALC patients are 65 or older and the vast majority live with incurable conditions usually associated with age. The law, the two organizations argue, interferes with the Charter’s right to life, liberty and security.

“Bill 7 infringes an ALC-LTC patient’s liberty rights by depriving them of personal autonomy with respect to their medical treatment and health care,” they argue.

“Simply put, Bill 7 clearly deprives ALC-LTC patients of the fundamental rights to informed consent to where they are likely to spend their final days, and to the protection of their personal health information.”

What both sides agree on is that there are not enough hospital or long-term care beds in Ontario. While the province is building more hospitals and incentivizing the construction of dozens of nursing homes, there’s nowhere near enough supply to meet demand, the documents say.

Provincial lawyers say the law is needed to open up beds for patients needing to get into a hospital.

“The purpose of a hospital bed is not to act as a waiting area for (long-term care) home admission,” the province says.

Ontario argues patients do not have a Charter right to live free of charge in a hospital after discharge. Nor does the law discriminate on the basis of age or disability, it says.

“Bill 7 does not infringe anyone’s Charterrights,” provincial lawyers wrote.

On Jan. 31, 2024, there were 2,243 ALC patients awaiting a spot in a nursing home who had spent a total of nearly 200,000 days in hospital beds, the province said.

The Charter does not protect against the sharing of private health information, provincial lawyers argue, pointing to several other laws that lay out how personal health information can be shared, including under court orders.

The province also said the law does not force patients into any particular nursing home. The patient can refuse such a placement.

“The consequence for an ALC patient who refuses to leave hospital despite being discharged is purely economic: they must pay a portion of the cost of the publicly funded hospital bed that they have chosen to occupy,” the province said.

The organizations say the threat of a $400-per-day fine is “coercive,” while the province contends it acts as a “deterrent” to patients in the effort to get them to agree to be moved to a home they didn’t choose.

Only five people have been charged under the law, the health minister’s office said recently.

The threat of a fine didn’t deter Ruth Poupard’s family. Michele Campeau, who has power of attorney for her 83-year-old mother, refused a hospital’s attempts to force Poupard into a long-term care home Campeau hated in Windsor, Ont.

Hôtel-Dieu Grace Healthcare began charging the family $400 per day and they ended up with a $26,000 bill in the spring, which Campeau refused to pay. Poupard ended up in her top choice for a nursing home.

By mid-September, no one had come calling for the money, Campeau said.

“I would encourage others to fight back because in the end, the fight is worth more than putting your loved one in a horrible situation,” Campeau said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 23, 2024.