Connect with us


Tested: Has Apple shrugged off its reputation for poor battery life?



Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority

Apple has often ridden a fine line balancing powerhouse and “optimal” specs for years now, and nowhere has it been more apparent than in battery sizes. However, as you can guess, high-end computing and small battery sizes do not correlate to excellent battery life, and the iPhone has cultivated a bit of a reputation for delivering sub-par longevity.

Related: Charging habits to maximize battery life

Genius Dog 336 x 280 - Animated

Previously, if you wanted maximum battery life, the Max variant of the iPhone was your only safe bet to get some extra battery juice in your phone. But something seemingly changed with the iPhone 13 series. Sure, the phone continued to set new performance records, but the overwhelming focus was on efficiency. At its recent launch event for the iPhone 14 series, Apple once again talked about improving efficiency with its latest and greatest A16 Bionic chipset. So, what’s the deal? Does the iPhone chug battery life, or does it finally slug it out of the park with all-day longevity?

Are you satisfied with your iPhone’s battery life?

216 votes








To test if Apple has once and for all shrugged off its reputation for poor battery life, Android Authority brought three generations of iPhones to the lab to determine once and for all if the days of terrible battery life when using iPhones are finally behind us. Here are the results.

iPhone battery efficiency test: The test bench

Four iPhones lying face down showing the rear view

Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority

While the Max-sized models have generally fared well with battery life, it’s the regular-sized iPhones that usually suffer. For our test bench, I sourced the iPhone 12, iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Pro, and iPhone 14 Pro to ensure a reasonable sample size of some of the most popular iPhone models. Meanwhile, my colleague Robert Triggs pitched in with data from the iPhone 14 to complete the data set.

Battery Capacity
iPhone 12 2,815mAh
iPhone 13 3,240mAh
iPhone 13 Pro 3,095mAh
iPhone 14 3,279mAh
iPhone 14 Pro 3,200mAh

Everyone’s smartphone usage pattern varies, and I’m firmly of the opinion that an arbitrary screen-on-time figure doesn’t necessarily indicate the kind of battery life you will get out of your phone. Moreover, there’s too much variance in battery capacities across iPhones, so the overall screen-on time or standby time wouldn’t make much sense without added context. Instead, we need to test efficiency.

Testing efficiency can give us a lot more data than an arbitrary screen-on time.

For our tests, we settled on a series of scenarios that gauged how much the battery dropped with 40 minutes of intensive gaming simulated via the 3DMark WildLife stress test, two hours of video streaming on Netflix, an hour of video calling, and an hour of music streaming from Apple Music — consecutively. All tests were conducted with displays calibrated to 350 nits to ensure a level playing field.

The test setup might not replicate your exact usage, but the heavier-than-average use should give us an idea of edge-case scenarios. Additionally, most users should expect slightly better overall battery life from their phones than the tests suggest.

iPhone battery test: The results

Looking at the results, it is easy to see an overlying trend of improvements in battery efficiency. A cursory glance at the overall battery consumption at the end of our tests indicates a dramatic reduction in power consumption with the iPhone 13 series. Meanwhile, the iPhone 14 series largely continues the same trend. The iPhone 14 Pro, specifically, doesn’t quite match the benchmark set by last year’s Pro model but isn’t too far off either. However, adding a larger battery helps it achieve roughly similar longevity. That said, the results aren’t quite cut and dry.

Our iPhone 13 and 14 handsets survived the stress test with plenty of battery to spare.

Let’s start with some context. The A14 Bionic in the iPhone 12 was Apple’s first processor to be built on TSMC’s 5nm manufacturing line, but despite the efficiency gains that come with the smaller transistors, the discrete modem and dramatic bump in CPU performance over the A13 chipset meant that battery life suffered. In our tests, the phone dropped almost 30% charge over a 40-minute simulated gaming session and an additional 22% during a 40-minute Google Meet phone call.

Related: A14 Bionic test — Is iPhone silicon still more powerful than Android SoCs? 

While these figures sound relatively inefficient, the iPhone 12 was still, by and large, an all-day phone and could compete with and sometimes beat the best Snapdragon 888-based smartphones in terms of battery life.

The iPhone 13 series is where we start observing a sharp improvement in battery life. Apple’s shift to TSMC’s second-generation N5P process for the A15 Bionic helped it achieve significantly better performance-per-watt on the processor’s efficiency cores. This is particularly noticeable in our video call test, where the iPhone 13 consumes just 18% battery life, compared to 22% on the iPhone 12. That’s a 20% difference and speaks volumes about the more efficient GPU and CPU configuration. The gains continue in gaming, where the iPhone 13 drops just 24% charge over 40 minutes of intensive gaming, compared to 30% on the iPhone 12.

The A15 Bionic equipped iPhone 13 series improved battery efficiency by as much as 20%.

The A15 Bionic also sports an updated video decoder block which should theoretically result in more efficient video decoding, but we didn’t see much of an improvement there, and the iPhone 13 used up 10% charge during an hour of Netflix streaming. Overall, the A15 processor made substantial improvements to enable full-day use and, for many users, multi-day use.

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max back close

Robert Triggs / Android Authority

Switching over to the iPhone 13 Pro, most of the same battery trends carry over, but there are a few notable differences. The phone proves even more efficient at video streaming, which can be tied to battery gains made via the variable refresh rate-enabled LTPO display. Battery consumption while video streaming dropped down to 6% compared to 10% on the iPhone 13, likely because of the lower refresh rate.

Read more: Now is the right time to buy the iPhone 13

Interestingly, the iPhone 13 Pro exhibits the exact same battery consumption as the iPhone 13 in our simulated gaming test. We expected a bump in battery use because of the additional GPU core in the iPhone 13 Pro.

The iPhone 13 Pro improves battery life further, despite packing a smaller battery, thanks to a variable refresh rate display.

Combined with the upsized batteries, the iPhone 13 series could significantly outpace the iPhone 12 lineup in terms of battery life. Interestingly, the iPhone 13 Pro sported a smaller battery than the regular model but could deliver similar longevity to the iPhone 13, thanks to the variable refresh rate display that dramatically reduced power consumption in several scenarios.

Switching over to the 2022 series, the iPhone 14, in particular, exhibits a slight enhancement in longevity. The phone packs the same A15 Bionic chipset with an additional GPU core as last year’s iPhone 13 Pro but drops the variable refresh rate display. As a result, battery consumption sees a slight uptick in tasks like video streaming, where the display remains locked to 60Hz.

On the other hand, the iPhone 14 shows significantly improved efficiency with gaming. Cumulatively, the results are similar to that of the iPhone 13 Pro despite the lack of a variable refresh rate panel.

The iPhone 14 Pro is an outlier in our efficiency tests, but the larger battery helps.

This brings us to the outlier, i.e., the iPhone 14 Pro. This year, only the Pro-variant is sporting the new A16 Bionic processor built on TSMC’s N4 fabrication process. Apple claims that the efficiency cores on the A16 Bionic use a third of the power of competing products, but our tests show that the higher clock speeds eliminate much of the gains made with battery efficiency.

In most of our tests, the iPhone 14 Pro tracks roughly in line with the iPhone 13 Pro except for the video calling test. We clocked a 21% drop in battery life here which is a noticeable increase over the iPhone 13 Pro and iPhone 14. This could potentially be due to the new display sporting a panel area above the Dynamic Island. While this would consume a bit more battery life, it doesn’t entirely explain a 4% increase. That said, the iPhone 14 Pro is known to have a battery-related bug, and we’ll circle back for another round of tests once an update has been rolled out.

Better efficiency through hardware optimization

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max camera

Robert Triggs / Android Authority

Looking at the broader trends with Apple’s chipset engineering, it is clear that performance, and more specifically, performance-per-watt, is improving, but absolute gains are slowing down. To be sure, Apple leaped forward with the iPhone 13 series, both with performance and efficiency, and has continued the trend with the iPhone 14. However, many of those gains in power efficiency are also a by-product of elements like more frugal displays, be it through absolute power consumption or the ability to downclock the refresh rate. We’ve seen similar benefits for Android smartphones sporting LTPO displays too.

With nine to 10 hours screen-on time, battery life is no longer a reason to put off an iPhone purchase.

Unlike previous years, Apple is also finally increasing battery sizes, which helps mitigate some of the effects of battery-guzzling components. What can’t be denied, however, is that the iPhone has shed its image of battery inefficiency. Even the most inefficient smartphone on our test bench, the iPhone 12, ended the benchmark session with about 35% charge leftover — despite the grueling benchmarking session.

With a more typical use case, nine to 10 hours of screen-on time is not out of the picture for the latest iPhone 14 series. That’s a particularly astounding figure, keeping in mind Apple’s lead in performance and a battery that is a third smaller than most equivalent Android phones. If battery concerns have previously put you off, don’t fret, longevity is no longer a reason to avoid Apple’s iPhone.

Source link

Continue Reading


‘Super Mario’ Movie Trailer Sparks Mass Mockery Of Chris Pratt – Forbes



Another trailer for the hotly anticipated Super Mario movie has hit the internet; the film looks gorgeous, and surprisingly faithful to the wonderfully weird lore of the games. If there’s a single criticism to be made, it’s Chris Pratt’s “Mario” voice.

It’s become something of an internet tradition to pile on Chris Pratt after the release of a popular trailer (usually a Marvel movie), and the Super Mario movie provided Pratt’s haters with plenty of material.

Most of the voice actors we hear in the trailer match their characters perfectly; Charlie Day nails Luigi’s anxiety, Anya Taylor-Joy is a soft, determined Peach, and Jack Black is clearly having a blast playing Bowser (and putting effort into crafting a gruff, distinctive voice).

Genius Dog 336 x 280 - Animated

Pratt, on the other hand, is saying Mario’s dorky little catchphrases using his regular voice, and it’s a little uncanny.

There’s nothing wrong with Pratt’s voice, exactly; the man has “generic main character” energy, and that matches the essence of Mario, an empty vessel inhabited by the player. But it is strange to hear Pratt’s voice emerge from such an iconic character.

Obviously, kids watching this movie aren’t going to care – to them, Pratt will be Mario. On Twitter, however, adult Super Mario fans weren’t impressed.

But Pratt’s flat voice acting wasn’t the sole inspiration for the pile on. Over the years, Pratt has gained a reputation as a staunch conservative and Evangelical Christian; at one point, actor Elliot Page called him out on Twitter, claiming that Pratt belonged to a church that is “infamously anti-LGBTQ.”

The church in question was believed to be Hillsong Church, which does view homosexuality as “sinful.” Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn once corrected the record on Twitter, insisting that Pratt didn’t deserve his bad reputation, while Pratt himself later claimed to have never attended the church, and even described himself as “not a religious person.”

Marvel fans didn’t buy it, and regularly post tweets and memes that frame Pratt as a homophobic MAGA-enthusiast (for the record, Pratt has never made a disparaging comment about the LGBT community). After the Mario trailer showed a scene featuring Rainbow Road, Pratt’s haters took the opportunity to crack a well-worn joke.

As for being religious, well, Pratt’s Instagram is filled with posts that praise God; there is even a photo of him dragging a large metal crucifix up a mountain, which seems like a religious thing to do. At the 2018 MTV Movie & TV Awards, Pratt famously went on a lengthy tangent about God, Jesus, and the power of prayer.

While he might never have attended Hillsong Church, Pratt did mention in an interview that he plays golf with Chad Veach, the pastor of Zoe Church. Veach previously told The New York Times that he modeled Zoe Church after Hillsong Church, and was involved in the 2017 film The Heart of Man, a docudrama on “sexual brokenness” which aligns homosexuality with porn addiction and infidelity.

Pratt’s haters might be on to something. Or maybe they just find the actor kind of annoying, and the mass mockery has become a running joke.

Whether Chris Pratt is unfairly maligned, or not, he’s not a great fit for Mario; the man should have practiced that voice before he got to the recording studio.

Adblock test (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading


Are Folding Phones Really a Good Choice for Mobile Gamers?



One of the latest developments in smartphone technology is the foldable phone. A foldable phone is basically a smartphone that comes with what is known as a folding form factor technology that enables the device to be folded, often in half. Some folding smartphones come with a flexible display, whereas other designs come with several touchscreen panels on a hinge.

They are great for the more graphically demanding, high-end video games, and they are also great for playing state-of-the-art live dealer casino games at licensed casino sites, such as LeoVegas Canada. One of the most popular foldable smartphones on the market today is the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4, which some of you may already be familiar with by now. The question being asked here is, are folding phones really a good choice for mobile gamers?

Are foldable phones any good for gaming?

The difference between some folding smartphones out there today and regular-sized smartphones is that when a foldable phone is unfolded, the screen is square in appearance and not rectangular, which is how almost every smartphone in the world appears. Games have been designed to be played across rectangular-sized screens, not square screens.

There are pros and cons for both when it comes to gaming, and in most games that are played across a foldable phone screen, the main thing that you will notice is that there is more space in the background. The landscape appears bigger in all directions. The gameplay has remained largely unchanged, so it’s just down to an individual’s personal preference.

Genius Dog 336 x 280 - Animated

Some players like to game on a foldable phone and watch the action across a square screen, and others still prefer to play on the standard-size smartphone screen. However, it seems that the vast majority of mobile games are actually in favour of gaming from a traditional smartphone and not a foldable smartphone.

A look at some of today’s best foldable smartphones

Some of today’s best foldable smartphones that are great for gaming in 2022 include a variety of Samsung, Motorola, and Huawei devices, such as the:

  • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2
  • Huawei Mate XS
  • Motorola Razr 2020

If you’re not a fan of foldable smartphone devices, and if you’re looking to become more actively involved in mobile gaming, some of the other popular smartphone devices for gaming in 2022 to keep an eye out for are the following:

  • Nubia Red Magic 7
  • Xiaomi Black Shark Pro 5
  • Asus ROG Phone 6D
  • Asus ROG Phone 5
  • Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
  • Sony Xperia 1 IV
  • Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

What are the best games to play on foldable smartphones?

There are literally too many great games for playing on your foldable smartphone to list individually here, so here are just some of the most popular foldable smartphone games to keep an eye out for in 2022. They include hit titles, such as Call of Duty Mobile, Pokémon GO, Raid: Shadow Legends, Monument Valley, Among Us, Alto’s Odyssey, Forge of Empires, League of Legends: Wild Rift, and Apex Legends Mobile. In addition to these great games, top-rated casino games, such as blackjack, roulette, slots, and video poker, also look fantastic on foldable phones.

Are foldable phones worth getting for gaming?

As mentioned, it all boils down to personal preference. You can see what mobile gaming from a smartphone looks like before spending hundreds of dollars on a device that you may not like by heading to YouTube. Famous live streamers have also uploaded lots of videos of themselves gaming from foldable smartphones on the Twitch video gaming site. The good thing about foldable smartphones is that the games look great. The only real downside is that these handsets still aren’t cheap. They are more expensive than your average smartphone.

Continue Reading


Samsung’s Galaxy Watch 5 falls to $230 with a charger for Cyber Monday




All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission. All prices are correct at the time of publishing.

If you’ve already been looking to buy Samsung’s Galaxy Watch 5, today looks like a good time to take the plunge. The Android smartwatch is now on sale from $230 at several retailers, and at Amazon you can get a 35W two-port wall charger included at no extra cost. That’s about $40 below the usual price of a 40mm model. The sale applies to multiple finishes and configurations — a 40mm model with LTE is down to $260 with the wall charger, for instance, while the larger 44mm model is available for the same price.

Shop Galaxy Watch 5 sale at Amazon

Genius Dog 336 x 280 - Animated

The Galaxy Watch 5 Pro, a larger titanium variant with a more durable screen and bigger battery, is also on sale from $399, though that one includes a 15W wireless charger instead. All of these match the all-time lows we saw on Black Friday, but for Cyber Monday the chargers are available as a bonus. Amazon says this sale will run for today only.


The Galaxy Watch 5 is our pick for the best smartwatch for Android users, and we gave it a review score of 85 back in August. The Galaxy Watch 5 Pro, meanwhile, got an 86. The former isn’t a major upgrade over its predecessor, and its battery life can take a hit if you set the display to always-on, but it still gets you a clean, water-resistant design, reliable activity monitoring and useful sleep tracking. If you don’t use an iPhone and want a do-everything wearable, it’s the way to go. The Galaxy 5 Pro puts the same perks in a more durable package, but you’ll need to be sure your wrist can handle something bulkier.

Source link

Continue Reading