Connect with us


Politics, not public health, at root of mandatory masks, say protesters – Timmins Press



Small group of demonstrators gathered at Hollinger Park Thursday night

Annabelle Laferrière, on right, the main organizer of a demonstration held Thursday night against the mandatory use of masks amid the current pandemic. Participants in the demonstration believe the impositions of masks has more to do with politics than public health.


jpg, TD

A small group of demonstrators who rallied at Hollinger Park Thursday night said the media and left-leaning political forces are misleading the public and concealing various truths about COVID-19.

The truth, they say, is masks aren’t effective in preventing the spread of the virus.

In addition to that, they say the fear being generated about this virus is simply a ploy to prevent the re-election of U.S. President Donald Trump.

“We have basic human rights,” Donald Bruneau told The Daily Press. “The biggest, the most important thing in our life is our health. So based on my research and research by scientists, the mask does not protect you from the virus. And this is a fact. But those facts are hidden by the media. The media is our biggest enemy.”

For example, he said he supports the findings of former physics professor Denis Rancourt, who recently authored a paper entitled Masks Don’t Work. However, articles published in response to his findings, including one in Psychology Today, portray Rancourt as a discredited “pseudoscientist” and question his sources.

Bruneau also cited the media coverage of Dr. Stella Immanuel, a Nigerian physician whose findings were recently heralded by President Trump.

“She herself has said a few days ago with the front-line doctors that she has healed over 350 patients of COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine and zinc but mainly hydroxychloroquine. The U.S. media and the medical establishment in the U.S. don’t want anyone to know what I just said — that hydroxychloroquine cures COVID-19.”

Bruneau said “dozens of doctors” are claiming they have had “100 per cent of success” in curing the virus. “Why don’t they want the media to hear about the hydroxychloroquine drug? It’s because all of this came about because they do not want Donald Trump to win the next election at all costs. The Democrats don’t want him to win, so they need to get the virus going, put everybody in lockdown and then get an election hopefully by mail where there will be all kinds of corruption going on.

“Plus Trump can’t hold his rallies like he’d love to because of the lockdown. It’s all about Donald Trump; it’s all about getting everyone in control. The bad guys are China, the Democrats, World Health Organization (WHO) — you can’t trust them at all.”

Bruneau said, “We have nothing to be afraid about. We just want to send out a message through this protest that be honest and let the word come out that hydroxychloroquine heals.”

Another demonstration was held on Thursday evening by bunch of people who stand against mandatory masking and vaccines in the community.

Annabelle Laferrière, the main organizer of the protest, agreed.

She said this demonstration is not just a protest against mandatory use of masks.

“It’s also about government policies in general. There are lots of different things that led up to this and it’s just an overall of how the government handles the situation, how the government has been taking advantage of us over the years and it’s just an accumulation of a bunch of different things.”

Laferrière questioned why the Porcupine Health Unit would impose the use of masks now.

“It was very late in the pandemic where they decide to impose this on us and if it was really something that they believe was helpful they would’ve done it at the beginning of the pandemic,” she said.

“We’ve done a pretty good job as a community of containing this spread so far, so I think it should’ve been left as it is and may be if we would’ve got the second wave then may be the mask could’ve been discussed then.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link


Politics Chat: Trump Extends Coronavirus Relief In Executive Order – NPR



We look at President Trump’s executive order on extending unemployment benefits and look to the next phase of the presidential race to see how Vice President Biden will handle the increasing scrutiny.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


We need more liberty, less politics: Richard Boddie – OCRegister



Back in 1990 when I was running to become the 1992 nominee for president as the Libertarian Party candidate, and again when I actually ran for the Senate in California against Dianne Feinstein and John Seymour in 1992, and then against “DiFi” again and Michael Huffington in 1994, reporters would often ask me, “How many Libertarians are there”?

My late friend and mentor David Bergland, the 1984 Libertarian Party presidential candidate, used to often tell reporters, “Most Americans are libertarians. They’re just in the process of discovering it.”

I pray that he might have been right, and I have reasons to believe so.

I believe that many Americans just want to be left alone to live their own lives freely, and that most abide by a live-and-let-live philosophy in their daily lives. It’s clear to me that we would probably all be better off if we stopped using the state, or so-called government, as the vehicle by which we try to impose our values on others. Voluntary anything beats mandatory anything every time.

But current political frameworks and debates don’t actually lend themselves to maximizing personal freedom, or even freedom from politics.

My initial political beliefs came from my home, as is most people’s experience. My dad, a Negro church pastor (this was in the early 1940s and that’s what we were called and also called ourselves when not using the term “colored”) was a Democrat, mainly because of FDR’s influence on the Black communities nationwide with his New Deal. Thus, I too was a Democrat. Rev. Boddie (pronounced “body”) strongly opposed war and questioned any and all United States military intervention worldwide. I also do to this day, most likely as a result of dad’s pacifist influence.

As an adult, after college and law school, I observed that the vast majority of Black folks in my city, Rochester, New York, were Democrats, likely for much the same reason as most people: you inherit political perspectives from those around you.

In those days in the minds of most people, politically, there were only Republicans, Democrats and Communists.

The concept of liberal, conservative, or even independent had yet to surface as political divisions in the minds of the citizenry. And surely there were no color-coded red, blue or purple shortcuts until recent times. And as for that recent innovation, it’s obvious that somebody definitely got the red and blue colorings backward. Who ever heard of a blue progressive or socialist, or a red Republican? Come on. But I ramble.

Unfortunately for our nation, the word “libertarian” and understanding thereof appears to be much too late in coming, just now breaking through to the masses. Instead and as a result, most of our politics are dominated by factions committed to using government to achieve what should be achieved voluntarily or as close to the individual as possible.

Libertarianism as a political approach is much closer to the intuition most people have of live and let live, for it is based on the common belief and understanding that this nation was predicated on respect for the individual first and foremost.

We would probably all be better off if we stopped using the government as the vehicle through which we seek to solve every problem, from the personal to the cultural to the economic.

This current divisive culture war and craziness that we are experiencing could ultimately be better handled by individuals and communities, often voluntarily, instead of being botched up and exacerbated by politicians at all levels.

I believe that we wouldn’t have our lives dominated by headlines about Trump or Biden or whomever if we didn’t trust in government to do so much that it shouldn’t be doing. Isn’t it obvious to you yet where the actual obvious problem is here?  As the late American businessman and libertarian activist Robert LeFevre put it, “Government is a disease masquerading as its own cure.”

The late co-founder of the Libertarian Party, David Nolan, established that there are five basic elements that one must believe in if she or he professes to be a libertarian: 1. You own yourself; 2. A belief in the right of self-defense; 3. Opposition to “criminal possession” laws; 4. Opposition to taxes on productivity; and 5. Support for a sound money system. That’s basically it.

Or more concisely, by yours truly:  “Do all you agree to do, and do not encroach on other people or other people’s property.” Or, “Don’t hurt other people and don’t take their stuff.” Or, “Thou shalt not aggress.” And this especially goes for people calling themselves government, too.

These days so many decent American voters are clamoring for a third party. It is quite understandable considering all the bipartisan angst. But, for some strange reason, perhaps due to the Libertarian Party’s principled and consistent positions and belief that “thou shalt not aggress” or “live and let live.” and absent the traditional cut-throat and too often blind political tactics, few are aware of or making the switch to the only political party that could fix the mess.

The LP has been in existence for almost 50 years now, it is in all 50 states and has been for years, and has run presidential and congressional candidates since its inception, as well as state and local candidates. It’s interesting to note that very few Americans have been allowed to even consider that political party choice. What’s up with that?

Whether you vote for the LP or not, whether you call yourself a libertarian or not, wouldn’t our lives all be better if we were less bombarded with politics? The only way to get there is to stop playing the usual games, stop sticking to the usual scripts and stop putting so much power in the hands of politicians and the state.

Richard Boddie is a member of the Southern California News Group’s editorial board.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


Ukraine president says Kyiv staying out of U.S. internal politics, elections – Reuters



FILE PHOTO: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy gestures during an open-air news conference, one year after his inauguration, amid the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Kiev, Ukraine May 20, 2020. Sergey Dolzhenko/Pool via REUTERS

KYIV (Reuters) – Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Saturday that it was a matter of Ukraine’s national security to stay out of U.S. internal politics, particularly its election.

“#Ukraine did not and will not allow itself to interfere in the elections and thus harm our trusting and sincere partnership with the #USA,” he wrote on Twitter late on Saturday.

Zelenskiy, 42, was a comic actor when he won a landslide election last year. But the first year of his presidency was overshadowed by Ukraine’s unwitting involvement in events that led to the impeachment of Republican U.S. President Donald Trump. Trump had unsuccessfully pressed Ukraine to launch an investigation into his Democratic rival in the 2020 presidential race, former Vice President Joe Biden.

“Never, under any circumstances, it’s acceptable to meddle in another country’s sovereign elections,” Zelenskiy wrote.

Zelenskiy appealed to Ukrainian politicians to avoid any actions that could be linked to U.S. elections, nor allow themselves to try to solve any of their personal, political or business problems that way.

“Ukraine’s reputation is worth much more than the reputation of any of our politicians,” the president said.

Earlier this week, Zelenskiy told Reuters that he hoped U.S. support for Ukraine would remain strong regardless of who wins the American election.

Reporting by Natalia Zinets; editing by Jonathan Oatis

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading