Connect with us

Politics

B.C. politics: Candidates make their pitches for Liberal leadership – Vancouver Sun

Published

 on


All six candidates — Gavin Dew, Kevin Falcon, Michael Lee, Val Litwin, Renee Merrifield and Ellis Ross — acknowledged the need for change

Article content

The six leadership candidates gathered on Saturday to present their vision of the future for the B.C. Liberal party.

Advertisement

Article content

Many candidates stressed that the party needs to be “renewed,” “rebooted” or “rebuilt” with the aim of creating a more diverse and inclusive community of B.C. Liberals.

Kevin Falcon , who held several ministerial posts in the former Liberal government and is perhaps the best known candidate outside political circles, said the party should not shy away from past successes. He highlighted several infrastructure projects in B.C. as well as the 2010 Winter Olympics as big wins for the Liberal party.

He acknowledged the need to “rebrand, reboot and re-energize” the party, however.

After a lengthy introductory segment talking about supporting families with autistic children, Falcon addressed his recent firing of a campaign staffer following allegations that the man subjected a female staffer from another campaign to a barrage of hateful, profanity-laden insults.

Advertisement

Article content

“Last weekend’s incident,” he said, “offered a reminder about the need for respect and professionalism.”

Michael Lee , whose campaign worker was the victim of the attack by Falcon’s staffer, opened his speech by acknowledging the challenges facing the party.

“It’s time to talk about who we are, what we stand for, and how we want to go forward,” he said.

“It’s time for a difficult conversation,” Lee said, adding that the party had lost “40 per cent of its vote share since 2001.”

“We need to modernize our party so everyone feels welcome,” Lee said.

Renne Merrifield , the only female candidate, also said the party needs to change.

“Right now, our party has a diversity problem,” she admitted.

“We once had it all — and now we do not. And that is our reality.”

Advertisement

Article content

Ellis Ross , a member of the Haisla Nation, stressed the need for more voices at the table and a return to the party’s grassroots. “We’ve gotta get back to listening,” he said. “We haven’t changed with the times.”

Ross also spoke of the previous Liberal government’s efforts to bring LNG profits and development to First Nations communities.

Long-time political operator Gavin Dew stressed the need to support British Columbian families, especially those with autistic children.

“It’s all about family,” he said. “It’s about making sure my kids have a future, right here in B.C.”

For entrepreneur Val Litwin , who spent his career “reinvigorating old legacy brands,” renewing the party means building on the past and embracing what comes next.

“Renewal is not revolution,” he said.

Voting for the B.C. Liberal leader will run from Feb. 3 to 5, 2022, and is open to eligible members. The new leader will be elected on Feb. 5, 2022.

ngriffiths@postmedia.com

twitter.com/njgriffiths


CLICK HERE to report a typo.

Is there more to this story? We’d like to hear from you about this or any other stories you think we should know about. Email vantips@postmedia.com .

Advertisement

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Politics

Russia criticises U.S. over threat of escalation with Iran at IAEA

Published

 on

Russia on Friday chided the United States for threatening a diplomatic escalation with Iran at the U.N. nuclear watchdog next month unless it improves cooperation with the agency, saying it risked harming wider talks on the Iran nuclear deal.

The United States threatened on Thursday to confront Iran at the International Atomic Energy Agency if it does not give way on at least one of several conflicts with the IAEA, especially its refusal to let the IAEA re-install cameras at a workshop after an apparent attack in June.

“I believe that demonstrates that our American counterparts lose patience but I believe all of us need to control our emotions,” Russia’s ambassador to the IAEA Mikhail Ulyanov told a news conference with his Chinese counterpart.

“I don’t welcome this particular statement of the U.S. delegation (at the IAEA). It’s not helpful.”

Indirect talks between the United States and Iran aimed at reviving the battered 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers are due to resume on Monday after a five-month break that started after the election that brought Iranian hardline President Ebrahim Raisi to power.

The 2015 deal lifted sanctions against Iran in exchange for restrictions on its nuclear activities. Then-President Donald Trump pulled Washington out of the agreement in 2018 and re-imposed sanctions against Tehran.

Iran responded by breaching many of the restrictions, reducing the time it would need to obtain enough fissile material for a nuclear bomb if it wanted to. Tehran denies that it would ever seek atomic weapons.

“The U.S. did not negotiate with the Iranians for a very long time and forgot that Iranians don’t do anything under pressure. If they are under pressure, they resist,” Ulyanov said, apparently referring to the fact that U.S. and Iranian envoys are not meeting directly.

 

(Reporting by Francois Murphy, Editing by William Maclean)

Continue Reading

Politics

Extremist Politics Threatens Chile's Economic Miracle – Bloomberg

Published

 on


Chile has for decades been Latin America’s most stable nation and one of its most prosperous. Its pro-business outlook has drawn foreign direct investment and fueled economic growth, and its record in reducing poverty has been impressive. Much of that is now thrown into question. After the recent first round of elections, the two front-runners for the presidency are extremists — an ultraconservative who seems nostalgic for the dictatorial rule of Augusto Pinochet, and a leftist who promises not merely to reform but to dismantle Chile’s economic model. It’s hard to say which of these agendas might prove more toxic.

The candidate of the far right, José Antonio Kast, emerged with a narrow lead heading into the runoff vote on Dec. 19. His platform is thin on economics and heavy on social conservatism and authoritarian messaging. His counterpart on the left, Gabriel Boric, promises radical change to combat inequality, rein in capitalism and dethrone market forces. “If Chile was the birthplace of neoliberalism,” he explains, “it will also be its grave.”

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Now, more than ever, the N.W.T. government needs party politics – CBC.ca

Published

 on


This column is an opinion by former Yellowknife MLA Kieron Testart. For more information about CBC’s Opinion section, please see the FAQ.

In 2019 near the end of my term as an MLA, I proposed implementing a caucus system that, among other things, would allow for political discipline of MLAs. At the time MLAs rejected any changes that would limit their jealously-guarded independence. What they failed to recognize was that this proposal was not about imposing discipline, rather it was about enabling politicians to effectively discipline MLAs when required. 

The Norn affair and the pronounced lack of any real accountability in the legislature over the government’s failings are the consequences of being governed by a gang of loosely aligned political independents who lack common vision and leadership.

This point was made by MLA Rylund Johnson who said, “In party systems, the party whip would probably make sure this never happens. Party caucuses would kick members out and make them irrelevant …Those aren’t tools that we have in consensus government.”

The consensus system is based on little more than good intentions and is powerless to address its own failings, with MLAs routinely using their constituents as a convenient smoke screen for their own bad behaviour. 

Sound familiar? It should, it happens all the time with the recent example of Steve Norn being the most spectacular failure of political will to date in the 19th Assembly.

Norn’s sustained attacks on his colleagues and the legislature were left virtually unchecked by MLAs, who stood by silently. Public confidence in elected officials has been shaken to the point that two former premiers have taken the extraordinary step of publicly criticizing sitting MLAs. Scandal and policy failures have become the chief commodity of the Legislative Assembly and Caroline Cochrane’s government.

While other provinces acted swiftly with new spending and policies to bolster their economies and attract new health-care workers, the Cochrane government has wrung its hands, paralyzed by bureaucratic inertia. We have watched in real time as our health-care system has buckled and broken under the strain of the pandemic, with no plan yet released for economic recovery after months and months of delay. And despite the outcry from Northerners for their government to act, the “unofficial opposition” of regular MLAs is absent, or at least silent, unable to muster the courage and unify to demand better government from the cabinet. 

In the Northwest Territories the people have a choice in who gets to take power but not in how that power is used, nor can they hold the powerful accountable during elections. MLAs appoint the premier and cabinet, who are solely accountable to each other. This means that voters have no say over who forms government or what that government does for its four-year term and cannot hold that government accountable for its decisions. This leaves accountability in the hands of an undisciplined committee of regular MLAs who lack resources, staff, and experience to provide alternatives to cabinet policies. Public policy development and implementation are the sole domain of unelected bureaucrats in the government’s senior management.

Despite the constant mythologizing of consensus government as a superior form of government, founded in the traditions of Indigenous Peoples, the fact is none of the N.W.T.’s self-governing Indigenous nations use consensus systems, nor did Indigenous people design the system when it was first implemented decades ago. That honour falls to federal bureaucrats when they devolved responsible government to our young territory. Despite their frustration, Northerners continue to consent to an undemocratic democracy where their electoral choices have been reduced to little more than an overblown hiring competition. 

A culture of silence has taken root in the N.W.T.’s democratic discourse. The fear of reprisal from those in power forces many to whisper in the back of coffee shops and speak anonymously to reporters, when they ought to be able to freely express their own views and see those views transformed into political action.

There was a time that the consensus system served Northerners well. But that time has passed, made clear by persistent scandal and public policy implosions that have not stopped since the last election. We’ve seen devolution create a modern N.W.T. granted nearly full responsibility over its land and resources. It is now time for evolution to transform our political system into a modern multi-party democracy that can provide unity and real action on the most pressing issues.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending